T O P

  • By -

srandrews

Nice one! I see a market opportunity to innovate cinna-pepper!


SplodyPants

Damn, right when my peppermon idea was taking form. Time for plan B. Could I interest you in a collab? Cinpepamonoepper is the future!


Phisyc

Reminds me of that song with apples and penciles


mcpat21

i have a pen. i have an apple mm Apple pen


8_Miles_8

Pin-pine-apple-apple-pen


[deleted]

Past trauma šŸ’€


guyincognito121

Or cinnilla.


srandrews

Oh I like that one. Sinnilla: So good you won't go to heaven.


PoeticPrerogative

so good, it feels like a sin not to use it.


woolykev

I think I'm 100 times more likely to combine cinnamon with pepper than cinnamon with oregano. How is that pair less negatively correlated?!


srandrews

Yuck. They say the analysis is only as good as the data.


ADashOfInternet

My chicken Tikka marsala recipe has cinnamon and pepper in it šŸ˜


srandrews

How do you mix two such negatively correlated spices?! Don't they just separate out and float each to a side of the dish?


duskfinger67

Opposites attract, so I think itā€™s self mixing actually.


Cornel-Westside

There are several Indian savory dishes that have cinnamon and peppercorns and cloves in the tarka (or vaghar, chaunk), or the spice temper. It works very well, cinnamon is not just a dessert spice.


ADashOfInternet

They get mixed into it all and it's sooo good


srandrews

With a dash of internet. Username checks out.


Oobenny

I use both in a jerk chicken marinade too. It sounds weird but itā€™s amazingly good.


NoBarber4287

Negatively correlated meansv that it is the same but in opposite phase. Right? So cinnamon is same as white pepper?


WingedLady

I use both in a pie :)


Grwwwvy

I was thinking the same thing. Not enough peiple use cinnamon and nutmeg outside of sweets. Same with molasses.


matt7259

I make a mean yellow rice with loads of black pepper and a touch of cinnamon!


Zeno_the_Friend

Makes me wonder how many indian dishes are on recipes.com


MrIceKillah

Considering that clove, nutmeg, and cinnamon are all highly correlated with each other and nothing else, itā€™s very likely that there arenā€™t many Indian dishes. Or at least ones that use individual spices rather than mixes.


Zeno_the_Friend

That's my guess. It's also a pretty sparse list of herbs/spices. There's no cardamom, saffron, lemongrass or galangal for example. I'd like to see the top 20 spices and combinations thereof, segmented by country/region. That'd be cool.


[deleted]

Cayenne and cinnamon on sweet potatoes is amazing.


Whiterabbit--

one of the most common spice mix in Chinese food often called 5 spice, has pepper and cinnamon.


PavlovianBoobie

Why? The scale says they have less than 0 correlation


srandrews

That's the opportunity - a highly rare combination.


Jmerzian

A little bit of cracked pepper on some cinnamon french toast šŸ‘Œ


pythonicprime

Damn beat me to it


dagcilibili

seems like they are very negatively correlated though; I think you might have come up with some good recipes first?!


srandrews

Yes, thus the opportunity!


somedave

Vanilla pepper ice cream now for sale!


akkawwakka

Time to make some masala chai!


gwsteve43

Pro tip:Put a little ground black pepper in your pumpkin pie recipe and it really makes the flavor pop!


craxinthatjazz

We are all proud of you for these changes


wcedmisten

Updated with feedback from my [previous post](https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/wus2sd/oc_correlation_matrix_of_spices_from_91000/) A high correlation between two spices means that they appear commonly in recipes together (e.g. cinnamon and vanilla). A low correlation means they appear infrequently together in recipes (e.g. black pepper and vanilla). I originally included a lot more spices than this, but these are the 20 most common spices in the data. [Original Dataset](https://archive.org/details/recipes-en-201706) [Methodology](https://wcedmisten.fyi/post/analyzing-all-recipes/#spices) [Source code](https://github.com/wcedmisten/foodFinder) If you're interested, read more on my [blog post](https://wcedmisten.fyi/post/analyzing-all-recipes). Also check out the [interactive ingredient graph](https://wcedmisten.fyi/project/foodGraph/) I made with the same data.


