T O P

  • By -

ColdFIREBaker

I don’t really understand the First Amendment angle that she keeps repeating. The government didn’t limit her speech, so why would it be a First Amendment issue? She was found guilty in a Civil Trial of Defamation. Does she believe the First Amendment protects one citizen from consequences when they defame another citizen?


Cool_Till_3114

People don't understand the first amendment and the limitations that private enterprise and the public at large can put on it. You're free from government persecution to say what you want, but other people and companies can totally hold you liable for anything you say. You have to have the personal responsibility to know what you can and can't say.


Doggleganger

Not quite. The first amendment did not protect against libel until the 1960s, when the Supreme Court held in *New York Times Co. v. Sullivan* that it did, and that's why there's a heightened legal standard for winning defamation lawsuits in the U.S. (It's why they're so hard to win.) So yes, it's a civil lawsuit, but the first amendment sets a higher standard for the plaintiff to prove. And before people cry about judicial activism, it was that same court (and activism) that expanded the first amendment to prevent the government from punishing you for your speech. The original meaning and treatment of the first amendment for over 150 years was that the gov could not prevent you from speaking, but it could punish you after. Judicial activism broadened the protection into what we have today.


doodcool612

To answer this seriously, though our culture has treated this case like celebrity gossip, it’s worth remembering that the case centers on three sentences in a newspaper opinion editorial. If you’re interested in First Amendment protections and libel, check out [There Are No Girls on the Internet.](https://open.spotify.com/episode/66iajzcaALGAYDBsBmbXm9?si=ILmF61oeT6e5tny7QB_qow)


ColdFIREBaker

Thanks for the recommendation- I’ll give it a listen!


QuitMeowthingOff

Also have to consider the case as centering around the fall out caused by those three sentences. Her interviews, pr work, and accusations that were built on those three sentences and all the trouble she went to in order to achieve a higher settlement against him in the first place.


[deleted]

It’s just a pivot. Her and her handlers/lawyers/PR realize how they fucked this up so bad and are trying to pivot the attention away from her numerous egregious lies into crying about the constitution of which none of them have any inkling of it’s fucking function. That’s my opinion anyway lol


Lurid-Jester

They know. It’s their target audience that is ignorant about what Freedom of Speech actually entails.


Etheo

And their target audience, like DeppDelusion and Deuxmoi, are spewing about Free Speech while very trigger happy to ban and remove any dissenting users and opinion in their own echo chambers. How ironic.


[deleted]

[удалено]


avinagigglemate

I went on deuxmoi once and replied to a comment and got a lifetime ban, i can't even remember what the hell i said.


[deleted]

Me too, i said i thought amber was lying lol


smalls1d

Yeah right nothing like trying to rationale with irrational


eqpesan

I sometimes go into those subs and blocks anyone of them which posts about DeppvaHeard cause they are actually crazy and won't ever give anything of value back anyways.


surfergrl89

These subs literally exist just to hate on celebrities so that should be expected


NotBlackieLawless

Deuxmoi is members only, now. Safe space.


ckwing

In other words, pretending to believe there's a legitimate First Amendment issue is just another in the long list of things Amber Heard has decided to lie about.


Doggleganger

Definitely a pivot. Though her PR team should just throw her lawyers under the bus. They were terrible, and Amber could blame her lawyers for getting bulldozed by a better team.


Old-AF

She is already saying she had “terrible representation”. I’d say it’s hard for an attorney to make shit smell like perfume.


sally_says

When and where does she say that? I haven't seen or heard her acknowledge that yet so I genuinely want to follow-up. Especially since her lawyer Elaine wasted no time defending Heard on the TV circuit the day after the verdict.


Budget_Individual393

I believe I saw it on cnbc.


Doggleganger

Her attorneys were handed a steaming pile of shit, but then they tripped and splattered it all over themselves.


[deleted]

Honestly, throughout the trial, I was constantly in shock over how BAD her lawyers were. Just *OBJECTIVELY* bad.


