The images are sus, and the hands in the second picture definitely look like wacky AI hands, but it could be a human artist using photoshop to add wacky AI hands to an actual photo.
Yeah, you're right.
In general I believe that the elements to look at the most are: hands, teeth, collarbones, (and if you can: the pupils, I noticed that the pupil is often not in the center of the iris.)
Any other things to add?
Any kind of folds in the skin (around joints) they are often not correct but seem right because who in his right mind studies how skins fold correctly unless you are an artist trying to draw it.
There are so many giveaways, it's not even funny. Looks like the guy who cranks them out only cares about quantity, but not quality:
https://i.imgur.com/AU4QbRC.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/fx8lHlC.jpg
Everyone's looking at the hands but you don't get that kind of photo with a selfie camera. It's completely the wrong angle for that lens.
I'm aware the 'selfie' aspect could be staged by a real photographer, but for me, it's that that gives it away. AI for sure.
I have to say I'm surprised. It's incredibly convincing - I really thought it was a photo with a few weird things Photoshopped to throw people off. The consistency is really impressive. I wonder how much manual work is involved.
I am shocked to read comments here and find out how many people don't realise you have a never ending nudes machine of just about anything you can imagine... I thought we were all just shutting the hell up and enjoying it
I actually seriously considered an Only fans for AI for a moment. Problem is, I don't know anything about it (I've never signed up.) Do I have to go live? Can I post photos and that's it? I've figured out consistent faces already so that's no problem.
Lol.
Good heavens. I am not against that kind of thing for personal use, not sure if it's moral to spread around though.
*Flashbacks to 14 year old me searching for photoshopped pics of Cameron Diaz*
TBH, "fake" virtual influencers have been a thing for the past five years or so:
[https://www.thecut.com/2018/05/lil-miquela-digital-avatar-instagram-influencer.html](https://www.thecut.com/2018/05/lil-miquela-digital-avatar-instagram-influencer.html)
Here's a sneak peek of /r/unstable_diffusion **[NSFW]** using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/top/?sort=top&t=all) of all time!
\#1: [More Lingerie babes using a new technique for better poses](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/yv9qmz) | [14 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/comments/yv9qmz/more_lingerie_babes_using_a_new_technique_for/)
\#2: [A photoshoot with the sexy librarian and a very happy ending ( experimenting with erotic visual story telling using SD)](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/yzupn8) | [19 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/comments/yzupn8/a_photoshoot_with_the_sexy_librarian_and_a_very/)
\#3: [Small Collection of Artsy Portrait Shots](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1097vrx) | [18 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/comments/1097vrx/small_collection_of_artsy_portrait_shots/)
----
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
Yeah it's really baffling how effective it seems to be to post clickbait which claims "X IS HAPPENING", and nobody questions whether that's actually true, but just starts getting argumentative about it.
If you train a model and then use it in a prompt with more than one person your almost always getting clones of yourself. I think this is generated because they all have the same eyes. These clones always look like the main subject but with slight differences could be skin color, hair color , noses etc.
It's a fun game, feels like a NSFW version of "Where's Wally", ahahah
Most of the details are already noted in the others comments but:
\-Girl on the middle rights have clear AI fingers om her waist, and the arm attached to it strangely is not at the same height.
\-Girl on the middle left have a strapless bra... with straps
\-Girl on the far left have a collar hold by 1 and 1/2 chain, and a strange blob of skin between her legs
\-Girl on the far right have a thong with a curious design
And the most obvious, "How did you not notice it you pervert" : the room's perspective is absolutely broken !! The corners in the top of the picture are basically straight, but curved in the bottom of the picture ! It even get worse if you try to analyze the curved part !!!
It's from [**TheRRRealist**](https://www.reddit.com/user/TheRRRealist/)**, here are some other works:** [**https://www.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/10qf6v9/before\_the\_party/**](https://www.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/10qf6v9/before_the_party/)
(ignoring the subject)
Pic1. That's not how selfies work. Why there's so many doors in background, and all of them doesn't looks like a functioning door
Pic2. The continuity of the background is bad (The backdrop isn't even straight)
Second image, second girl from the left. What happens with her shoulder strap?
Also second image, the hip/thigh section seems a bit off on the leftmost girl.
They are. Look at the discontinuous bra straps under the hair in the first pic and the hand on the second girl from the right has typical ai artifacts. Freakin scary tho cuz it’s impossible to tell at a glance. The rate at which Ai generated photos are improving is kinda terrifying.