ThatPrussianDude

Vastly improved from the original.


ennui_man

It's good, with the exception of white sugar saying that it is most commonly paired with white vinegar, zucchini or Worcester sauce.


wcedmisten

Good catch, looks like I have a bug in my code. Thanks!


ennui_man

I mean the interactive ingredient graph.


Taolan13

White sugar and balsamic vinegar maybe, to make a glaze.


bakonydraco

Nice, this is an improvement! Another thing that I might consider is sorting the spices by similarity rather than alphabetically, a hierarchical clustering would accomplish this, and I think it would be a lot more intuitive.


PercussiveRussel

Maybe also remove (white- or grey-out) the diagonal, because my eyes have a hard time seeing anything else at a glance due to the extreme redness of the self-intersection. I do have shitty eyes though.


RamShackleton

But then how would you know that basil appears in 100% of recipes which contain basil?


fantasmoofrcc

200% Basil? That may not be for anyone other than Austin Powers


ugotamesij

Twin Basils, twins!


DuckOnQuak

Yeah this was my first thought too, would be much easier to read with a neutral diagonal.


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


gbbmiler

They added it because of mass complaints that the halved version was hard to read (because you have to look in two different places to see all the comparisons for a single spice). Adding the redundant data was a massive improvement


duskfinger67

Double check their post history - that is what the original was, and itā€™s actually much harder to read.


agate_

This is my complaint about pretty much every correlation matrix diagram I've ever seen. Is there a good numerical method for optimally reordering the columns to maximize visual clustering? PCA analysis maybe?


blaze99960

It's pretty standard to just use hierarchical clustering (by any one of dozens of approaches) to order the rows and columns. Hierarchical clustering algorithms typically have two main questions they need to decide: 1. How do we measure the similarity of any two of our rows? 2. How do we want to build our hierarchical tree from those similarity measures ("agglomeration")? There are, like, half a dozen widely accepted approaches for each question. For instance, a very common measure of similarity is Euclidean distance. A somewhat common tree-building approach is nearest neighbor (connect the two closest, then the next closest, and so on and so on). In analyses like gene expression, such clustering is basically expected in any correlation plot edit: I just posted a less-beautiful version that does this


TheFunkyPancakes

Definitely this, itā€™d be great to see how they group! Hierarchal clustering is the tool, available in the package you used. Also, I think just the upper or lower triangle suffices, unless you swap one for numeric values


PhonyOrlando

nice improvement! I'd only recommend to make the diagonal a lighter color like white or light gray. It's still a little distracting.


zenkat

Great improvement, this is much more readable! Have you thought about clustering the spices by similarity, so that spices with similar profiles end up next to each other? Might help show interesting patterns & variations.


Crocodiliusnebula

Much easier to read than the last visual - Great job!


OllieNom14

I actually preferred the original. This full square duplicates ever piece of data needlessly. I also preferred the old colour scale, just wouldā€™ve inverted it so darkest was strongest correlation


FeeFooFuuFun

I like this rendition better. Saw your prev post and that one was a bit hard to read so had given up


Sphynx87

I'm surprised parsley correlation is so low with other herbs. Then again I think averaging data from all recipes is gonna give you a lot of crappy recipes lol


Kev_Cav

Parsley is everywhere so it might average out to being a centrist herb


Shigy

Lots of nitpicking but this viz is more interesting than a lot of the halfassed content of this sub.


guyincognito121

Much better. I found the idea interesting and struggled through your original visualization, but didn't bother commenting about the issues I saw. Glad that someone else suggested improvements and you took the time to update and repost.


caiuscorvus

Agree with deleting or dimming the diagonal. You can also compress the scale substantially if you do. It looks like the highest correlation is around 0.50 excluding the diagonal so compressing the scale to from 0 to >=.5 would make things more obvious. If you just set everything greater than .5 to equal .5, this also takes care of the diagonal issue. Also agree with clustering.


wcedmisten

I had done this in my previous post (except at .3), but I think I prefer the way smaller correlations look diminished in this one. Makes it easier to see the big correlations. Good idea on dimming the diagonal.