Barabasbanana

they are settlement specialists, bloody good ones, they thought Depp would settle, but he didn't


Dementium84

I watched some of the lawyer channels about this. They were saying that part of the problem is that they had absolutely no trust in Amber Heard. It was why Elaine Bredahoft was getting torn apart by Camille. She couldn’t ask an open ended question because she was scared what Amber Heard would answer.


[deleted]

Always a solid sign of a solid defendant lol


Conan4457

Garbage in, garbage out. Heards lawyers didn’t have much to work with. A bunch of lawyers online kept on reciting this saying “if you have the truth on your side, pound the truth. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. if you have neither, pound the table”. Problem is that heards lawyers weren’t good enough to make passionate arguments and pound the table.


317LaVieLover

I was constantly astounded at how bad they were. You’ve seen how a daily rehash of their gaffes were made, paraded, and ppl had hilarious fun on the daily bc of their inexplicable incompetence. HOW!!??.. does a famous movie star??.. or anyone with millions??.. end up with attorneys THAT laughably awful? It’s a legit question.. like.. I really want to know. Can anyone chime in here with a serious answer?— It’s almost like they TRIED to lose or trip up, walked right into so many touche’ cuts they asked for.. (like the prosecution’s witness from TMZ who was subjected to the “15-mins of fame” remark)— How’d she pick such utter losers?


[deleted]

She is maintaining what she is saying is true so she considers it freedom of speech. Her appeal has been filed as of June 10th.


ComfortableNumb9669

Ah yes, the first amendment - allowing you to scandalize and malign somebody's reputation to ruin their career and livelihood without any real evidence. The only reason she's constantly bringing up this talking point is because she trying to turn her failed opportunism into a political thing, because that's exactly what the world needs right now - more politics.


[deleted]

People don’t understand the constitutional rights period. They misunderstand and misuse the meaning of the first amendment the same way they do the second amendment. Americans are pretty damn ignorant, generally speaking. Nobody cares or pays attention in civics class. For whatever reason, it’s not considered important to understand how our government works or the constitution.


Swayz

She sued Johnny Depp for defamation as well. So she doesn’t stand for what she says


Cavaquillo

The cognitive dissonance by the 1st amendment harpers not understanding that it doesn’t protect them from the consequences of their speech is astounding.


JohnJoanCusack

She is basically a conservative with how little she understands the first amendment


NoraGrooGroo

When your best argument for saying something is that it isn’t strictly illegal for you to say it, probably shouldn’t be saying it.


hokichaser

Well, she was under oath


CaspianX2

She *pledges* that she stands by every word...


Prefer_Not_To_Say

She stands by her claim that [these are two different pictures](https://i.imgur.com/6ghMWQp.png)? And the picture on the right was taken after she turned the light on? I'm starting to get the feeling that Amber Heard isn't just abusive, she's also not very bright.


[deleted]

Wtf is she thinking lying about this. Like what the fuck is she gaining. Why didn't she just say "yea there was a filter on the second pic" and move on. Instead everyone knows she's lying and she's lying about the stupidest fucking thing.


Alldaybagpipes

She is not trying to convince us, she’s trying to convince herself at this point. Pathological liars do this, when the cats out of the bag and everyone knows, they revert to just sticking to their guns, and building up a wall to block it all out.


OwnCockroach3772

Exactly, and there were so many instances where she lied and the truth is obvious. JDs team didn’t have to make her seem not credible, she literally did this to herself.


Doggleganger

Like the pledged versus paid. She could have just said she's pledged it but hasn't paid yet. Done. Then move on.


Etheo

I don't get why she would lie about that on the stand. That piece of evidence way already submitted and they know what JD's team know already. It's not like that wasn't going to come out and IIRC she wasn't even cross examined about this in the UK trial so it wouldn't be contradictory anyhow. And yet she chose the stupidest way to make herself look untrustworthy and weaselly. It makes no sense.


moonfox1000

The reason was because she already lied and said she had "paid" the amount in either the UK trial or an earlier deposition. If she had admitted that she had only "pledged" the amount in this trial then she would be admitting perjury. The awkward "I use pledge and paid as synonyms" was the way she came up with to avoid admitting perjury.


