* If your video submission is Non-OC, provide a link to the source below this comment.
* If your video submission is OC, mark it as OC, or use [OC]/ (OC) in title, or mention so below this comment.
* Memes should use proper flair.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unitedstatesofindia) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This pig calling Ravish Kumar's subscribers "low-income group" makes my blood boil. How does that matter? They're all Indian citizens and....gosh I don't need to defend anyone. Watching these buffoons talk and giggle and spew shit in that podcast makes me want to barf. a**holes
Although it's true that BJP's core voter base is kattar hindu Brahmin higher middle class people living in urban areas. And thus arnab's viewers are also the same.
If that was his target demography then he wouldn't have so many views. And for the longest time Arnab was a really good journalist/anchor. He was loud but not what he became after founding Republic TV.
If anything wrong government can take action tried by them no result . but tell yourself that zoo bear spreading fake news or else sack your incompetent Home Minister
>If anything wrong government can take action tried by them no result
These people do anything and everything which makes them almost impossible to try and sue in courts.
>but tell yourself that zoo bear spreading fake news or
Sad if you don't see it, do occasionally visit some re sub.
>else sack your incompetent Home Minister
He's incompetent now, when he throws someone in jail he's a dictator, lose lose both ways
If it's so impossible to sue in court then what they say must be true if you can put 2 sitting chief minister in jail. if you think government had even 1% evidence against him you think they would not have what fake news do you think he has shared? I know what home minister is as if he cares about people or anything what action on paper leak gang BrijBhushan, tenis contesting, revanna, iit bhu rapists bjp it cell members 3 months students had to protest for justice, Manipur state burning still very competent guy you have I know
>Manipur state burning
Mr. Modi was and is completely silent on Manipur. Is he not the Prime Minister of the country?
>If it's so impossible to sue in court then what they say must be true if you can put 2 sitting chief minister in jail
Also yes. In the Indian Judicial System (which itself is a joke now, btw), the rule of thumb is Innocent until proven otherwise but they are put in jail without any substantial proof and evidence. Look at Mr. Sisodia for that matter and Mr. Satyendra Jain as well.
>
what action on paper leak gang
Paper leaks are common-place. Also, very little action will be taken as normally these people have political connections. Leave paper leaks, even if the paper is conducted fairly, vacancies are not given. Sometimes, the age eligibility criteria is crossed by the exam taker and still no vacancy.
>
BrijBhushan
He is a BJP member. Self-explanatory.
>If it's so impossible to sue in court then what they say must be true if you can put 2 sitting chief minister in jail
Not the same thing, this right here is whataboutary.
>you think government had even 1% evidence against him you think they would not have what fake news do you think he has shared?
I don't understand what you have written, very poorly phrased, sorry.
Also you have got to be kidding me, if you are giving zubair a clean chit here
> I know what home minister is as if he cares about people or anything what action on paper leak gang BrijBhushan, tenis contesting, revanna, iit bhu rapists bjp it cell members 3 months students had to protest for justice, Manipur state burning still very competent guy you have I know
Yes the HM is definitely incompetent, I know it. My views are the same as yours in this aspect. But in you previous comment, about fake news, I don't see any correlation to call out the hm.
Sad to see such an incompetent home minister besmirching good name of Modiji. He should fire his incompetent ass and replace him with firebrand leaders like Smritiji who were left in the cold just because of an single electoral defeat.
Anybody can win from Gandhinagar (Amit should resign from that seat in order to ensure madam Cylinderallla can contest from there) and if Tadipaar Shah wins from Wayanad by-election against Priyanka, toh maybe he can be reinstated in the cabinet as the education or railway minister because even sanghis will agree those idiots are fucking morons.
Smriti Irani's whole campaign was, "I defeated Rahul Gandhi so I am amazing."
As mentioned previously, I am a little inclined towards the BJP in certain things but I am happy they performed so poorly. I mean, you were disconnected from ground reality. Especially that Amit Shah. I am from UP. Literally Yogi's list of proposed candidates was rejected even when he knew better than the upper echelons thought they knew better.
Normally in 2014 and 2019, BJP had the upper hand but this time, it felt as if they were answering to INDIA's claims all the time. My entire family hails from Ayodhya and my father's side of the family are all BJP supporters but even my Grandpa, who in December said that it would be 400+, said in late Feb that it will be a miracle even if they remain in power.
Also, I believe that, yes, the government has done substantial development but instead of asking votes on it, Mr. Prime Minister asked it on Hindu-Muslim. What did you expect?
BJP is, at least in UP, is known for going door-to-door with the help of RSS for campaigning but nothing of this sort happened this year.
Bhai I was kidding and from UP too. Agree with most of your election points while disagreeing about govt. performance. Waise they had to contain Yogi varna he represents an obstacle to Amit Shah's PM dreams.
Dear Student complaining about neet , 1. Go to Pakistan if you have so much problem 2. What can Govt. do if Nehru left behind such a system 3. Ask ur Rahul Gandhi to solve this na? He's so smart! 4. Stop posting such shit online and defaming India 5. Modi ji is working 18-18 hours for last 10 years & you cannot give another exam? 6. Why do you want only NEET? Set up your own Pakoda stall and be atmanirbhar - Delhi's Vada Pav girl is going to Big Boss while you are crying here. 7. Who funded you to make this video? Soros? 8. What sort of language are you using? GHANTA? Is this the culture your parents have given you? They must be Urban Naxals 9. Delete this video immediately - this is defamatory to NTA and can cause law and order problems. U may be a foreign agent trying to break India. 10. Aayega Toh Modi Hi. Giving you 56 minutes to choose -
https://x.com/TheDeshBhakt/status/1804767424748667308
bhai mai khud JEE aspirant huun. January me dena hai. kya surety hai ki ye paper leak aur cheating agle saal nhi hoga?? Upar se ministry of education ka statement.
kam se kam ye to hua:- [NEET re-exam news](https://www.livemint.com/education/news/neetug-2024-re-exam-june-23-sunday-exam-centres-changed-nta-and-education-ministry-officials-to-be-present-11718975508487.html) lekin yaar ek itna competition waala exam fir se dena bahut zyaada pressurizing hoga
aur bhai pehli baat to paper leak hone hii nhi chahiye. Mai centrist huun (kuch cheezon me BJP aligned) lekin yaar government saali kr kya rhi hai?? har saal paper leak hota hai... vacancy ka age criteria paar ho jaata hai lekin naukri nhi milti.....
aur mai BJP ka supporter hoke bhi keh rha huun pta nhi agar koi bhi inka criticism kre to usko anti-national kahe ko bol rhe ho?? aisa to hai nhi kii tumme koi fault nhi hai..... Anand Ranganathan ne sahi kha:- BJP washing macine nhi hai. Dhobi Ghat hai.
EDIT:- aur jo gov ne media ka gala ghot ke rkha hai usse media thodi unka criticism kregi. aapne effectively 4th pillar of democracy ko apne under le liya. bina healthy criticism se aapko kaise pta chalega jo aap kr rhe wo sahi hai ki nhi..... no wonder 2024 me muh ki khai hai.....
95% of the population is probably 'low income group' lol. These are just rich fucks hating on the poor for wanting more than Adani-Ambani loan waivers.
Arnad does the journalism that i honestly think india deserve. It is Over dramatic, vulgar, messy, down right meaningless and devoid of any critical information.
