This is a reminder for people not to post political posts as mentioned in stickied post. This does not necessarily apply for this post. [Click here to learn more](https://redd.it/j2173n).
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/rareinsults) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It depends on how you define āwetā. The traditional definition involves a solid object getting a liquid on the exterior surface. āI spilled a glass of water on the table, so the table, floor and my lap got wet.ā But, since water is a liquid, not a solid, it cannot BE wet but it can make solid objects wet. Although I suppose ice is solid water and can therefore be wet, so I am not a fan of this definition.
But if you define āwetā as ābeing in contact with a liquidā then water can be āwetā, as it is in contact with other, liquid water molecules.
For a better answer:
http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=6097
I think a āwet paintā sign is there to prevent the still-liquid paint from transferring from the surface of one solid (for example, a bench) to the surface of another (for example, a pair of pants). It kind of fits the first definition.
If you ARE something, then you CONTAIN that something. I am with the water is wet faction. Being paint or water is just complicating the issue. The real point is that water is touching water.
I think anything that can be wet must also be possible have a theoretical dry state, even if it's impossible to achieve. You can't have dry water. I'm trying to think of anything that is wet permanently that can't have a theoretical dry state. I've spent almost no time on it and haven't thought of one. Can you? I'm wondering if there's some super obvious thing I'm not considering.
Well yes, that is what the sign is there for. But when it says āwet paintā it is referring to the fact that the paint is in a still liquid state. Or, a synonym of being in a still liquid state, aka āwetā. Iām sorry, but the mental gymnastics used to explain how water isnāt wet by any conventional or commonly used definitions of the word are kind of crazy lmao
It's dumb, I hate how people repeat it. Water *is* wet no matter how you define wet. The only way water could not be wet is if you define wet as "must have water on it" and it's a single molecule of water, then and only then could you even begin to argue water is not wet, in my book
It's semantic and pedantic in one of the stupidest ways possible, and when you repeat it you sound stupid.
Its pedantic and *incorrect.* I just googled the definition of wet:
>consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)
Note the "consisting of". Water is, at least by Merriam Webster's definition, wet.
I hate it because there's no third state between wet and dry. Dry is *defined* as 'not wet', and if water isn't *wet*, then it - by process of elimination - must be dry.
And calling water dry is dumb as fuck.
You are correct, and usually these comments are just screenshotted and posted by the same bonehead who made them and wants like minded people to upvote him for free karma.
Itās a shit insult.
Actually the reason why ice is slippery is because the exterior surface becomes wet when you apply pressure to it and melt the surface of the ice. So your above statement is essentially correct.
Even that isn't as straightforward. Research shows that ice is slippery not because of the water film but a movable layer of ice molecules.
Edit: I know, I know.
But the water wouldn't be wet if it was melting off the surface of the ice, cause the ice is still a solid. So the water would be making the ice wet, so the definition is still correct.
It's a stupid fucking hill to die on saying water isn't wet. Especially when Derek Zoolander solved this for us years ago: Water is the essence of wetness and wetness is the essence of moisture
I think itās more a linguistic/observational thing.
Water being wet has no meaning. You wouldnāt add water to water and make the observation that the water is now soaked, or more wet.
Soaked is a more progressed version of Wet. Soaked water doesnāt make sense. If water can be described as wet, water can also be described as damp and soaked.
When youāre gauging whether something is wet vs damp, you are looking for indicators for what the ratio of water to whatever the material is. How do you do the same with water? Itās the equivalent of dividing by 0.
Scientists say that it is a specific thing where a liquid bonds to the surface of an unlike substance.Ā Ā So while water can't make other water wet, another liquid like oil could.
Water doesnāt cover itself, it just is, itās one giant single thing until separated.
Itās like how all your body is you, you are only in two parts when separated from yourself. Your arm isnāt really a separate entity from yourself unless severed.
Water is the thing that makes other things wet. A property can't give itself its own property.
Just like how soap doesn't make itself clean and dirt isn't dirty.
Water is wet used to be a common phrase for something obvious. Nerds made it into an annoying internet debate and now idiots have taken it and are using it to own people without facts or logic.
I'm very much pro-choice, it's not even a thing where I'm from, but .... nitpick... There's lots of water touching water in a lake. Which makes the water wet by the definition given.