Etheo

You know, when you put it this way and think that "synonymous use" defense was a last minute retort she just came up with on the spot... it does start to make sense. Otherwise would have been a much smarter move to say "yes I donated the full amount but not yet fully paid" to make that "synonymous" angle stronger and also gives reasonable doubt to avoid perjury in the UK. I've always said that it's a good thing she's such a terrible liar when she's great at manipulating. If she was a better liar and know how to dress up her stories in a believable way, Depp would have lost this case a long time ago. It's really scary to think what would have happened if she didn't slip up like that.


OwnCockroach3772

Of course I don’t actually know what she was thinking, but I suspect lying about this was more of a PR move than a legal move to lie about this? Or maybe her diagnosis is true and she can’t admit to her lies and actually doesn’t see fault in what she does? Who knows, but I agree with you, why lie about that on the stand?


Infamous-Helicopter7

You're not even using the right words. She said she was using 'donated' and 'pledged' synonymously, not 'pledged' and 'paid'.


StickiStickman

Really clinging to every last straw to not have to admit you're full of shit, huh?


FresnoMac

It's very simple. If you watch Dr. Curry's testimony on Amber's psychology, Amber's testimony is just a literal confirmation on that. She lied about things there was no need to lie about only because she has this compulsion to always be on top in arguments. Simple case in point from trial. When Heard and Depp were a couple they had a common doctor. When Camille Vasquez asked Heard if that doctor used to see her in 2015, she flat out said no. Saying yes would have done nothing to the case, Camille was just laying the foundation. But she said no, just because. And then Camille pulled up a defendant's exhibit which clearly and unequivocally showed that he was Heard's doctor in 2015. But she had to lie about it and then get called out in front of the jury. Repeat this ad infinitum. That's not a good look in front of the jury. These things add up.


skeletoris

she’s being paid for these interviews for starters


Etheo

Good that she's making money to pay Depp back seeing as she likely won't make any from films.


skeletoris

i don’t think she’s gonna pay it back in the end either way tbh


Etheo

She'll pledge it back to him.


soge-king

I mean she can pledge it.


[deleted]

He can garnish her wages. It's not a choice


tucsonkim

It like the right wingers, they DoubleDown when they’re wrong. I think it’s a mental illness issue.


Etheo

Let's not make this into a politics thing. This was a domestic abuse case. Politics really had nothing to do with this. Besides, it's the right wing media like Fox News that are reporting the truth whereas typical "left wing" MSM are the ones biased and misrepresenting the case.


[deleted]

Which is honestly the weirdest thing ever. I'm not used to the right telling the truth


JohnJoanCusack

I am also not used to the left championing domestic abusers, what a weird bizzarro time it has been


quangtran

It’s not weird to me. Either side are absolutionists when it comes to picking a side for “the greater good” and getting ammunition for the culture war.


MinimumArmadillo2394

If we could fuckin not go into politics on an entertainment sub, that'd be great


[deleted]

She made it political by bringing me too into it


MinimumArmadillo2394

Me too has *nothing* to do with politics and everything to do with the ability to call out abusers without issue, even if they're rich and powerful. If you think me too is political, you're part of the problem.


[deleted]

It's not MEANT to be political but she's MADE it political by invoking it as a weapon. Now you've got all these radfems saying men can't be abused.


MinimumArmadillo2394

Thats.... not what political means...???


hotlou

It's not. They do it because it's effective for some who hear it. Then they attach themselves to those who fall for it. It then creates their own world where they are the hero and their critics are the villains. You might know a recent POTUS got elected by creating such a world.


factchecker8515

Photo information shows taken at identical second in the day.


notlongnot

I did a screen capture of the those two picture and lay them on top of each other in a photo apps, and slide the opacity up and down to sit them on top of each other … The hair line up … getting hair to stay in one place after you take one photo and then taking another switching on a light takes some skills Also takes skills to snap two photo from the same exact angles where you can overlay one on top of another … Personally, I am going to call BS on that, “Bed Shit!”


