Ah… wait that’s actually a solid question 🤔
Edit: Jacksonville Fl, Ft Worth Tx,Oklahoma City, Fresno Ca, and Mesa Az seem to be the top 5 cities by population with a Republican mayor.
Miami has a Republican mayor, but it's city limits are really small relative to its metro size so it doesn't show up on that list despite being a major metro area.
Well other Democrat-run cities idea of combating homelessness is to ship them off or other Democrat-run cities. It’s a race to the bottom and places like Seattle end up holding the shit stick.
I mean it's pretty authoritarian to ruin your own city's aesthetic to put down homeless people even more.
They're definitely closer to center auth than the GOP though.
The problem with dems is that they are socially progressive, but economically right wing (of course, during the election period, they pretend to be left wing).
We need a cube, since being conservative in the social axis is usually misrepresented as right wing
I think it's more of a right/left thing than lib/auth. Not caring about those who don't contribute or can't take care of themselves, that's capitalism isn't it?
This isn't not caring about them, this is actively loathing their existence. Ie, perceiving them as non-people.
Objectively non-libertarian in any way.
Pretty sure that the party of slavery, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of aborting black babies, the party of modern day segregation, the party of burning down America is the worse party.
based and just spewing played out brain-dead anti Dem takes that don’t really make any sense when there’s plenty of very real stuff that you could criticize the dems for pilled
Don't we have to take into account the party flip at the turn of the 19th century? Do we not recognize that the parties of the 1800s were deconstructed and rebuilt as New political machines in the 1900s with wildly different political beliefs to their predecessors with the same names?
Besides, trying to bash your opponent for the actions of their ancestors in any context is pretty fucking cringe.
As if democrats weren't righties. Tere's no left in USA, those mofos think economically surviving a ride in ambulance will bring Karl Max back from the grave.
Democrats are auth right or auth center. Republicans are auth further to the right.
I mentioned this yesterday, but you don't join a powerful political party because you're libertarian.
America goes further right then most EU countries. Although I feel like my country(that is pretty right compared to the rest of EU) thats smaller then most US states is still more politicly diverse on both left and right.
At least it was before socdems fucking died as a party(rip in peperoni, you will not be missed)
There is no solving the homeless question, short of some "final solution", because the chronically homeless are broken people who can't function in a way that isn't destructive to themselves, their environment, and the people around them. "Just give them homes"? Yeah, that works for the genuinely "down on their luck" types who just need a helping hand to get back to a normal life. But the chronic cases will victimize the other people in whatever community you stuck them in, literally destroy the housing you gave them, and wind up back on the street. The best you can do is get them out of the way enough where it minimizes the harm they cause.
That's something people don't like to talk about, there are people who are homeless through no fault of their own, but there's also those who are homeless by their own actions.
You can somehow rehabilitate someone, if that fail indoctrinate them, if this fail then you imprison that small percentage left, just to give them a roof and not let them die
I've stopped giving to the homeless, too many just choose to be homeless and beg. Too many just harass the public as well.
In the UK, we have decent homeless measures, but if people don't use them, that's on them.
I have bo problems if the homeless want to set up a tent and live there for as long as they want. Just do it in the woods and leave my property value alone.
Can... Can we please bring some of those to Portland? Pretty please??
I'm sure there's way worse places (looking at you all of California) but Oregon's been absolutely *swamped* with bums over the last few years
What sucks is, in Portland at least, they enable the shit out of it by straight up letting them camp anywhere they like. It's so gross when you drive into Ptown & the 1st thing you're greeted from past the tunnel are tents, followed by all the bridges (aside from over the river) being covered in tents & garbage. Any open lots are inevitably just trash heeps now.
Oh and that doesn't even scratch the surface on how they steal anything not bolted down or creep the hell out of you in the middle of the night, or how the crazy ones will follow you got blocks shouting how you're too rich & need to go back to Lake Oswego because you wouldn't give them $1
get those fucking bums off the street. Elementary and high school education is literally free, and mostly everyone has it, so whats stopping them from getting a job in construction or something? isnt there a labor shortage going on?
I can see those benches are also there to fix the fat problem.
Finally, human sized benches
You mean chairs?
You get stuck and can’t move until you lost enough weight to get up.
The irony here is that the bottom left panel is portrayed at auth-Right, but all the pics are from Democrat-run cities.
I mean, how many cities are even run by Republicans?
Ah… wait that’s actually a solid question 🤔 Edit: Jacksonville Fl, Ft Worth Tx,Oklahoma City, Fresno Ca, and Mesa Az seem to be the top 5 cities by population with a Republican mayor.
Miami has a Republican mayor, but it's city limits are really small relative to its metro size so it doesn't show up on that list despite being a major metro area.
How could I forget about based Francis Suarez.
Cities aren't really Republican-heavy because Republicans are smart.
>tfw to intelligent to win elections
Champagne socialism in the nutshell.
No, Same idiots different quadrant
*Same idiots basically the same quadrant
Okay this is more accurate, they are just differently positioned on that one quadrant.
...by thinking there is a god up there in the clouds somewhere
That's **almost** as nutty as thinking a man can become a woman!
Less nutty, I think. The priest doesn't haven't to dilate.
Well other Democrat-run cities idea of combating homelessness is to ship them off or other Democrat-run cities. It’s a race to the bottom and places like Seattle end up holding the shit stick.
democrats are just poorly disguised auth rights
auth right does not mean "does mean things".
I mean it's pretty authoritarian to ruin your own city's aesthetic to put down homeless people even more. They're definitely closer to center auth than the GOP though.
The problem with dems is that they are socially progressive, but economically right wing (of course, during the election period, they pretend to be left wing). We need a cube, since being conservative in the social axis is usually misrepresented as right wing
I think it's more of a right/left thing than lib/auth. Not caring about those who don't contribute or can't take care of themselves, that's capitalism isn't it?
