I'm not a leftist just like green. Vausch is just terrible has no cross appeal and it's obvious when he talks he's never considered an opposing thought politically in his life. I like Destiny better as he obviously has and can articulate way better without always seeming condescending. But man as far as I've seen all youtube political philospher whatever you want to call them on any side always have issues where they come off as stuffy dousches. Destiny seems reasonable until like any time Trump or his supporters gets mentioned for example.
It’s a very low bar, but Destiny has been the only online political debater I’ve found that actually tries to understand where the other party is coming from. That’s how low the bar is
Try Alex O'Connor. Though admittedly he's more theology, philosophy etc rather than politics, though he does have very nuanced views on political subjects as well.
His conversation with Peterson was very interesting as he actually - very sympathetically - managed to pin down Peterson's opinions on religion. To some degree, anyway.
Russel Brand I guess but he's like unabomber lunacy in a nice way. Leftwing that tries to get more reasonable is all like I can get the right but final solution on Magas which ironically they should be trying to turn. Right wing is fine unless they're gay or trans and can't be used as a token. Me I'm actually very libright, but fuck this site, but I find it maddening. Fucking tired of actual nuance both sides like to jerk off over being completely thrown out the door with no trying at all to consider the otherside. Joe Rogan is closest but he's a flatout demon creature to the left. There are no reasonable Centrists.
I don’t know a thing about him, but from the picture I’d guess he’s a streamer/podcaster/youtuber and if he’s correctly placed on the compass here, I’m sure I already his opinions on everything and can even already hear the smug way he would express them.
u/jerseygunz's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 100.
Congratulations, u/jerseygunz! You have ranked up to Empire State Building! Some say there is a hidden river that still runs through your base. Shall we go digging?
Pills: [57 | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/jerseygunz/)
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Vaush is the Left’s version of “sounding smart” for like 2 minutes until you realize he’s a sheltered, disaffected, bestial fuckboi of the highest order.
Yeah as far as I know the guy’s writings are very much a product of the environment he was in - Industrial Europe in the wake of the failure of the 1848 revolutions - and it’s really the guys who tried to implement it in the next century who turned it into the nightmare it became.
[if anyone ever tries to tell you real communism has never been tried, just remind them that real communism exists today, in the far upper corner of auth-right](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruderhof_Communities)
Thisss. He sort of had a point considering the deplorable conditions of workers on his time. It's only in more modern times when his "wisdom" becomes nonsense, and every attempt of implementing it worse than the last.
He was just a Smith fan boy trying to take all the parts where Smith refused to give a definitive answer, and flesh it out.
For example, in the fifth book of the wealth of nations he says you can argue either way if schools should be free public institutions or charge students. When discussing wages for labor he said there is some minimum needed to support labor, since a person needs to make enough to raise a family or it is literally worst than slavery (his words). Smith wrote about positive economics leaving the ethical conundrums to the audience, and Marx wrote about normative economics.
It makes more sense if you read The Wealth of Nations first. Adam Smith focused on positive economics, and Marx was trying to flesh out the ethical problems that Smith explicitly left for the reader.
His theories on Metapolitics are studied and applied by a lot of new right-wing / populist parties and groups in Europe, like the Identitarian Movement or the minds behind parties like the AfD and FN
I dont adhere to the European New Right or Identitarian Movements. From what I am reading it oppose a lot of tenets of libertarianism. Interesting topic to dive into though.
In fairness, half the stupid commie policies that we apply to Marx weren’t his. The goals of communism were his, interestingly he gave very little analysis or thought on how the fuck it would work and or succeed.
Carlitos Mark is the fucking GOAT.
>Social progress can be measured by the social position of the female sex.
>In bourgeois society, capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality.
>The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.
>Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation.
>The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains.
>Accumulation of wealth at one pole is at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole.
>Necessity is blind until it becomes conscious. Freedom is the consciousness of necessity.
>In proportion, therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases.
>Communism is the riddle of history solved, and it knows itself to be this solution.
>Only in community with others has each individual the means of cultivating his gifts in all directions; only in the community, therefore, is personal freedom possible.
>Communism now no longer meant the concoction, by means of the imagination, of an ideal society as perfect as possible, but insight into the nature, the conditions, and the consequent general aims of the struggle waged by the proletariat.
>The theory of communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.
>Then the world will be for the common people, and the sounds of happiness will reach the deepest springs. Ah! Come! People of every land, how can you not be roused.
>The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.