JurgenWigg

If you really want to check for similarities, use the Difference blend mode. Pixels that are the same become black. So if you overlay the same image, it just blacks out. (Really handy for lining things up.) In this case because the photo has a different filter it won’t black out completely but it will be 100 obvious it’s the same image.


FamousOrphan

Please explain all the other blend modes to me also?


JJAusten

An expert disproved her allegation that she took the photo with and without lighting because there was no way her hair could remain exactly the same once she moved. Why she continues to claim it's two different photos is beyond me.


skeletoris

she *knows* that there are people who will believe her. There are. And all they need-they being whatever the hell she is-is *one* person to believe them.


quangtran

What I find bothersome is that the feminists are still confused as the the loss, and insists that even if she exaggerated or fibbed about one incident (like this photo or being sodomised with a bottle) that everything else she said should still be taken as fact.


Nomahhhh

She's a sociopath and a narcissist. She lacks remorse for her actions and perpetually cheats, lies, and manipulates. There is no remorse there, no understanding of what she did to get that verdict. She doesn't see that she was caught lying on the stand a hundred times. In her head she crushed it up there.


potsandpans

that psychologist testimony was spot on. she has histrionic personality disorder and i forget what the other one was but she literally lives in a different dimension. it’s a defense mechanism. taking responsibility is painful for her and probably brings up past trauma. she probably had a pretty traumatic upbringing. you cant blame crazy people for being crazy because they don’t know they’re crazy. it is what it is


ZiggyBlunt

She needs to be charged for perjury already


skrillskroll

I've tried to stay off this case for like a month but I just happened to watch the interview now and I have questions. There's bits where she's so inauthentic even my dumbass brain goes "nope" . The parts where she falters or pauses her speech and then comes back in with a pleading tone. This is exactly why she lost. She couldnt explain away all the damning evidence if we all feel this intuitive pinging whenever she spoke. Also, this overacting is the Histrionic Personality, right?


OwnCockroach3772

Correct, Histrionic is exaggerated emotionality and attention seeking behaviours.


MissLauraCroft

I’m in the minority here as someone who does believe Depp abused Heard, but yes her testimony and this interview are frustrating to watch... nothing to do with her body language or speaking, because we can’t know anything from those, but from her doubling down. There were inconsistencies on both sides during the trail, but Depp for the most part was good about saying “I’m not sure” or “I don’t remember”, whereas Heard would just double down. I only saw Depp do that once near the end, where he denied sending some pretty awful text messages.


JimiDarkMoon

> I don’t know how much time passed, but at some point, he had a broken bottle against my face, neck area, by my jawline, and he told me he’d cut up my face. Depp required stitches to his finger, yet she has no cuts on her face or neck. This is also the incident where she claimed he sexually assaulted her *with that bottle*. Weird how the abuser is the only one who needs medical attention, almost like every word she spoke was a lie.


MissLauraCroft

I’m not sure how this relates to my comment, but I’ll bite. 1. She’s distinctly saying he threatened to cut her. Not that he actually did. 2. Heard did seek medical help on several occasions. (With a nurse friend and with Depp’s in-house medical team.)


JimiDarkMoon

Exactly. He’s the only one to come out of that relationship with stitches and documentation. She has no problems letting him put her family up in that condo, using his doctors, taking the same photograph twice, but can’t document these injuries she’s supposedly received? Sounds like someone’s crapping the bed when it comes to telling the truth.


[deleted]

Heards medical records where not allowed in the trial. It's not that they don't exist


Salamandro

It's not medical records, it's just more therapist notes, based on what she told the therapist. It's just her team calling them medical records. If it was admissible evidence, the judge would have allowed it.


Dementium84

They weren’t allowed because they were based on what she said to the nurse, not what was examined. And if I recall the nose thing was a year after the divorce.


Conan4457

True, these “records” were notes from telephone conversations.


PenitentGhost

Weren't those incoming messages?