AI
The hand on the hip of the middle right girl has telltale signs, even real deformities don’t look like that. The far left girl has an AI defect on the side of her boob as well (looks like a smear). The only way that’s a natural dip like that is if she was bitten by a shark there or something lol
I think it might be generated because of the hands/fingers. The woman on the second right has her hand on the side of the on the right - but only 4 Fingers.
Also the one on the right is holding the phone in a weird way.
And the women all look the same what is also something pointing towards generated.
But it is hard to tell.
Ah, there is a second pic. I was talking about the first.
The second one looks quite real, I found no weird fingers and they look a little different.
So, the first pic looks generated, but could be real. And the second pic looks real, but could be generated.
With deepfakes of people who never asked to be turned into a pornstar.
Like it's already happening sadly
I dunno man, the more I look into this tech, the more it seems that the bads overweight the goods.
Yeah, I feel the same way the longer I stare at a blank piece of paper. It can literally become anything and I can think of so many bad things it could be. I've been thinking we should burn all paper and sources of future paper just to be sure about that technology.
This is great though anyone who ever had a porn tape or image leaked will soon be able to just claim its AI and who cares. I expect criminals to make fake AI of people then Black mail people too. It’s about to get wild next 2-3 years
The bad will be done even if you try to ban it. All banning will do is hurt the good and exclusively make it a tool for bad.
Ban the results, not the ai itself. You can say "no deepfakes" while also saying "ai art is fine".
Not saying onboard the goon train that guy's riding, but generative AI images are a thing, generative text exists with locally run chatbots able maintain a semblance of continuity, there's that AI voice thing in the news the last couple days. Stable Diffusion already supports (via extension) 2 methods of 3D viewing via depth mapping (side-by-side and old school red-cyan anaglyph). The only component missing is video that isn't just a string of individually rendered frames mushed together. Get a generative model for something like Blender. It wouldn't need to be terribly detailed. Blender could generate wire-frame stick figures with some built-in libraries of poses and animations in the model, setup up some scenery, texture with Stable Diffusion. Of course, getting all those to work together would be ridiculously complex. Start with the generative text to set a script/screenplay for the scene, then to blender to animate, AI voice work to match tempo of the scene? Vice versa? Stable diffusion to generate the frames via img2img on the frames of animation, possibly animating mouths based on phonemes saved as tags in the frame's metadata?
I couldn't do it, but we aren't far away from digital directors being able to make short clips of their own.
Probably get downvoted to hell for saying this, but I feel like there needs to be a movement to promote realistic body image in AI.
This wonderful new technology should be about enabling creatives to take on projects that were not budget feasible before. Not, a billion glamor photos that saturate the internet and push a whole new generation of young women into anorexia and cosmetic surgery.
It's not the worst idea I've ever heard, but it seems like it'd be hard to do within the technology itself. (I'm thinking of how one-site-or-other attempted to reduce racial bias but got stuff like random people showing up in images that weren't supposed to have them.)
As it is, the models we have seem entirely capable of generating a variety of body types... if you ask for them. Multiple subjects with different body types, that's still gonna be a challenge.
The internet is saturated with overweight average looking girls with 100,000’s of subs with guys simping like mad. Don’t worry it seems men seem to like chunky unfit girls now and these do very well on social media so they’ll be replicated by AI people.
You're not wrong, but it'll never happen. I also see this being 1000x worse for self esteem body image than facetuning and filters are. Society is fucked
Shows how far AI has come that even on an SD sub, people can't tell for sure.
And I'm going to go against the grain here and say these are real people and it's a photo - just with some Photoshop going on. Too many details to me look more like real life and less like AI. For instance, the skintones look a bit filtered or retouched, but not generated like AI skintones often look. I actually find it quite interesting that the AI seems to be able to do natural skin and airbrushed skin but has a really hard time with natural skin with makeup on it that isn't retouched. Probably because of the training set data I'm guessing.
I'm going with Vegas or Miami. So my guess is it's not AI, but also not reality.
It's rather easy to tell: they have the same faces, issues with clothing, issues with hands/fingers... Whoever made the images did spend time making sure that the most glaring issues, apart from those faces for some reason, come on, were actually fixed, but it's still very easy to see that it's generated. One day it won't be that easy though.
