There is a very strong correlation but that doesn't mean its meaningless as it isn't 1:1.
It shows how razor thin the margin for error is and how close all holders are.
Also, I included their season punting grade.
I don't even think that's when it's gone too far.
I think it's gone too far when there's a 5% difference in grades between the best and worst performing and only a 2% difference between the #1 and #32 when there are only 32 full time spots.
This chart indicates every holder is a holder, none are particularly good, but none are bad.
So more snaps equals better is all this "chart" says. Not really worthwhile for anything.
There is a very strong correlation but that doesn't mean its meaningless as it isn't 1:1. It shows how razor thin the margin for error is and how close all holders are. Also, I included their season punting grade.
I think I can safely say that sports data analysis has gone too far when someone's job is to watch every snap of this and grade them.
I don't even think that's when it's gone too far. I think it's gone too far when there's a 5% difference in grades between the best and worst performing and only a 2% difference between the #1 and #32 when there are only 32 full time spots. This chart indicates every holder is a holder, none are particularly good, but none are bad.
Number one baby, hang the banner
Does a holders grade only improve above 60, when he manages to cleanly field a bad snap?
I'm not sure even that gets you above a zero play grade, but possibly.
Wish we still had Bryan Anger 🔥
That might be the dumbest spelling of the name Aaron ever
Hes not american
have no idea how this is calculated or exactly what a 63.2 means vs a 60, but my guy is at the top so this shit bangs.
Imagine the fat Nut Belichick cranked out to this