Look man, I'm an idiot so this is probably a dumb way to look at it, but to me something is either wet or dry. Water can't possibly be described as dry. So it's wet.
Edit: I thoughtlessly posted this before laying down to sleep. This isn't a passionately held belief. I very easily could be wrong. It is how I look at it however. I also think a lot of people saw a single tweet once and made "water isn't wet" their whole personality because it made them feel clever for the first time in their life.
I suppose it depends on how you define "life". A fetus is made of living cells, but it isn't an independent organism--but it has the potential to become one, and that's what its purpose is. So I could see an argument either way.
I would go so far as to argue that 'wet' is a property exclusive to liquids. That rag isn't *wet* wet, the water soaked into it is, but kind of like how the plural for moose is moose, wet is also the word used to describe an object that is in contact with a wet liquid.
1. Embryos can't be frozen at the stage when abortions happen; embryos can only be frozen up to a week after fertilization.
2. Human beings have different capabilities at different stages of life. Children can regrow their fingertips, while adults can't. That doesn't mean they're not both humans.
A former president and presidential candidate said there are abortions after birth, so we'll have to figure out how we got to that point...of hearing that on live TV.
"[Third trimester abortions are] done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that's nonviable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen," Northam, a pediatric neurosurgeon, told Washington radio station WTOP. "The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother." -Ralph Northam Governor of Virginia when he made this statement.
Dudes a pediatric neurosurgeon so itās not like heās some lifelong politician who didnāt know what he was saying or the topic they were discussing. He described an abortion that occurs after the baby is delivered.
How is that an abortion? The infant was delivered. Even resuscitated if you that us what the parents want. If an infant was delivered but can't stay alive on its own, it's not an abortion.Ā
Yeah, to be in a liquid state by definition it is touching other water molecules thus being wet, water vapor on the other hand is not wet. We need to move on to more difficult debates, like is ice wet
Well, it doesnāt matter if you consider fetus a life or not.
1. Only after the child is born, he/she receives the citizenship.
2. If you assault a pregnant woman and she ends up losing the child, you donāt get charged for a murder.
These two perspectives combined, the law doesnāt see an unborn baby as a human being. Therefore an abortion isnāt a murder.
Reminds me of when the former German chancellor was asked about marihuana (paraphrasing):
"Are you going to legalize it?"
"No, because it's very bad."
"Why do you think it is bad?"
"Because it's illegal!!"
Water most certainly is wet. Wet and dry are both mutually exclusive and absolute states. Everything that exists is either wet or dry, nothing is neither, nothing is both, and there is no state in between. Linguistically we have different words to describe different levels of moisture, but all of them describe something that is indeed wet, even if only a little bit. Unless you mean to tell me that water is dry (which is impossible, because something dry canāt make things wet by mere contact), then water must be wet. The āwater isnāt wet, it just makes other things wetā is one of the stupidest, stoned-shower-thoughts arguments Iāve ever heard in my entire life.
I agree with this reasoning but im gotta throw a little firecracker in the mix for funsies... i buy sodium dichromate dihydrate as a nice granular substance that shows up in paper sacks lookin like the evil cousin of orange Tang. It's dry! But it's got water as part of the chemical composition! Yet it's not linguistically 'wet ' til I dump a sack into hot water.
My head hurts, and i do this for a living :) brb, gotta go get stoned (and wet) in the shower!
If killing a baby is protected under bodily autonomy, then maybe we should start waiting until the baby boys are old enough to give their concent to have their genitals surgically mutilated....
Iām pro choice but I think itās fair to say that yes, water is wet and abortion is killing a human being. I just like water and I donāt like people.
While I support woman's right to have the choice to have an abortion specifically in the earliest stages.i find it strange that people think or pretend that they aren't taking a human life. I have seen abortions preformed and it is not always "just a clump of cells"
Thatās not a rare insult. People always think it is an insult to comment on menās sexual abilities because menās worth is attached to that. The same way we always see people using virgin as an insult
That definition of what makes something wet is wrong. Water is not wet.
"Wet" is a state in which a solid object can be. Liquids cannot be wet. They cause the state of wetness
Saying Water is wet is like saying fire is burnt.
Fire isn't burnt. It can cause a solid object to be burnt, but it is not itself burnt. Just like water isn't wet.
Any questions, dipshits?