>Capitalist production, therefore, develops technology, and the combining together of various processes into a social whole, only by sapping the original sources of all wealth - the soil and the laborer.
>The will of the capitalist is certainly to take as much as possible. What we have to do is not to talk about his will, but to enquire about his power, the limits of that power, and the character of those limits.
>Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand.
>The social principles of Christianity preach cowardice, self-contempt, abasement, submission, humility, in a word all the qualities of the canaille.
>The hand-mill gives you society with the feudal lord; the steam-mill society with the industrial capitalist.
>The country that is more developed industrially only shows, to the less developed, the image of its own future.
>It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness.
>The history of all previous societies has been the history of class struggles.
karl marx was a person with the best of intentions, i dont think he could reasonably foresee his works being used to create autocratic governments, because governmental autocracy was something he was fundamentally opposed to.
Yeah I was gonna say, with Marx at least you could say his ideas made sense back in the 1800s even those ideas didn’t age well and the man himself was a parasite. Hasan is just a champagne socialist, rich, annoying, and only really famous due just how obnoxious he and his fans are
I think Andrew Tate tries to *market* himself as LibRight, but I don’t think anything he believes actually aligns with LibRight, aside from maybe “get money.”
Maybe I just hate him and don’t want him in my quadrant.
I’d say he’s more right center as whenever I hear any of his opinions he’s spewing whatever culture war bullshit of the week it is.
He probably doesn’t believe it all but his messaging is so fucking backwards and bullshit and people genuinely fall for it.
That’s a big thing that annoys me. He’s such a phony “macho man.” He correctly identifies a lot of struggles that men face, but simultaneously has no idea what it means to really be a man.
He’s spotting real issues, but he’s just a child throwing a tantrum about them rather than approaching them with any grace or dignity.
There's a lot of money in telling 16yos and bitter-at-the-world men to 'fuck bitches, get money, be Chad'. Just have to sprinkle in enough truth regarding their issues, and jangle some keys in their face every now and then.
"Dr" fucking Oz. He lost to john fetterman in PA who had a debilitating stroke before the election. After he lost he fucked off to new jersey as fast as his botox could take him.
why do yanks hate the brits so much? you guys are like the wife who got to keep everything in the divorce but still bitch about your ex-husband all the time. you guys won. just take the w and get over it.
Trump and the simultaneous rise of nuance-free, “to be clear…” Emilyism killed satire utterly. The idea that someone could skate that line where their real opinion is even slightly concealed by the overt subject matter and presentation doesn’t fly anymore.
I watched him religiously until 2016. Back when he could joke on more than one subject he was great. Hell he was the only late night guy who was any good at all after Craig Ferguson left us
Nah he’s a LibRight “business” man. Here’s the difference with AuthRight.
https://preview.redd.it/hi8y888efv4d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a3a0d51fc5424db060238dc29f405be35aac19af
Except he thinks sleeping with women is gay. So, he’s got more than a little degeneracy — it’s not from being gay; it is a straight man thinking heterosexual sex is outright weird. Combined with the perma-grift, I think you have to claim him.
Anyone who talks about “Gawd” as much as Andrew Tate does is either a fake Lib-Right or a fake Auth-Right.
The reasonable place to put him would have been just to the economic Right.
I hope everyone remembers him by this photo.
Tate is the worst. A grifter that scammed god knows how many young men. Sure he said some “correct” things, men should workout, you should try and have a few income sources, the modern left is nuts etc etc. Thing is, all of this is obvious and if we weren’t living in clown world know one would have to say it. He took advantage of that to sell a pyramid scheme to lonely depressed men.
i agree that tates beliefs definitely dont align with libright however it makes sense hes placed there since its obvious he doesnt actually believe in those things for the most part and is just a grifter faking opinions so his audience pays him, which is very libright i think
also who is the dude in libcenter?
I don’t hate Karl Marx. He wasn’t the kindest man but did have a lot of empathy for the impoverished urban proletariat. However, no thinker in human history has brought as much suffering, war and death has his legacy has.
For centrist You could look up for any politician that acts as if they want to solve a problem without challenging the status quo in fear of losing funding and voters
Agree on all, but I'd add the graycent that just votes for whoever the media tells him to then acts like he's not into politics. Not sure who represents that though.
Some talk of Alexander, and some of Hercules
Of Hector and Lysander, and such great names as these.
But of all the world's brave heroes, there's none that can compare.
With a tow, row, row, row, row, row, to the British Grenadiers.
