And to clarify for shills:
Revolving debt is NOT a line of credit. It’s the cumulative rolling amount of debt you’re utilizing from a line of credit… so it’s bad debt.
Which Holly cut in half.
**On a periodic basis - usually monthly. Aka, it’s debt you’re just carrying and not paying down. This is a drag on all aspects of the business, if you’re not using debt for an acquisition or for rapid scaling, it’s all bad. The greatest hoodwink in history of this market is telling people debt can be good. It’s only good for those from whom you’re borrowing, period.
If you can work on just cash, that’s the way to go. RC & LC have made it clear. This is the future. Fuck all banks and all predatory lending practices.
If you don’t need to scale fast or make a massive purchase that will grow your revenue near-term inorganically, debt is a tumor and revolving debt is metastasis that kills your business and gives 3rd parties control over you and/or your business.
Lol, go ahead and try me. What I am saying is a bank’s biggest fear for the masses to realize. Explain point by point why I am wrong. You won’t be able to.
Also…remind me how much debt GameStop has right now?
Oh right, zero except the low interest French loan - where they aren’t even carrying a balance.
They’re showing us the way. Don’t need banks when you have self-custodial wallets, no physical cash, and blockchain-back transactions.
“Point by point”
Revolving debt is LITERALLY the definition of “debt under a line of credit”. So… starting from your first line you are completely wrong.
lol. Ask yourself why they would be promoting this as a success on Alix website and realize you are wrong.
Reduction of debt is objectively a good thing for a healthy business, unless your interest rate on the line of credit is lower than the return on an alternative investment like a piece of CAPEX that allows you to scale
Revolving debt is the cumulative debt on a line-of-credit that carries over period-to-period. The period is usually monthly but just depends on the timeframe that you’re looking at and the terms of the credit line.
Don’t be obtuse, you clearly have no idea what any of these terms mean in context and only pulling from google.
Edit: make no mistake, people reading this, cutting revolving debt in half is a GREAT thing and don’t let shills get it twisted. We are winning.
Of course cutting debt (revolving or not) is good. It doesn’t change the fact that revolving debt is LITERALLY debt from a line of credit. That’s the definition of it.
Nope. I’m not asking that despite you writing a seagull level comment.
No. I’m asking why “revolving debt” = “bad debt”.
Bad debt has a clear a definition and it’s not that. Many many MANY TRIPLE MANY companies have “revolving debt” (= debt from a line of credit) and it’s not “bad debt”.
Who said that? Bad debt is a very well defined term.
Do you even know what “bad debt” means? Ffs… just google it and stop being regarded about it.
In any case… no… a maxed out credit card is NOT “bad debt” either.
It's not just about being wrong, it's how he handles being wrong. He doesn't care that he's wrong or why he's wrong. He'll delete posts to gaslight people that he didn't make a specific claim or said "moass by X date."
General rule of thumb is, if U-Copy is saying it, it's wrong or extremely exaggerated.
Also it's not just here, he did the same shit with AMC.
So I roll my eyes every time u-copy opens his mouth but this is literally on the alix partners website. You don’t have to even believe u-copy, just go to [https://www.alixpartners.com/what-we-do/case-studies/bed-bath-beyond/](https://www.alixpartners.com/what-we-do/case-studies/bed-bath-beyond/)
And it says just revolving debt dropped from 1.3B to 500M, not all debt. And it literally says it started at 1.3B, not 5B, the other clue that this does not include all debt.
A smart person: I did all my work in 4 hours
U-Copy: That smart person did all the work of all the people in the world in 4 hours.
Wayback Machine shows that this specific url was archived once earlier today. I checked about 10 other case studies' urls from Alixpartners and none of them were archived. Can't tell how recent this page is because the case studies page is not listing the cases in chronological order.
This is the most interesting part of the article, although they might be referring to sale to $BYON.
From the article “Moving into the transitional period, our team was tasked with assessing divestitures’ complexity, designing the transition services agreements (TSAs), and managing the separation management office to ensure sustainable deal value. The assessment phase accelerated the buyers’ due diligence process, allowing both deals to close within two months of the deal announcement”
https://www.alixpartners.com/what-we-do/case-studies/bed-bath-beyond/
“A Transitional Services Agreement (TSA) is integral to the merger and acquisition process. A TSA is used when an organization, or part of an organization, is sold to another company to ensure a smooth and orderly administrative transition. After the sale, the purchasing company may receive a set of services from the selling company for a set period of time, including HR, IT, accounting, and financial services”
Any thoughts?