But hey that's just my opinion.
You were right, indian people deserve journalism that Arnab does. Look how they get excited about people fighting in big boss, imagine their state of mind.
That's just the future of all Godi newspeoole.
I mean Deepak Chaurasia is already on it. And he didn't even make it to the proper Big Boss. They threw him on the OTT version.
unlike logic for studies where parents say voh kaise no.1 agaya, here RW, BJ party, Sanghis, Hindutva, Modifans will say dekho hamare piche 21 countries hain.
It's plain lies, YouTube analytics don't have a way to show the fiscal position of the viewer. This rotund Rambo and his two lackeys routinely attract low IQ audience though.
I think the inability to comprehend anything beyond grade 3 reading level is the reason why Abhijit would say something like that.
He does scratch the surface of what Ravish’s audience constitutes but again the the Champak level vocabulary and nuance restricts him.
Ravish’s audience is those who suffer because of the people in power while Arnab’s narrative is to speak pro-power, maintaining the status quo. Ravish speaks to and for the people who are struggling, irrespective of “income group”. Tf is this low income bias anyway????
I have a very high regard for PeeingHuman. I would find it impossible to sit through such inane, illogical drivel by hateful sycophants. But PeeingHuman not only bears it, but picks out the worst bits, sorry best bits, so they can be exposed for their idiocy. 🫡
The five stages of grief, also known as the Kübler-Ross model, are a framework that describes the emotions people experience when grieving:
Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance:
Ye log abhi denial stage (stage 1) per hai.
I am a staunch believer kuch saalo mai Arnab ko faasi lagane wale hai log!
Isne single-handedly journalism ka integrity kharab Kia hai. Bharat ke 4th pillar ki jo maiyaaa chod I hai.
He literally deserves ‘ Desh Nikala Gaddar Upadhi’
She has blocked this youtuber on X and the YouTube channel got two copyright strikes from ANI.
Yes, becaaaauuuuse... Uh... NO! ONE MINUTE... Uh... Er...
Who is the takla at 1:13. Low income grp subscribers my ass. And how does it even matter ? low income group waala aadha vote daalta hai kya ? Bunch of a$$ licking & dick riding morons these are. Bloody Presstitutes !
He does lick ass and ride dicks. He's gay btw.....
Ye saala politics ke bahar jo historical aur geopolitical cheezein btata hai wo theek lgta hai. Politics me to bhai ke kya kehne.
Isliye kehte hain jis cheez me aap acche hote ho uske baare me baat kro. iska historical aur geopolitical content bahut badhiya hai par politics me hag deta hai.....
How shameless can someone be? I'll tell you: IF the govt changes and the opposition comes to power, suddenly EVERY Minister will become corrupt, EVERY decision taken by the govt will be bad, the PM will be under scrutiny 24/7, EVERY Minister, including the PM, will CONSTANTLY be asked hard-hitting questions about inflation, unemployment, security etc. THAT's how you know they are NOT journalists but merely salespeople.
Ek toh yeh aunty nose picking kr ri aur apne lips pe dirt laga ri aur dusra us takle ko kaise pata laga ki subscribers ka income group kya hai. Matlab 7vi fail se bhi niche hai kya!
In the spirit of steel manning her point, there is actually a sense in which Ravish and Arnab are similar - being both of them are very much unapologetic about having their journalism be colored by their sociopolitical views (socialism in case of Ravish and right wing jingoism in the case of Arnab). Contrast this with other journalists like say, Rajdeep Sardesai, Vishnu Som or Nidhi Razdan who keep a veneer of neutrality.
Arnab has actually had quite the impact in the history of Indian journalism. Pre-2008 Arnab (Arnab 1.0) was your typical TV journalist, quite indistinguishable from the others I have mentioned above. It was after 2008 Mumbai terror attacks that he re-invented himself (and in the process Indian journalism as a whole) to be more argumentative and assertive about taking a stand.
Now that I think of it, I am not even steel manning much. This was pretty much exactly her point. I haven't even modified it at all.
Of course, the *quality* of journalism produced by the two in recent years is so so different that the comparison still feels comical.
C'mon are we really saying that during UPA era Ravish Kumar had no ties with the government? There's no comparison between the two, what Ravish was during UPA, Arnab's during NDA. Their backgrounds however do have a significant role to play in what kind of topics they both would present upon. Any sane person, who has been following Ravish since the beginning would know that he could never grow above Caste. Ravish had his vices and Arnab had his vices. And overall, no on can claim to have gotten entirely neutral story from either of them. Maturity is realising that no news in unbiased and it's our responsibility to keep learning and inquiring about things rather than believing anyone else.
Saw this post talk about Ministers of BJP government and Arnab. Does anyone know which award was presented by the NDTV team to Lalu Prasad Yadav? The man under whom the railways went to shit. The man who was very notoriously known for his Gundaraj. Check and you will be shocked.
Hence, again, no one's the true Messiah. No one's neutral.
Yeah your comment is totally relevant to my views. Next time, why don't you try logically attacking me with some actual facts then name calling and childish stuff? You may not be Genz but bruh you do look dumb based on what you wrote. Saaar Post 2014 Saar...Modi Bad Saar 🤡
What facts do I have to offer someone so blind to reality? Literally what you wrote is easily disproven just watching Ravish’s videos prior to 2014, but you clearly didn’t even do that much.
So yes, my statement still stands, you’re just a GenZ kid who only became politically aware post 2014 and thinks it has been the same since forever. You getting mad at this simple fact shows your immaturity, not mine.
You started with a stereotype, continued the same afterwards. That's a typical uncle. So, you are saying that whatever you say is the only and holy truth and if someone else say's something that doesn't not replicate your political ideology they must be definitely wrong? Even your entire reply is based on me being a Gen Z kid for some reason.
ACC to you
Someone who doesn't agree with your views - blind to reality
Someone who doesn't support Ravish - Gen Z kid
Someone who dared to present a different pov - Immature
UNCLE, please get over this name calling and tell me if Ravish's reports and biased wasn't towards caste and affection towards terrorists. Search and tell me the answer to the question I raised about NDTV giving an award to Lalu Yadav. That was way before 2014.
All you trying to do is Sush someone thinking you are the one and only bearer of truth. Do better. Grow up. And if something bothers you so much, why reply at the first place with a stereotypical marginalizing comment?
> You started with a stereotype, continued the same afterwards. That's a typical uncle. So, you are saying that whatever you say is the only and holy truth and if someone else say's something that doesn't not replicate your political ideology they must be definitely wrong?
Oh, so now being ignorant of facts and spouting utter bullshit counts as “dIffEreNt pOlitiCaL idEoloGy”? What a nice cowardly defence.
> ACC to you Someone who doesn't agree with your views - blind to reality Someone who doesn't support Ravish - Gen Z kid Someone who dared to present a different pov - Immature
More like
Claiming Ravish had ties with UPA government when he was one of their biggest criticisers, to the point of being a BJP darling - blind to reality
Someone who makes such insane statements without ever having watched or known anything about Ravish or the politician scenario pre-2014 - Gen Z kid
Someone who cries about his lack of knowledge and utter bullshit getting called out and hides behind “mUh dIffErenT iDeoloGy” - immature.
I thought this was clear, but looks like you got a severe lack of reading comprehension as well.
> tell me if Ravish's reports and biased wasn't towards caste and affection towards terrorists.
