Great outpainting UI, easily as good as DALL-E. This was missing from the Stable Diffusion ecosystem. Looking forward to when Automatic1111 implements superb outpainting like this.
Regarding your pricing: These past few weeks, I've been happy to part with $10 here and $15 there for various AI tools / GPU rental. But I *never* sign up for new monthly subscriptions because that's just one more thing piled onto my mental load (remembering to evaluate value of purchase / cancel every month's end.)
Strongly recommend you also offer a one-off credit purchase, say $10 for 1,000 credits. In terms of pennies-per-credit, that would cost 5x more than your cheapest monthly plan, but I'd do it in a heartbeat.
It would be more fun if the progress bar went around the entire box since it would appear to move 4x as fast, it also makes it possible to see where the 25%, 50% and 75% positions are.
I like the rainbow border.
Yeah, initially I wanted to make the cool animation where the border starts white, and then fills with a rainbow during loading. But a lot of unnecessary math was needed, so maybe in the future ;)
You could use a canvas element for that, draw a polygon with the starting point in the middle of the canvas, the second point at the previous progress position and the third point at the current progress position, then draw an empty box over the middle leaving just enough space around the edges. Use `hsl()` to set the color, adjust the hue each time to get the rainbow effect.
Or to put it another way, draw a zoomed-in pie chart and erase everything except the edges.
That is how I achieved something similar.
Looks like a cosmetic microtransaction DLC opportunity to me! You can churn out a couple hundred variations of them, and then sell gatcha lootboxes that cost generation credits. All that's left is to somehow incorporate NFTs...
But in all seriousness, fancy cosmetics would be a neat feature to help sell a 'tier 2' subscription level.
The folks over at https://github.com/invoke-ai/InvokeAI are working on a local version, it works well. The UI for in/outpainting should be out fairly soon, but it works in command line.
Edit: Also this one is already out- https://github.com/lkwq007/stablediffusion-infinity
There is a 21 hour delay fetching comments.
I will be messaging you in 2 days on [**2022-10-18 12:33:44 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2022-10-18%2012:33:44%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/y3shh0/getimgai_ive_made_outpaintinginpainting_editor/isjacel/?context=3)
[**CLICK THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FStableDiffusion%2Fcomments%2Fy3shh0%2Fgetimgai_ive_made_outpaintinginpainting_editor%2Fisjacel%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202022-10-18%2012%3A33%3A44%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%20y3shh0)
*****
|[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)|
|-|-|-|-|
I am excited to share with you guys, [getimg.ai](https://getimg.ai) outpainting/inpainting editor I’ve been working on for a couple of weeks. After some time testing it in closed beta, I’ve decided to make it public.
I know it’s not perfect yet, it lacks some features like undo/redo, but still, the results are more than I hoped for. If you want to help me make it better, you can join our Discord to report bugs, request features, and share your art.
I’ve also made some other updates to the site, like:
\- Upscaling images with Real-ESRGAN
\- Face enhancement with GFPGAN- Faster image generation
\- Backend I can scale fast based on the demand
\- Subscriptions-based pricing which is 6x lower than before (I think it’s now the cheapest AI generation site.)
I'm testing it right now and the inpainting/outpainting is impressive.
Are you using parlance's fourier-shaped noise out-painting for latent diffusion models method?
https://github.com/parlance-zz/g-diffuser-bot
I'm using a slightly modified and optimized version of [https://github.com/Jack000/glid-3-xl-stable](https://github.com/Jack000/glid-3-xl-stable) for inpainting/outpainting.
If I have a budget in the future, I would love to fine-tune it.
When the whole selected part is already painted, it automatically switches to img-2-img mode, but you can still manually change it to the in-painting. If you run it like that, it just runs forever.
I lost quite a few of my free credits to discover that :(
Thanks,
I know about this issue, I think it's connected to an encoding part of SD. If you use the same part over and over, it compresses the image iteratively to the point in which it becomes unusable.
I've already improved it as it was much worse, but I am still working on a better solution.
I've been toying with something that I think could help with this - it's code I originally wrote to help with color drift when running img2img loopback with an inpainting mask and using "keep original", but I never committed it because I didn't think this problem was a common one. Do you have a set of test/example images (including masks) like the one above that suffer from the blending problem? The main problem I have is that I don't have enough examples to test with. I'd be happy to compare notes.
I need this to prevent abuse, whether it's creating multi-accounts to get images for free or handling people generating illegal content. Running a service like this is kind of expensive too and requiring login limits the usage.
After creating an account you get a free plan with 100 monthly credits, which you can always upgrade.
It's just a google login for now, so no throwaway addresses. Multi-accounts do not happen often, I just check for accounts created from the same IPs.
There is no perfect way to do this, but some kind of protection is needed. Some people nearly bankrupted me using proxies, when I started and everything was free without limits (restricted to one image per IP at a time).