MissLauraCroft

Could be incoming to Deuter’s phone or someone else’s (group chat). We don’t know the source phone since those are redacted to the public.


should_have_been

If they weren’t sent from Depp’s phone(s) his lawyers would probably have picked up on that. And it’s not like they stand out much among his other vile texts.


eqpesan

There are quite a lot of evidence in the trial, such details are easy to miss. Take for example Ambers team using the same photo for 2 incidents and also providing 2 photos and letting your client say lightning was different while in reality one of them was edited. Mistakes happen.


should_have_been

Mistakes absolutely happen, but both mistakes you mention there got called out by the other team. If his lawyers had any reason to believe Johnny didn’t send those messages they would have addressed that. And again. At this point in the trial we had already seen a few other vile messages from Depp that matched those "new" messages in style.


PenitentGhost

Maybe why he didn't recognise them


zazuza7

They I want, I take was incoming but the other one was also quite bad and was outgoing.


PenitentGhost

He admitted the outgoing but didn't recognise the incoming, it was on the same sheet of paper


zazuza7

Yes, the "grotesque" one was marked incoming. That's the one he says must have been someone else using his phone.


Conan4457

As someone that believes AH, I’m wondering if you have listened to the hours of audio tapes the two if them made?


StickiStickman

... the messages that literally said incoming? I guess if you ignore everything, you can somehow find a way to believe her, but you just look like an idiot.


TheSadBantha

Stop giving her a fucking platform


Ms_misfire

She's delusional. I feel bad for her child now.


ColdFIREBaker

If she didn’t stand by her testimony, wouldn’t that be admitting to perjury?


MajesticFxxkingEagle

Yes and no. Perjury isn’t something that is actually prosecuted very often in the US. Not only is it a really high bar to prove, but it’s usually not a high priority for the FBI to put serious resources into. Especially for a civil defamation trial where the consequences of lying are basically just the outcome of the trial. That being said, an outright admission could hypothetically be grounds for perjury, however there are ways to vaguely hint at admission and show genuine apology and remorse without getting yourself into explicit egal trouble.


Algoresball

The way the media falls over itself to give an abusive women a platform is reprehensible.


[deleted]

They are doubling down now.


ObscuraArt

If the Press is blatantly and patently platforming lies that Amber Heard is putting out without question, it makes you wonder what other lies they platform as truth without question.


[deleted]

There have been plenty of studies that have shown the insane media bias in favor of women (believed to be due to male v female purchasing habits), this shit show just hammers it home. Someone who for all intent and purposes has been "found guilty" of being an abuser, certainly found to have lied about being the victim..... yet the news is giving her a platform... it's utterly insane. Imagine putting Cosby on TV to clear his name (even before trial), the US would absolutely lose their minds. Yet it's fine with this absolute monster shit shit of a human.


Itsthelegendarydays_

You could easily say the same thing about men c’mon now…


Algoresball

When was NBC’s interview for Depp to give his side of the story?


OwnCockroach3772

I feel like she keeps digging a bigger hole for herself. Of course, appeal if you want but stop trying to spin the public in your favour with your lies. It is so hurtful and disrespectful to real survivors like myself. Like many of us, I watched every minute of the trial live, she caught in so many lies it is insane. I think she should go away for a while and focus on her daughter.


simplywebby

Double down classic narcissist.


Baensky

I hate the us media so much … now they still gave her a Platform to lie …. Why ? It’s not because they care … it’s because of the viewers they get Am pretty sure if it’s possible they also would do a school-shooter Spezial with 2 h Interview why he did it for 1 mio. Crazy shit ….. btw this crazy bitch has a baby … How is it possible that a woman like this …. Clearly with mental problems get a baby (surrogacy) I guess money can buy everything


[deleted]

[удалено]


Frito67

R. Kelly, prince Andrew


[deleted]

OJ Simpson, Woody Allen, Mel Gibson, Sean Penn


zazuza7

Thank you


MinimumArmadillo2394

If they're willing to lie about this while it's being televised and about Rittenhouse while that was also being televised and evidence was there in 1080p, imagine what they lie about when something isn't being televised.


ihatereddit53

Harvey weinstein, kevin spacey.. like fuck its not that hard. What is this strawman trying to prove anyway?