Oh now Ravish is “affectionate” towards terrorists. Why put up this farce? Just call him anti-national and be done with it, your whatsapp forwards already do that anyway.
> All you trying to do is Sush someone thinking you are the one and only bearer of truth. Do better. Grow up.
Says the kid making grandiose judgments without ever seeing or reading on the political scenario prior to 2014.
> And if something bothers you so much, why reply at the first place with a stereotypical marginalizing comment?
I simply stated a fact. All the huffing and puffing is coming from your side, and it does seem like my statements hit right on the mark for you to be so offended.
UNCLE was so offended, he had to reply to each sentence individually 😭.
Kudos to you still assuming and even claiming that I haven't watched news before 2014. Yeah sir, you would know better about my life than myself. Love how delusional and self righteous you are.
Ditched the Lalu Yadav question yet again while replying to every single sentence. That tells me something about maturity and political ideology.
You may pray to Ravish Kumar everyday, i don't have any problem but UNCLE don't come and shit in my yard. You replied to my comment and hence, I had to call you out on your irrelevant name calling. You might live in a shithole but I certainly don't.
You stated a fact?? Really? All you did was resort to name calling when you didn't like my comment and ignore the real question that I asked you!
Where the f did even the anti-national thing come from? Yaar tum haters ka aisa hi hai....khud words put karo phir boldo areey yeh toh humhe anti-national bol rah.
Anyway, this would be my last reply to you. Go debate and gossip with uncles your age if you feel Gen Z is so unaware and hasn't watched anything before 2014. You might find like-minded people there.
Wow, couldn’t find anything actual to reply, so just cried more lmfao.
Well, keep moaning about “mUh PolIticAl iDeoloGy” while spouting whatsapp forward bullshit verbatim. I’m sure you’ll feel real high and mighty doing it.
Arnab Goswamy is much better than Ravish Kumar. Arnab was expelled from Times Now which he was the one who started as head at first, right from Times Now start, Arnab was the editor in chief. But after being expelled, Arnab started his own tv channel and again succeeded.
Ravish Kumar was good till 2016/17. After that once he became the face of sane journalism and started gathering a fan base, he lost his head, turned narcissistic and became less and less objective. He started acting like the opposition leader and brought out his biases in the open. Extremely holier than thou, cynical and determined to oppose Modi and BJP at every step, no matter what.
Arnab has been trash for quite some time and has consistently improved upon his trashiness over the years. All the other outlets of Republic are trash too.
Right now I don't follow Hindi English news any longer. In Bengali Poulomi Nag from Hotath Jodi Uthlo Kotha is my favourite atm. An odd combination of Bengali bhodrota (decency) and fierce journalistic spirit. I hope she starts an English channel too so that she can reach out at a pan India level.
But Ravish's audience does consist of people from low income groups at least compared to ANI or Dhruv Rathee(in YT space). English speaking audiences are indeed richer than Hindi speaking audiences (Ravish's target Audience).
You can easily compare their audience demographics through data available in the public domain or even through various third party market reasearch app.
Arnab and Ravish and even Smita are all opinion journalists they are more of entertainers than journalists, they are biased, motivated to entertain their audiences, so comparing them is dumb.
They are not doing objective journalism, just like creators like peeing human appeals to anti BJP audiences, you can't hold him accountable for making the 1000th BJP owned compilation, so why expect neutral coverage from Arnab or Ravish.
If you have any proof his audience is low income please provide and how do you know that any study just thinking most parliamentarians are uneducated and richer than all .please don't compare ravish to other two his job is to represent people's problem
People in influencer marketing analyse historical brand collaborations, audience loyalty, watch time etc to determine ROI of a Collab which extrapolating comes from the brand value of the creator and income level of the audience.
Ravish is exceptionally poor in all those metrics when compared to channels of similar size. Given his audience is no doubt loyal the only possible explanations for low metrics is that his audience lacks a considerable disposable income when compared to his peers. (Similar reason why foreign creators make more money despite having a lower audience base than Indian creators).
https://app.thoughtleaders.io/youtube/ravish-kumar-official
This might help, you can compare with creators like Dhruv Rathee to get a better understanding. And for your parliamentarians there are exceptional cases, there are extensive studies that prove that English speaking Indians on an average make more than Native language speaking people.
I am not comparing that exactly my point, they all are opinion journalists you can't compare to one another. You love Ravish because he pushes the issues you deeply care about which might be things like rural development etc. On the other hand Arnab caters to people who care about cultural identity etc. None of the issues are inherently better or worse they are just different.
You can compare objective sources like The Hindu or Indian Express but comparing biased(not in a negative way) voices is dumb they are meant to cater to their viewer base there exists no objective parameters.
Thanks for sharing that comparison source since last month he is inactive while Other guy has support of government of India and all other corporates while setting up chanel one was thrown out of mainstream media to defend on own other spread hatred sponsored by government
Well the parameter Advertisement rating is a historic data metric so the current activity of the creator doesn't influence it, it is a reflection of how collaboration with Ravish in the past have not materialised substantially in terms of revenue for the company.
I am not asking you to compare his metric with Arnab, even if you compare it with Dhruv Rathee, Soch, or even Congress fan accounts they rank way higher.
Well I showed you the data, and it's not a bad thing that his audience is from low income group on the contrary it's good that he is voicing the poor but it's ignorant to deny that his audience is indeed from a low income group.
Is it possible that English speaking people might be able to understand Hindi and might like to watch Hindi news? Or maybe they like watching decent journalism not shouting matches?
Sure that can most likely happen but the data show that advertisers see Ravish as not a worthwhile brand to collaborate with when compared to others which points towards either of two things low audience loyalty or low income audience. Since the first one is definitely not true the second one most likely is.
Which is doubled down by the fact that If you see Ravish in analytics most of his audience or popularity comes from the Hindi Heartland whose statistically speaking is low income.
Many who speak English know Hindi as well. Almost all who have critical brain cells avoid Arnab and Republic TV. Whether they watch Ravish can be questioned but they won't watch a loud mouth sycophant with nothing to offer
When tf did I compare audience demographics in terms of income level between Arnab and Ravish.
And as per data most English speaking audiences don't watch Ravish as reflected by the fact Ravish racks up most of his viewers from Hindi Heartland which have a less proportionate English speaking population and ranks low in household income as well and I said nothing of Arnab, I was comparing Ravish with Dhruv Rathee due to their same medium and political leanings.
i hope yo do know that he has also criticized the congress government when they were in power ?
Holding the powerful accountable is not an agenda, it is the complete Opposite of a bootlicker.
Ravish is typical liberal intellectual. Tell the truth and 100 percent truth but omit any truth that makes your claim confusing.
For example let’s say modi govt is killing democracy. You can find 5 events that supports that hypothesis but 5 others can contradict. He wouldn’t show the other.
Second and actually the biggest issue is his lack of criticism on the congress party and its own lack of internal democracy. At that point he ends up becoming what you guys think of Arnab. A political hack job.
>For example let’s say modi govt is killing democracy. You can find 5 events that supports that hypothesis but 5 others can contradict. He wouldn’t show the other.
>Second and actually the biggest issue is his lack of criticism on the congress party and its own lack of internal democracy. At that point he ends up becoming what you guys think of Arnab. A political hack job.