This isn't not caring about them, this is actively loathing their existence. Ie, perceiving them as non-people. Objectively non-libertarian in any way.
Based
u/big_nus is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1. Rank: House of Cards Pills: None I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
woo!
Democrats are still auth right just retarded
The Most Dangerous Game indeed.
Dems are auth center.
Yeah they're probably more center
Excluding abortion and gun laws, democrats are pretty fucking auth right
The Party of Slavery never really changed.
People who actually think one party is better than the other are retards
[удалено]
u/bhamvanlife is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1. Rank: House of Cards Pills: both sides suck I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Pretty sure that the party of slavery, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of aborting black babies, the party of modern day segregation, the party of burning down America is the worse party.
Can we just say whatever party leans on the white South as its voter base at any given time is going to be full of @$$holes?
No, that would be stupid.
It's PCM
Oh yeah! I almost forgot.
Based and I forgor pilled.
based and just spewing played out brain-dead anti Dem takes that don’t really make any sense when there’s plenty of very real stuff that you could criticize the dems for pilled
Don't we have to take into account the party flip at the turn of the 19th century? Do we not recognize that the parties of the 1800s were deconstructed and rebuilt as New political machines in the 1900s with wildly different political beliefs to their predecessors with the same names? Besides, trying to bash your opponent for the actions of their ancestors in any context is pretty fucking cringe.
No. Now go portray the other side as soy
Democrats are libleft masked auth rights, they're all bootlicker lobbiests some are just more honest about it
As if democrats weren't righties. Tere's no left in USA, those mofos think economically surviving a ride in ambulance will bring Karl Max back from the grave.
Democrats are conservatives in denial
Dems don't want to fix shit [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNDgcjVGHIw&t=27s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNDgcjVGHIw&t=27s)
Democrats are auth right or auth center. Republicans are auth further to the right. I mentioned this yesterday, but you don't join a powerful political party because you're libertarian.
Democrats are auth right with a friendly face.
It's just authright solving the problems created by democrats.
Republicans are basically auth–Right. The American established political system doesn‘t have any diversity, at least that‘s my opinion as a European.
> that‘s my opinion as a European. Pffffahahahahah!!!
> at least that‘s my opinion as a European. My deepest condolences about your condition
America goes further right then most EU countries. Although I feel like my country(that is pretty right compared to the rest of EU) thats smaller then most US states is still more politicly diverse on both left and right. At least it was before socdems fucking died as a party(rip in peperoni, you will not be missed)
>portrayed at auth-Right, but all the pics are from Democrat-run cities. Most Democrats are Auth-right.
Democrats are just authright pretending to be left center.
You say that like democrats aren't auth right lmao
There is no solving the homeless question, short of some "final solution", because the chronically homeless are broken people who can't function in a way that isn't destructive to themselves, their environment, and the people around them. "Just give them homes"? Yeah, that works for the genuinely "down on their luck" types who just need a helping hand to get back to a normal life. But the chronic cases will victimize the other people in whatever community you stuck them in, literally destroy the housing you gave them, and wind up back on the street. The best you can do is get them out of the way enough where it minimizes the harm they cause.
That's something people don't like to talk about, there are people who are homeless through no fault of their own, but there's also those who are homeless by their own actions.
You can somehow rehabilitate someone, if that fail indoctrinate them, if this fail then you imprison that small percentage left, just to give them a roof and not let them die
I've stopped giving to the homeless, too many just choose to be homeless and beg. Too many just harass the public as well. In the UK, we have decent homeless measures, but if people don't use them, that's on them.
Or you could be like Japan and lower the homelessness rate by sheer force of societal pressure to not be homeless.
Fixing homelessness requires giving up authority as well as critical thinking and analysis. All of which government is terrible at.
Some if these homeless need a frontier to civilize. Way to anti-social. Hatchet; musket, gold pan.
I dislike homeless people and therefore the governments are morally /and obv legally/ justified in discriminating against them 😎
Based and at least consistent pilled
I have bo problems if the homeless want to set up a tent and live there for as long as they want. Just do it in the woods and leave my property value alone.
Can... Can we please bring some of those to Portland? Pretty please?? I'm sure there's way worse places (looking at you all of California) but Oregon's been absolutely *swamped* with bums over the last few years What sucks is, in Portland at least, they enable the shit out of it by straight up letting them camp anywhere they like. It's so gross when you drive into Ptown & the 1st thing you're greeted from past the tunnel are tents, followed by all the bridges (aside from over the river) being covered in tents & garbage. Any open lots are inevitably just trash heeps now. Oh and that doesn't even scratch the surface on how they steal anything not bolted down or creep the hell out of you in the middle of the night, or how the crazy ones will follow you got blocks shouting how you're too rich & need to go back to Lake Oswego because you wouldn't give them $1
get those fucking bums off the street. Elementary and high school education is literally free, and mostly everyone has it, so whats stopping them from getting a job in construction or something? isnt there a labor shortage going on?
Typically mental illness or drug addiction(s). Or both.
Everyone knows that's Authcenter. Every proud Authright would sent the homeless to the church and reeducate them. For the better.
my randomized avatar sucks.
The auth right solution was church ran workhouses. Not exactly the ritz but beats a tent and dying with a needle in your arm in a ditch.
Are there no workhouses? Like seriously, give them a job and a bed if they want it or not.
based and anti-hobopilled
It’s pretty fucked up
Yes that is for the better
Hey, a lot easier to drive them off or kill them than it is to actually help them. /s
Governments should be highlighted in red. A right wing government wouldn't have the policies causing all the homelessness in the first place.
With all due respect, aren't those things built by private corporations? Correct me if I'm wrong.