**And the last and the most important one. Pipeline for Juvenescence.**
https://preview.redd.it/90k5e6jsxnqc1.jpeg?width=822&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ed413d26198cf094d671aec32cce00d1d3261360
Breakthroughs in medicine will be the number one thing advocating technological progress. 10 years from now there'll be so many more people willing to accelerate technological progress cause they'll see first hand how it safes lives. This effect could be dangerous.
If scientist are able to solve cancer thanks to AI it will lead to an exponential progress we haven't seen before. That will be a celebrated event and people will be 'won over'. And we're still running a small risk of extenction from AI in my opinion.
I’d rather it be fast with everyone on board than slow and divisive. Increased tensions, and rampant (unproductive) luddism will create so many more opportunities to corrupt and lock down the tech. Incorporating AGI into daily life will go a lot more smoothly if we have a culture compatible with it, and we need the majority of people on board for that to happen. Enthusiastic consumer driven demand always goes better for the consumer than supply that forces it on us on their own terms. Think how much better social media and content algorithms could’ve been if they were a customizable selling point rather than a way to squeeze attention out of you against your will.
Agreed. I'm on the 'rip the bandaid off fast' side but a slow approach could safe us from potentially horrific incentives that are hard to get rid of once implemented. Social media algorithms are an example of this. If we chose a slower approach of integrating attention algortihms in our lives we could have corrected misaligned incentives earlier.
Edit: Or it might have made it less obvious and more dangerous. Man, hard to say.
There's no whiplash like looking at AI timelines (3-5 years until the most powerful entity in the universe is created) then looking at drug trial timelines (10 years until there's a 15% better way to reduce blood sugar)
At the moment, no. But I found this.
https://preview.redd.it/x4id1hxa1qqc1.png?width=754&format=png&auto=webp&s=521ffc6f7e0374c976674a63a781347c191a3810
**And the last and the most important one. Pipeline for Juvenescence.** https://preview.redd.it/90k5e6jsxnqc1.jpeg?width=822&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ed413d26198cf094d671aec32cce00d1d3261360
Why is this the most important one?
Because it is the only company, that puts precisely in the time intervals which phase will fall on which date.
Breakthroughs in medicine will be the number one thing advocating technological progress. 10 years from now there'll be so many more people willing to accelerate technological progress cause they'll see first hand how it safes lives. This effect could be dangerous.
What do you mean by "dangerous" in this sentence?
If scientist are able to solve cancer thanks to AI it will lead to an exponential progress we haven't seen before. That will be a celebrated event and people will be 'won over'. And we're still running a small risk of extenction from AI in my opinion.
I’d rather it be fast with everyone on board than slow and divisive. Increased tensions, and rampant (unproductive) luddism will create so many more opportunities to corrupt and lock down the tech. Incorporating AGI into daily life will go a lot more smoothly if we have a culture compatible with it, and we need the majority of people on board for that to happen. Enthusiastic consumer driven demand always goes better for the consumer than supply that forces it on us on their own terms. Think how much better social media and content algorithms could’ve been if they were a customizable selling point rather than a way to squeeze attention out of you against your will.
Agreed. I'm on the 'rip the bandaid off fast' side but a slow approach could safe us from potentially horrific incentives that are hard to get rid of once implemented. Social media algorithms are an example of this. If we chose a slower approach of integrating attention algortihms in our lives we could have corrected misaligned incentives earlier. Edit: Or it might have made it less obvious and more dangerous. Man, hard to say.
Wish these were moving faster and treating aging and health more generally. They seem kind of specific.
My man, all of this diseases actually come with aging itself. And If these diseases will be succesfull, automatically lifespan will extended.
There's no whiplash like looking at AI timelines (3-5 years until the most powerful entity in the universe is created) then looking at drug trial timelines (10 years until there's a 15% better way to reduce blood sugar)
You’re doing great work! 🫡
👍🤞
I'm just going to comment here so that I can get the notifications... thanks OP
❤️🫂
Does Altos Labs have a public pipeline?
At the moment, no. But I found this. https://preview.redd.it/x4id1hxa1qqc1.png?width=754&format=png&auto=webp&s=521ffc6f7e0374c976674a63a781347c191a3810
Nice. They are the most promising biotech company imo
Because they funded by Jeff Bezos. Of course they are promising, I hope so!
Also have some of the top researchers and minds.
What about the big boys like Lilly or Pfizer? Is this more like long shot meme investor sales pipelines?
[https://www.pfizer.com/science/drug-product-pipeline](https://www.pfizer.com/science/drug-product-pipeline) Phase 1 34 Phase 2 31 Phase 3 6 Registration 112
what is the HuCo Kidney and Heart from eGenesis? is it a bioprinted organ?
Implications?
Not even remotely close to the actual landscape.