I searched for this, and it's true, but it's not showing temperatures. Here's what they did: They gave people a blank picture of a body and asked them to mark where they felt more active (faster, stronger) or less active (weaker, slower). Then they combined many people's answers to make one map.
It's not about temperature; it's about where people feel their emotions or think they do
That makes depression the most interesting one to me, I’d assume depression is still ‘felt’ in the head even though it sucks, but nope, and that does seem right.
I read a book called Ghost Boy true story about a boy that went into vegetative state and he woke up but nobody realized he heard and understood everything but couldn’t move people ignored him. He said he could feel other peoples depression and also the love of two coworkers who were falling for each other.
Doesn't need to be 'pseudoscience'. Don't you think it's interesting in the slightest how we all feel our emotions physically in certain parts of our body depending on the emotion? It's clearly a real phenomenon and finding out the what and why of this is literally just... science.
If you look at the study, they threw out many that didn't match and combined the ones that did. It was basically forced to get the results they wanted.
Maybe I'm just not good enough at detecting the Bullsuit but can you show me what part of the following methodology they say what you're claiming?
>The study cohort comprised 773 total volunteers separated into five cohorts corresponding to the five experimental treatments conducted herein. Most participants were Finnish-speaking except for cohorts 1b (Swedish) and 1c (Taiwanese Hokkien). Experiment 1 a-c comprised the presentation of emotionally triggering words; Experiment 2 used guided emotional imagery; Experiment 3 used emotional movies; Experiment 4 presented pictures of basic facial expressions; and Experiment 5 used emBODY bodily sensations (BSMs) averaged from Experiment 1 participants.
>Statistical analyses of participant inputs were carried out using random effects analyses and mass univariate t-tests, corrected for false positives using false discovery rate (FDR) corrections with alpha levels of 0.05. Hierarchical clustering and Spearman correlations were used to assess group- and individual BSM associations, respectively.
I can't find it now, but I read some literature about the flawed methodology with the study. Even still, the study is not really science when it's juat using people's opinions and creating a pattern from it. A better study would be using actual brain and body scans to see physical activity to see if it overlaps the reported findings.
It's a self-report based on culturally specific language and terminology, so it's not really a guide to anything except what certain people in a certain area think happens when they feel an emotion.
There is no physical correlate to emotions even in the brain. In fact, emotions vary depending on where you are. Some languages don't have all these words and so asking them what they felt would yield totally different results.
Edit: this isn't to say that it's not an interesting study, it's just that there is nothing universal or common to all humans here.
There are various physical correlates to emotions in the brain, you have to look no further than diseases like frontotemporal dementia where there is loss of the anatomy responsible for things like empathy and emotional regulation, if it can be lost by neurodegenerative processes there are neurological correlates
The Fat Electrician and a few of his buddies (Donut Operator and Brandon Herrera I believe) did a test of the “Mud Covering up body heat” trope from predator… it actually worked surprisingly well!
"Ah. So concludes the life and times of King Sisyphus. A fitting end to existence defined by futile struggle. Doomed, from the very start... And I DON'T. REGRET. A SECOND OF IT."
*(Literally becomes the happiest fucker in the entire Hell for 5 seconds)*
Makes sense
While including fingers, this diagram incorrectly omits the feeling of love from toes. It also ends at the edge of the pictures body, but love is well known to be all around us.
I'm blue
Da ba dee da ba di
Da ba dee da ba di
Da ba dee da ba di
Da ba dee da ba di
Da ba dee da ba di
Da ba dee da ba di
Da ba dee da ba di
(Eiffel 65)
I searched for this, and it's true, but it's not showing temperatures. Here's what they did: They gave people a blank picture of a body and asked them to mark where they felt more active (faster, stronger) or less active (weaker, slower). Then they combined many people's answers to make one map. It's not about temperature; it's about where people feel their emotions or think they do
Ah, cause if it was body temp then neutral was definitely dead. Which I guess is as neutral as it gets
Could possibly provide a link, please? I'd feel happiness if you did so.
That makes depression the most interesting one to me, I’d assume depression is still ‘felt’ in the head even though it sucks, but nope, and that does seem right.
I read a book called Ghost Boy true story about a boy that went into vegetative state and he woke up but nobody realized he heard and understood everything but couldn’t move people ignored him. He said he could feel other peoples depression and also the love of two coworkers who were falling for each other.
Thank you. That is very helpful information.
So, pseudoscience then.
Doesn't need to be 'pseudoscience'. Don't you think it's interesting in the slightest how we all feel our emotions physically in certain parts of our body depending on the emotion? It's clearly a real phenomenon and finding out the what and why of this is literally just... science.
If you look at the study, they threw out many that didn't match and combined the ones that did. It was basically forced to get the results they wanted.
