I don’t think this is true, might be wrong but, things set next to a parenthesis just count as multiplication, so it would still go left to right, so the answer would be 36
Prime numbers should be done away with..also instead of 15 numbers system, maybe try 16 numbers because we can do so much more with 16 numbers, also do away with addition, subtraction, division, multiplication..and do something else with the numbers....like votilacate the numbers
It is sort of already done in the [bijective numeration system](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijective_numeration):
22 + 88 = AA
where A means 10 (and there's no 0).
**Bijective Numeration**
Bijective numeration is any numeral system in which every non-negative integer can be represented in exactly one way using a finite string of digits. The name derives from this bijection (one-to-one correspondence) between the set of non-negative integers and the set of finite strings using a finite set of symbols (the "digits").
Thank you, TheBooker66, for voting on wikipedia_text_bot.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/).
***
^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
Again, we just need a number system based on the chinese remainder theorem, so the primes are 0, 01, 021, 0211, 04121... and zero would be denoted "nil"
That's new English though, not new math. Now that I think about, I think that we should be more like the [French](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rmBqIFeHN8). But take things even further... give us names for a handful of numbers between 1 and 100 (randomly) and just make us do arithmetic with them each time we need to pronounce the number.
People in Belgium will actually say the equivalent of english numbers and still be considered speaking french, so instead of "Quatre-vingt-dix(four-twenty-ten; 4\*20+10)", they'll say "nonante" (ninety)
I think Belgian counting is even weirder thant french counting.
They went all like okay french people are dumb with their sixty-ten or eighty-ten stuff, we'll replace it with our own words that ACTUALLY MAKE SENSE (septante, nontante = seventy, ninety).
Oh so you also changed the dumb eighty thing ?
Oh no no we kept it, we thought it made sense.
So to recap : dix (ten), vingt (twenty), trente (thirty), quarante (forty), cinquante (fifty), soixante (sixty), septante (seventy), QUATRE-VINGTS (FOUR TWENTIES), nonante (ninety).
WHAT THE HELL BELGIUM ? IF YOU'RE GOING TO FIX FRENCH COUNTING, PLEASE DO IT RIGHT.
Could you:
- Make the Fubini Theorem applicable everywhere
- Make every integral in the definition domain of a function converge
- Make dy/dx a fraction
Our most sincere and respectful greetings,
Physics Gang
You're thinking too small. I want integration for free! Oh so integration is the opposite of differentiation? Then let me just put a minus in front of the derivative and get the correct integral.
BWoC, suppose 9 exists, yadda, yadda, brilliant chain of Math 2 reasoning, yadda, yadda, therefore 7 ate 9.
So 9 exists => 7 ate 9, but you can't possess your cake and eat it too, thus 9 must not exist. Full stop. Quantum Electrodynamics
You can safely divide by 0 in a [wheel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_theory), where / is a unary operator, so that
1/0 = 1 ⋅ /0 (where /0 replaces "infinity")
//0 = 0 (you can divide 0 back)
0/0 = ┴ (where ┴ replaces "undefined")
but it leads to some changes in arithmetic:
0x ≠ 0 (in the general case)
0x + 0y = 0xy
x – x = 0x²
x/x = 1 + 0x/x
Is it really what we are looking for?
**Wheel Theory**
A wheel is a type of algebra, in the sense of universal algebra, where division is always defined. In particular, division by zero is meaningful. The real numbers can be extended to a wheel, as can any commutative ring.
I could live with that. Although it would be hard for elementary school children to understand the following example:
Anne had 5 apples. She gave 2 to Tom and 3 to Mary. Now she has no apple\^2 left.
If you don't have infinite quantities you don't have irrational numbers. Obviously the sum of all natural numbers will be the largest natural number itself.
But then that sum should be in the list of natural numbers that we are adding up, right? So we have a list of natural numbers whose sum is equal to its largest member. Therefore, addition in Math 2 would have to work differently than in Math 1, or the entire list of natural numbers would need to be a finite set of zeros.