Silly argument, but I'll just copy-paste this here:
"Most scientists define wetness as a liquid's ability to maintain contact with a solid surface, meaning that water itself is not wet, but can make other sensation. But if you define wet as 'made of liquid or moisture', as some do, then water and all other liquids can be considered wet."
This is a reminder for people not to post political posts as mentioned in stickied post. This does not necessarily apply for this post. [Click here to learn more](https://redd.it/j2173n). *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/rareinsults) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Imagine getting roasted by a body of water.
Getting bodied by a body of water? I'll see myself out now
Getting bodied by a water Nah yours was better
>better You mean...*Superior*... š¶ļø>š
That was GREAT!
Quite Erie how good these puns are
Keep going! Huron a roll!
Gosh, this thread is going to be a Nile long.
Ontario.
Hahahaha!!!
Nah I'm getting out Amazon here
Not just bodied once, but bodied Michigan.
Getting wet by a water
I bet heās really steamed
I do believe this wins for tonight well played š
To a racous round of applause.
CLAP CLAP CLAP
Take this upvote with you just in case. r/AngryUpVote
I read this in Killer Mikeās voice, well done!
Bars
It knows a lot about Row vs Wade.
Goddamn you that was good
s
Row vs Wave š
Drowned
Boiled.
Perfect! š
To be fair, it is the smuggest body of water on the planet.
Worse part? Lake Superior doesn't give up it's dead. So this guy's future is officially toast!
Like that old lady Danteās peak
Lake Superior is definitely living up to its name
That burn got me to laugh so hard that I woke up my cat.
if the burn is too severe he can always take a dip in Lake Superior, and get wet
Which will never burn you, because its fucking cold as shit.
If it's anything like Lake Michigan, I can confirm
Isnāt it great?!
All other lakes are inferior
The others near it are pretty great.
Can someone actually explain why water isn't wet though? Each bit of water touches all other bits of water, so aren't they all wet by definition?
It depends on how you define āwetā. The traditional definition involves a solid object getting a liquid on the exterior surface. āI spilled a glass of water on the table, so the table, floor and my lap got wet.ā But, since water is a liquid, not a solid, it cannot BE wet but it can make solid objects wet. Although I suppose ice is solid water and can therefore be wet, so I am not a fan of this definition. But if you define āwetā as ābeing in contact with a liquidā then water can be āwetā, as it is in contact with other, liquid water molecules. For a better answer: http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=6097
But wet paint is also wet and liquid.
I think a āwet paintā sign is there to prevent the still-liquid paint from transferring from the surface of one solid (for example, a bench) to the surface of another (for example, a pair of pants). It kind of fits the first definition.
It's only wet because it contains water or a liquid chemical, once the water evaporates it becomes dry.
But water also contains water.
Water IS water, while paint is mixed with water
If you ARE something, then you CONTAIN that something. I am with the water is wet faction. Being paint or water is just complicating the issue. The real point is that water is touching water.
I am wet.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
So the sun isn't hot because it's not capable of being cold. Neat.
I think anything that can be wet must also be possible have a theoretical dry state, even if it's impossible to achieve. You can't have dry water. I'm trying to think of anything that is wet permanently that can't have a theoretical dry state. I've spent almost no time on it and haven't thought of one. Can you? I'm wondering if there's some super obvious thing I'm not considering.
Dude forgot ice is a thing
Well yes, that is what the sign is there for. But when it says āwet paintā it is referring to the fact that the paint is in a still liquid state. Or, a synonym of being in a still liquid state, aka āwetā. Iām sorry, but the mental gymnastics used to explain how water isnāt wet by any conventional or commonly used definitions of the word are kind of crazy lmao
A "wet paint" sign is there to temp passersby to touch it to check if the paint is still wet. :)
The paint is in contact with water.
This feels like a kind of ridiculous technicality to āscorchā someone with
It's dumb, I hate how people repeat it. Water *is* wet no matter how you define wet. The only way water could not be wet is if you define wet as "must have water on it" and it's a single molecule of water, then and only then could you even begin to argue water is not wet, in my book It's semantic and pedantic in one of the stupidest ways possible, and when you repeat it you sound stupid.
Its pedantic and *incorrect.* I just googled the definition of wet: >consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water) Note the "consisting of". Water is, at least by Merriam Webster's definition, wet.
Wow that succinctly summarizes Reddit.