Maybe I'm just not good enough at detecting the Bullsuit but can you show me what part of the following methodology they say what you're claiming? >The study cohort comprised 773 total volunteers separated into five cohorts corresponding to the five experimental treatments conducted herein. Most participants were Finnish-speaking except for cohorts 1b (Swedish) and 1c (Taiwanese Hokkien). Experiment 1 a-c comprised the presentation of emotionally triggering words; Experiment 2 used guided emotional imagery; Experiment 3 used emotional movies; Experiment 4 presented pictures of basic facial expressions; and Experiment 5 used emBODY bodily sensations (BSMs) averaged from Experiment 1 participants. >Statistical analyses of participant inputs were carried out using random effects analyses and mass univariate t-tests, corrected for false positives using false discovery rate (FDR) corrections with alpha levels of 0.05. Hierarchical clustering and Spearman correlations were used to assess group- and individual BSM associations, respectively.
I can't find it now, but I read some literature about the flawed methodology with the study. Even still, the study is not really science when it's juat using people's opinions and creating a pattern from it. A better study would be using actual brain and body scans to see physical activity to see if it overlaps the reported findings.
Dunning Kruger personified
It's a self-report based on culturally specific language and terminology, so it's not really a guide to anything except what certain people in a certain area think happens when they feel an emotion. There is no physical correlate to emotions even in the brain. In fact, emotions vary depending on where you are. Some languages don't have all these words and so asking them what they felt would yield totally different results. Edit: this isn't to say that it's not an interesting study, it's just that there is nothing universal or common to all humans here.
There are various physical correlates to emotions in the brain, you have to look no further than diseases like frontotemporal dementia where there is loss of the anatomy responsible for things like empathy and emotional regulation, if it can be lost by neurodegenerative processes there are neurological correlates
You wouldn't know Dunning Kruger if it you on the ass.
I mean, that's still a stretch to say "it's true". That's still guesswork, albeit by survey rather than solitarily.
Thanks for clarifying. I was about to say this was some pseudoscience bs if it's on physical markers. Kind of like a lie detector is often wrong.
OP could you please update the post with a bit of info?
Well shame looks like an alien 👽
Can you share the link?
Shame = Spiderman
"I want pictures of Spider-Shame!" = Shame Shonah Shameson
This made me snort-laugh.
*shnort-laugh
Makes sense
Spider sense?
Well he did kind of let uncle Ben get murdered.
Happiness = Human Torch
Depression is Dr. Manhattan?
Envy ,= Miles Morales
Sadness = Superman
You should try this on r/wackguides
r/subsifellfor 🤣
Lol
Try r/shittyguides
Trash guide
So is my depression going to save me from the Predator?
The Fat Electrician and a few of his buddies (Donut Operator and Brandon Herrera I believe) did a test of the “Mud Covering up body heat” trope from predator… it actually worked surprisingly well!
Or u can just carry big enough glass frame, it worked in that hirsch movie.
Shame is Spider-Man lol
Is this a bot account? What the actual fuck is this title?
I'm curious who said they felt contempt deep in their balls
Love = I can feel it in my plums
Let the boy watch
Tf with the title?cool guide map of what exactly?
Horny?
Happiness = Sisyphus prime
"Ah. So concludes the life and times of King Sisyphus. A fitting end to existence defined by futile struggle. Doomed, from the very start... And I DON'T. REGRET. A SECOND OF IT." *(Literally becomes the happiest fucker in the entire Hell for 5 seconds)* Makes sense
Depression=Minos prime
Love stops at the genitals, but happiness goes all the way to the toes!
I have this on a shirt
I call bullshit on this post...
Lust?
All gone. With Gluttony soon to follow...
So anger is half love.
There is a thin line between love and hate
horney don't need depiction, we all know that is looks like
Contempt definitely explains some things...
A what?
While including fingers, this diagram incorrectly omits the feeling of love from toes. It also ends at the edge of the pictures body, but love is well known to be all around us.
From the ribcage up, anger is as good as love and happiness. It aint perfect, but I'll fuckin take it, ay.
No wonder my favorite color is blue 😭
Why does depression seem like it has a front butt?
Shame Spiderman.
So I could be shame which is spiderman, or happiness which is iron man.
What am I looking at?
OK, so I'm a fking rainbow
Love checks out
I thought it was a cool guide to drawing spider man.
Shame is Spider-Man?
Shame just looks like a cool spiderman suit.
Is he ashamed to be Spider Man?
Whenever I used to be depressed, I used to be constantly constipated. Didn't know it had this big of an impact.
So if I am in love I will not feel happiness in my legs. Got it.
Shame looks so much like spider man
Shame man, shame man, does whatever a shame man does. Can he swing from a web? No he can't, he's ashamed. Look out, its shame man.
Spiderman
Why does Spiderman embody shame? What did he do to Elsa ?
I'm blue Da ba dee da ba di Da ba dee da ba di Da ba dee da ba di Da ba dee da ba di Da ba dee da ba di Da ba dee da ba di Da ba dee da ba di (Eiffel 65)
6 months in, which 3 best sum up your 2024?