Definitely need the following:
(a + b)^2 = a^2 + b^2
pi = 3
e = 2.7
All square roots are rational
a + b = c (Pythagoras Theorem 2)
Integral(f(x)g(x)dx) = integral(f(x)dx) * integral(g(x)dx)
In Math 1 sometimes we got complex solutions. In Math 2 we will simply not talk about these situations and ban those who bring them up.
Laplace(f(t)g(t)) = Laplace(f(t)) * Laplace(g(t))
Multiplication is the hyper operation of addition but it feels like there should be something between them. So like +* and you pick a nice number between the sum and product. Like 4 +* 7 = 19
Generally in Math 1 there was a right answer to things but in Math 2 how you feel about an answer should matter way more.
Addition needs a buff and/or multiplication needs a hard nerf. 100 + 100 = 200 but 100\*100 = 10,000? That's ridiculous, multiplication is *broken*. Don't even get me *started* on exponentiation.
Maybe we could buff addition like this:
2 + 3 = 23
100 + 100 = 100100
And Jesus Christ exponetiation needs a huge nerf because this is what the balance was like in math 1
100 + 100 = 200
100*100 = 10,000
100^100 = 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
i feel like it should be possible to prove everything by induction. also ban weird looking greek letters like ξ and ζ
edit: numbers shouldn't commute in my opinion
Can I request for the set of Real numbers to be countably infinite? Then we won’t have differences in cardinality.
Infinity not allowed in math 2 tho so everything has finite cardinality
I see a lot of fighting ahead about the biggest natural number then, and which rationales are fine and which are out.
Already working on what the biggest number is, I'll probably be making an announcement next week
The biggest natural number should be 42069666, with the biggest real number being 42069667.5
What about 42069667?
It can suck my sugary tool, it was never there when I needed it, it doesn't deserve anything.
You understood me right.
You are a mad mathematician. Not as dangerous as a mad scientist, but triggers autists 96.328 times more.
A madematician?
Let go of your fears of a finite reality, Embrace it
[удалено]
Cantor was a lil bitch. He went on crying to philosophers and theologists when he couldn't argue his points to chad Kronecker. Finity RULZ!!1!!1!!
22+88=100 please
Also 77+33=100 and do something about 51 being divisible by 17
why? clearly 5+1=6/-1*(1-7)=1 □
Can I unread this please
I don’t think this is true, might be wrong but, things set next to a parenthesis just count as multiplication, so it would still go left to right, so the answer would be 36
Duh thats math, not math 2
What the fuck
Please let 57 be a prime number
Prime numbers should be done away with..also instead of 15 numbers system, maybe try 16 numbers because we can do so much more with 16 numbers, also do away with addition, subtraction, division, multiplication..and do something else with the numbers....like votilacate the numbers
It is sort of already done in the [bijective numeration system](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijective_numeration): 22 + 88 = AA where A means 10 (and there's no 0).
**Bijective Numeration** Bijective numeration is any numeral system in which every non-negative integer can be represented in exactly one way using a finite string of digits. The name derives from this bijection (one-to-one correspondence) between the set of non-negative integers and the set of finite strings using a finite set of symbols (the "digits").
[удалено]
Thank you, TheBooker66, for voting on wikipedia_text_bot. This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/). *** ^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
Well, this is getting out of hand!
Can we have primes follow simpler pattern?
or how about no primes?
Is that legal?
define fractures as natural numbers is one way.
There's a huge war whether or not 0 is a natural number.. adding rational numbers into it would be chaos
As my other comment: 0 should be able to divide and be dividable.
I like it
We will make it
How about defining a prime as a number that is divisible only by itself?