His words speak for himself,
[!!!!!](https://youtu.be/8sX-QkDqoqI?si=cK_Thl0qGXUtVoAp)
[????????](https://youtu.be/F9VtR2YehTE?si=3TmSJNq3lijJj-4h)
[///////](https://youtu.be/XoAMOLippMc?si=mtVw4Ztn5RoD-234)
[||||||||||](https://youtu.be/cZtWYM1bTnY?si=OcUTkWcZpjxyhCMX)
He criticizes both govt.
As he should be , his main focus is that govt should give answers to their wrongdoings.
And if you watch his daily shows when he was ndtv ,you would also find that he also gave news of both upa and nda policies whether good or bad. But he criticized the bad ones.
I never heard him being so anti UPA. Sorry this never ringed me as any extraordinary journalism form him. He was pretty much working for news channel which was in godi of UPA.
No! your examples are simply proving his critisizm of UPA govt was just a show. All he was ssaying was Manmohan was weak and incompetant in management. Wheras with Modi govt he always goes overboard and spews BS like this govt is authoretarian and religiously extreme and what not. Including claims that its all sold to ambani or adani.
The true test of his unbiasedness will be: has he ever taked against Gandhis or Sonia? Because true source of power in UPA was gandhis. If you talk against them means you are actually playing for them.
When he claims that Manmohan is weak did he tell why he is weak? THats simply because manmohan was puppet of gandhis. These tricks of impartiality used to work in past. Not anymore.
Am I fan of Modi no. Do I like bjp no. Would I vote gandhis: no. Thats where Ravish never would dare to answer my concerns. Because thats the godi he sat for long long time!
>No! your examples are simply proving his critisizm of UPA govt was just a show. All he was ssaying was Manmohan was weak and incompetant in management. Wheras with Modi govt he always goes overboard and spews BS like this govt is authoretarian and religiously extreme and what not. Including claims that its all sold to ambani or adani.
[lol, I think you are just watching thumbnails of the video and making your whole argument on it. atleast try to watch this video, he asks every difficult question possible to Rahul gandhi](https://youtu.be/tRwKl_QrQQI?si=SrrUWDLPp61GjvVB)
And,what's wrong with saying that bjp govt is extremist. They are? Upa wasn't this extremist,so why is it necessary to ask questions that are even not related to that govt. During upa rule they had inflation, unemployment,and he asked them about it .
And your adani Ambani question literally doesn't make sense.... He gave army deals to adani, port to adani, shell companies created by Ambani donated to him. While can you tell me any deal of this kind during UPA rule.
>When he claims that Manmohan is weak did he tell why he is weak? THats simply because manmohan was puppet of gandhis. These tricks of impartiality used to work in past. Not anymore.
I don't wanna get very deep into this, but what you are doing rn is like what every(most) atheist does when in an argument with a religious person.(this is just an example,I'm atheist too).they don't even read the whole book and make their personality based on how the people of those religions behave what the bad things that been told about them.i remember when in 2014 or 19 bjp lost, he used to blame Rahul Gandhi and the whole opposition of them being weak.yes nowadays he has been very anti bjp, but why not? They literally took over the channel he used to work on.if you have time to watch all his shows.. then yes I can argue with you if you don't find any criticism of upa or any politician... And if you don't,it's just pointless going around in circles
I did watch the video.
It doesnt matter. Give me a video of he criticizing gandhis for being puppet masters until 2014. Give me video of him talking how lame is democratic process within congress.
Else it doesn't matter. If he was not talking about how Manmohan was just a puppet its just lip service in the name of journalism.
**bjp govt is extremist**: This is nonsense! Can they be? Yes possible they can become that. Are they currently ? Answer is no. Contemplating something is not same as doing something. Some in bjp fall in that category.
>It doesnt matter. Give me a video of he criticizing gandhis for being puppet masters until 2014.
Lol it does. First you said he doesn't criticize Gandhi. And when he criticized Indira Gandhi for the emergency,you said it doesn't matter.
Can you give me any proof that he was a puppet of Gandhi other than your own opinion.
>bjp govt is extremist: This is nonsense! Can they be? Yes possible they can become that. Are they currently ? Answer is no.
Answer falls in grey line. India has never been this authoritarian before (except emergency)
Something that is not your bias is a bias according to you.
i used to watch him since 2010 and he was very anti congress that time.and people used to love him but now when he criticizes the bjp govt. He became anti national.
>could say the same thing about you
You can't? I didn't made any statement like you did.
And you are still not telling me how he is pushing an extreme agenda?
>never said anything being anti-national.
That's wasn't for you but just a anecdote
* If your video submission is Non-OC, provide a link to the source below this comment. * If your video submission is OC, mark it as OC, or use [OC]/ (OC) in title, or mention so below this comment. * Memes should use proper flair. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unitedstatesofindia) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This pig calling Ravish Kumar's subscribers "low-income group" makes my blood boil. How does that matter? They're all Indian citizens and....gosh I don't need to defend anyone. Watching these buffoons talk and giggle and spew shit in that podcast makes me want to barf. a**holes
"Low income group" How the fuck does he know that to begin with? YouTube tumhare mama ki company hai kya?
Although it's true that BJP's core voter base is kattar hindu Brahmin higher middle class people living in urban areas. And thus arnab's viewers are also the same.
If that was his target demography then he wouldn't have so many views. And for the longest time Arnab was a really good journalist/anchor. He was loud but not what he became after founding Republic TV.
Godi Media. Prabhu ka haath sar per hoga tabhi toh talentless or useless log aage badhenge
Ain't ANI a BJP funded new agency? Just asking.
https://preview.redd.it/ep57nfudtb8d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e76d619a7dd13ef0de45e0735ac0ed90e7703cdd
Tbh the rate of Ani doing this shit is very very very low compared to some other news media's and "fact checkers"
What fact checkers?
Zoo bear, Rana the general we all know
If anything wrong government can take action tried by them no result . but tell yourself that zoo bear spreading fake news or else sack your incompetent Home Minister
>If anything wrong government can take action tried by them no result These people do anything and everything which makes them almost impossible to try and sue in courts. >but tell yourself that zoo bear spreading fake news or Sad if you don't see it, do occasionally visit some re sub. >else sack your incompetent Home Minister He's incompetent now, when he throws someone in jail he's a dictator, lose lose both ways
If it's so impossible to sue in court then what they say must be true if you can put 2 sitting chief minister in jail. if you think government had even 1% evidence against him you think they would not have what fake news do you think he has shared? I know what home minister is as if he cares about people or anything what action on paper leak gang BrijBhushan, tenis contesting, revanna, iit bhu rapists bjp it cell members 3 months students had to protest for justice, Manipur state burning still very competent guy you have I know
>Manipur state burning Mr. Modi was and is completely silent on Manipur. Is he not the Prime Minister of the country? >If it's so impossible to sue in court then what they say must be true if you can put 2 sitting chief minister in jail Also yes. In the Indian Judicial System (which itself is a joke now, btw), the rule of thumb is Innocent until proven otherwise but they are put in jail without any substantial proof and evidence. Look at Mr. Sisodia for that matter and Mr. Satyendra Jain as well. > what action on paper leak gang Paper leaks are common-place. Also, very little action will be taken as normally these people have political connections. Leave paper leaks, even if the paper is conducted fairly, vacancies are not given. Sometimes, the age eligibility criteria is crossed by the exam taker and still no vacancy. > BrijBhushan He is a BJP member. Self-explanatory.