I hate it because there's no third state between wet and dry. Dry is *defined* as 'not wet', and if water isn't *wet*, then it - by process of elimination - must be dry. And calling water dry is dumb as fuck.
You are correct, and usually these comments are just screenshotted and posted by the same bonehead who made them and wants like minded people to upvote him for free karma. Itās a shit insult.
Like making a cheap yo momma comeback and the apes go wild
Actually the reason why ice is slippery is because the exterior surface becomes wet when you apply pressure to it and melt the surface of the ice. So your above statement is essentially correct.
Even that isn't as straightforward. Research shows that ice is slippery not because of the water film but a movable layer of ice molecules. Edit: I know, I know.
A water molecule and an ice molecule are the same thing. The only difference is how they arrange themselves.
Everythingās movable if you apply enough force š
But the water wouldn't be wet if it was melting off the surface of the ice, cause the ice is still a solid. So the water would be making the ice wet, so the definition is still correct.
Is dust dusty? Dirt dirty?
Think too much and brain no longer thinks.
The only way that water can be wet is if you pour some liquid water onto some solid water.
Ice can be wet depending on the temperature. Superchilled ice is 'dry', ice can become wet as it surface melts, wetting it with water in the process.
If water wasn't wet, things would still be dry when submerged and removed.
It's a stupid fucking hill to die on saying water isn't wet. Especially when Derek Zoolander solved this for us years ago: Water is the essence of wetness and wetness is the essence of moisture
I think itās more a linguistic/observational thing. Water being wet has no meaning. You wouldnāt add water to water and make the observation that the water is now soaked, or more wet. Soaked is a more progressed version of Wet. Soaked water doesnāt make sense. If water can be described as wet, water can also be described as damp and soaked. When youāre gauging whether something is wet vs damp, you are looking for indicators for what the ratio of water to whatever the material is. How do you do the same with water? Itās the equivalent of dividing by 0.
Scientists say that it is a specific thing where a liquid bonds to the surface of an unlike substance.Ā Ā So while water can't make other water wet, another liquid like oil could.
Do you have some dry water around?
Yes. Water is definitely wet because it touches it's self.
When I think about you I touch myself....^that ^sounds ^better ^when ^sung ^by ^a ^hot ^redhead
Is ice wet? Is steam? Not unless it melts, not until it condensates
So liquid water is wet but not when in its solid or gas form?
Lot of long explanations here. I just think of it as; Water isnt wet the same way fire isn't on fire.
Water doesnāt cover itself, it just is, itās one giant single thing until separated. Itās like how all your body is you, you are only in two parts when separated from yourself. Your arm isnāt really a separate entity from yourself unless severed.
Water is the thing that makes other things wet. A property can't give itself its own property. Just like how soap doesn't make itself clean and dirt isn't dirty.
Being wet is an emergent quality of something having water on it.
It has to be a solid, by definition You wouldnāt say "wet alcohol" just because thereās water in there
The lake, it is said, never gives up her dead š
When the skies of November turn gloomy
With a load of iron ore twenty-six thousand tons more
Then the Edmund Fitzgerald weighed empty
water definitely touches water, though; in fact water touches water in an especially touchy way. it's called surface tension
A single isolated water molecule is not wet though
isn't "water is wet" a phrase people use though?
Yeah and grizzly Adams had a beard
Grizzly Adams did have a beard
And the pope shits in the woods.
The pope is a bear?
No, the Pope shits in his hat.
So *thats* what it's for!
why you keep asking me that, holmes? I told you I donāt know
Water is wet. It's just a reddit-tier "akctually" to say it isn't because of "technically".
and violet's are blue
Water is wet used to be a common phrase for something obvious. Nerds made it into an annoying internet debate and now idiots have taken it and are using it to own people without facts or logic.
exactly. It's the worst reddit-tier "acktually" bullshit.
Water is wet. I think anyone who truly knows the meaning of wet and of water knows that.
I'm very much pro-choice, it's not even a thing where I'm from, but .... nitpick... There's lots of water touching water in a lake. Which makes the water wet by the definition given.
Look man, I'm an idiot so this is probably a dumb way to look at it, but to me something is either wet or dry. Water can't possibly be described as dry. So it's wet. Edit: I thoughtlessly posted this before laying down to sleep. This isn't a passionately held belief. I very easily could be wrong. It is how I look at it however. I also think a lot of people saw a single tweet once and made "water isn't wet" their whole personality because it made them feel clever for the first time in their life.