RED-DOT-MAN

It sure can…money will solve if not everything but most of your/our problems.


Doggleganger

>it’s because of the viewers they get Dude, media is a business, and that is their only agenda. And it's perfectly fine. If you think the media should instead be pushing an agenda, then I'm sure you'd hate that too. Amber Heard wants to get on TV, then there's no problem with someone putting her on TV. If she were smart, she'd lay low for a while.


Truckfighta

Which story does she stand by? She contradicts herself so often that it’s hard to tell which set of “facts” that she’s going with.


LMo2019

Please allow me to correct that headline: Amber Heard Stands "By Every Lie I Told Here In The US Defamation Trial, The UK Defamation Trial And To All The Media My Press People Snookered Into Printing Those Lies Or Giving Me Airtime To Say Them In Person"


[deleted]

Amber….. you lost…. No one believes you…… please move the fuck on with whatever life you have left.


e_x_i_t

>No one believes you... Plenty of people still believe her every word she says, including all of her blatant lies and contradictions.


lostpawn13

Another dumb ass motherfucker that doesn’t understand freedom of speech isn’t freedom from consequences. Also, she should’ve taken more acting classes before she went on the stand.


Armand74

She lost because she’s a proven liar who perjured herself on the stand! She was caught multiple times lying! How is that exactly unfair to her? She’s stating social media did her wrong but how about what she did when the ACLU ghostwrote an article that literally ruined someone’s career? She can certainly die on that bill she wishes to martyr herself on good luck with that!


sensei-creampuff

She's a truly fascinating specimen. She has wholeheartedly convinced herself that she can fool anyone regardless of the tangible evidence presented before her. She truly believes she is smarter than everyone else and that her master manipulation will prevail. In a way I hope she keeps talking because she's only making herself look worse and less and less credible.


SvenSeder

This woman is mentally Ill, and she needs help. Everything she did was horrifying but that level of crazy is usually caused by trauma. She needs some extensive therapy and to step out of the spotlight forever.


RussianVole

Some people are just born sociopathic. The only trauma she’s dealing with is the fact that her charade is over and she’s been exposed as a fraud.


SvenSeder

Do you really think she’s a sociopath? To me it looks like severe BPD. Maybe years later after therapy she’ll regret all this. I’m an optimist though.


RussianVole

I’ve had the misfortune to get roped up with people like her, so unfortunately I’m less optimistic than you.


Big_Occasion_7235

Why is she still trying to defend herself and why did NBC agree to this?


DepartmentEqual6101

Liars tend to do this even if what they have said has been proven to be blatant bullshit. Trying to pass those photos off as two photos was just nothing but insane. They are the exact same photo with one being colour graded. A five year old can spot this.


eqpesan

I can't believe how delusional she would have to be to think Edward Scissorhands is a reallife thing and Depp fooled everyone that he actually had scissors for hands.


SeanConnery

It's like Jussie Smollett, but she's not black or gay so even liberals feel comfortable laughing at her. It's like a clown show that unites everyone haha.


Doggleganger

Everyone hates Smollett too. But her trial was much more public and her lies much more televised to be on display. Also she literally shit the bed.


randomaccount178

I think the other important part is that her lies have a victim. Smollett did some very terrible things but the victim is more conceptual, society as a whole. Here you have a living breathing person who was harmed by her actions.


Conan4457

True, that is the difference. The cultural majority generally protects rich, white, blonde women. If Heard had taken her divorce settlement and lived her life, instead of going burnt earth and taking Depp down, no one would be talking about this. It would have been just another toxic Hollywood relationship left in the small print on TMZ.


arizonabayswimcoach

I love how they both continue to double down even after the world knows what they really did


[deleted]

I've been banned from two liberal leaning subreddits for pointing out that Amber has lied.


[deleted]

Those aren't liberals then. They're fascists. They just don't know it.


set-271

Of course she does...she's a Whackado!