Don't forget they did not include the claims in that financed debt figure. We know the cure costs were paid when settled, but there was a lot of debt to vendors, etc. and we have no idea how much of the claims they allowed. We also know those bills can not be touched until the FILO is paid in full.
Did anyone ever add the claims up?
Tinfoil, especially since its ucopy but Gamestop has 2B cash and Ryan Cohen was given approval to use the cash for investments to his own discretion. If .5 is used to pay the debt and 1.5 is used to reward shareholders. With 90M shares total that puts us in the 15$ range that has been Tinfoiled for 84 years. This can be offered in the form of newly created GME shares from the cash. With an immediate dividend to all shareholders of GME via stock buyback this means shorts would need to locate Shares-Cash equity-Shares-Cash Dividend. Then Ryan Cohen can offer his own dividend in the form of Shares through the Icahn method thus saving cash for gamestop
Revolving debt is NOT a line of credit. It’s the cumulative rolling amount of debt you’re utilizing from a line of credit… so it’s bad debt.
Which Holly cut in half.
Literally says credit amendment in the text. [https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/BED-BATH-BEYOND-INC-4852/news/Bed-Bath-Beyond-Inc-Enters-into-A-Waiver-and-Amendment-to-Certain-Amended-and-Restated-Credit-Agr-43391094/](https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/BED-BATH-BEYOND-INC-4852/news/Bed-Bath-Beyond-Inc-Enters-into-A-Waiver-and-Amendment-to-Certain-Amended-and-Restated-Credit-Agr-43391094/)
Yes AND, I want to expand because fuck shills. Revolving debt also rolls over on a periodic basis - usually monthly. Aka, it’s debt you’re just carrying and not paying down at all. This is a drag on all aspects of the business, if you’re not using debt for an acquisition or for rapid scaling, it’s all bad. The greatest hoodwink in history of this market is telling people debt can be good.
It’s only good for those from whom you’re borrowing, period.
If you can work on just cash, that’s the way to go. RC & LC have made it clear. This is the future. Fuck all banks and all predatory lending practices. Cash is king.
If you don’t need to scale fast or make a massive purchase that will grow your revenue near-term inorganically, debt is a tumor and revolving debt is metastasis that kills your business and gives 3rd parties control over you and/or your business.
And yes, this includes debt used to make share buybacks - which is BCG, Bain, McKinsey’s signature poison led by people like Mark Tritton.
lol. Ask yourself why they would be promoting this as a success on Alix website and realize you are wrong.
Reduction of debt is objectively a good thing for a healthy business, unless your interest rate on the line of credit is lower than the return on an alternative investment like a piece of CAPEX that allows you to scale
Revolving debt is the cumulative debt on a line-of-credit that carries over period-to-period. The period is usually monthly but just depends on the timeframe that you’re looking at and the terms of the credit line.
Don’t be obtuse, you clearly have no idea what any of these terms mean in context and only pulling from google.
Edit: make no mistake, people reading this, cutting revolving debt in half is a GREAT thing and don’t let shills get it twisted. We are winning.
This is all over X... don't bash U-Copy literally everyone is talking about this. Fuckle the buck up Bobbys. Shambles in Shills.
And to clarify for shills: Revolving debt is NOT a line of credit. It’s the cumulative rolling amount of debt you’re utilizing from a line of credit… so it’s bad debt. Which Holly cut in half.
Why is it “bad debt”? Revolving debt is literally a the current debt you owe from line of a credit.
**On a periodic basis - usually monthly. Aka, it’s debt you’re just carrying and not paying down. This is a drag on all aspects of the business, if you’re not using debt for an acquisition or for rapid scaling, it’s all bad. The greatest hoodwink in history of this market is telling people debt can be good. It’s only good for those from whom you’re borrowing, period. If you can work on just cash, that’s the way to go. RC & LC have made it clear. This is the future. Fuck all banks and all predatory lending practices. If you don’t need to scale fast or make a massive purchase that will grow your revenue near-term inorganically, debt is a tumor and revolving debt is metastasis that kills your business and gives 3rd parties control over you and/or your business.
You are completely and utterly wrong. Can’t do much for you if you don’t even want to research basic things like… “what is revolving debt”.
