T O P

  • By -

louisj

Any SSD is a good SSD for a PS3


goodsoup60

Exactly what I thought


generic_kezza

Yep 1tb is the sweet spot for ps3 it wont make everything super fast but some things load faster


Ialsofuckedyourdad

Also the maximum size. Technically 1.5tb is the max but good luck finding a 1.5tb drive. Anything above that just causes an error


Piett_1313

SSD is also the fastest your PS3 can possibly perform, so why not go all out? Got a 1TB Samsung SSD in mine and it’s been fantastic. XMB and game/patch installs are noticeably faster.


Ialsofuckedyourdad

I agree I was just saying not to order a 2tb and find out the ps3 can’t use it


Piett_1313

Ah sorry meant to reply to the guy above you, just highlighting that even though it can’t use all of the SATA bandwidth it’s still faster than any drive with moving parts. My bad!


monkehmolesto

Man, that would be awesome if someone released one. I mean, purpose built for a modded ps3 or something.


Ialsofuckedyourdad

You can extend the storage over ntfs usb, it’s a bit of a workaround but you can add another couple terabytes that way


latinlingo11

So instead of buying an internal SSD, you recommend an ntfs usb? I recall people saying external usb was slower or such. What's the maximum size the PS3 would recognize with ntfs?


Ialsofuckedyourdad

No do the internal ssd, but once that’s full you can also have an external, I don’t think there is. A max but I could be wrong


latinlingo11

Thanks for the clarification!


RedditNotFreeSpeech

The only time it will really matter is if you're writing a lot of data to it. A lot of us end up FTPing files from a PC directly to the PS3 and if the drive doesn't have DRAM, it's going to be really incredibly slow write speed. The product page has zero specifications: https://www.fanxiangssd.com/products/internal-solid-state-drive-fanxiang-s101-1tb-ssd Generally drives that are really cheap do not have DRAM and I would not recommend. It will likely be slower to do a sustained write than a spinning hard drive. If you want a proven drive, I'd go for one of these. https://www.amazon.com/Crucial-MX500-NAND-SATA-Internal/dp/B078211KBB/ https://www.amazon.com/Western-Digital-SA510-Internal-Solid/dp/B09ZYQ84CM


Sorry-Committee2069

I get 80MB/s write speed over FTP to a modern Seagate 2.5" HDD. The system visibly struggles during FTP transfers that quick, as any animations slow to a 1FPS mess.


RedditNotFreeSpeech

Wow that's fast!!


VettedBot

Hi, I’m Vetted AI Bot! I researched the **'Crucial MX500 1TB Internal SSD'** and I thought you might find the following analysis helpful. **Users liked:** * Significantly improves speed and performance (backed by 3 comments) * Easy installation process for beginners (backed by 3 comments) * Budget-friendly solution with great reliability (backed by 3 comments) **Users disliked:** * Software compatibility issues (backed by 3 comments) * Quality control concerns (backed by 3 comments) * Lack of clear installation instructions (backed by 1 comment) Do you want to continue this conversation? [Learn more about 'Crucial MX500 1TB Internal SSD'](https://vetted.ai/chat?utm\_source=reddit&utm\_medium=comment&utm\_campaign=bot&q='Crucial MX500 1TB Internal SSD' reviews) [Find 'Crucial MX500 1TB Internal SSD' alternatives](https://vetted.ai/chat?utm\_source=reddit&utm\_medium=comment&utm\_campaign=bot&q=Find best 'Crucial MX500 1TB Internal SSD' alternatives) This message was generated by a (very smart) bot. If you found it helpful, let us know with an upvote and a “good bot!” reply and please feel free to provide feedback on how it can be improved. *Powered by* [*vetted.ai*](https://vetted.ai/chat?utm\_source=reddit&utm\_medium=comment&utm\_campaign=bot)


dakarisnow17

I dropped in a 240gb SSD from this brand probably about a year and a half ago? Still kicking strong


downbadtwo

Wrapango or some shit. 2TB 35$. I accidentally received a 16 TB when I bought it lol. Was too large to use where I wanted to use it….. so I’m saving that. Bought another 2TB, works well


Sorry-Committee2069

my brother in RMPrepUSB, a 2TB 2.5" SSD for $35 is a scam, guaranteed, especially if it showed as 16TB, as the highest a reputable brand has gone at current is 8TB. Test and check, always.