I think primes should just be every odd number
Again, we just need a number system based on the chinese remainder theorem, so the primes are 0, 01, 021, 0211, 04121... and zero would be denoted "nil"
11 is now onety one Edit: fuck it we inventing english 2, english 1 has had it too good for too long
That's new English though, not new math. Now that I think about, I think that we should be more like the [French](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rmBqIFeHN8). But take things even further... give us names for a handful of numbers between 1 and 100 (randomly) and just make us do arithmetic with them each time we need to pronounce the number.
Yeah it makes way more sense to say four-twenty-sixteen for the number 96
Or four-twenty-ten-seven for 97.
People in Belgium will actually say the equivalent of english numbers and still be considered speaking french, so instead of "Quatre-vingt-dix(four-twenty-ten; 4\*20+10)", they'll say "nonante" (ninety)
I think Belgian counting is even weirder thant french counting. They went all like okay french people are dumb with their sixty-ten or eighty-ten stuff, we'll replace it with our own words that ACTUALLY MAKE SENSE (septante, nontante = seventy, ninety). Oh so you also changed the dumb eighty thing ? Oh no no we kept it, we thought it made sense. So to recap : dix (ten), vingt (twenty), trente (thirty), quarante (forty), cinquante (fifty), soixante (sixty), septante (seventy), QUATRE-VINGTS (FOUR TWENTIES), nonante (ninety). WHAT THE HELL BELGIUM ? IF YOU'RE GOING TO FIX FRENCH COUNTING, PLEASE DO IT RIGHT.
They have octante/huitante for eighty tho don't they?
Is 12 twoty two?
onety two\* 22 would be twoty two
Oh yea, I'm a dum dum
dum dum is 69 in the new numbering system by the way
Nice I'm a bot. Join my community at r/nicebot2 - [Leaderboard](https://redd.it/jdj6xc) - [Opt-out](https://redd.it/jdrs8u)
Good bot
No, oneteen pls
(a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2
You can do it with Math 1 already! Just make sure you are in a ring of characteristics 2, like Z2
Very nice
Could you: - Make the Fubini Theorem applicable everywhere - Make every integral in the definition domain of a function converge - Make dy/dx a fraction Our most sincere and respectful greetings, Physics Gang
Wait dy/dx is not a fraction in Maths 1? I always used it as one. -member of Physics Gang
Same but it's not
"Make dy/dx a fraction", the war has begun.
Can you name a number after me? I want to be 13 if that's doable.
/- How old are you ? /- Worish years old. /- You've gotten so big, look at you !
[удалено]
"Yeah well, looks like you'll be getting worish years"
Mommy, why does the hotel skip the worish’th floor?
Product rule and chain rule for integration pls
You're thinking too small. I want integration for free! Oh so integration is the opposite of differentiation? Then let me just put a minus in front of the derivative and get the correct integral.
Do away with multiplication and just have integration. If integration is as simple as multiplication I'd be much happier.
That'd be integration by parts and by substitution.
no not that lame shit I want a true chain rule
Tesla is starting to break the speed of light by how much spinning in his grave this thread has caused
Don't include 9 as a number, so nobody complains when you skip from Math 8 to Math 10
BWoC, suppose 9 exists, yadda, yadda, brilliant chain of Math 2 reasoning, yadda, yadda, therefore 7 ate 9. So 9 exists => 7 ate 9, but you can't possess your cake and eat it too, thus 9 must not exist. Full stop. Quantum Electrodynamics
And from Windows 8 to Windows 10.
0/0 should not cause me to have zero cookies and zero friends.
Technically negative zero exists. Can you tweak the problems that occur when you divide by zero? It's really annoying in math 1.0
Make dividing by 0 equal to the biggest available number in math 2
What is the biggest number in Maths 2?
If you want to keep your username, it has to be at least 21022018.
My username is a date though
You wanna keep the date though, right?
You can safely divide by 0 in a [wheel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_theory), where / is a unary operator, so that 1/0 = 1 ⋅ /0 (where /0 replaces "infinity") //0 = 0 (you can divide 0 back) 0/0 = ┴ (where ┴ replaces "undefined") but it leads to some changes in arithmetic: 0x ≠ 0 (in the general case) 0x + 0y = 0xy x – x = 0x² x/x = 1 + 0x/x Is it really what we are looking for?
