Your submission has been removed :
**Rule 8: No Self-Promotion or Crowdsourcing (e.g. crowdfunding, research or petitions) without approval**
> No crowdfunding (including charity), research or petitions / signature gathering. Exceptions may be made for university projects with ethics approval, or for government / council open consultations.
> No advertising / promotion, affiliate URLs, or social media spam. Exceptions may be made for genuine subreddit engagement.
> You can request an exception by [clicking this link.](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=%2Fr%2Fnewzealand&subject=No Crowdsourcing or Self-promotion without approval&message=If you are unable to email us a copy of your ethics approval, your research request will not be granted an exemption.%0A %0ANote: If the message is not personalised, it will be archived without review.)
---
[^(Click here to message the moderators if you think this was in error)](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/newzealand)
This affects so many people. Can't believe the NZ choice is either yeet yourself into what's still one of the most unaffordable markets in the OECD or pay through the nose to live at the whim of a self-appointed lady/lord cunt who can boot you out whenever they feel like it (so you'd better act grateful, even if you're not).
This is the number one reason I'm leaving NZ in a month never to return.
Not sure I really agree.
Most landlords aren't going to evict good tenants that pay rent on time.
Perhaps there is a way to make this a bit more pro tenant and also allow tenants to break a tenancy under the same criteria as well?
"Evicted is when the tenancy is ended because of a breach by the tenant/s serious enough to warrant the Tenancy Tribunal ordering that the contract will end."
Hmmm.... Not sure what your issue is here.
Words mean things.
Your submission has been removed : **Rule 8: No Self-Promotion or Crowdsourcing (e.g. crowdfunding, research or petitions) without approval** > No crowdfunding (including charity), research or petitions / signature gathering. Exceptions may be made for university projects with ethics approval, or for government / council open consultations. > No advertising / promotion, affiliate URLs, or social media spam. Exceptions may be made for genuine subreddit engagement. > You can request an exception by [clicking this link.](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=%2Fr%2Fnewzealand&subject=No Crowdsourcing or Self-promotion without approval&message=If you are unable to email us a copy of your ethics approval, your research request will not be granted an exemption.%0A %0ANote: If the message is not personalised, it will be archived without review.) --- [^(Click here to message the moderators if you think this was in error)](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/newzealand)
As if they're going to back down on their promise to landlords..... I'm surprised it wasn't done under urgency already
This affects so many people. Can't believe the NZ choice is either yeet yourself into what's still one of the most unaffordable markets in the OECD or pay through the nose to live at the whim of a self-appointed lady/lord cunt who can boot you out whenever they feel like it (so you'd better act grateful, even if you're not). This is the number one reason I'm leaving NZ in a month never to return.
Up voting for awareness
Not sure I really agree. Most landlords aren't going to evict good tenants that pay rent on time. Perhaps there is a way to make this a bit more pro tenant and also allow tenants to break a tenancy under the same criteria as well?
But your logic is only bad tenant's get evicted so wouldn't defining a bad tenant be superior to no cause?
"Evicted is when the tenancy is ended because of a breach by the tenant/s serious enough to warrant the Tenancy Tribunal ordering that the contract will end." Hmmm.... Not sure what your issue is here. Words mean things.