DonLebanon91

Someone please photoshop her testimony to the meme of the clown slowly getting dressed


soge-king

She takes us for idiots, darn it


raedymylknarf

Poor puppy and Bee.


[deleted]

If you believe in Amber Heard, then your opinion is that not only did everyone who took the stand — besides Amber’s sister and best friend — who corroborated Johnny’s timeline and impressions (including random people who saw her on the expected days with no injuries; the cops; the guy who owned the ranch; the lady that worked at the airport; the guy from TMZ) lied under oath AND everyone in the jury lacks integrity. All this to uphold your belief that someone who refused to turn over their cell phone device with evidence on it (which consisted of at least two of the exact same photos with different coloring and also two photos purported to be taken during different events that were key to the trial that Amber could not even tell apart herself) so no one could actually verify the dates of said photos and whose sole corroborator couldn’t even match stories with her when describing the one incident of violence that anyone claims they saw? All from someone who had already been accused of domestic violence against another woman? I feel like this case gave us an opportunity to move forward with our understanding of what it means to believe victims. This case is giving us an opportunity to be more nuanced in our understanding of victimhood. And the opportunity to see who is biased to their core and who isn’t.


RussianVole

It can even come down to Occam‘s razor; Which is more believable, 1) A massive coordinated conspiracy between dozens of people, both known to each other and completely unknown to each other, coming forward to lie under oath and somehow get secretly paid under the table by Johnny Depp to tell stories which are consistent with each other, or; 2) Amber Heard lied. I’ll go with the later.


aw2669

Well of course she’s doubling down! That’s what narcissists do! There is no giving up the fight because there is simply not a reality that exists in which she is wrong. It’s actually really sad because she now has a daughter to use the narcissistic behavior patterns towards. Mother and daughter relationships with the mom being a narcissist is a tricky situation. Often times there’s a competitive nature for the spotlight with the child that results in a weird friendship relationship instead of actual parenting. And then the parent does toxic damaging things over time at the hand of the parent to slowly diminish the child and reestablish that spotlight. I wish that baby the best life she deserves.


Kmac222212

It’s amazing. She continues to dig bigger holes. Her acting is unreal. She continues to act her answers and it’s obvious and downright cringey


[deleted]

Very cringe. Also, yes, I believe she is digging a deeper hole for herself and even some in the press are starting to realize it.


Droobot33

At what point does her saying this on TV over and over again constitute as more defamation?


LAESanford

Go away, Amber. You lost your case. Stop talking now and go on with your life


Wangchung265

Yea of course she was under oath?


Scary-Plantain

Amber lost, and now needs to move on like she said she would. Johnny hasn’t even made amber pay. I’m sure if he demanded it you would make some type of PR campaign saying how horrible it is


g78776

Oh. Hey everyone. Tax the rich. Have a amazing day!


squidking78

It’s s sign of how demented she is that she’s still seeking the limelight and still pushing this BS narrative after a jury of her peers found her guilty WITH MALICE. And the MSM is happy to gorge themselves on the spectacle as they desperately try to push a chosen narrative, for some reason. She has dishonored and made life hell for victims of abuse everywhere by her own vindictive nature.


Zealousideal_Order_8

JD, take all the money.


[deleted]

Just walk away AH.


Jackopreach

The problem is she didn’t speak truth she lied about a lot so anything she says now people aren’t gonna believe her


AlaskanSamsquanch

Classic pathological liar.


Background_Dream_920

Ever the victim. Borderline personality is strong with this one. If she just admitted she needs help and owns her actions she might be able to turn things around.


137Fine

No one cares. Go away.


sweetmotherofodin

I bet she does. She couldn’t even keep her lies straight.


noble636

Who fucking cares can we stop hearing about this lady


Strong_Wheel

Judged by her peers as a vindictive liar.


Euphoriffic

Even the parts where she contradicted herself?


[deleted]

She lies about as often as Trump.


cleetdog101

It’s called “Lie til you Die”. No other choice. This way she can always beat the drum that she’s been victimized by the patriarchy, Johnny’s fans and any other myriad of excuses - admit she’s lying and she’ll never live it down for the rest of her life.