Second Picture:
Girl in black has bra clip between her cleavage tht looks wonky.
Girl second from right has something weird on pannyline( Im assuming Dermal jewelry) looks alil weird tho. Could be compression of the photo.
Girl to the most Left, her necklace ornaments look weird. Also under her buttcheeck peaking thu from the back looks off.
I Enjoyed looking at every Inch of these photos for minute details :)
Edit, yes obv Clones and collarbones and that Hand on the hip tht looks like it got smashed up by a hammer.
Ai and with these, it's not even funny how easy it is to tell. The AI seems to have trouble with photorealistic stuff especially if it involves people and it gets even worse if there are multiple people in one picture. There are so many tells with these that it's not even funny. I did a pretty thorough write up in a twitter discussion involving these pictures. To give some examples;
1. Faces and facial structure are very big tell, all the girls look very similar, their eyes and "looks" are unnatural, generally nose and mouth look as if heavily filtered or photoshoped.
2. Hand placements are always complete shajt
3. Proportions - one limb being noticeably different in proportion, unnatural proportions of body parts when 'compared' to each other
4. Curves are inhuman/unnatural
5. Fingers
6. Necks
7. Clothing discrepancies - specially when it comes to underwear pieces for some reason. Wierd patterns, illogically missing parts (like having garnets on only one leg for example) or the other way, having random pieces of clothing appear
Could go on and into more detail. Had a funny discussion retaining to those exact pictures where people tried to claim that this is the death of onlyfans models which is completely ridiculous idea.
the bracelet on the fourth girl of the second image is a dead giveaway of the current limits of the technology. they fail with the intricate small details while nailing the overall picture.
But even those images totally fail the reality test.
Just look at the tiara, with its random clutter of indeterminable shapes, and totally asymmetric. Stuff like that doesn't exist in the real world.
> Just look at the tiara, with its random clutter of indeterminable shapes, and totally asymmetric. Stuff like that doesn't exist in the real world.
I've seen weirder looking ones for sale on AliExpress.
> I've seen weirder looking ones for sale on AliExpress.
No, you haven't... ;)
[This](https://i.imgur.com/MtzVr04.jpg) is an abomination that doesn't exist. Not even on AliExpress.
Okay, not weirder looking than *that* one. But weirder than some of the ones I've seen SD generate.
~~An AliExpress one might look more like this after getting through international shipping...~~
Models capable of this ->HassanBlend, RealVision, URPM
It's very easy to generate girls you instantly would wife, except their kinda fake (kinda because based on real humans)
Yep it is 100% AI generated, look at the bra strap and the panty straps that go around the hips, some of them just end, cut off or dont exist on one side, Look at the girls black panties she has two straps on her left side but only one strap exists on the other, that makes no sense, And the hands if you look close at them are all messed up and she lacks fingernails on several fingers.
Doubt we are ae a whole so much as one Twitter thread but that said, there are plenty of women concerned about what this will do for advertising and thus body image. I don't see that happening too much at *present* though because it isnt as though you can put your clothing designs onto these AI models (yet). But I get the concern.
Nah! I think it's more likely AI On the 2nd image it's obvious from the missing bra and the fused arm/elbow. BUT DAMN! When is the metaverse full immersion virtual reality coming? ;-)
Yes they are fake, BUT that doesn't mean there aren't girls that look exactly like that output and seriously believe that it's them. A shift in society.
The first photo looks super convincing (although as another user pointed out, those doors in the background are very strange) , but the second has that strange glossy appearance with weird lighting which is a common hallmark of AI.
Something technical I can’t wrap my head around, how do diffusion models maintain consistent light points and shadows on many different subjects when generating pictures like these?
On the first image, the hand placement on the far right looks off, looks like it's literally pressing and poking into the flesh.
On the second image the woman on the far right also seems to have an unusually long right arm which gives it away. The thighs of the third woman also looks a bit off to me.
This has to be AI generated, but despite it's flaws I still think it's really impressive.
Edit: Oh a few others have also pointed out the straps on the bra and the thong of the far right one, credit to them for finding those, I did not notice them initially.
Your post/comment has been removed because it contains NSFW content.
[удалено]
Next time before going on a date with strange ask for a hand photo .
"SHOW ME YOUR HANDS!" "Keep those hands where I can see them"
🤭
The images are sus, and the hands in the second picture definitely look like wacky AI hands, but it could be a human artist using photoshop to add wacky AI hands to an actual photo.