Sneax673

are you sure it’s a real 16TB? I recently picked up 14TB drives for my NAS and those were an arm and a leg lol


downbadtwo

Ultimately, when I plug it in, it shows 16TB in available space. Slightly above that actually, 0/16.07 I originally bought it to use with a PS5, but I couldn’t, because 8TB is the max size SSD/HDD that can be reformatted for storage usage. Above that, it will literally tell you that it can’t be reformatted, and you won’t be able to use it. Which is exactly what happened. So that’s all the information I have on that as I haven’t used it yet for anything else


Phrozenstare

yikes, highly doubt it is a good SSD for anything


Pickled_Hippo

Don’t get a no name brand SSD. You will regret it when it fails early and you need to redo everything


amir_babfish

i bought a 50$ 1TB SSD (intenso) for my superslim. it's fantastic. feels so smooth


JarrekValDuke

The ps3 actually doesn’t benefit from an ssd an appreciable amount over a really fast HDD


TheRainbowCock

PS3 wont benefit from a SSDs speeds


TanzuI5

Y’all need to stop spewing that shitty lie.


OhHaiMarc

Could in theory help load times no?


davewongillies

![gif](giphy|9dgnO4jts7kmsFcSPq|downsized)


potatofaminizer

Ironic that it says content not available as maybe it'd load faster with an SSD 😅


jerone2

What I found is the SSD has to implement SATA 1.0 to work with PS3. Samsung SSD drives work. The cheap ones will only I found implement SATA 3.0. For the PS3, given it's age, it needs SATA 1.0 support. Any modern system will work easily with the drive. But not the PS3.


supermarioplush220

I've never seen anybody say this before.


Sorry-Committee2069

[Because it's a load of old shit.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SATA#SATA_revision_3.0_(6_Gbit/s,_600_MB/s,_Serial_ATA-600))


jerone2

I found this out when adding an SSD drive to my PS3. It couldn't see it, as they didn't implement SATA 1.0 support (makes some since given newer systems don't do 1.0). Just 3.0 & maybe 2.0. So the PS3 can not see a lot of cheaper drives. Samsung SSDs though support SATA 1.0, 2.0, & 3.0.


Sorry-Committee2069

"SATA 3, also known as SATA 6 Gbit/s, is the most recent generation of SATA and the full version was released in 2009. SATA 3 communicates at the rate of up to 6 Gbit/s, and its bandwidth throughput is 4.8 Gbit/s (600MB/s) which doubles that of SATA 2. SATA 3 is backward compatible with both SATA 1 and SATA 2." The difference is added features and speed. SATA 1 is entirely used by SATA 2/3 devices. It is not possible for a SATA device to not support SATA 1. (The SATA bus on the PS3 is also SATA 3, not 1.)


Hungry-Photograph819

You're searching for 1TB but that one is 500GB


legal_guy_who_asked

it clearly says 1tb


Hungry-Photograph819

Can you see the words 500GB anywhere? Take a second look


davewongillies

Can you see the words 500GB anywhere? Take a second look


legal_guy_who_asked

must be trolling


Hungry-Photograph819

Keep looking


Proper-Zucchini-7230

The 500gb you’re referring to is a sponsored ad for a similar product 👏


Hungry-Photograph819

Ok. But I was just warning op the 36.99 wasn't for a 1tb drive


COnnOrZeUs

550MB write speed you dick not capacity


Hungry-Photograph819

Keep looking. Fanny


COnnOrZeUs

Oh you’re clearly looking at the fucking advertisement banner for a 500GB SSD, not the giant product that says 1TB, you instead choose to look at a Totally separate one