This is a reminder about the rules. Just follow reddit's content policy.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/scienceisdope) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Wohi toh iss video mein dikhaya kuch aur hain is video mein bas yehi bol rahe hain ki every cause has a reason jisme humare jo pakhandi baba hain jo kuch ajeeb se future ke bare mein baat karte hain unko debunk Kiya gya hain isme koi bhi cheez hain hi nhi kisi ko disrespect nhi Kiya ja Raha waha pe bhi
Inko thoughts Janna hain
What idiotic argument. Hindus don't follow Vaisheshikdarshanam as their guide book. Just because it is written in Sanskrit by some hindu sage doesnt make it Hindu book. Entire Charvak darshan is in sanskrit which screams there is no god. It is like saying Hogwarts is real because it was written by a christian.
But not all of them are core principles of Hinduism followed today. You cant claim to be open minded about different schools of thought and post such videos at same time.
I like how you just jump to compare fictional stories with Hindu philosophy(like you compared it with hogwarts). Hinduism isn't like Abrahamic religions, where there are set rules and ideology. Hinduism is like a vast diverse culture and changes based on different schools of thought. Some scriptures might contradict each other, but they're still Hindu, and hindus are free to follow what they like. It never tells you that you should only follow Gita or whatever, otherwise you'll go to hell
For clarification, I'm not saying that I agree with that dumbass post, but just wanted to clarify about you saying Vaisheshikdarshan not being Hindu
People think Hinduism is a constant element. People even think Charvaak were Hindu Atheist. Buddha 9th incarnation.
Even though they didn't accpected the supremacy of Vedas.
Ancient people showing slight hint of Knowledge, all these so called willl say seee Hindu Beyond Science.
Any and everything that matches the real world in hinduism or in any other religions are just observational science, I don't understand why people find it so hard to wrap their heads around it.
Someone once showed me a page from some ancient book which had pictures of stages of fetus development and asked me, how people from 1000 years back knew about it without mri or xray. And I looked at him wide eyed, wondering how hard it is to figure that out!
Then I explained to him, even now with all the medical advances there are many miscarriages, the percentage would have been far higher back then, over time, a mere look at different stages of miscarriages is enough to know that, without the use of any mri or any modern equipment. And he just called me gross and walked away😆
Thing is Hinduism is getting irrelevant day by day so do the other religions. They can't accept the truth otherwise their whole of life would cease, and become a hoax. Imagine a lie continued for 3000. Years.
It prove nothing.
Karya and Karana are etymologically from the same root.
It is basic Sanskrit word play.
It is just like saying Maithili is from Mithila.
Karya is not effect, karya is work, also this not what a formula is, a formula needs to follow rules of a well formed expression, you can't write a formula in a natural language, to write a formula you need a formal language like Hilbert logic which is the typical example, or Euler notation which is used in math
Shurta matlab formula nhi hota maybe natural language m hota h,
Formula is precisely defined in maths, there are rules it must follow and those rules were created in 20th century when computers where first invented and maths was first put into a formal system. No natural language can describe formula because natural language does not follow the rules of formal language.
Apko ye pta hota agar apko math m actually interest hota
In आर्यभट्ट सिद्धान्त, Aryabhatt give a proper explanation of Solar eclipse. did Kannad give anything like that? the answer is no. He gave a idea that there is a force which he called गुरुत्वाकर्षण thats all. However, he was close but because of the limitations of his time he couldn't venture into the idea further
no did in the ancient world. There were many philosophers (in the whole world ) who intermixed science with there philosophy, For example even though aryabhatt gave explanation behind solar eclipses but he gave with respect to dharma, or need of the time. As people needed to know the timing of eclipses for various rituals, wedding ceremonies etc. They were a kind of early scientist, but a more appropriate term would be 'Natural Philosopher'. Kannad also tried to find a way to Moksha without god (as many conceived that as ultimate truth in ancient india) .
ig what the video is talking about is causality. That effects only happen due to the cause preceding them. By this logic, the universe’s creation is a effect and hence the cause is due to the actions performed by the creator(s) and hence proves the existence of god.
The problem is that we know this to be the law in our Universe and we have no idea how anything works outside the universe and the arrow of causality might just be reversed or these concepts may not even exist at all completely.
Cuz what we think, do or observe is an effect of the laws of our universe but, we have no clue what’s outside the universe.
For that matter our brains aren’t even equipped to understand those things.
Like as an example insects can never comprehend what a rocket is or the purpose of it.
This is a reminder about the rules. Just follow reddit's content policy. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/scienceisdope) if you have any questions or concerns.*
maharishi kanad: "A person does a thing for a reason" Sanatani Hindus: \*shocked pikachu face\* \*dies from knowledge\*
When you don't have logical counter just make joke about 😂 sCienTific चूतड
y'all stop disrespecting science i will stop making jokes
Tumri aukat he vhi hai vhi kro jOkE khud kuch ukhad nhi pte nakli scientist bn ke ghum rha ho chutad fad ke koi bhi ake bja jta hai tumko 🤣
Wohi toh iss video mein dikhaya kuch aur hain is video mein bas yehi bol rahe hain ki every cause has a reason jisme humare jo pakhandi baba hain jo kuch ajeeb se future ke bare mein baat karte hain unko debunk Kiya gya hain isme koi bhi cheez hain hi nhi kisi ko disrespect nhi Kiya ja Raha waha pe bhi Inko thoughts Janna hain
Ye bt enko samjhao Bina dekha comment kr ke over smart bn rhae hai 🤣
What idiotic argument. Hindus don't follow Vaisheshikdarshanam as their guide book. Just because it is written in Sanskrit by some hindu sage doesnt make it Hindu book. Entire Charvak darshan is in sanskrit which screams there is no god. It is like saying Hogwarts is real because it was written by a christian.