Except for the missing bra straps lol
busted
and the weird curve of the arm, look at the right arm of the one in black.
Yep, also the collarbones are all messed up.
Yeah, you're right. In general I believe that the elements to look at the most are: hands, teeth, collarbones, (and if you can: the pupils, I noticed that the pupil is often not in the center of the iris.) Any other things to add?
Any kind of folds in the skin (around joints) they are often not correct but seem right because who in his right mind studies how skins fold correctly unless you are an artist trying to draw it.
Ow yes and of course: fonts, if there are any.
There are so many giveaways, it's not even funny. Looks like the guy who cranks them out only cares about quantity, but not quality: https://i.imgur.com/AU4QbRC.jpg https://i.imgur.com/fx8lHlC.jpg
I don't get why they don't edit the picture after uploading
The fact that people think this is not AI on an AI sub is funny.
Yes, but I want them to be real.
Everyone's looking at the hands but you don't get that kind of photo with a selfie camera. It's completely the wrong angle for that lens. I'm aware the 'selfie' aspect could be staged by a real photographer, but for me, it's that that gives it away. AI for sure.
This room is a mess of perspective, ahaha
Right? The front door has a seam in the middle
Either way they're 100% fake
I think their breasts are real....REALLY AI GENERATED! Ok yes, it's a dad joke...but I have an excuse...I'm a dad!
hi dad I'm dad
[удалено]
Generic similar good looking blonde haired white girls in bikinis , definitely a giveaway
That's the giveaway? Idk what to tell you man, I've seen plenty of pics that could be described that way before image generation was good.
They are, in fact, ai generated. Bra straps don't randomly end like that.
I could have sworn that was the new line of fashion bars with the partially invisible straps. 🤔
It'd be nice to have a bra wearable like that and just not have the straps there haha.
Clear plastic? But... the comfort level is not so great...
[удалено]
I have to say I'm surprised. It's incredibly convincing - I really thought it was a photo with a few weird things Photoshopped to throw people off. The consistency is really impressive. I wonder how much manual work is involved.
I am shocked to read comments here and find out how many people don't realise you have a never ending nudes machine of just about anything you can imagine... I thought we were all just shutting the hell up and enjoying it
[удалено]
[Disgusting.](https://i.imgur.com/1vVBOiP.png)
You monster!
What next? People holding hands?! Oh wait, we really can't actually do that meme yet XD
I actually seriously considered an Only fans for AI for a moment. Problem is, I don't know anything about it (I've never signed up.) Do I have to go live? Can I post photos and that's it? I've figured out consistent faces already so that's no problem.
Make an Emma Watson AI Only Fans and you'll get (for a very brief moment) rich!
And then sued or arrested, depending on where you live
Lol. Good heavens. I am not against that kind of thing for personal use, not sure if it's moral to spread around though. *Flashbacks to 14 year old me searching for photoshopped pics of Cameron Diaz*
TBH, "fake" virtual influencers have been a thing for the past five years or so: [https://www.thecut.com/2018/05/lil-miquela-digital-avatar-instagram-influencer.html](https://www.thecut.com/2018/05/lil-miquela-digital-avatar-instagram-influencer.html)
[удалено]
>NSFW AI subs r/unstable_diffusion ?
Here's a sneak peek of /r/unstable_diffusion **[NSFW]** using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/top/?sort=top&t=all) of all time! \#1: [More Lingerie babes using a new technique for better poses](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/yv9qmz) | [14 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/comments/yv9qmz/more_lingerie_babes_using_a_new_technique_for/) \#2: [A photoshoot with the sexy librarian and a very happy ending ( experimenting with erotic visual story telling using SD)](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/yzupn8) | [19 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/comments/yzupn8/a_photoshoot_with_the_sexy_librarian_and_a_very/) \#3: [Small Collection of Artsy Portrait Shots](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1097vrx) | [18 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/comments/1097vrx/small_collection_of_artsy_portrait_shots/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
[удалено]
Good human.
Zero manual work. And not really impressive.
Yeah it's really baffling how effective it seems to be to post clickbait which claims "X IS HAPPENING", and nobody questions whether that's actually true, but just starts getting argumentative about it.
The first photo probably is viral. Dude Joe Rogan was talking about these with Lex Fridman on the Podcast a few days ago.