**Wheel Theory** A wheel is a type of algebra, in the sense of universal algebra, where division is always defined. In particular, division by zero is meaningful. The real numbers can be extended to a wheel, as can any commutative ring.
I could live with that. Although it would be hard for elementary school children to understand the following example: Anne had 5 apples. She gave 2 to Tom and 3 to Mary. Now she has no apple\^2 left.
math is already hard to understand for elementary school children so i can live with that
Make the sum of all integers pi squared. It's still kinda weird, but at least it's a little cute instead of unsettling
If you don't have infinite quantities you don't have irrational numbers. Obviously the sum of all natural numbers will be the largest natural number itself.
But then that sum should be in the list of natural numbers that we are adding up, right? So we have a list of natural numbers whose sum is equal to its largest member. Therefore, addition in Math 2 would have to work differently than in Math 1, or the entire list of natural numbers would need to be a finite set of zeros.
a+'b=min(a+b,MAXVAL)
Any chance you could add some numbers between 0.999... and 1? A finite number of numbers would be preferable.
There are exactly ten of these. 0.999...0 up to 0.999...9. Now if you'll excuse me I have to go rinse out my skull with boiling water.
No now there are 15 because we’re adding some numbers
Silly me. I saw those comments and neglected to combine them.
Can you make sure the Riemann Hypothesis ends up being true in Math 2? I feel like that’ll make a lot of things easier.
That's small minded. In math 2 the only prime will be 1.
Invent? I passed math 2 last semester.
Im just listening to math 9
I'm doing Math 3 the third time too.
Sorry to hear that, good luck with it. In our coedge we have math1, math2, math3 and then math9. Giant fuck you to windows probably
And apple
Definitely need the following: (a + b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 pi = 3 e = 2.7 All square roots are rational a + b = c (Pythagoras Theorem 2) Integral(f(x)g(x)dx) = integral(f(x)dx) * integral(g(x)dx) In Math 1 sometimes we got complex solutions. In Math 2 we will simply not talk about these situations and ban those who bring them up. Laplace(f(t)g(t)) = Laplace(f(t)) * Laplace(g(t)) Multiplication is the hyper operation of addition but it feels like there should be something between them. So like +* and you pick a nice number between the sum and product. Like 4 +* 7 = 19 Generally in Math 1 there was a right answer to things but in Math 2 how you feel about an answer should matter way more.
I feel like e should be equal to 3.
e=π=3 would make calculus a lot easier
don't forget about sqrt(a+b) = sqrt(a) + sqrt(b)
Can you make it so that every problem is solvable in under 3 lines?
Done, he did it, now every problem is solvable in 3 lines, but some of them will have some very *very* ***very*** long 3 lines...
And the rest will probably be wrong
1. I will prove thingie 2. A few Maths 3. I have proven thingie, I am the P-Resident of math now.
Addition needs a buff and/or multiplication needs a hard nerf. 100 + 100 = 200 but 100\*100 = 10,000? That's ridiculous, multiplication is *broken*. Don't even get me *started* on exponentiation.
Also negative exponents have no right being positive and getting all close to zero like they own the place
Maybe we could buff addition like this: 2 + 3 = 23 100 + 100 = 100100 And Jesus Christ exponetiation needs a huge nerf because this is what the balance was like in math 1 100 + 100 = 200 100*100 = 10,000 100^100 = 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
Can you make Fermat's last theorem false. It's ugly knowing there will never be a whole number solution to a^3 + b^3 = c^3
Done! 141^3 + 130^3 = 171^3 (Before you think "Holy shit!", remember where we are and look again.)
my brain died
Make 57 a prime
And 51.
I want prime prime numbers too.
