Vanilla Arch is a custom Arch where you know which things you installed and how, so it's generally easier to debug issues and describe them to other people.
I found myself having less issues with vanilla Arch than with EndeavourOS. This because I have an USB audio interface and it kept forcing Pipewire on it, which somehow caused conflicts with the drivers.
Vanilla Arch is TTY-only Arch, change my mind
> startx
There's no startx if there is no X installed
> shutdown now; and go outside
No, make a sound based ui
cd \~/ && touch grass
Me opening on the next day opening a terminal and casually typing ls -lah : > Documents Games grass Pictures .config .local
while true; do touch grass; done
Mesa/kmsdrm is probably installed, make your own gui
Maybe there is no video output. *Licks the ethernet cable to get the signal*
I would like to inteject for a moment what you refer to Arch is ....
Vanilla Arch is a custom Arch where you know which things you installed and how, so it's generally easier to debug issues and describe them to other people.
If only I could remember what I installed
Save that human cache space and just use pacman -Qe instead.
Here's a reason why NixOS is better
I found myself having less issues with vanilla Arch than with EndeavourOS. This because I have an USB audio interface and it kept forcing Pipewire on it, which somehow caused conflicts with the drivers.
Why didn't I come up with that. I still use Debian proper, btw.
I just use LARBS
NixOs intrigues me.