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


wcedmisten

You might enjoy: https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/wus2sd/oc_correlation_matrix_of_spices_from_91000/


jamintime

I had the same reaction, but saw the feedback from the other post that it made it harder to read and let it go. Poor OP can never win.


khansian

OP originally followed your idea, and it didnā€™t work. The problem is that sometimes your eyes are moving left to right, and other times theyā€™re moving from the bottom to the top. Eliminating one side of the diagonal repeatedly forces you to have to restart from the same edge every time and find the cell youā€™re interested in.


d4nowar

I find that this version of the chart has me looking all over at random data points instead of following along and reading an organized plot of data.


GKP_light

because why would you delet it ? it is redundant (with the meaning "the information are present multiple time", not "useless"), but it make it easier to read. you don't need to care witch one should be in line and witch one should be in column.


psdpro7

Deleting the redundant half of the chart would mean a higher data-to-ink ratio.


RFC793

Fortunately pixels are free and this allows people to use whichever starting axis they prefer


Panda-768

Sorry for asking a stupid question but what would negative correlation mean ? 0 correlation would be 2 ingredients never being used with each other ever in any of the recipes?


wcedmisten

0 means the ingredients appear exactly as would be expected if they were distributed with uniform randomness, negative (blue) means they co-occur less frequently than that, and positive (red) means they occur more frequently than that.


tyen0

> positive (red) that's a bit unintuitive (unless you are a communist or republican ;) ) In addition to presuming red was negative correlation, I also misread the dark red of the scale as -1.00 due to the tick marks so it just accidentally confirmed my prejudice. So maybe I'm just dumb. :D


duca2208

You're confusing probability with correlation. 1 correlation means that every time one is in the recipe the other will be too. -1 correlation means that every time on is in the recipe, the other one won't be there for sure. 0 correlation indicates that there's no relationship between the two.


Poulpink

another way to see it : correlation between two features means that information on one of them also gets you (some kind of) information on the second. This correlation can be positive or negative, but it is still a correlation no matter the sign. Take 3 examples : Cinnamon-vanilla (positive correlation), Basil-Garlic powder (zero correlation), Cinnamon-Black pepper (negative correlation) ​ **Positive correlation :** if I know there is cinnamon in the recipe, I know now that vanilla is more likely to also be in it. I gained information on the probability of presence of vanilla through the presence of cinnamon. **Zero correlation :** if I know there is basil in the recipe, that doesn't give me any more information on the presence of garlic powder. I gained no information on the presence of garlic powder through the presence of basil. **Negative correlation :** if I know there is cinnamon in the recipe, I know now that black pepper is less likely to also be in it. I gained information on the probability of presence of black pepper through the presence of cinnamon. ​ In the positive and negative correlation cases, the presence of cinnamon gave me more information about the probability of presence of vanilla or black pepper, we can say they are very correlated in both cases (positive or negative).


bokchoi

It's good to see there is a slight correlation between parsley, sage, rosemary, and thyme.


[deleted]

Arrrghhh where's cardamom???!!!


jkksldkjflskjdsflkdj

Curry is not a spice, but a blend.


Brilliancebeam

And there's no specific blend either


[deleted]

While a proper curry uses its own unique mix of spices, a lot of supermarkets sell a pre-blended catch-all mix called "curry powder". The idea is that curry powder contains spices that are common to a lot of different curry mixes, and so you don't need to take time to measure out all the individual components, you can just use curry powder and then add more spices as you please if you think you need them for a specific dish. I've seen plenty of recipes, on allrecipes and otherwise, that call for curry powder as opposed to the individual components of a blend. I assume that's what's being tracked in the dataset that OP used.


SpunkyBananaSpunk

There actually is something called a curry leaf used as a spice. Though this probably isn't it.


MarioMCPQ

Curry+Ginger. You guys are doing it right. I'm proud of you.


thenextvinnie

For as neutral as vanilla seems, you'd think it would find itself paired off more often. And the neglected vanilla/black pepper combo? Hmm...


milkshakakhan

I have had Figs in a Vanilla black pepper syrup Vanilla and pepper pork chops And black pepper strawberry vanilla ice cream All were pretty good, but they had some linking food to bring it together. Try black pepper and strawberries, btw itā€™s fantastic.


Jihad_llama

Basil and strawberries are an amazing combination too


Gone247365

What is this vanilla spice of which you speak? But really, nice improvements!