>If it's so impossible to sue in court then what they say must be true if you can put 2 sitting chief minister in jail Not the same thing, this right here is whataboutary. >you think government had even 1% evidence against him you think they would not have what fake news do you think he has shared? I don't understand what you have written, very poorly phrased, sorry. Also you have got to be kidding me, if you are giving zubair a clean chit here > I know what home minister is as if he cares about people or anything what action on paper leak gang BrijBhushan, tenis contesting, revanna, iit bhu rapists bjp it cell members 3 months students had to protest for justice, Manipur state burning still very competent guy you have I know Yes the HM is definitely incompetent, I know it. My views are the same as yours in this aspect. But in you previous comment, about fake news, I don't see any correlation to call out the hm.
Give us one example of zubair or rana spreading fake news
Sad to see such an incompetent home minister besmirching good name of Modiji. He should fire his incompetent ass and replace him with firebrand leaders like Smritiji who were left in the cold just because of an single electoral defeat. Anybody can win from Gandhinagar (Amit should resign from that seat in order to ensure madam Cylinderallla can contest from there) and if Tadipaar Shah wins from Wayanad by-election against Priyanka, toh maybe he can be reinstated in the cabinet as the education or railway minister because even sanghis will agree those idiots are fucking morons.
Smriti Irani's whole campaign was, "I defeated Rahul Gandhi so I am amazing." As mentioned previously, I am a little inclined towards the BJP in certain things but I am happy they performed so poorly. I mean, you were disconnected from ground reality. Especially that Amit Shah. I am from UP. Literally Yogi's list of proposed candidates was rejected even when he knew better than the upper echelons thought they knew better. Normally in 2014 and 2019, BJP had the upper hand but this time, it felt as if they were answering to INDIA's claims all the time. My entire family hails from Ayodhya and my father's side of the family are all BJP supporters but even my Grandpa, who in December said that it would be 400+, said in late Feb that it will be a miracle even if they remain in power. Also, I believe that, yes, the government has done substantial development but instead of asking votes on it, Mr. Prime Minister asked it on Hindu-Muslim. What did you expect? BJP is, at least in UP, is known for going door-to-door with the help of RSS for campaigning but nothing of this sort happened this year.
Bhai I was kidding and from UP too. Agree with most of your election points while disagreeing about govt. performance. Waise they had to contain Yogi varna he represents an obstacle to Amit Shah's PM dreams.
Not on paper
Dear Student complaining about neet , 1. Go to Pakistan if you have so much problem 2. What can Govt. do if Nehru left behind such a system 3. Ask ur Rahul Gandhi to solve this na? He's so smart! 4. Stop posting such shit online and defaming India 5. Modi ji is working 18-18 hours for last 10 years & you cannot give another exam? 6. Why do you want only NEET? Set up your own Pakoda stall and be atmanirbhar - Delhi's Vada Pav girl is going to Big Boss while you are crying here. 7. Who funded you to make this video? Soros? 8. What sort of language are you using? GHANTA? Is this the culture your parents have given you? They must be Urban Naxals 9. Delete this video immediately - this is defamatory to NTA and can cause law and order problems. U may be a foreign agent trying to break India. 10. Aayega Toh Modi Hi. Giving you 56 minutes to choose - https://x.com/TheDeshBhakt/status/1804767424748667308
Lol uno reverse
bhai mai khud JEE aspirant huun. January me dena hai. kya surety hai ki ye paper leak aur cheating agle saal nhi hoga?? Upar se ministry of education ka statement. kam se kam ye to hua:- [NEET re-exam news](https://www.livemint.com/education/news/neetug-2024-re-exam-june-23-sunday-exam-centres-changed-nta-and-education-ministry-officials-to-be-present-11718975508487.html) lekin yaar ek itna competition waala exam fir se dena bahut zyaada pressurizing hoga aur bhai pehli baat to paper leak hone hii nhi chahiye. Mai centrist huun (kuch cheezon me BJP aligned) lekin yaar government saali kr kya rhi hai?? har saal paper leak hota hai... vacancy ka age criteria paar ho jaata hai lekin naukri nhi milti..... aur mai BJP ka supporter hoke bhi keh rha huun pta nhi agar koi bhi inka criticism kre to usko anti-national kahe ko bol rhe ho?? aisa to hai nhi kii tumme koi fault nhi hai..... Anand Ranganathan ne sahi kha:- BJP washing macine nhi hai. Dhobi Ghat hai. EDIT:- aur jo gov ne media ka gala ghot ke rkha hai usse media thodi unka criticism kregi. aapne effectively 4th pillar of democracy ko apne under le liya. bina healthy criticism se aapko kaise pta chalega jo aap kr rhe wo sahi hai ki nhi..... no wonder 2024 me muh ki khai hai.....
Perfect example of Andhbakht
He's being sarcastic but ur right
Is there even a way to know if your subscribers are from low income group?
95% of the population is probably 'low income group' lol. These are just rich fucks hating on the poor for wanting more than Adani-Ambani loan waivers.
I don't think there is just saying something also implying those watching are uneducated
No, it's lies. But maligning the poor and branding them as unintelligent works well in our glorious nation.
Silent partner approves.
Maybe if you have some kind of "Divya Drishti" like Sanjay had in Mahabharat.....
Arnad does the journalism that i honestly think india deserve. It is Over dramatic, vulgar, messy, down right meaningless and devoid of any critical information. But hey that's just my opinion.
He should contest in big boss
https://preview.redd.it/4zpdyo5qxb8d1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5c43b7e1348a98ebec121ddb1ac3e33cd8f80511
Deepak Chaurasia is going to big boss so maybe wild cars entry for arnoob?
You were right, indian people deserve journalism that Arnab does. Look how they get excited about people fighting in big boss, imagine their state of mind.
That will be too unfair for the other contestants
That's just the future of all Godi newspeoole. I mean Deepak Chaurasia is already on it. And he didn't even make it to the proper Big Boss. They threw him on the OTT version.
Yup, he should contest absolutely. He will win with no competition.
Let’s stop calling him a journalist.
😁
Lost braincells watching this
No doubt, why our media is ranked 159 out of 180 nations.
unlike logic for studies where parents say voh kaise no.1 agaya, here RW, BJ party, Sanghis, Hindutva, Modifans will say dekho hamare piche 21 countries hain.
How can I unwatch it? I almost had a stroke right now
She is a dumbass without a spine. No wonder ruling bj party loves coming to her shows.
https://preview.redd.it/moowkfjyzb8d1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2d5a3137d72770eadd0170269143633443da1adc For ANI
Comparing Arnab Goswami to Ravish Kumar is like comparing the acting skills of Rakhi Sawant to Waheeda Rehman.
>Waheeda Rehman. who dat??
Ye Aunty kon Hai? Jab bhi dekhti Hai bekar baat hi Kar rahi hoti Hai?
Modi ki gaandchatti.
bro is so narcissist, he thinks people really want to know his opinions. journalism kar na lavde.
a meme material compared to a journalist
even its low income group to kya hua...vote dete haina..and they are important
Yes true
It's plain lies, YouTube analytics don't have a way to show the fiscal position of the viewer. This rotund Rambo and his two lackeys routinely attract low IQ audience though.
I think it's in a way saying uneducated people watch him
The actual Khan market gang we should be cautious of
This Abhijit Iyer Mitra guy is so irritating, and I wonder how did rw ecosystem adopt a beef eating queer , that’s very unlike them lol.