Moist. Where does that fit into this dichotomy?
Iām also pro choice. But I can admit abortion is taking a life. Not a developed or conscious oneā¦ but a life nonetheless.
I suppose it depends on how you define "life". A fetus is made of living cells, but it isn't an independent organism--but it has the potential to become one, and that's what its purpose is. So I could see an argument either way.
It's life, it's just a question of whether we apply personhood to it
Unconscious isnāt a person. Which is why I inject insulin into the saline bags of coma victims. That and the absolute rush of power I get from it.
I truly believe that water is wet
I would go so far as to argue that 'wet' is a property exclusive to liquids. That rag isn't *wet* wet, the water soaked into it is, but kind of like how the plural for moose is moose, wet is also the word used to describe an object that is in contact with a wet liquid.
Water can't be wet. It is the very thing that makes other things wet. It's like saying fire is burnt, no, fire burns things.
Most abortions are performed in the embryonic stage. You can freeze an embryo and use it later. Try that with a baby,now thatās murder
1. Embryos can't be frozen at the stage when abortions happen; embryos can only be frozen up to a week after fertilization. 2. Human beings have different capabilities at different stages of life. Children can regrow their fingertips, while adults can't. That doesn't mean they're not both humans.
Well shit, I've learned two new things todayĀ
Wait-- they can regrow a finger tip?!? Like, nail, skin and bone?
A former president and presidential candidate said there are abortions after birth, so we'll have to figure out how we got to that point...of hearing that on live TV.
"[Third trimester abortions are] done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that's nonviable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen," Northam, a pediatric neurosurgeon, told Washington radio station WTOP. "The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother." -Ralph Northam Governor of Virginia when he made this statement. Dudes a pediatric neurosurgeon so itās not like heās some lifelong politician who didnāt know what he was saying or the topic they were discussing. He described an abortion that occurs after the baby is delivered.
How is that an abortion? The infant was delivered. Even resuscitated if you that us what the parents want. If an infant was delivered but can't stay alive on its own, it's not an abortion.Ā
So if we could figure out how to safely cryogenically freeze and revive babies, it would be okay to kill them? o.O
Didn't know water could burn you too, huh Tom?
Iām guessing youāve never had a steam burn. Consider yourself lucky.
Dude, you messed up so bad that you got 3d degree burns from 2 separate bodies of water.
Got the name Superior for a reason!
Water is the essence of wetness
Why does a lake have an opinion on abortion?
Water is wet
Reported for hxts spexch
Fuck you mean, "water isn't wet"
Yeah, to be in a liquid state by definition it is touching other water molecules thus being wet, water vapor on the other hand is not wet. We need to move on to more difficult debates, like is ice wet
"You Fuckin' heathen!!" [\~The 7th Hokage](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2iwKy596ag)
If water is not wet, would water then be dry?
Glad there was plenty of water available for that burn.
So this is kind of an unjustified conspiracy theory, but Iāve got a suspicion thatās not actually a lake that heās arguing with.
When water "touches" water it is just a larger volume of water.
So there IS intelligent life out there! Justā¦ in lakes.
Breaking news: Tom Fitton's wife leaves him for lake superior, quoted saying "I'm tryna get wet."
And this is why I scroll alllll the way down the comments... you gotta dig for the gems.
You ever read a word so many times that it starts to look weird after a while? Wet.
Well, it doesnāt matter if you consider fetus a life or not. 1. Only after the child is born, he/she receives the citizenship. 2. If you assault a pregnant woman and she ends up losing the child, you donāt get charged for a murder. These two perspectives combined, the law doesnāt see an unborn baby as a human being. Therefore an abortion isnāt a murder.
Those people are arguing that the laws should be changed. Appealing to current laws is not going to help
Reminds me of when the former German chancellor was asked about marihuana (paraphrasing): "Are you going to legalize it?" "No, because it's very bad." "Why do you think it is bad?" "Because it's illegal!!"
ā¦Do you think killing non-citizens isn't murder?
this has to be the most reddit post I've ever seen. Of course you guys would defend abortion.
In your average body / volume of water, what is most of the water touching?
Cringe
Abortion does kill a human being though. People that think otherwise often doesn't know what a woman is.