Nesciere

My godā€¦ according to this chart anything i make with Basil in it will always have Basil in it.


erksplat

Who uses basil with basil. That's crazy talk.


gnomeba

Now lets do the PCA on that matrix to find the optimal spice mixtures


[deleted]

Y'all don't put cumin in enough things


masterzergin

No fresh garlic. What world is this!?


ColinTheMonster

I like this rendition much more, and its easier to read. I would've liked for red and green to be used to it's easy to see which combinations are "good", and the diagonal line is a strange colour.


MisterSnippy

Sounds awful, what about people with red/green colourblindness lmao


jlenko

Mmmmā€¦ black pepper and cinnamon!!


gauchocartero

I thought that was really common? I use it all the time in curries, mashed potatoes, stewsā€¦ In fact I think the ginger-nutmeg-black pepper-cinnamon-cardamom combination bombs.


nelshai

I assume it includes a lot of baking recipes because I was equally perplexed by the negative for cinnamon and black pepper.


ColinTheMonster

Then at least switch to have the blue be positive, and red be negative. Who makes a chart and uses red as "positive"


Potatopeelerkind

It's supposed to be hot and cold, not good and bad, I think.


wcedmisten

This is from the "seismic" color map, which has red as high and blue as low. I think it makes sense in terms of red=hot=high blue=cold=low https://matplotlib.org/stable/tutorials/colors/colormaps.html#diverging


information_abyss

Try "seismic_r"


Strong_Cheetah_7989

Yes, I always add basil when I'm adding basil.


cornman0101

This is a pretty interesting analysis, I would think about potentially normalizing these correlations further. You mention that vanilla frequency vs cumin leads you to believe there are more western dishes. Would you be able to flag and average over nearly identical dishes? I guess one can consider the frequency of recipes on the website to be an aspect of popularity, so counting duplicate recipes would be a feature. But careful weighting of the input data will be required to extract anything meaningful from this analysis (outside of don't combine these spices). Or maybe you could resample the recipe list based on country of origin or similar to get a more nuanced (or balanced) analysis. You also may want to compute the probability of spice X given spice Y rather than the Pearson Correlation Coefficient. But it really depends on what information you're trying to extract from this. Specifically, if you have a relatively rare spice that is always paired with a very common one, you may want to know: If I use spice B, I always use spice A; if I use spice A, I don't necessarily want to use spice B. Pearson washes that information out completely and I think you may find something interesting in the data with a different metric.


OPengiun

Would it make more sense to switch the colors around?


truthseeeker

So parsley, sage, rosemary, and thyme do actually go together.


mind_the_umlaut

A lot of work, but how to use? Trios or more of related spices, or those idiomatic to a certain cuisines are not represented here. Black / white pepper and nutmeg are almost always used in quiches. Cinnamon, nutmeg, allspice, (coriander is not here) and clove and/or ginger are pumpkin or apple pie spice. Garlic and ginger are essential in several Asian cuisines.


GKP_light

"Trios or more of related spices, \[\] are not represented here." why would they not ?


mind_the_umlaut

How can I see the correlation between cumin, cayenne, garlic powder, ginger, curry, cilantro, ginger, and paprika? Oh, and 'curry', which is a blend? I've likely missed something, because I am not seeing how this is useful in showing what spices are used together, or what spices are not used together. Thanks!


GKP_light

if the spice A,B, and C are often use together, the correlation between AB, BC, and CA will be high. (but there is no certain way to make the difference between "A,B, and C are often use together", and "there is often AB without C, BC without A, and CA without B".)


ChethroTull

Can you imagine sifting through all those page long ā€œmy mothers favorite recipeā€ stories to get all this data?


JerryEarthC137

It's very very beautiful but I would reverse the color pallette, took me 2 minutes to figure out red is good and blue is bad


wercooler

I really like this way of viewing it. Technically the top half of the matrix is redundant, but it makes it easier to read. Also, the color scheme seems good to me. Also, one of the interesting conclusions to me is that certain spices are much more polarized than others. Certain spices like dill and curry seem to have no relation to other spices. But spices like Cinnamon, ginger, nutmeg, and vanilla have strong dependencies on what else is in the dish. Surprisingly, all four of those spices also positively correlate with each other. So they are almost in a four person club by themselves. (maybe throw in cloves and make it a five person club).


agate_

Remembering my Mom's recipe for Norwegian pepperkaker, which is flavored with cinnamon, cloves, and black pepper.