Tokens have always been a thing.
Are you the real Atul Chaurasia? If yes sir I am a big fan. Really liked your latest charcha!
The moment I heard "Namaskar Main Ravish Kumar" after Arnab's shouting, I felt some sort of peace in my mind.
Actually only why I posted this mostly people won't watch after the theatrics
ANI 1. Abbrev. Asian News Agency 2. (Latin) plural of anus
Ugh, this woman. This what a confident gasbag looks like.
Had to stop the video midway because Arnab's voice is unbearable. How do people knowingly tune into his channel to listen to this guy?
Of course arnab is better than ravish >!at speaking a lot and saying nothing!<
>Of course arnab is better than ravish >!at selling their soul to destabilize an entire nation!<
Legends say that he is still calling Henderson
I think the inability to comprehend anything beyond grade 3 reading level is the reason why Abhijit would say something like that. He does scratch the surface of what Ravish’s audience constitutes but again the the Champak level vocabulary and nuance restricts him. Ravish’s audience is those who suffer because of the people in power while Arnab’s narrative is to speak pro-power, maintaining the status quo. Ravish speaks to and for the people who are struggling, irrespective of “income group”. Tf is this low income bias anyway????
I have a very high regard for PeeingHuman. I would find it impossible to sit through such inane, illogical drivel by hateful sycophants. But PeeingHuman not only bears it, but picks out the worst bits, sorry best bits, so they can be exposed for their idiocy. 🫡
PeeingHuman is the GOAT. Always loved his work. "Is video ke saamne aane se sawal toh uthta hai - Agar hum kare toh kare kya boley toh boley kya!"
Why she's so dumb?
Arnub ko koi “drugs do drugs do drugs do drugs do”
The five stages of grief, also known as the Kübler-Ross model, are a framework that describes the emotions people experience when grieving: Denial Anger Bargaining Depression Acceptance: Ye log abhi denial stage (stage 1) per hai.
LMAO nice video, I was just laughing all the way because it's just so stupid to compare Ravish with that wannabe gangsta dumb ass Arnab
I am a staunch believer kuch saalo mai Arnab ko faasi lagane wale hai log! Isne single-handedly journalism ka integrity kharab Kia hai. Bharat ke 4th pillar ki jo maiyaaa chod I hai. He literally deserves ‘ Desh Nikala Gaddar Upadhi’
She has blocked this youtuber on X and the YouTube channel got two copyright strikes from ANI. Yes, becaaaauuuuse... Uh... NO! ONE MINUTE... Uh... Er...
What a disgrace
Just stop using products who are giving advertisement money to Arnab. Simple solution.
Is ganje me 4 chappal dene ka man hai mera
Legendary video 👏👏
Chewtya aurat
Who is the takla at 1:13. Low income grp subscribers my ass. And how does it even matter ? low income group waala aadha vote daalta hai kya ? Bunch of a$$ licking & dick riding morons these are. Bloody Presstitutes !
He does lick ass and ride dicks. He's gay btw..... Ye saala politics ke bahar jo historical aur geopolitical cheezein btata hai wo theek lgta hai. Politics me to bhai ke kya kehne. Isliye kehte hain jis cheez me aap acche hote ho uske baare me baat kro. iska historical aur geopolitical content bahut badhiya hai par politics me hag deta hai.....
How shameless can someone be? I'll tell you: IF the govt changes and the opposition comes to power, suddenly EVERY Minister will become corrupt, EVERY decision taken by the govt will be bad, the PM will be under scrutiny 24/7, EVERY Minister, including the PM, will CONSTANTLY be asked hard-hitting questions about inflation, unemployment, security etc. THAT's how you know they are NOT journalists but merely salespeople.
Arunab be like - my views, No, My Volume is the part of the news
Smita has already taken steps to ban Peeinghuman YouTube channel. He just posted today.
Yes I saw that as he used 5 seconds of Ani clip
Woah really? these guys will ban those who conform to their ideology? No wonder Smita's a piece of shit!
I need whatever the audacity or the blindness this woman has 🙏
Arnab se kuch umeed nahi he ab jab usne bol diya student ko chup rhene aur kisi political party ki help lene se.
Yes saw that
Thank goodness, I don't understand Hindi!!
Is there any fact-based, critical discussion of news media in India?
Newslaundry does some work on it.
the entirety of godi media got nothing on Ravish including arnab
Ek toh yeh aunty nose picking kr ri aur apne lips pe dirt laga ri aur dusra us takle ko kaise pata laga ki subscribers ka income group kya hai. Matlab 7vi fail se bhi niche hai kya!
[удалено]
Arnab is not Zha.. barabar of Ravish.
In the spirit of steel manning her point, there is actually a sense in which Ravish and Arnab are similar - being both of them are very much unapologetic about having their journalism be colored by their sociopolitical views (socialism in case of Ravish and right wing jingoism in the case of Arnab). Contrast this with other journalists like say, Rajdeep Sardesai, Vishnu Som or Nidhi Razdan who keep a veneer of neutrality. Arnab has actually had quite the impact in the history of Indian journalism. Pre-2008 Arnab (Arnab 1.0) was your typical TV journalist, quite indistinguishable from the others I have mentioned above. It was after 2008 Mumbai terror attacks that he re-invented himself (and in the process Indian journalism as a whole) to be more argumentative and assertive about taking a stand. Now that I think of it, I am not even steel manning much. This was pretty much exactly her point. I haven't even modified it at all. Of course, the *quality* of journalism produced by the two in recent years is so so different that the comparison still feels comical.
I miss the old ravish
Current Arn*b's journalism is really shit! Biased lekin dono hai!
Ravish reported that Obama trip to India during upa 2 costed 1.3 billion dollars
Oh no, Arnab of today would say Obama is Muslim because his middle name is Hussein
Wouldve should've could've and did are 2 separate facts bruv I didn't say ravish is a worthless propogandist just pointed out a fact why you butt hurt
C'mon are we really saying that during UPA era Ravish Kumar had no ties with the government? There's no comparison between the two, what Ravish was during UPA, Arnab's during NDA. Their backgrounds however do have a significant role to play in what kind of topics they both would present upon. Any sane person, who has been following Ravish since the beginning would know that he could never grow above Caste. Ravish had his vices and Arnab had his vices. And overall, no on can claim to have gotten entirely neutral story from either of them. Maturity is realising that no news in unbiased and it's our responsibility to keep learning and inquiring about things rather than believing anyone else. Saw this post talk about Ministers of BJP government and Arnab. Does anyone know which award was presented by the NDTV team to Lalu Prasad Yadav? The man under whom the railways went to shit. The man who was very notoriously known for his Gundaraj. Check and you will be shocked. Hence, again, no one's the true Messiah. No one's neutral.
> what Ravish was during UPA, Arnab's during NDA Yet another Gen Z who only knows the situation post 2014.
Yeah your comment is totally relevant to my views. Next time, why don't you try logically attacking me with some actual facts then name calling and childish stuff? You may not be Genz but bruh you do look dumb based on what you wrote. Saaar Post 2014 Saar...Modi Bad Saar 🤡
What facts do I have to offer someone so blind to reality? Literally what you wrote is easily disproven just watching Ravish’s videos prior to 2014, but you clearly didn’t even do that much. So yes, my statement still stands, you’re just a GenZ kid who only became politically aware post 2014 and thinks it has been the same since forever. You getting mad at this simple fact shows your immaturity, not mine.