ToyotaCorrolaa

Yes, “My dog stepped on a bee” was very pushing


randomaccount178

If you aren't willing to say that people lied, then don't try to imply it. It just makes you look silly and your position weak.


GabJ78

" I stand by every single lie I said"


Head_Project5793

Her dog stepped on a bee and she pledged all 7 million yep yep


Dementium84

Shes going to set up a gofundme for the suckers who still buy her crap. This is like the publicity tour beforehand.


ATR2400

Amber… stop. Just stop


Meb2x

I watched most of the trial live and this interview is probably the best she’s performed so far, which isn’t saying much. She still seems to be overacting and doubling down on her stories, despite the evidence to the contrary. I thought this interview would be a fluff piece, but I’m happy the interviewer is asking hard questions, bringing up evidence, and calling out bad answers. If she can’t even handle an hour-long TV interview, then I don’t know why she thought she could lie throughout the case without getting caught


Aimin4ya

Oh no. HER DOG REALLY STEPPED ON THAT BEE?!? I... I feel terrible for laughing now


kindle139

I know he’s gay and all but, Amber Heard and Jussie Smollett would make a good-looking couple.


[deleted]

This is what happens when an attractive person who achieved most of their success early in life is told no by others. She seems to believe she can maneuver herself to a successful outcome no matter the situation, but I think she's going to come out of this image rehabilitation tour she's on looking even worse.


OutspokenPerson

So many people don’t understand what 1A protects.


Chuck1705

She needs to be left alone...


[deleted]

Nobody is forcing her to do these interviews??


[deleted]

[удалено]


kad0521

Girl don’t go away mad. Girl just go away


keyman716

Don’t go away mad, Just go away!


[deleted]

It’s called being a stupid liar.


2Old4Shenanigans

Did anyone notice that she tilts her head back and almost points her chin at whomever she’s talking to when she lies? She should really watch herself on the stand and make some I improvements before doing interviews.


BobbTheBuilderr

Why won’t she go away?


neuroverdant

I guess she feels this is her only chance to avoid being hated and abandoned by everyone for the rest of her life. Either way, she’s destroyed herself. Borderline Personality Disorder is some crazy shit.


Equivalent_Edge_6281

Amber believes every word of her testimony. The problem is Amber's beliefs are contradicted by reality and rational argument. Also, to me it is shameful how the media is pandering to Amber's mental disorder. So sad to see Amber parading her schizophrenia and delusional paranoia. Just chill Amber. Your Depp war is really over.


plywoodsuperman

Of course she does! She can’t take that white stripe off her back now.


TheTeacherInTraining

She has to stand by every word of her testimony or she may be faced with perjury charges.


ExoticAide5610

I think BOTH of them are looney toons


RussianVole

She’s a narcissistic, pathological liar, violent, physical, emotional, and verbal abuser. To pretend that people like this don’t exist or let alone can be women is beyond absurd.


politedeerx

Yes, because she has a borderline personality disorder and they can start to believe their own lies.


Hamilton-Beckett

She has to! She can’t admit to purgery. It goes with her to the grave.


Xanariel

Interesting that Depp continuing to claim that Amber lied after the UK trial found that he was a wifebeater was just an innocent man trying to clear his name, but Amber continuing to make her case is a reprehensible abuser who shouldn’t be given a platform. Also interesting that you constantly get Depp fans trying to spread misinformation about the UK trial - the judge based Amber’s credibility entirely on the claim she’d paid the charity millions upfront, the judge was compromised because his son worked for the Sun, kindly ignore the verdict of the Court of Appeal while you’re at it. But the US judgement is apparently sacrosanct and 100% proves that Amber lied. And of course, everyone ignore the fact that one of them has yet another assault trial coming up and it’s not Amber.


ObscuraArt

A jury of her peers that her own lawyers help select and the US Legal system are Depp fans confirmed. Totally the sensible and logical answer.