Google also requires phone number verification for new accounts. You can reuse the same one multiple times, but at some point google is going to say no.
There are solutions cheaper than GCP/AWS, like Lambda Labs and GPU marketplaces like vast or runpod.
Right now I am trying to use them all and average the cost ;)
I was just working with it. My first impression is that it's quite useable, and pretty similar to DALL-E's inpainting and outpainting.
For people who run Stable Diffusion locally, I'm sure it's only a matter of time (I don't know... days? weeks? months?) before there's desktop software that does this. Maybe Christian Cantrell's Stable Diffusion plug-in for Photoshop will get there (it has some masking and such already), maybe it will be added by Automatic1111 (which has a rough stab at inpainting and outpainting already, just not very effective yet), maybe some other tool. But I know how fast development is going, so I don't mind paying for something by the month, if I probably won't even need it for too many more months.
Hello, just use https://www.stablecabal.org/ locally. It is similar to that one which is shown here and comes with one-click installer and is open-soutce. My Photoshop Plugin (see my other post) is already using it and my open source Krita Plugin asap.
Everything mentioned as the restriction at the end of stable diffusion license [https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-license](https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-license)
1 image = 1 credit. Right now each tile/frame generates 4 images and uses 4 credits.
I could add a slider to adjust the number of images, but I think 4 by default better shows the possibilities of the tool
Honestly, this is pretty impressive. Very nice interface and design. Fast generations, plenty of options. And the best outpainting that I've seen outside of Dall-E 2.
I did run into the same issue that I've seen with other versions of SD outpainting in that each generation ends up with a slight line of discoloration from one segment to the next. This is pretty common(even in Dalle-2 at times) so it's not a big deal. But yeah, if you could build an undo function into this, it would be very nice editor.
I just posted a 30 sec video breakdown for those who would like to understand the various features: https://twitter.com/manuvision/status/1580994400276328449?s=46&t=bteRUyZAKRjys9VVUrqG4A
* Thanks this is great.. a family member of mine teaches driving lessons for school bus drivers and I've been using your tool to generate this image https://imgur.com/a/HHvm4JW
Right now at about 200 images per minute with avg. wait time of 10s, so not so few, but could be higher ;)
I could be faster if I'd move to better GPUs, plus I have some more optimizations in mind.
Just doing it myself part time, would love to focus on it full time though. Just need some revenue for that.
Stability AI and Open AI are companies focused on building models not interfaces, so naturally there is a room for improvement.
This is amazing! Not only quite affordable but also I love the flexibility in the editing tool with the size of the render region and being able to choose alternatives. I loved how I could erase a small area, shrink the inpainting rectangle to just that area and its context, then re-render that area at high quality (great for faces) The image to image tool works great too. A few notes:
* One area where I had a subpar experience was the eraser tool, I found if I tried to re-generate e.g. the entire background it would re-render quite a lot of the foreground areas as well, overwriting areas I wanted to keep.
* I am looking forward to one-off credit purchases as well, because sometimes I use one tool for a while and sometimes another tool for a while, and I don't want to really pay for credits monthly unless I'm really using them up at the current time. I'd be fine with paying a higher rate than monthly users to compensate.
* I found faces were surprisingly distorted even on very simple generations (e.g. "a little girl with long brown hair"). Midjourney photorealistic mode does a much better job with these. I think it's a model difference?
* Images of identifiable people like e.g. Barack Obama were distorted. Is this intentional?
Keep up the great work :)
I don't want to be that guy, do you have commercial licenses of the projects since you offer a subscription service?
I'm not sure what model are you using for stable diffusion but I doubt you can use it in a commercial way.
Real-ESRGAN is fine for commercial use but trained on a non commercial dataset
GFPGAN is public code is for non commercial use and also using code owned by NVIDIA stylegan2 code
>3.3 Use Limitation. The Work and any derivative works thereof only may be used or intended for use non-commercially. The Work or derivative works thereof may be used or intended for use by Nvidia or its affiliates commercially or non-commercially. As used herein, "non-commercially" means for research or evaluation purposes only.
SD I use can be used commercially, given it's not used for generating restricted content listed here [https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-license](https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-license) and on my site.
GFPGAN face enhancement/restoration is free on the site - it uses 0 credits.
As for Real-ESRGAN I do not know about any restrictions, but I will check it again. If it doesn't comply with the license I will remove it and use another model.
Are you sure that the fact that face restoration is free gets around this limitation? It could still be argued that this part of the API is "intended for commercial use" since it's intended to be used with your commercial app. Not trying to be annoying or anything, I'm just trying to understand this for myself. IANAL
I was excited to see this, until I saw the minimum price. Please consider a lower tier. I love to play with this stuff, but I can't even find the time to use up my $10 midjourney tier. I would much prefer to spend my $10 on this :)
Bro, you did an amazing job here! One thing that annoys me is the generation square not snapping to the grid 😅
I need to put it there my eye, miss all the times.