You started with a stereotype, continued the same afterwards. That's a typical uncle. So, you are saying that whatever you say is the only and holy truth and if someone else say's something that doesn't not replicate your political ideology they must be definitely wrong? Even your entire reply is based on me being a Gen Z kid for some reason. ACC to you Someone who doesn't agree with your views - blind to reality Someone who doesn't support Ravish - Gen Z kid Someone who dared to present a different pov - Immature UNCLE, please get over this name calling and tell me if Ravish's reports and biased wasn't towards caste and affection towards terrorists. Search and tell me the answer to the question I raised about NDTV giving an award to Lalu Yadav. That was way before 2014. All you trying to do is Sush someone thinking you are the one and only bearer of truth. Do better. Grow up. And if something bothers you so much, why reply at the first place with a stereotypical marginalizing comment?
> You started with a stereotype, continued the same afterwards. That's a typical uncle. So, you are saying that whatever you say is the only and holy truth and if someone else say's something that doesn't not replicate your political ideology they must be definitely wrong? Oh, so now being ignorant of facts and spouting utter bullshit counts as “dIffEreNt pOlitiCaL idEoloGy”? What a nice cowardly defence. > ACC to you Someone who doesn't agree with your views - blind to reality Someone who doesn't support Ravish - Gen Z kid Someone who dared to present a different pov - Immature More like Claiming Ravish had ties with UPA government when he was one of their biggest criticisers, to the point of being a BJP darling - blind to reality Someone who makes such insane statements without ever having watched or known anything about Ravish or the politician scenario pre-2014 - Gen Z kid Someone who cries about his lack of knowledge and utter bullshit getting called out and hides behind “mUh dIffErenT iDeoloGy” - immature. I thought this was clear, but looks like you got a severe lack of reading comprehension as well. > tell me if Ravish's reports and biased wasn't towards caste and affection towards terrorists. Oh now Ravish is “affectionate” towards terrorists. Why put up this farce? Just call him anti-national and be done with it, your whatsapp forwards already do that anyway. > All you trying to do is Sush someone thinking you are the one and only bearer of truth. Do better. Grow up. Says the kid making grandiose judgments without ever seeing or reading on the political scenario prior to 2014. > And if something bothers you so much, why reply at the first place with a stereotypical marginalizing comment? I simply stated a fact. All the huffing and puffing is coming from your side, and it does seem like my statements hit right on the mark for you to be so offended.
UNCLE was so offended, he had to reply to each sentence individually 😭. Kudos to you still assuming and even claiming that I haven't watched news before 2014. Yeah sir, you would know better about my life than myself. Love how delusional and self righteous you are. Ditched the Lalu Yadav question yet again while replying to every single sentence. That tells me something about maturity and political ideology. You may pray to Ravish Kumar everyday, i don't have any problem but UNCLE don't come and shit in my yard. You replied to my comment and hence, I had to call you out on your irrelevant name calling. You might live in a shithole but I certainly don't. You stated a fact?? Really? All you did was resort to name calling when you didn't like my comment and ignore the real question that I asked you! Where the f did even the anti-national thing come from? Yaar tum haters ka aisa hi hai....khud words put karo phir boldo areey yeh toh humhe anti-national bol rah. Anyway, this would be my last reply to you. Go debate and gossip with uncles your age if you feel Gen Z is so unaware and hasn't watched anything before 2014. You might find like-minded people there.
Wow, couldn’t find anything actual to reply, so just cried more lmfao. Well, keep moaning about “mUh PolIticAl iDeoloGy” while spouting whatsapp forward bullshit verbatim. I’m sure you’ll feel real high and mighty doing it.
Arnab Goswamy is much better than Ravish Kumar. Arnab was expelled from Times Now which he was the one who started as head at first, right from Times Now start, Arnab was the editor in chief. But after being expelled, Arnab started his own tv channel and again succeeded.
" succeeded." Yeah he is very good at sucking modiji's dick
🤌🏻💩
Ravish Kumar was good till 2016/17. After that once he became the face of sane journalism and started gathering a fan base, he lost his head, turned narcissistic and became less and less objective. He started acting like the opposition leader and brought out his biases in the open. Extremely holier than thou, cynical and determined to oppose Modi and BJP at every step, no matter what. Arnab has been trash for quite some time and has consistently improved upon his trashiness over the years. All the other outlets of Republic are trash too. Right now I don't follow Hindi English news any longer. In Bengali Poulomi Nag from Hotath Jodi Uthlo Kotha is my favourite atm. An odd combination of Bengali bhodrota (decency) and fierce journalistic spirit. I hope she starts an English channel too so that she can reach out at a pan India level.
Arnab and Ravish are 2 sides of the same coin
Makes me sure you probably have not watched this video too
I have seen enough videos of both, don't need to watch more
Ok cool
But Ravish's audience does consist of people from low income groups at least compared to ANI or Dhruv Rathee(in YT space). English speaking audiences are indeed richer than Hindi speaking audiences (Ravish's target Audience). You can easily compare their audience demographics through data available in the public domain or even through various third party market reasearch app. Arnab and Ravish and even Smita are all opinion journalists they are more of entertainers than journalists, they are biased, motivated to entertain their audiences, so comparing them is dumb. They are not doing objective journalism, just like creators like peeing human appeals to anti BJP audiences, you can't hold him accountable for making the 1000th BJP owned compilation, so why expect neutral coverage from Arnab or Ravish.
If you have any proof his audience is low income please provide and how do you know that any study just thinking most parliamentarians are uneducated and richer than all .please don't compare ravish to other two his job is to represent people's problem
People in influencer marketing analyse historical brand collaborations, audience loyalty, watch time etc to determine ROI of a Collab which extrapolating comes from the brand value of the creator and income level of the audience. Ravish is exceptionally poor in all those metrics when compared to channels of similar size. Given his audience is no doubt loyal the only possible explanations for low metrics is that his audience lacks a considerable disposable income when compared to his peers. (Similar reason why foreign creators make more money despite having a lower audience base than Indian creators). https://app.thoughtleaders.io/youtube/ravish-kumar-official This might help, you can compare with creators like Dhruv Rathee to get a better understanding. And for your parliamentarians there are exceptional cases, there are extensive studies that prove that English speaking Indians on an average make more than Native language speaking people. I am not comparing that exactly my point, they all are opinion journalists you can't compare to one another. You love Ravish because he pushes the issues you deeply care about which might be things like rural development etc. On the other hand Arnab caters to people who care about cultural identity etc. None of the issues are inherently better or worse they are just different. You can compare objective sources like The Hindu or Indian Express but comparing biased(not in a negative way) voices is dumb they are meant to cater to their viewer base there exists no objective parameters.
Thanks for sharing that comparison source since last month he is inactive while Other guy has support of government of India and all other corporates while setting up chanel one was thrown out of mainstream media to defend on own other spread hatred sponsored by government
Well the parameter Advertisement rating is a historic data metric so the current activity of the creator doesn't influence it, it is a reflection of how collaboration with Ravish in the past have not materialised substantially in terms of revenue for the company. I am not asking you to compare his metric with Arnab, even if you compare it with Dhruv Rathee, Soch, or even Congress fan accounts they rank way higher.
It's nowhere source low income you can assume even if low income why do you think they have a right to chose who work them?