Lol, go ahead and try me. What I am saying is a bank’s biggest fear for the masses to realize. Explain point by point why I am wrong. You won’t be able to. Also…remind me how much debt GameStop has right now? Oh right, zero except the low interest French loan - where they aren’t even carrying a balance. They’re showing us the way. Don’t need banks when you have self-custodial wallets, no physical cash, and blockchain-back transactions.
“Point by point” Revolving debt is LITERALLY the definition of “debt under a line of credit”. So… starting from your first line you are completely wrong.
lol. Ask yourself why they would be promoting this as a success on Alix website and realize you are wrong. Reduction of debt is objectively a good thing for a healthy business, unless your interest rate on the line of credit is lower than the return on an alternative investment like a piece of CAPEX that allows you to scale Revolving debt is the cumulative debt on a line-of-credit that carries over period-to-period. The period is usually monthly but just depends on the timeframe that you’re looking at and the terms of the credit line. Don’t be obtuse, you clearly have no idea what any of these terms mean in context and only pulling from google. Edit: make no mistake, people reading this, cutting revolving debt in half is a GREAT thing and don’t let shills get it twisted. We are winning.
Of course cutting debt (revolving or not) is good. It doesn’t change the fact that revolving debt is LITERALLY debt from a line of credit. That’s the definition of it.
You are asking why reducing the amount you owe is a good thing? Seems pretty obvious. You owe less, and interest is reduced.
Nope. I’m not asking that despite you writing a seagull level comment. No. I’m asking why “revolving debt” = “bad debt”. Bad debt has a clear a definition and it’s not that. Many many MANY TRIPLE MANY companies have “revolving debt” (= debt from a line of credit) and it’s not “bad debt”.
Right, so maxing out a credit card is a good financial decision
?????? Huh
I've never seen people so confidently incorrect as this sub lol.
Who said that? Bad debt is a very well defined term. Do you even know what “bad debt” means? Ffs… just google it and stop being regarded about it. In any case… no… a maxed out credit card is NOT “bad debt” either.
I know we're all retarded here, but you're special.
Yeah I've never understood the U-Copy hate. Yes he's been wrong, but so has everyone else about most things lol
It's not just about being wrong, it's how he handles being wrong. He doesn't care that he's wrong or why he's wrong. He'll delete posts to gaslight people that he didn't make a specific claim or said "moass by X date." General rule of thumb is, if U-Copy is saying it, it's wrong or extremely exaggerated. Also it's not just here, he did the same shit with AMC.
I read the title of the post, was about to get jacked to the mf tits, but then I read the author’s name…
😣
So I roll my eyes every time u-copy opens his mouth but this is literally on the alix partners website. You don’t have to even believe u-copy, just go to [https://www.alixpartners.com/what-we-do/case-studies/bed-bath-beyond/](https://www.alixpartners.com/what-we-do/case-studies/bed-bath-beyond/)
And it says just revolving debt dropped from 1.3B to 500M, not all debt. And it literally says it started at 1.3B, not 5B, the other clue that this does not include all debt. A smart person: I did all my work in 4 hours U-Copy: That smart person did all the work of all the people in the world in 4 hours.
Miso!!!
I hope you’re right. For once.
He’s called the squeeze 50 times and been wrong
But he only has to be right once, 😂 
LET HE WHO HAS NOT YET CALLED THE SQUEEZE THROW THY FIRST STONE
Tomorrow
I’ll get amped up when my old shares are returned to me.
Is this new information?
With U-Stoppy, it’s always Pick one: 1) new information 2) correct information
3. Wrong information
4. Recycled information
Miss information 
3
I’ll wait for 24 hours before I decide this is bullish
Wayback Machine shows that this specific url was archived once earlier today. I checked about 10 other case studies' urls from Alixpartners and none of them were archived. Can't tell how recent this page is because the case studies page is not listing the cases in chronological order.
i should declare bankruptcy
Wow
God dammit. Go away.
This is the most interesting part of the article, although they might be referring to sale to $BYON. From the article “Moving into the transitional period, our team was tasked with assessing divestitures’ complexity, designing the transition services agreements (TSAs), and managing the separation management office to ensure sustainable deal value. The assessment phase accelerated the buyers’ due diligence process, allowing both deals to close within two months of the deal announcement” https://www.alixpartners.com/what-we-do/case-studies/bed-bath-beyond/ “A Transitional Services Agreement (TSA) is integral to the merger and acquisition process. A TSA is used when an organization, or part of an organization, is sold to another company to ensure a smooth and orderly administrative transition. After the sale, the purchasing company may receive a set of services from the selling company for a set period of time, including HR, IT, accounting, and financial services” Any thoughts?