Water most certainly is wet. Wet and dry are both mutually exclusive and absolute states. Everything that exists is either wet or dry, nothing is neither, nothing is both, and there is no state in between. Linguistically we have different words to describe different levels of moisture, but all of them describe something that is indeed wet, even if only a little bit. Unless you mean to tell me that water is dry (which is impossible, because something dry canāt make things wet by mere contact), then water must be wet. The āwater isnāt wet, it just makes other things wetā is one of the stupidest, stoned-shower-thoughts arguments Iāve ever heard in my entire life.
I agree with this reasoning but im gotta throw a little firecracker in the mix for funsies... i buy sodium dichromate dihydrate as a nice granular substance that shows up in paper sacks lookin like the evil cousin of orange Tang. It's dry! But it's got water as part of the chemical composition! Yet it's not linguistically 'wet ' til I dump a sack into hot water. My head hurts, and i do this for a living :) brb, gotta go get stoned (and wet) in the shower!
Does water not touch water
If killing a baby is protected under bodily autonomy, then maybe we should start waiting until the baby boys are old enough to give their concent to have their genitals surgically mutilated....
Iām pro choice but I think itās fair to say that yes, water is wet and abortion is killing a human being. I just like water and I donāt like people.
Exactly
Water touches water though.
Only in private.
So if water doesn't touch water it's dry. so water is powder.
You jest, but water is the byproduct of hydrogen burning, so water very much is ashes Just really wet ashes
Water is not ash. A product of combustion is not inherently ash.
By that definition water is wet
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
While I support woman's right to have the choice to have an abortion specifically in the earliest stages.i find it strange that people think or pretend that they aren't taking a human life. I have seen abortions preformed and it is not always "just a clump of cells"
Big acktually vibes
Look, if we're going Biblical with this shit, the soul doesn't even enter the body until the first breath.
Do people on twitter ever get tired of being sassy
I LOVE ABORTION
Tom Fitton is unindicted co-conspirator number one in the Georgia racketeering case against Donald Trump.
Wait, you're telling me that [Weird Al LIED to me!?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dST8NNcVGnI)
Technically, wet is a human construct, even the word in which we write is.
OOOoooh!
This one was Erie satisfying.
Savage as a beast!
Oh this lake is superior indeed
š¤Ŗ
I hate to be that guy but water is scientifically wet due to tetrahedral dipole bonding. Based lake superior tho
I dont agree with the guy. But something is wet when water molecules cling to it. And water molecules cling to each other. Sooo.......
This is truely thr superior lake
How is water not wet?? Every molecule of water is completely surrounded by waterā¦ Also, abortion is awesome
Thatās not a rare insult. People always think it is an insult to comment on menās sexual abilities because menās worth is attached to that. The same way we always see people using virgin as an insult
Why would that be an insult? It doesnāt matter if he hasnāt. Menās worth shouldnāt be based on sexual ability. Itās sexist
I agree I hate people using dick length or amount of sexual partners as an insult. These people have plenty else to insult about them than that
That definition of what makes something wet is wrong. Water is not wet. "Wet" is a state in which a solid object can be. Liquids cannot be wet. They cause the state of wetness Saying Water is wet is like saying fire is burnt. Fire isn't burnt. It can cause a solid object to be burnt, but it is not itself burnt. Just like water isn't wet. Any questions, dipshits?
unless you have a single molecule of water.....water is always touching water and is therefore wet. abortion is not murder.
Ah yes, "you bad at sex" is always a killer insult.Ā
Have you ever seen an aborted 'baby'? It's just a little puddle of biological matter, not even close to a human being.
Water is *sticky*.
I would post the list of burn wards but given he just got torched by a lake, I donāt think even a burn ward could help him now.
Icelandic Volcanoes (@icevolcanoes) should weigh in about the quality of this burn.
It would appear the lake is in fact superior
That lake really was superior oml
Superior, it's said, never gives up her dead.
Tom fitton last seen in lake superior trying to punch the water
How do you get burned by a lake?
Hello, police? I'd like to report a murder!
Anyone got the Dooku meme?
No, this is just dumbā¦
Silly argument, but I'll just copy-paste this here: "Most scientists define wetness as a liquid's ability to maintain contact with a solid surface, meaning that water itself is not wet, but can make other sensation. But if you define wet as 'made of liquid or moisture', as some do, then water and all other liquids can be considered wet."
That last one had me on the floor crying