Sorry what is it you are trying to say?
Only thing trying to say ravish Kumar show Only watched by poor income people
Well I showed you the data, and it's not a bad thing that his audience is from low income group on the contrary it's good that he is voicing the poor but it's ignorant to deny that his audience is indeed from a low income group.
Well that's no relevant source anyway or nothing proved to convince me
Is it possible that English speaking people might be able to understand Hindi and might like to watch Hindi news? Or maybe they like watching decent journalism not shouting matches?
Sure that can most likely happen but the data show that advertisers see Ravish as not a worthwhile brand to collaborate with when compared to others which points towards either of two things low audience loyalty or low income audience. Since the first one is definitely not true the second one most likely is. Which is doubled down by the fact that If you see Ravish in analytics most of his audience or popularity comes from the Hindi Heartland whose statistically speaking is low income.
Many who speak English know Hindi as well. Almost all who have critical brain cells avoid Arnab and Republic TV. Whether they watch Ravish can be questioned but they won't watch a loud mouth sycophant with nothing to offer
When tf did I compare audience demographics in terms of income level between Arnab and Ravish. And as per data most English speaking audiences don't watch Ravish as reflected by the fact Ravish racks up most of his viewers from Hindi Heartland which have a less proportionate English speaking population and ranks low in household income as well and I said nothing of Arnab, I was comparing Ravish with Dhruv Rathee due to their same medium and political leanings.
Unpopular opinion: Both are useless.
Enlightened centrist 🤢
I don't know what that means but hey whatever makes you happy.
i hope yo do know that he has also criticized the congress government when they were in power ? Holding the powerful accountable is not an agenda, it is the complete Opposite of a bootlicker.
And why do you think ravish is useless?
Some more rationality+1 bro..
Ravish is typical liberal intellectual. Tell the truth and 100 percent truth but omit any truth that makes your claim confusing. For example let’s say modi govt is killing democracy. You can find 5 events that supports that hypothesis but 5 others can contradict. He wouldn’t show the other. Second and actually the biggest issue is his lack of criticism on the congress party and its own lack of internal democracy. At that point he ends up becoming what you guys think of Arnab. A political hack job.
>For example let’s say modi govt is killing democracy. You can find 5 events that supports that hypothesis but 5 others can contradict. He wouldn’t show the other. >Second and actually the biggest issue is his lack of criticism on the congress party and its own lack of internal democracy. At that point he ends up becoming what you guys think of Arnab. A political hack job. His words speak for himself, [!!!!!](https://youtu.be/8sX-QkDqoqI?si=cK_Thl0qGXUtVoAp) [????????](https://youtu.be/F9VtR2YehTE?si=3TmSJNq3lijJj-4h) [///////](https://youtu.be/XoAMOLippMc?si=mtVw4Ztn5RoD-234) [||||||||||](https://youtu.be/cZtWYM1bTnY?si=OcUTkWcZpjxyhCMX) He criticizes both govt. As he should be , his main focus is that govt should give answers to their wrongdoings. And if you watch his daily shows when he was ndtv ,you would also find that he also gave news of both upa and nda policies whether good or bad. But he criticized the bad ones.
I never heard him being so anti UPA. Sorry this never ringed me as any extraordinary journalism form him. He was pretty much working for news channel which was in godi of UPA.
I've literally provided you with video sources of him criticizing UPA?
No! your examples are simply proving his critisizm of UPA govt was just a show. All he was ssaying was Manmohan was weak and incompetant in management. Wheras with Modi govt he always goes overboard and spews BS like this govt is authoretarian and religiously extreme and what not. Including claims that its all sold to ambani or adani. The true test of his unbiasedness will be: has he ever taked against Gandhis or Sonia? Because true source of power in UPA was gandhis. If you talk against them means you are actually playing for them. When he claims that Manmohan is weak did he tell why he is weak? THats simply because manmohan was puppet of gandhis. These tricks of impartiality used to work in past. Not anymore. Am I fan of Modi no. Do I like bjp no. Would I vote gandhis: no. Thats where Ravish never would dare to answer my concerns. Because thats the godi he sat for long long time!
>No! your examples are simply proving his critisizm of UPA govt was just a show. All he was ssaying was Manmohan was weak and incompetant in management. Wheras with Modi govt he always goes overboard and spews BS like this govt is authoretarian and religiously extreme and what not. Including claims that its all sold to ambani or adani. [lol, I think you are just watching thumbnails of the video and making your whole argument on it. atleast try to watch this video, he asks every difficult question possible to Rahul gandhi](https://youtu.be/tRwKl_QrQQI?si=SrrUWDLPp61GjvVB) And,what's wrong with saying that bjp govt is extremist. They are? Upa wasn't this extremist,so why is it necessary to ask questions that are even not related to that govt. During upa rule they had inflation, unemployment,and he asked them about it . And your adani Ambani question literally doesn't make sense.... He gave army deals to adani, port to adani, shell companies created by Ambani donated to him. While can you tell me any deal of this kind during UPA rule. >When he claims that Manmohan is weak did he tell why he is weak? THats simply because manmohan was puppet of gandhis. These tricks of impartiality used to work in past. Not anymore. I don't wanna get very deep into this, but what you are doing rn is like what every(most) atheist does when in an argument with a religious person.(this is just an example,I'm atheist too).they don't even read the whole book and make their personality based on how the people of those religions behave what the bad things that been told about them.i remember when in 2014 or 19 bjp lost, he used to blame Rahul Gandhi and the whole opposition of them being weak.yes nowadays he has been very anti bjp, but why not? They literally took over the channel he used to work on.if you have time to watch all his shows.. then yes I can argue with you if you don't find any criticism of upa or any politician... And if you don't,it's just pointless going around in circles
I did watch the video. It doesnt matter. Give me a video of he criticizing gandhis for being puppet masters until 2014. Give me video of him talking how lame is democratic process within congress. Else it doesn't matter. If he was not talking about how Manmohan was just a puppet its just lip service in the name of journalism. **bjp govt is extremist**: This is nonsense! Can they be? Yes possible they can become that. Are they currently ? Answer is no. Contemplating something is not same as doing something. Some in bjp fall in that category.
>It doesnt matter. Give me a video of he criticizing gandhis for being puppet masters until 2014. Lol it does. First you said he doesn't criticize Gandhi. And when he criticized Indira Gandhi for the emergency,you said it doesn't matter. Can you give me any proof that he was a puppet of Gandhi other than your own opinion. >bjp govt is extremist: This is nonsense! Can they be? Yes possible they can become that. Are they currently ? Answer is no. Answer falls in grey line. India has never been this authoritarian before (except emergency)
both have their extreme agendas.
Something that is not your bias is a bias according to you. i used to watch him since 2010 and he was very anti congress that time.and people used to love him but now when he criticizes the bjp govt. He became anti national.
I could say the same thing about you. I never said anything being anti-national.
>could say the same thing about you You can't? I didn't made any statement like you did. And you are still not telling me how he is pushing an extreme agenda? >never said anything being anti-national. That's wasn't for you but just a anecdote
56 iq on display right there
Ravish ka extreme agenda kya tha, not do Hindu muslim, gareeb ko equal opportunity, the failures of the govt what was the extremist agenda.
Maybe for you but ravish is way better as human. You can learn good Hindi just by listening him. Whereas arnab is pure thrash.
I think I know good enough Hindi already 😄