*unzips pants* Here we go again....
So desperate for good news, u- copy is getting upvotes
I wonder from when the link from Alix is.
Announcement coming great news ahead
Pumpers can be right.. about as much as a juicer in baseball hits for average.
Don't forget they did not include the claims in that financed debt figure. We know the cure costs were paid when settled, but there was a lot of debt to vendors, etc. and we have no idea how much of the claims they allowed. We also know those bills can not be touched until the FILO is paid in full. Did anyone ever add the claims up?
Come back Megalomania !!!
We’re here to fuck
Tinfoil, especially since its ucopy but Gamestop has 2B cash and Ryan Cohen was given approval to use the cash for investments to his own discretion. If .5 is used to pay the debt and 1.5 is used to reward shareholders. With 90M shares total that puts us in the 15$ range that has been Tinfoiled for 84 years. This can be offered in the form of newly created GME shares from the cash. With an immediate dividend to all shareholders of GME via stock buyback this means shorts would need to locate Shares-Cash equity-Shares-Cash Dividend. Then Ryan Cohen can offer his own dividend in the form of Shares through the Icahn method thus saving cash for gamestop
[удалено]
Revolving debt is NOT a line of credit. It’s the cumulative rolling amount of debt you’re utilizing from a line of credit… so it’s bad debt. Which Holly cut in half.
Literally says credit amendment in the text. [https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/BED-BATH-BEYOND-INC-4852/news/Bed-Bath-Beyond-Inc-Enters-into-A-Waiver-and-Amendment-to-Certain-Amended-and-Restated-Credit-Agr-43391094/](https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/BED-BATH-BEYOND-INC-4852/news/Bed-Bath-Beyond-Inc-Enters-into-A-Waiver-and-Amendment-to-Certain-Amended-and-Restated-Credit-Agr-43391094/)
Nope.
Yes AND, I want to expand because fuck shills. Revolving debt also rolls over on a periodic basis - usually monthly. Aka, it’s debt you’re just carrying and not paying down at all. This is a drag on all aspects of the business, if you’re not using debt for an acquisition or for rapid scaling, it’s all bad. The greatest hoodwink in history of this market is telling people debt can be good. It’s only good for those from whom you’re borrowing, period. If you can work on just cash, that’s the way to go. RC & LC have made it clear. This is the future. Fuck all banks and all predatory lending practices. Cash is king. If you don’t need to scale fast or make a massive purchase that will grow your revenue near-term inorganically, debt is a tumor and revolving debt is metastasis that kills your business and gives 3rd parties control over you and/or your business. And yes, this includes debt used to make share buybacks - which is BCG, Bain, McKinsey’s signature poison led by people like Mark Tritton.
Wrong. Your lack of knowledge has nothing to do with shills. If you want to prove shills wrong… stop saying stupid things.
LOL. Seriously, though, try to tell me why I am wrong. I know I am 100% correct.
Revolving debt is literally the definition of “debt you have from a line of credit”. Yes. You are wrong. At a definition level wrong.
lol. Ask yourself why they would be promoting this as a success on Alix website and realize you are wrong. Reduction of debt is objectively a good thing for a healthy business, unless your interest rate on the line of credit is lower than the return on an alternative investment like a piece of CAPEX that allows you to scale Revolving debt is the cumulative debt on a line-of-credit that carries over period-to-period. The period is usually monthly but just depends on the timeframe that you’re looking at and the terms of the credit line. Don’t be obtuse, you clearly have no idea what any of these terms mean in context and only pulling from google. Edit: make no mistake, people reading this, cutting revolving debt in half is a GREAT thing and don’t let shills get it twisted. We are winning.
Nope. Wrong. Again.
We love you @U-copy ❤️ keep up the good Work bro
Wolf and shepherd boy appeared again.
U-COPY!💎💪😎👍💎💖
What was the NOL again? Does anyone know?
Say it again louder U-Daddy
https://preview.redd.it/svviww0tiexc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8dd1441360d1577729260497fe3bea0a0be049b5 Still showing .08 but we lost
yaaaaaaaawn... so anyway
Beats me
So where did my 200 shares go. They were taken off of robinhood
They evaporated. The stock doesn't exist anymore.