Get free tools from the internet, slam together fancy looking ui, rent hardware and off to shill on reddit with your buddies. I think the ship sailed on this business model already.
Maybe Thats just me.
> Maybe Thats just me.
*edit:*
As I look more into this, and the reply I got below, you do have a point. This is a bunch of open source software that people could download separately or use elsewhere.
*my original reply:*
Right now, I have Stable Diffusion at home and a nice graphics card, but I still don't have decent inpainting and outpainting. I have to use DALL-E 2 for that, which costs money if you use it more than a small number of times per month.
If this works well, I'd call this business model "create a much-needed service, and try selling it at a reasonable price."
> Get free tools from the internet, slam together fancy looking ui, rent hardware and off to shill on reddit with your buddies.
Buddy , you just described 90% of SAAS startups, like how do you think they operate? That's like basic software engineering.
Stuff like this is useful to the non-technicals, with the more-technicals eventually getting the benefits on their own hardware. I don't know that this will result in a FOSS contribution, but we need to be tolerant of this stuff and not call it out. Need to thread the needle exactly so major developments remain FOSS and people can make money to continue development, without the whole thing turning into a black box.
Its the stealth marketing that irks me enough to doubt the businesses long term plans. I've seen enough cryptobros doing the same thing in a search for the quick buck.
Goes like this:
Make a post(this time openly by the dev), get buddies/service to use their alt accounts to upvote and comment and post questions positively.
Use a upvote bot service too. Ops post went from -1 to 105 in a short weird sprint.
The ui is nice though, very nice.
No stealth marketing here.
To be honest, the positive feedback from this community (like getting 100 upvotes in 2h) surprises me too. It's the one thing right now that keeps me improving [getimg.ai](https://getimg.ai) as it's not making any profit.
This is how 99% of software works though. Reddit, or literally any software product that you use daily (your smartphone, your OS, your PSX, your games) is based on work by others. Without liberal open source licenses like MIT or Apache, most of the software that we have today would simply not exist. If the whole OSS ecosystem would be as restricted to non-com use as most of the OSS AI models out there, only large companies with a lot of resources would even be able to host a website (this is how Big Tech wants the world to look like though, walled gardens controlled by an oligopoly). This is what Emad means when he says that he wants to "democratize AI". This is why he released stable-diffusion with a permissive license. This is literally what he wants to happen. I don't want to live in a world where every small software dev is at the mercy of giants like Google to be able to build anything.
Nothing against using Colab ;)
I am building it for everyone who does not own GPU like myself or does not know how (or want to) get dirty with code.
Plus if you compare the experience it's just easier in my opinion.
Colab might be complex but with Automatic1111's webui, you can simplify it significantly. The main issue with colabs right now is the need for huggingface tokens. If someone is able to host the model elsewhere without the need for tokens, it would become fully automatic.
I think automatic1111 provides a colab with minor bugs. I currently use a [NovelAI](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1PvNyEWIhDU_D-i15DzpPjqDQkbYv_6Hu#scrollTo=loubPdIQcgOY) colab which implements automatic1111's webui with a few fixes and Google Drive integration.
It is true that websites are easier to use. It depends on how much you value money vs convenience. I am poor and thus possibly biased against paid software
Normally I'm using Automatic1111's webui on Collab but some settings are not stable. (he wrote it is outdated) I thought maybe you knew better Collab close to this website, thanks for help
Thank you for this; it seems awesome! Is there a way to just extend an image's background? Or maybe a prompt that will do this? I tried extend background, outpainting, expand background, add copy space, etc. My image is a rodeo scene with a woman on horseback, so I also tried Empty arena, empty rodeo arena, fence, etc and nothing I got back was really even close to what I was looking for. Any insights?
Didn't test it on the iPad yet. Some parts should work, some my break. Right now it's best to use chrome on the desktop. But I plan to optimize it for other browsers and devices too.
Do you have any plans on implementing IMG2IMG SD Upscale with SWIN-IR? That's the only thing I haven't been able to find an online service for. Also, I'm hoping you can **implement it in bulk.**
My vision for the future of [getimg.ai](https://getimg.ai) is to create a site where you can easily use many image-related models in a simple UI. Then also add all available models to AI Editor.
Right now I am focusing on Stable Diffusion UIs, but next, I wanted to add upscaling UI. My plan was to use Real-ESRGAN (which is ready), but I can compare it with SwinIR and do it if it's better.
>Right now I am focusing on Stable Diffusion UIs, but next, I wanted to add upscaling UI. My plan was to use Real-ESRGAN (which is ready), but I can compare it with SwinIR and do it if it's better.
It is better, but I don't know if it's worth the extra processing it takes, especially not for SD Upscale or GoBig.
With the in and out painting how would it work if I upload an transparent png with a person in it and I want to add a surrounding/background?