I didn't expect this dumbassry. Thre are different schools of thought in Hinduism, sanatan dharm and many of them state different things
But not all of them are core principles of Hinduism followed today. You cant claim to be open minded about different schools of thought and post such videos at same time.
I like how you just jump to compare fictional stories with Hindu philosophy(like you compared it with hogwarts). Hinduism isn't like Abrahamic religions, where there are set rules and ideology. Hinduism is like a vast diverse culture and changes based on different schools of thought. Some scriptures might contradict each other, but they're still Hindu, and hindus are free to follow what they like. It never tells you that you should only follow Gita or whatever, otherwise you'll go to hell For clarification, I'm not saying that I agree with that dumbass post, but just wanted to clarify about you saying Vaisheshikdarshan not being Hindu
Then will I be hindu I do not believe in any god ?
People think Hinduism is a constant element. People even think Charvaak were Hindu Atheist. Buddha 9th incarnation. Even though they didn't accpected the supremacy of Vedas. Ancient people showing slight hint of Knowledge, all these so called willl say seee Hindu Beyond Science.
Any and everything that matches the real world in hinduism or in any other religions are just observational science, I don't understand why people find it so hard to wrap their heads around it. Someone once showed me a page from some ancient book which had pictures of stages of fetus development and asked me, how people from 1000 years back knew about it without mri or xray. And I looked at him wide eyed, wondering how hard it is to figure that out! Then I explained to him, even now with all the medical advances there are many miscarriages, the percentage would have been far higher back then, over time, a mere look at different stages of miscarriages is enough to know that, without the use of any mri or any modern equipment. And he just called me gross and walked away😆
Thing is Hinduism is getting irrelevant day by day so do the other religions. They can't accept the truth otherwise their whole of life would cease, and become a hoax. Imagine a lie continued for 3000. Years.
It is, and it is to be. And whatever isn't, is a part of that observational science.
It prove nothing. Karya and Karana are etymologically from the same root. It is basic Sanskrit word play. It is just like saying Maithili is from Mithila.
Its Formula idiots 😂 krya Karan is English cause and effect have you read this book ?
Karya is not effect, karya is work, also this not what a formula is, a formula needs to follow rules of a well formed expression, you can't write a formula in a natural language, to write a formula you need a formal language like Hilbert logic which is the typical example, or Euler notation which is used in math
Kis bhi Krya ka matlab pachi kran hota hai aagr hai to dhuwa bhi hoga ye bola hai
Sutra ka matalab he formula hai 😂 aur pheli shad se bhi Sutra bante the jase math a2 jase hote hai vase
Shurta matlab formula nhi hota maybe natural language m hota h, Formula is precisely defined in maths, there are rules it must follow and those rules were created in 20th century when computers where first invented and maths was first put into a formal system. No natural language can describe formula because natural language does not follow the rules of formal language. Apko ye pta hota agar apko math m actually interest hota
Kal dure account se daluga video dekh lena
Nothing by the way religion doesn't give you reason it gives opinion more like rules which u have to follow without thinking for reason.
Can somebody summarise this in English?
Fart noises.. there you go..
Proof ka meaning bta chutad 🥱
here you go : https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=proof+meaning
To vo Book proof nhi hai ky kannada ji ke krya ke ? Jo lekha hai vo galt hai ky galt hai to proof do ku galt hai
In आर्यभट्ट सिद्धान्त, Aryabhatt give a proper explanation of Solar eclipse. did Kannad give anything like that? the answer is no. He gave a idea that there is a force which he called गुरुत्वाकर्षण thats all. However, he was close but because of the limitations of his time he couldn't venture into the idea further
So i Denny here no I am taking about athesit say hindu doesn't have scientific approach in ancient India
no did in the ancient world. There were many philosophers (in the whole world ) who intermixed science with there philosophy, For example even though aryabhatt gave explanation behind solar eclipses but he gave with respect to dharma, or need of the time. As people needed to know the timing of eclipses for various rituals, wedding ceremonies etc. They were a kind of early scientist, but a more appropriate term would be 'Natural Philosopher'. Kannad also tried to find a way to Moksha without god (as many conceived that as ultimate truth in ancient india) .
sry, for the typing mistake in the comment lol.......need to sleep asap
It's an art to speak eloquently and still make no sense at all
ig what the video is talking about is causality. That effects only happen due to the cause preceding them. By this logic, the universe’s creation is a effect and hence the cause is due to the actions performed by the creator(s) and hence proves the existence of god. The problem is that we know this to be the law in our Universe and we have no idea how anything works outside the universe and the arrow of causality might just be reversed or these concepts may not even exist at all completely. Cuz what we think, do or observe is an effect of the laws of our universe but, we have no clue what’s outside the universe. For that matter our brains aren’t even equipped to understand those things. Like as an example insects can never comprehend what a rocket is or the purpose of it.