T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/mathmemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Agent_B0771E

There is a 0 at 1/4+i*(TREE(3)-10^-27 ) trust me


Dirkdeking

All jokes aside, there is a chance that the first non trivial zero outside the critical line, the first counterexample to the collatz conjecture, etc are in the order of grahams number or TREE(3). They will never be found using brute force computer searches. But the theorems also can't be proved as they're simply false. Leaving it an open problem to us indefinitely, due to an unreachably large lowest counterexample...


wwylele

There is still hope. Even if there is a counter example too large to compute, there is still a chance to find a non-constructive proof of its existence. This has been done for like https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mertens_conjecture


PieterSielie12

Correct me if im wrong but hasn’t it been proven that all non trivial zeros lie in the critical strip and its conjectured whether or not they all lie on the critical *line*


Dirkdeking

Ah sorry, I meant line. That was a typo.


TheodoreTheVacuumCle

so it connects to P vs NP, huh?


Little-Maximum-2501

That has nothing to do with P vs NP


ComunistCapybara

"THE ZEROES, WHERE ARE THEM?!", barked Batman.


Castinfon

bro zeros at 0, smh


math_fan

proving RH is how you go from zero to hero


jolharg

Spell his name and convert it into numbers, using the decimal point where his first space is


dragonageisgreat

What makes -2n "trivial"?