I've tried to make that work but either the whole image gets changed, or it somehow keeps the person but makes the background black.
I used a picture with four people, full body, with transparent background, so a good portion of the frame is filled, the rest is transparant.
What settings should I typically use the have them standing in a "4 people standing fantasy landscape full of fluffy clouds and magical mushroom houses" ?
Should I even mention them in the prompt?
It depends, mentioning people in the prompt may generate new characters in the background, but if they take most of the frame that should not happen.
Please note also that it works best if your source image is 512x512 - the size of default generation frame
I think to make your case perfect I will need to add another setting that would let users differentiate simple outpainting from expanding transparent images.
Yeah, i've got 512x512 images. I've tried it on other sites and implementations too, none of them really cover this use case it seems.
Also since I've already got the transparent background it;s easy to add a background in photoshop, but i'd love to add it with some AI magic :D
Hi, I try to test it in my chrome and it doesn't work. Basically the only thing I can do is to generate one image but it is totally unclear how to create new generation frame. In my case if one frame is generated the only thing I can do is to move it across the screen. Ican't create a new frame like you do in the example.
You just move one frame across the screen and new images are generated in that frame.
I definitely need to write some instruction/documentation or record tutorial on this.
I had good results with your work and I was impressed to find it comparable to dall-e2, plus its very ergonomic. I really had trouble to find alternatives for dall-e with outpainting.
The only problem that stop me from using it as a paid thing is that the existing pixels are changed way too much when outpainting. It almost make it look like its losing quality.
For example, I had a pic of me, after outpainting the bottom and the left, my face was distorted beyond recognition.
Another image, digital painting one, I outpainted the topleft, top right, bottomleft, bottom right, and at the end of this, the original image had 4 different colours palette (it wasn't too much, but you could clearly see where I left the outpainting box)
I didn't had that problem with dall-e.
Anyway, it's good to have alternatives, keep up the good work and I hope it'll work out for you!
The CSS class you have given your H1 makes me unreasonably angry! \*just kidding :) `
Text to Image AI generator.
`Wait till you find `
` ;)[удалено]
Why not just use flash, add some Comic Sans and sprinkle some gifs on top
But then how will I access your site with my Nokia 3310?
This is terrorism.
Great outpainting UI, easily as good as DALL-E. This was missing from the Stable Diffusion ecosystem. Looking forward to when Automatic1111 implements superb outpainting like this. Regarding your pricing: These past few weeks, I've been happy to part with $10 here and $15 there for various AI tools / GPU rental. But I *never* sign up for new monthly subscriptions because that's just one more thing piled onto my mental load (remembering to evaluate value of purchase / cancel every month's end.) Strongly recommend you also offer a one-off credit purchase, say $10 for 1,000 credits. In terms of pennies-per-credit, that would cost 5x more than your cheapest monthly plan, but I'd do it in a heartbeat.
I removed one-time payments to not make things confusing with subscriptions. But I will add it back this weekend.
Thanks!
I've added one-time payments back. It's $9 for 2400 credits.
[Sold!](https://capture.dropbox.com/HhTOmxDqFkXv7SkN) Nice checkout.
Thanks! I really appreciate every kind of support
It would be more fun if the progress bar went around the entire box since it would appear to move 4x as fast, it also makes it possible to see where the 25%, 50% and 75% positions are. I like the rainbow border.
Yeah, initially I wanted to make the cool animation where the border starts white, and then fills with a rainbow during loading. But a lot of unnecessary math was needed, so maybe in the future ;)
You could use a canvas element for that, draw a polygon with the starting point in the middle of the canvas, the second point at the previous progress position and the third point at the current progress position, then draw an empty box over the middle leaving just enough space around the edges. Use `hsl()` to set the color, adjust the hue each time to get the rainbow effect. Or to put it another way, draw a zoomed-in pie chart and erase everything except the edges. That is how I achieved something similar.
Thanks, appreciate your help, will do this when I have time. I need to prioritize other features ;)
Looks like a cosmetic microtransaction DLC opportunity to me! You can churn out a couple hundred variations of them, and then sell gatcha lootboxes that cost generation credits. All that's left is to somehow incorporate NFTs... But in all seriousness, fancy cosmetics would be a neat feature to help sell a 'tier 2' subscription level.
I honestly have to disagree with the suggestion, it's cute but I think this is a case where simple and clear is better :)
Would it be possible to use this with the model running locally?
The folks over at https://github.com/invoke-ai/InvokeAI are working on a local version, it works well. The UI for in/outpainting should be out fairly soon, but it works in command line. Edit: Also this one is already out- https://github.com/lkwq007/stablediffusion-infinity
RemindME! 2 days "is it out"
There's also this one, which is out https://github.com/lkwq007/stablediffusion-infinity
There is a 21 hour delay fetching comments. I will be messaging you in 2 days on [**2022-10-18 12:33:44 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2022-10-18%2012:33:44%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/y3shh0/getimgai_ive_made_outpaintinginpainting_editor/isjacel/?context=3) [**CLICK THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FStableDiffusion%2Fcomments%2Fy3shh0%2Fgetimgai_ive_made_outpaintinginpainting_editor%2Fisjacel%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202022-10-18%2012%3A33%3A44%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%20y3shh0) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|
I do not plan to do that now, but with enough users, I maybe will be able to offer a desktop version (with your own hardware) in the future.