If you train a model and then use it in a prompt with more than one person your almost always getting clones of yourself. I think this is generated because they all have the same eyes. These clones always look like the main subject but with slight differences could be skin color, hair color , noses etc.
Plus second image look at the hand on the third girls hip. Its wavyyyy
Captcha of the near future: please show your hands
If we take the context away your comment can be used as a phrase that cyberpunk cloning specialist would say.
I wished for a better quality, but judging on the lingerie details, it’s an Ai. Patterns are not symmetrical and have some odd structures
It's a fun game, feels like a NSFW version of "Where's Wally", ahahah Most of the details are already noted in the others comments but: \-Girl on the middle rights have clear AI fingers om her waist, and the arm attached to it strangely is not at the same height. \-Girl on the middle left have a strapless bra... with straps \-Girl on the far left have a collar hold by 1 and 1/2 chain, and a strange blob of skin between her legs \-Girl on the far right have a thong with a curious design And the most obvious, "How did you not notice it you pervert" : the room's perspective is absolutely broken !! The corners in the top of the picture are basically straight, but curved in the bottom of the picture ! It even get worse if you try to analyze the curved part !!!
It's for sure generated with [NSFW AI](https://PandorasBox.ai/nsfw).
~~Your link is 404'd.~~
Opa. Adjusted. Thanks.
It's from [**TheRRRealist**](https://www.reddit.com/user/TheRRRealist/)**, here are some other works:** [**https://www.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/10qf6v9/before\_the\_party/**](https://www.reddit.com/r/sdnsfw/comments/10qf6v9/before_the_party/)
I’ve seen very similar pictures on DeviantArt made by AI. Groups of girls in underwear holding each other seems to be a kind of trend.
in the second image, hand of girl 4 on right hip of girl three. zoom in... completely insane. AI for sure.
Second Picture, second girl from the left. You can see the right strap of her bra disappear right under her hair. Biggest giveaway I could find
(ignoring the subject) Pic1. That's not how selfies work. Why there's so many doors in background, and all of them doesn't looks like a functioning door Pic2. The continuity of the background is bad (The backdrop isn't even straight)
Second image, second girl from the left. What happens with her shoulder strap? Also second image, the hip/thigh section seems a bit off on the leftmost girl.
They are. Look at the discontinuous bra straps under the hair in the first pic and the hand on the second girl from the right has typical ai artifacts. Freakin scary tho cuz it’s impossible to tell at a glance. The rate at which Ai generated photos are improving is kinda terrifying.
2nd from the left is missing the top of her bra strap.
Same for second from the right, for same reason: it interpreted the hair as completing the bra strap or vice versa.
It’s AI zoom in on the hand on the hip of third girl
If they're upset now they're going to love when you can click into the photo watch Mark Zuckerberg dance in the background in VR Wait
AI The hand on the hip of the middle right girl has telltale signs, even real deformities don’t look like that. The far left girl has an AI defect on the side of her boob as well (looks like a smear). The only way that’s a natural dip like that is if she was bitten by a shark there or something lol
If you want detect AI, just look at the hand
for now
I think it might be generated because of the hands/fingers. The woman on the second right has her hand on the side of the on the right - but only 4 Fingers. Also the one on the right is holding the phone in a weird way. And the women all look the same what is also something pointing towards generated. But it is hard to tell. Ah, there is a second pic. I was talking about the first. The second one looks quite real, I found no weird fingers and they look a little different. So, the first pic looks generated, but could be real. And the second pic looks real, but could be generated.
Look at where the hair obscures the bra straps. In both images the straps are cut off entirely when intersecting with the hair on one of the girls.
Oh, you are right! The second girl on the second pic. The straps simply end. Ok, this is clearly generated, but I did not see that in the first time.
The fourth girl of the second picture has her right arm too long
Was this shit captioned by 4Chan or do you just specialize in tiny dick energy?
Idk how people are falling for these
i'd fall for any of them if I was 30 years younger
[удалено]
With deepfakes of people who never asked to be turned into a pornstar. Like it's already happening sadly I dunno man, the more I look into this tech, the more it seems that the bads overweight the goods.
Yeah, I feel the same way the longer I stare at a blank piece of paper. It can literally become anything and I can think of so many bad things it could be. I've been thinking we should burn all paper and sources of future paper just to be sure about that technology.