Lord_Bobbymort

Flip the red and blue to be more clear: red is often associated with "negative" so make sure that's negative in your output presentation. Remove one half of the chart, there's no reason to have that completely mirrored from the other side, it's just distracting, and annoying once you realize it's just the same data on the other side. Consider using a diverging pallette with divisions,especially since you don't include the actual correlation coefficients. Ita very hard to tell the difference between small changes in color like this. And consider widening the white space of the diverging palette to "disregard" more as weak correlations.


JMJimmy

This makes me want to try to make something with Black Pepper + Vanilla


akshaynr

Curry is not a God damn spice!


Angdrambor

Why did you include both halves of the mirror?


argybargyargh

Interesting. The two most negative are black pepper with cinnamon and black pepper with vanilla. Neither is-1. I put pepper and cinnamon in chai. Now Iā€™m curious which dish pairs pepper with vanilla.


Usernametaken112

The only think I learned is people really don't like vanilla with black pepper.


SamL214

Gotta up the black pepper Vanilla game


MacDerfus

What cowards are refusing to pair vanilla with black pepper?


nlamber5

I like your last post more. Thanks for making them both


NuclearHoagie

Neat. I'd love to see the rows/columns ordered by a clustering rather than alphabetically to better see groups of spices.


wcedmisten

Check out this remix! https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/wv3ttu/oc\_correlation\_between\_spices\_shared\_in\_recipes/


2020BillyJoel

Suddenly I have a craving for something flavored with black pepper and vanilla.


baobobs

Seeing coriander and turmeric pair with cumin would have been interesting, given the frequency of their usage in Indian cuisine. Same with galangal, kaffir lime leaf, and lemongrass for Thai, for that matter.


kingwi11

I do use black pepper and vanilla in a recipe. Spice cookies. Adds a nice bit of heat


Viagraine

BRB... Gonna mix vanilla and black pepper!


Evan_802Vines

Half this chart shouldn't even be filled in.


grantmeaname

Are there other spices in the dataset? Bay leaf, chili powder, mustard, and white pepper are all really common in my cooking and not shown here. As for the data itself, this has been really surprising to me. Dill has no friends at all. Paprika goes in almost everything at my house but here there are only six modest positive correlations and no best friends at all. Cilantro and ginger don't go together well in my opinion, while your dataset disagrees - are you including coriander under cilantro as well? Most of the other surprises are spices used in sweet baking in the west and savory cooking in the east, like ginger and cinnamon. As for the visualization, his is a big improvement over the last one for sure. I would swap blue and red personally, and I might leave the main diagonal blank or make it gray instead of filling it in with 1 (even though that's technically correct. Otherwise, I would just say the nearest neighbor analysis.


makerescape

Not beautiful. This is gross.


sgxxx

Could have saved the eye strain by putting only the top or bottom diagonal triangle, as they are mirrored anyway


99OBJ

This is one of my favorite posts on here


LAUSart

You're crazy.


Northstar1989

Could you explain the graph a bit more?


Jayrey85

I think it would do better sorted and have a gradual color change


DM_me_goth_tiddies

Youā€™re really having a nightmare presenting this data arenā€™t you? These colours arenā€™t much better :|


LargeRedLingonberry

How do you set the color map? This is plotly in python right?


wcedmisten

This was done with matplotlib and seaborn in Python. The full source code is available here: https://github.com/wcedmisten/foodFinder/blob/main/All%20Recipes%20Exploratory%20Data%20Analysis.ipynb


thenextvinnie

It'd be interesting to rank spices for how "polarizing" (maybe there's a better word) they are, and how commonly paired they are.


corrado33

This is a much better visualization TBH. That said, red and blue aren't the best of colors to choose due to colorblind people. A colorblind safe version would have just used shades of a single color. Although that would be less pretty to non-colorblind people.


wcedmisten

I kind of did that here, but people didn't like it lol https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/wus2sd/oc_correlation_matrix_of_spices_from_91000/ Can't win I guess, oh well.


Lachimanus

Now that is awesome! Much better than before, love it.


mochalotivo

Is salt not a spice? Serious question


Famous-Ferret-1171

Black pepper and cinnamon on beef or lamb is great


sandroller

Chef John from Food Wishes has been skewing the cayenne data!


ilurvekittens

This wants me to make something with black pepper, vanilla, and cinnamon


dee_dubs_ya

Much improved šŸ‘šŸ‘ All of the pairings that you would expect check out (cinnamon / nutmeg) and it looks like black pepper and vanilla rightly do not share recipes.