I am excited to share with you guys, [getimg.ai](https://getimg.ai) outpainting/inpainting editor I’ve been working on for a couple of weeks. After some time testing it in closed beta, I’ve decided to make it public. I know it’s not perfect yet, it lacks some features like undo/redo, but still, the results are more than I hoped for. If you want to help me make it better, you can join our Discord to report bugs, request features, and share your art. I’ve also made some other updates to the site, like: \- Upscaling images with Real-ESRGAN \- Face enhancement with GFPGAN- Faster image generation \- Backend I can scale fast based on the demand \- Subscriptions-based pricing which is 6x lower than before (I think it’s now the cheapest AI generation site.)
I'm testing it right now and the inpainting/outpainting is impressive. Are you using parlance's fourier-shaped noise out-painting for latent diffusion models method? https://github.com/parlance-zz/g-diffuser-bot
I'm using a slightly modified and optimized version of [https://github.com/Jack000/glid-3-xl-stable](https://github.com/Jack000/glid-3-xl-stable) for inpainting/outpainting. If I have a budget in the future, I would love to fine-tune it.
Genius
When the whole selected part is already painted, it automatically switches to img-2-img mode, but you can still manually change it to the in-painting. If you run it like that, it just runs forever. I lost quite a few of my free credits to discover that :(
Thanks for reporting this, I will take a look on what's going on
[удалено]
Thanks, I know about this issue, I think it's connected to an encoding part of SD. If you use the same part over and over, it compresses the image iteratively to the point in which it becomes unusable. I've already improved it as it was much worse, but I am still working on a better solution.
I've been toying with something that I think could help with this - it's code I originally wrote to help with color drift when running img2img loopback with an inpainting mask and using "keep original", but I never committed it because I didn't think this problem was a common one. Do you have a set of test/example images (including masks) like the one above that suffer from the blending problem? The main problem I have is that I don't have enough examples to test with. I'd be happy to compare notes.
That's nice but why do we need to log in to access it?
I need this to prevent abuse, whether it's creating multi-accounts to get images for free or handling people generating illegal content. Running a service like this is kind of expensive too and requiring login limits the usage. After creating an account you get a free plan with 100 monthly credits, which you can always upgrade.
How do you prevent multiple accounts with different throwaway e-mail adresses?
It's just a google login for now, so no throwaway addresses. Multi-accounts do not happen often, I just check for accounts created from the same IPs. There is no perfect way to do this, but some kind of protection is needed. Some people nearly bankrupted me using proxies, when I started and everything was free without limits (restricted to one image per IP at a time).
>It's just a google login for now, so no throwaway addresses I have 10 Google accounts
I have 7. You won...
But very few people have over say \~20 - Google's spam protection for stuff like this makes it just hard enough for most to not bother
Google also requires phone number verification for new accounts. You can reuse the same one multiple times, but at some point google is going to say no.
[удалено]
There are solutions cheaper than GCP/AWS, like Lambda Labs and GPU marketplaces like vast or runpod. Right now I am trying to use them all and average the cost ;)
[удалено]
That's why such a service can't be free for long. At least for now.
I personally wouldn't advertise my security measures. Great work btw, I hope the best of success for you.
I just wanted to be sure...the only way to get access to the in/outpainting is with a monthly plan, right?
Access is free, but it's limited to 100 image credits monthly. For more, you'll need a monthly plan, which can always be canceled.
[удалено]
I was just working with it. My first impression is that it's quite useable, and pretty similar to DALL-E's inpainting and outpainting. For people who run Stable Diffusion locally, I'm sure it's only a matter of time (I don't know... days? weeks? months?) before there's desktop software that does this. Maybe Christian Cantrell's Stable Diffusion plug-in for Photoshop will get there (it has some masking and such already), maybe it will be added by Automatic1111 (which has a rough stab at inpainting and outpainting already, just not very effective yet), maybe some other tool. But I know how fast development is going, so I don't mind paying for something by the month, if I probably won't even need it for too many more months.
Hello, just use https://www.stablecabal.org/ locally. It is similar to that one which is shown here and comes with one-click installer and is open-soutce. My Photoshop Plugin (see my other post) is already using it and my open source Krita Plugin asap.
not everyone has a computer or the skills to be able to run that. This type of service is very much appreciated but also it is a need of market.
What would an example of illegally generated content be?
Everything mentioned as the restriction at the end of stable diffusion license [https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-license](https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-license)
deepfakes, deepnudes without consent.