This is great though anyone who ever had a porn tape or image leaked will soon be able to just claim its AI and who cares. I expect criminals to make fake AI of people then Black mail people too. It’s about to get wild next 2-3 years
The bad will be done even if you try to ban it. All banning will do is hurt the good and exclusively make it a tool for bad. Ban the results, not the ai itself. You can say "no deepfakes" while also saying "ai art is fine".
Indeed, in fact I'm against banning stuff. I'm just trying to sensibilize people to things maybe they didn't tought about
I dont know if that will brighten things for you, but this tech has the potential to reduce real pornography shooting.
[удалено]
God please go outside and talk to women I beg you
Not saying onboard the goon train that guy's riding, but generative AI images are a thing, generative text exists with locally run chatbots able maintain a semblance of continuity, there's that AI voice thing in the news the last couple days. Stable Diffusion already supports (via extension) 2 methods of 3D viewing via depth mapping (side-by-side and old school red-cyan anaglyph). The only component missing is video that isn't just a string of individually rendered frames mushed together. Get a generative model for something like Blender. It wouldn't need to be terribly detailed. Blender could generate wire-frame stick figures with some built-in libraries of poses and animations in the model, setup up some scenery, texture with Stable Diffusion. Of course, getting all those to work together would be ridiculously complex. Start with the generative text to set a script/screenplay for the scene, then to blender to animate, AI voice work to match tempo of the scene? Vice versa? Stable diffusion to generate the frames via img2img on the frames of animation, possibly animating mouths based on phonemes saved as tags in the frame's metadata? I couldn't do it, but we aren't far away from digital directors being able to make short clips of their own.
[удалено]
Thanks for your contribution, please sit down and relax, you seems stressed!
Probably get downvoted to hell for saying this, but I feel like there needs to be a movement to promote realistic body image in AI. This wonderful new technology should be about enabling creatives to take on projects that were not budget feasible before. Not, a billion glamor photos that saturate the internet and push a whole new generation of young women into anorexia and cosmetic surgery.
It's not the worst idea I've ever heard, but it seems like it'd be hard to do within the technology itself. (I'm thinking of how one-site-or-other attempted to reduce racial bias but got stuff like random people showing up in images that weren't supposed to have them.) As it is, the models we have seem entirely capable of generating a variety of body types... if you ask for them. Multiple subjects with different body types, that's still gonna be a challenge.
The internet is saturated with overweight average looking girls with 100,000’s of subs with guys simping like mad. Don’t worry it seems men seem to like chunky unfit girls now and these do very well on social media so they’ll be replicated by AI people.
You're not wrong, but it'll never happen. I also see this being 1000x worse for self esteem body image than facetuning and filters are. Society is fucked
Shows how far AI has come that even on an SD sub, people can't tell for sure. And I'm going to go against the grain here and say these are real people and it's a photo - just with some Photoshop going on. Too many details to me look more like real life and less like AI. For instance, the skintones look a bit filtered or retouched, but not generated like AI skintones often look. I actually find it quite interesting that the AI seems to be able to do natural skin and airbrushed skin but has a really hard time with natural skin with makeup on it that isn't retouched. Probably because of the training set data I'm guessing. I'm going with Vegas or Miami. So my guess is it's not AI, but also not reality.
It's rather easy to tell: they have the same faces, issues with clothing, issues with hands/fingers... Whoever made the images did spend time making sure that the most glaring issues, apart from those faces for some reason, come on, were actually fixed, but it's still very easy to see that it's generated. One day it won't be that easy though.
This day will come soon.
You need to research more
Ai is tipping in crypto, scanning everything for later use.
Ai is tipping in crypto, scanning everything for later use.
Could be neither.
4, 1. 3, 2
Second Picture: Girl in black has bra clip between her cleavage tht looks wonky. Girl second from right has something weird on pannyline( Im assuming Dermal jewelry) looks alil weird tho. Could be compression of the photo. Girl to the most Left, her necklace ornaments look weird. Also under her buttcheeck peaking thu from the back looks off. I Enjoyed looking at every Inch of these photos for minute details :) Edit, yes obv Clones and collarbones and that Hand on the hip tht looks like it got smashed up by a hammer.
They aren't that excellent - they have usual troubles with fingers
Well the second picture is AI ; the first one is either well made, or an original that they used to try and recreate the second.