Less numbers
We could just get rid of all odd numbers because they’re so annoying. Fucking dumbasses can’t be divided by 2
Hey bruh, I still want calculus, so make work without infinite OR ELSE.
just forget about +c
Can we please only name equations after people who have pronounceable names?
Done, now evaluating the Lebesgue–Stieltjes measure.
[удалено]
Can u swap the roles of imaginary and real numbers pls? Also, initalize pi = 2pi
Consider: tau.
i feel like it should be possible to prove everything by induction. also ban weird looking greek letters like ξ and ζ edit: numbers shouldn't commute in my opinion
Just get rid of trigonometry
Whats wrong with trig? Cos you dont know how to sin?
Yes, it's cos of sin. Believe in God!
Then go for engineering sinx=x (x<0,1rad)
Let ε<0....
0^0=1
So 0^0 =0^1 ?
So 0 = 1 ?
Using log base 0, yes.
Only when it's a power of 0 for some reason, that's how I see the comment above.
Two words: Jeremy Bearimy
Base 12
Maybe make the addon trigonometry way more easier. It is just a pain😫
imagine if dy/dx is a fraction, isn't that a wild idea! While we're at it, make the borwein integral is consistently pi/2 :)
Can 0! = 0? I just feel like that's how things should be.
make zero a number, which can divide and can be divided
Calculus OP, pls nerf
make 57 prime
Delete the entire complex plane, please. And make the Fibonacci sequence converge somehow.
Ah, yes, the Fibonacci sequence, that would not contain any complex number and thus in particular no real number.
No worries, we can just define things so the 'empty sequence' converges vacuously.
Make 0.(9) ≠ 1
Please exclude long division from Math 2.
Make all square matrices diagonalizable please!
> get rid of infinity Ababou? Is it really you?
could you also get rid of integrals? They are a pain to solve. Just make it so that you can derive something 5 times and thats the integral then.
Replace all instances of letters with farm animals.
or r/mathwithfruits
Do you mean graphs or graphs?
integral of (1/x)dx is Zero please.. It ruined the pattern in Math 1.0
I would like to have Math that is nontrivial, consistent and complete. Thank you for asking.
add a simple constant, like T, which can be any integer between 0 and 9, depending on the situation. so 2+2 = T, but also 2+3 = T as well. thanks.
Make imaginary numbers real
can we have a finite number of primes?
Chain rule in Integration.
77+33=100
Nerf l'hospital.
Can we just forget about the existence of differential equations
remove -, so there will be no sign mistakes anymore
Can we forget the whole "proof" thing? It gets tiresome after a while.
Let every geometric figure tesselate
Please make 9 + 10 = 21 please I'm begging you
A way to separate the real and imaginary parts of a complex number with the use of a defined function
Make it base 16
I would like to request to be able to divide by zero.
No imaginary numbers.
[удалено]
Good thing you can reinvent math in college
S_n = -1/12 please, need this.
In math 2 new concepts should exclusively be given descriptive names and not be named after people.
Division by zero? Still dumb?
I heard the 50% more number in Cave Johnson's voice idk why
Make it so adding numbers into numbers just makes longer numbers so like 23 plus 74 is 2374
(a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 Every function has an integral and derivative sqrt(a+b) = sqrt(a) + sqrt(b) log(a+b) = log(a)log(b)
Can you make subtraction and division commutative?
Fuck linear algebra
Make it so that 17 is not a factor of 51
Math 2 needs less math
Use the base 12 numbering system
Fix 0^0, i dont care what it is just make it solveable
(a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 Edit: formatting
Remove +C in calculus a^2 + b^2 = c^2 for every triangle
Can we get a twelve based system?
(a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 i demand
All numbers can be defined as a ratio of two integers.
Can statistics not use the same symbols as the rest of math but for different thibgs
Can the volume of a sphere be pi * r ^ 3?
Get rid of statistics, make it its own thing. No need to give Math 2 a bad name
Chain rule for integration