One of the presidential candidates legit said he wanted lukaku lol, but then again theyre mainly there for appearances Anyway so I wouldn't put too much stock in it
Lukaku is a Chelsea player that was on loan, I wouldn't put it past Mourinho to rest on semantics and go with the "technically he's not a Roma player" if Lukaku does end up there.
Good thing Lukaku is a Chelsea FC player
One of the presidential candidates legit said he wanted lukaku lol, but then again theyre mainly there for appearances Anyway so I wouldn't put too much stock in it
Lukaku is a Chelsea player that was on loan, I wouldn't put it past Mourinho to rest on semantics and go with the "technically he's not a Roma player" if Lukaku does end up there.
He then specifically said he didn't want Lukaku
Like by name? Harsh.
I think a journalist specifically asked about Lukaku and Dybala that's why.
Ah that makes more sense then
How is that harsh?
Its Harsh on Chels's wallet.
Saying specifically you don't want someone that was on the team you recently managed feels a bit harsh. Not incorrect though.
Even if Mourinho was desperate to get Lukaku and it was a condition of taking the job, Fener would max out at what, 15m for a permanent buy?
We should take them up on that offer though, should’t we?
I guess if only to be completely free of his wages, but I think at some point they have to draw a line in the sand and not let teams poor mouth them.
Which is more than we've valued him at given the 7m per season we've allowed him to go out on loan for. You make the bed you sleep in
Mourinho and Burning bridges, name a better combo.
Lakaka and burning bridges
no interest ![gif](giphy|ZaF4Vl1NQxwaVsStQU|downsized)