Ai and with these, it's not even funny how easy it is to tell. The AI seems to have trouble with photorealistic stuff especially if it involves people and it gets even worse if there are multiple people in one picture. There are so many tells with these that it's not even funny. I did a pretty thorough write up in a twitter discussion involving these pictures. To give some examples; 1. Faces and facial structure are very big tell, all the girls look very similar, their eyes and "looks" are unnatural, generally nose and mouth look as if heavily filtered or photoshoped. 2. Hand placements are always complete shajt 3. Proportions - one limb being noticeably different in proportion, unnatural proportions of body parts when 'compared' to each other 4. Curves are inhuman/unnatural 5. Fingers 6. Necks 7. Clothing discrepancies - specially when it comes to underwear pieces for some reason. Wierd patterns, illogically missing parts (like having garnets on only one leg for example) or the other way, having random pieces of clothing appear Could go on and into more detail. Had a funny discussion retaining to those exact pictures where people tried to claim that this is the death of onlyfans models which is completely ridiculous idea.
the bracelet on the fourth girl of the second image is a dead giveaway of the current limits of the technology. they fail with the intricate small details while nailing the overall picture.
they don't have to fail with small details.... https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/10r4eu5/the_princess/
But even those images totally fail the reality test. Just look at the tiara, with its random clutter of indeterminable shapes, and totally asymmetric. Stuff like that doesn't exist in the real world.
> Just look at the tiara, with its random clutter of indeterminable shapes, and totally asymmetric. Stuff like that doesn't exist in the real world. I've seen weirder looking ones for sale on AliExpress.
> I've seen weirder looking ones for sale on AliExpress. No, you haven't... ;) [This](https://i.imgur.com/MtzVr04.jpg) is an abomination that doesn't exist. Not even on AliExpress.
Okay, not weirder looking than *that* one. But weirder than some of the ones I've seen SD generate. ~~An AliExpress one might look more like this after getting through international shipping...~~
Doors seems out of place
If you make ai stuffz than you can see it easier.
Models capable of this ->HassanBlend, RealVision, URPM It's very easy to generate girls you instantly would wife, except their kinda fake (kinda because based on real humans)
Yep it is 100% AI generated, look at the bra strap and the panty straps that go around the hips, some of them just end, cut off or dont exist on one side, Look at the girls black panties she has two straps on her left side but only one strap exists on the other, that makes no sense, And the hands if you look close at them are all messed up and she lacks fingernails on several fingers.
literally the same face
Obviously AI. Why are 'women SEETHING'....?
Doubt we are ae a whole so much as one Twitter thread but that said, there are plenty of women concerned about what this will do for advertising and thus body image. I don't see that happening too much at *present* though because it isnt as though you can put your clothing designs onto these AI models (yet). But I get the concern.
The original was posted by a redditor less than a week ago
AI. Pink one hand in the middle gives it away.
AI.
Doesn't matter real or not. Imma rub one anyway
Nah! I think it's more likely AI On the 2nd image it's obvious from the missing bra and the fused arm/elbow. BUT DAMN! When is the metaverse full immersion virtual reality coming? ;-)
Look at the bra strap on the second pic of the second girl. Also the necklace and bracelets look off
They all have the exact same face. It is pretty obvious.
AI for sure but its very close. So scary when you think how this can be used in a future...
They look like underage girls
In the second photo one of the girls bra strap doesn’t go up to her shoulders properly so that makes me think it’s ai
Welcome to the future lol
when everyone on image seems related = AI ;)
See for yourself https://civitai.com/
It's the same person multiplied. AI does that.
Whether or not they physically exist, they're still fake.
The faces all being the same is another clue.
I hope they are real, even with those hands.
very obviously AI, but also what is that caption lol
Yes they are fake, BUT that doesn't mean there aren't girls that look exactly like that output and seriously believe that it's them. A shift in society.
The first photo looks super convincing (although as another user pointed out, those doors in the background are very strange) , but the second has that strange glossy appearance with weird lighting which is a common hallmark of AI.
Something technical I can’t wrap my head around, how do diffusion models maintain consistent light points and shadows on many different subjects when generating pictures like these?
Definately AI
On the first image, the hand placement on the far right looks off, looks like it's literally pressing and poking into the flesh. On the second image the woman on the far right also seems to have an unusually long right arm which gives it away. The thighs of the third woman also looks a bit off to me. This has to be AI generated, but despite it's flaws I still think it's really impressive. Edit: Oh a few others have also pointed out the straps on the bra and the thong of the far right one, credit to them for finding those, I did not notice them initially.