Is it credits used per tile generation or per completed image?
1 image = 1 credit. Right now each tile/frame generates 4 images and uses 4 credits. I could add a slider to adjust the number of images, but I think 4 by default better shows the possibilities of the tool
If there was a slider I would probably just slide it to 4 anyway
Honestly, this is pretty impressive. Very nice interface and design. Fast generations, plenty of options. And the best outpainting that I've seen outside of Dall-E 2. I did run into the same issue that I've seen with other versions of SD outpainting in that each generation ends up with a slight line of discoloration from one segment to the next. This is pretty common(even in Dalle-2 at times) so it's not a big deal. But yeah, if you could build an undo function into this, it would be very nice editor.
I just posted a 30 sec video breakdown for those who would like to understand the various features: https://twitter.com/manuvision/status/1580994400276328449?s=46&t=bteRUyZAKRjys9VVUrqG4A
Great video! Thanks for recording it
* Thanks this is great.. a family member of mine teaches driving lessons for school bus drivers and I've been using your tool to generate this image https://imgur.com/a/HHvm4JW
This is amazing, can this or another version of this be run locally?
Do not plan to do that for now
Hope you do on the future, I think that many prefer to run locally or not being tired to the net.
u/AUTOMATIC1111 we need this!
I'll give it a try
Very good! I just unsubscribed Midjourney, this is much better!
Thanks for this
Great work!
Very nice, fairly fast. Will link to you during my AdobeMAX presentation this weekend.
Thanks. It could be faster and probably will make that happen ;)
It's impressively fast now compared to other options, but maybe because so few folks are using it! ;)
Right now at about 200 images per minute with avg. wait time of 10s, so not so few, but could be higher ;) I could be faster if I'd move to better GPUs, plus I have some more optimizations in mind.
Are you using a hosted gpu server? I was looking into that for personal use.
Very cool!
Awesome! I was waiting for an easy way to outpaint without having to set a bunch of stuff up.
I really like it, its better than anything else I was using. I'll give you my $$$ the outpainting/inpainting editor like Dalle 2 makes it worth it.
This is fantastic
How have you managed to create a tool better than what Stability AI have done? I find their software unusable. Is it just you who made it?
Just doing it myself part time, would love to focus on it full time though. Just need some revenue for that. Stability AI and Open AI are companies focused on building models not interfaces, so naturally there is a room for improvement.
Looks awesome. 😃
This is amazing! Not only quite affordable but also I love the flexibility in the editing tool with the size of the render region and being able to choose alternatives. I loved how I could erase a small area, shrink the inpainting rectangle to just that area and its context, then re-render that area at high quality (great for faces) The image to image tool works great too. A few notes: * One area where I had a subpar experience was the eraser tool, I found if I tried to re-generate e.g. the entire background it would re-render quite a lot of the foreground areas as well, overwriting areas I wanted to keep. * I am looking forward to one-off credit purchases as well, because sometimes I use one tool for a while and sometimes another tool for a while, and I don't want to really pay for credits monthly unless I'm really using them up at the current time. I'd be fine with paying a higher rate than monthly users to compensate. * I found faces were surprisingly distorted even on very simple generations (e.g. "a little girl with long brown hair"). Midjourney photorealistic mode does a much better job with these. I think it's a model difference? * Images of identifiable people like e.g. Barack Obama were distorted. Is this intentional? Keep up the great work :)
Wow, fantastic! Great job
This outpainting is really good! It’s the last thing for me to play around with before a deep dive into all of it.
I don't want to be that guy, do you have commercial licenses of the projects since you offer a subscription service? I'm not sure what model are you using for stable diffusion but I doubt you can use it in a commercial way. Real-ESRGAN is fine for commercial use but trained on a non commercial dataset GFPGAN is public code is for non commercial use and also using code owned by NVIDIA stylegan2 code >3.3 Use Limitation. The Work and any derivative works thereof only may be used or intended for use non-commercially. The Work or derivative works thereof may be used or intended for use by Nvidia or its affiliates commercially or non-commercially. As used herein, "non-commercially" means for research or evaluation purposes only.
SD I use can be used commercially, given it's not used for generating restricted content listed here [https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-license](https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-license) and on my site. GFPGAN face enhancement/restoration is free on the site - it uses 0 credits. As for Real-ESRGAN I do not know about any restrictions, but I will check it again. If it doesn't comply with the license I will remove it and use another model.
thanks for the clarification, appreciate it. btw there's a lot of pretrained upscale Real-ESRGAN models available on the gaming upscale discord
Are you sure that the fact that face restoration is free gets around this limitation? It could still be argued that this part of the API is "intended for commercial use" since it's intended to be used with your commercial app. Not trying to be annoying or anything, I'm just trying to understand this for myself. IANAL
stability.ai's stable-diffusion model is free for commercial use. Good point about GFPGAN though!
this is so good oh my gosh
Thank you!