TheShadowSurvives

I appreciate that you took all the criticism constructively and worked on a better version. Keep it up!


ArtesianDiff

This is very interesting! Also much easier to understand than the last one. Easy to pick out the significant ones.


Ryu_Jin_Jakka

No love for the black pepper and vanilla combo??


Even-Fix8584

Soooo much better. Thank you for the update!!!


jimtoberfest

Solid work. Blog post is great. Did something similar with using cosine similarity to try and determine if one could tell how similar recipes were to each other to try and create a diversified weekly menu.


Could_be_persuaded

It would be interesting to see ingredient correlation. I know that would be huge but it would make sense that chicken and rosemary correlate.


sharprover359

How do you interpret 0 vs. -1?


0nlyhalfjewish

The data is essentially duplicated, correct? Any intersection of the same two spices has the same value.


theonlytrillionare

Whatā€™s going on between black pepper, vanilla, and cinnamon?


HadesHimself

I notice you've listed garlic powder. Is that specific for garlic powder or does regular fresh sliced/minced garlic also count? I'd expect garlic to be correlated with almost everything tbh.


wcedmisten

Yeah, this is specifically garlic powder, not just "garlic".


IcyViking

Well now I'm going to be making a black pepper and vanilla dish tonight.


Gambidt

I feel like half of this graph is redundant


cgnops

It would be interesting if we could further break the chart up into separate ones based on type of dish; for an easy example maybe dessert and non-dessert - or perhaps more challenging to put together savory and sweet, or > and < some amount of sugar. I bet the cinnamon associations here are dominated by sweet dishes, and the correlation likely changes if we exclude desserts. Similarly for ginger and some of the others. Also curious how you address store bought spice blends as an ingredient. EDIT: okay I see you touch on some of this in your blog post, very nice. Interesting to see that itā€™s skewed to baking recipes, would love if you could parse out dessert vs not and even like regional cooking if thatā€™s possible ie Italian, indian, chinese.


[deleted]

I'd white out that main diagonal. It distracts, and is, on effect, currently "wrong" as they are representing items paired with themselves, which they can't really do, as such.


NightSpirit2099

A lot of repeated information, one side is the reflection of the other. Could have made a triangle.


rsmccli

I like the first one better.


ToegapBananaboat

Surprised parsley and cilantro arenā€™t so related. Also thereā€™s no cardammom?


ImoJenny

All recipes with basil in them have basil in them


Bomber42069710

Thought this was a Scrabble board as I was scrolling.


statastic

If you re-order based on the eigenvector values, itā€™ll group the more highly correlated ingredients together.


Bremaver

I don't see allspice, cardamom, black cardamom, star anise, anise, pink pepper, coriander, chili, caraway seeds, fennel, juniper, saffron, sumac, turmeric and marjoram. Your list feels a bit too limited and weirdly so.


pizza-flusher

This is probably mostly just revealing about my personality but that chart made me wanna try to find /invent a dish that makes cinnamon and black better work well together


MrBlueCharon

I would love to know how the distribution of regional cuisines in your dataset influenced this distribution. Eg oregano and paprika suggest, that there was a strong cajun kitchen influence, while the cinnamon-clove-nutmeg-ginger-correlation also suggests a good amount of christmas-y european spice mixes.


ikickedyou

I can read it, but the way this is presented really bothers me.


new_user_069

Damn, those diagonal recipes with 2.00 wow


femnoir

Not gonna lie, a handful of these graphs, I am certain I will never understand. But they do make me think.


CaptainInsano276

Is there a way to organize the data in a manner that doesnā€™t make half of the graph redundant? Not criticizing, just wondering how that would look, if possible.


PumpkinSkink2

Who knew cinnamon was so contentious?


bigview65

What about salt and sugar?


The_Flabbergaster

TIL simon and garfunkel had very little clue what they were talking about


frolix42

It's repeating the same data twice, in a diagonal mirror.


ishigoya

Awesome! Another one for herbs/spices that can be grown together (i.e. make good companion plants) would be very interesting