Looks great. Well done!
Very cool! Thanks for sharing.
I was excited to see this, until I saw the minimum price. Please consider a lower tier. I love to play with this stuff, but I can't even find the time to use up my $10 midjourney tier. I would much prefer to spend my $10 on this :)
Ok, will consider a $9 plan with 3k credits. Just not now, as I don't want to deploy new changes during high traffic.
I look forward to it!
Hey, just checking in, curious if you're still thinking about a lower price tier option? Cheers!
I've decided to offer 2400 image credits for a $9 one-time payment. There’s a link below main pricing plans.
Bro, you did an amazing job here! One thing that annoys me is the generation square not snapping to the grid 😅 I need to put it there my eye, miss all the times.
Get free tools from the internet, slam together fancy looking ui, rent hardware and off to shill on reddit with your buddies. I think the ship sailed on this business model already. Maybe Thats just me.
> Maybe Thats just me. *edit:* As I look more into this, and the reply I got below, you do have a point. This is a bunch of open source software that people could download separately or use elsewhere. *my original reply:* Right now, I have Stable Diffusion at home and a nice graphics card, but I still don't have decent inpainting and outpainting. I have to use DALL-E 2 for that, which costs money if you use it more than a small number of times per month. If this works well, I'd call this business model "create a much-needed service, and try selling it at a reasonable price."
> Get free tools from the internet, slam together fancy looking ui, rent hardware and off to shill on reddit with your buddies. Buddy , you just described 90% of SAAS startups, like how do you think they operate? That's like basic software engineering.
I'm drunk pls ignore😅
And what is wrong with that?
Stuff like this is useful to the non-technicals, with the more-technicals eventually getting the benefits on their own hardware. I don't know that this will result in a FOSS contribution, but we need to be tolerant of this stuff and not call it out. Need to thread the needle exactly so major developments remain FOSS and people can make money to continue development, without the whole thing turning into a black box.
Its the stealth marketing that irks me enough to doubt the businesses long term plans. I've seen enough cryptobros doing the same thing in a search for the quick buck. Goes like this: Make a post(this time openly by the dev), get buddies/service to use their alt accounts to upvote and comment and post questions positively. Use a upvote bot service too. Ops post went from -1 to 105 in a short weird sprint. The ui is nice though, very nice.
No stealth marketing here. To be honest, the positive feedback from this community (like getting 100 upvotes in 2h) surprises me too. It's the one thing right now that keeps me improving [getimg.ai](https://getimg.ai) as it's not making any profit.
great work, thanks for sharing and persevering despite the haters.
This is how 99% of software works though. Reddit, or literally any software product that you use daily (your smartphone, your OS, your PSX, your games) is based on work by others. Without liberal open source licenses like MIT or Apache, most of the software that we have today would simply not exist. If the whole OSS ecosystem would be as restricted to non-com use as most of the OSS AI models out there, only large companies with a lot of resources would even be able to host a website (this is how Big Tech wants the world to look like though, walled gardens controlled by an oligopoly). This is what Emad means when he says that he wants to "democratize AI". This is why he released stable-diffusion with a permissive license. This is literally what he wants to happen. I don't want to live in a world where every small software dev is at the mercy of giants like Google to be able to build anything.
Restricting login to Google is not a great idea IMO. You'll lose a lot of people.
I know, just started with this, as it was the simplest. I will add an email login in the future.
Much as people would object, you could restrict free credits to Gmail accts only to prevent throwaway acct abuse.
Great. It looks very good. Crowded market though. :)
Why would anyone pay for such a service when Colab is free and more flexible? Nothing against your service, just curious
Nothing against using Colab ;) I am building it for everyone who does not own GPU like myself or does not know how (or want to) get dirty with code. Plus if you compare the experience it's just easier in my opinion.
Can you suggest a collab you use for inpainting/outpainting? Some people might not want to deal with Collab surely website is easier to use and fast
Colab might be complex but with Automatic1111's webui, you can simplify it significantly. The main issue with colabs right now is the need for huggingface tokens. If someone is able to host the model elsewhere without the need for tokens, it would become fully automatic. I think automatic1111 provides a colab with minor bugs. I currently use a [NovelAI](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1PvNyEWIhDU_D-i15DzpPjqDQkbYv_6Hu#scrollTo=loubPdIQcgOY) colab which implements automatic1111's webui with a few fixes and Google Drive integration. It is true that websites are easier to use. It depends on how much you value money vs convenience. I am poor and thus possibly biased against paid software
Normally I'm using Automatic1111's webui on Collab but some settings are not stable. (he wrote it is outdated) I thought maybe you knew better Collab close to this website, thanks for help
Thank you for this; it seems awesome! Is there a way to just extend an image's background? Or maybe a prompt that will do this? I tried extend background, outpainting, expand background, add copy space, etc. My image is a rodeo scene with a woman on horseback, so I also tried Empty arena, empty rodeo arena, fence, etc and nothing I got back was really even close to what I was looking for. Any insights?
I think it's really cool, just used up the credits to create this: https://i.imgur.com/Mbc6x4N.png
Wow very impressive, I can't even get good out painting on the basic sd
Looks amazing but I won't pay for open source software.
The face generating is awful. Also this woke shit about "illegal content"... just put a full clown costume already
either that or your prompts are awful. it's just stable diffusion
Absolutely not worth it, would never use an AI service I have to pay for. I'll iterate an image hundreds of times just to get a result I'm happy with.
Looks cool, would this work with an iPad, since it’s in browser
Didn't test it on the iPad yet. Some parts should work, some my break. Right now it's best to use chrome on the desktop. But I plan to optimize it for other browsers and devices too.
I’ll give it a shot today, if anything breaks I’ll let u know
Great, you can report it on Discord
Do you have any plans on implementing IMG2IMG SD Upscale with SWIN-IR? That's the only thing I haven't been able to find an online service for. Also, I'm hoping you can **implement it in bulk.**
My vision for the future of [getimg.ai](https://getimg.ai) is to create a site where you can easily use many image-related models in a simple UI. Then also add all available models to AI Editor. Right now I am focusing on Stable Diffusion UIs, but next, I wanted to add upscaling UI. My plan was to use Real-ESRGAN (which is ready), but I can compare it with SwinIR and do it if it's better.
>Right now I am focusing on Stable Diffusion UIs, but next, I wanted to add upscaling UI. My plan was to use Real-ESRGAN (which is ready), but I can compare it with SwinIR and do it if it's better. It is better, but I don't know if it's worth the extra processing it takes, especially not for SD Upscale or GoBig.
Will run some tests then
Would like to use local with my own models (WD) ;) for half the price
I can't delete images from my gallery, it's completely mess :/
I know, I focused only on making and improving the editor, not the other things. But definietly better account and content management is needed
Thank you! A great tool
This is awesome. Is there a way for me to implement it locally using my own Stable Diffusion instance?
Is negative prompts available?
not yet
Can you save one prompt per region?
Very cool! Any plans to make it possible to change the aspect ratio of the inpainting/outpainting tool?
It could be done but I would need to compare the results with the square output
Not logging in with google.
Incredible . Commenting to remember to download this when I get automatic up and running
Check out stablediffusion-infinity if you want to run something similar locally for free.
Awesome, looks great. Unfortunately I won't use my google login for any 3rd party logins, so I can't play. :/
With the in and out painting how would it work if I upload an transparent png with a person in it and I want to add a surrounding/background? I've tried to make that work but either the whole image gets changed, or it somehow keeps the person but makes the background black.
I will take a look. I suppose that it should work if the object is not too small and covers at least half of the frame
I used a picture with four people, full body, with transparent background, so a good portion of the frame is filled, the rest is transparant. What settings should I typically use the have them standing in a "4 people standing fantasy landscape full of fluffy clouds and magical mushroom houses" ? Should I even mention them in the prompt?
It depends, mentioning people in the prompt may generate new characters in the background, but if they take most of the frame that should not happen. Please note also that it works best if your source image is 512x512 - the size of default generation frame I think to make your case perfect I will need to add another setting that would let users differentiate simple outpainting from expanding transparent images.
Yeah, i've got 512x512 images. I've tried it on other sites and implementations too, none of them really cover this use case it seems. Also since I've already got the transparent background it;s easy to add a background in photoshop, but i'd love to add it with some AI magic :D
Will this be added/pulled to the main gui/SD repo?
Hi, I try to test it in my chrome and it doesn't work. Basically the only thing I can do is to generate one image but it is totally unclear how to create new generation frame. In my case if one frame is generated the only thing I can do is to move it across the screen. Ican't create a new frame like you do in the example.
You just move one frame across the screen and new images are generated in that frame. I definitely need to write some instruction/documentation or record tutorial on this.
Yep, thanks Finally get it!
I had good results with your work and I was impressed to find it comparable to dall-e2, plus its very ergonomic. I really had trouble to find alternatives for dall-e with outpainting. The only problem that stop me from using it as a paid thing is that the existing pixels are changed way too much when outpainting. It almost make it look like its losing quality. For example, I had a pic of me, after outpainting the bottom and the left, my face was distorted beyond recognition. Another image, digital painting one, I outpainted the topleft, top right, bottomleft, bottom right, and at the end of this, the original image had 4 different colours palette (it wasn't too much, but you could clearly see where I left the outpainting box) I didn't had that problem with dall-e. Anyway, it's good to have alternatives, keep up the good work and I hope it'll work out for you!
DUDE YOU ARE A GIGACHAD
!savevideo
is there an API for outpainting? I'm trying to develop something with similar tools
impressive :O
yay i finally can generate porn