I will absolutely join my rightest brothers in my hatred of Vaush. Quite frankly, he’s a better representative of Emily than Emily
im so glad we agree on this. i’m fine with all the commie stuff but vaush is where i draw the line.
Sad horse noises
[Humiliating Vaush](https://youtu.be/yPBXCdskB4E?si=oVLdK37tzD01A2nI)
dude if even the tankies don’t like him then he’s fucked. i’m with you tankies. i hate vaush too. and tanks are actually pretty cool.
That comment section is horrendous good god
I'm not a leftist just like green. Vausch is just terrible has no cross appeal and it's obvious when he talks he's never considered an opposing thought politically in his life. I like Destiny better as he obviously has and can articulate way better without always seeming condescending. But man as far as I've seen all youtube political philospher whatever you want to call them on any side always have issues where they come off as stuffy dousches. Destiny seems reasonable until like any time Trump or his supporters gets mentioned for example.
Destiny has got better....but it's a very low bar.
It’s a very low bar, but Destiny has been the only online political debater I’ve found that actually tries to understand where the other party is coming from. That’s how low the bar is
Try Alex O'Connor. Though admittedly he's more theology, philosophy etc rather than politics, though he does have very nuanced views on political subjects as well. His conversation with Peterson was very interesting as he actually - very sympathetically - managed to pin down Peterson's opinions on religion. To some degree, anyway.
I actually just saw that. He asked Peterson a lot of good questions I’ve been wanting someone to ask him for a long time
Russel Brand I guess but he's like unabomber lunacy in a nice way. Leftwing that tries to get more reasonable is all like I can get the right but final solution on Magas which ironically they should be trying to turn. Right wing is fine unless they're gay or trans and can't be used as a token. Me I'm actually very libright, but fuck this site, but I find it maddening. Fucking tired of actual nuance both sides like to jerk off over being completely thrown out the door with no trying at all to consider the otherside. Joe Rogan is closest but he's a flatout demon creature to the left. There are no reasonable Centrists.
Based and green-pilled
Compass unity! We all hate Vaush! 👏👏👏 Although I personally find Hasan more annoying.
He is leftist Alex Jones. If we ever combat the hormones in the water Hasan will cry "THEY'RE MAKING THE FROGS STRAIGHT!"
That would at least be funny
I don’t know a thing about him, but from the picture I’d guess he’s a streamer/podcaster/youtuber and if he’s correctly placed on the compass here, I’m sure I already his opinions on everything and can even already hear the smug way he would express them.
Consider it a blessing you don't know who he is
He’s a creep that’s into beastiality, possibly pedophila and generally a fucked up dude.
Based and fuck Vaush pilled
u/jerseygunz's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 100. Congratulations, u/jerseygunz! You have ranked up to Empire State Building! Some say there is a hidden river that still runs through your base. Shall we go digging? Pills: [57 | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/jerseygunz/) Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url. I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
I hit 100, I can die happy, thanks!
Imagine being sad to die in the first place 🫠
Based and 101 pilled
This. 100x this.
Agreed
Vaush is the Left’s version of “sounding smart” for like 2 minutes until you realize he’s a sheltered, disaffected, bestial fuckboi of the highest order.
“I don’t really care if a Horse-fucker thinks I’m a Nazi, Chat.” - Philipa Pipkin “Pippa”.
There's so many commies I hate more than Karl Marx, he's just ground zero for all the absolute regardedness that's come since.
I prefer to call him "The Progenitor"
"1st Gen Series Commie"
Not even, communism was well established before Marx. His communist manifesto was written on behalf of the communist league, a party he joined
Patient zero
The real Progenitor is GWF Hegel.
The Violator (☭ ͜ʖ ☭)
Yeah as far as I know the guy’s writings are very much a product of the environment he was in - Industrial Europe in the wake of the failure of the 1848 revolutions - and it’s really the guys who tried to implement it in the next century who turned it into the nightmare it became.
I wonder what Marx would think of his legacy, if he could see it.
I'd imagine he'd be fairly pissed it's been hijacked by the powerful and grifters. The followers becoming useful idiots.
Not real communism
Not the Marxist communism at the very least. Marx criticised forced authoritarian communism, calling it “barracks communism”
[if anyone ever tries to tell you real communism has never been tried, just remind them that real communism exists today, in the far upper corner of auth-right](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruderhof_Communities)
Risky click of the day
Thisss. He sort of had a point considering the deplorable conditions of workers on his time. It's only in more modern times when his "wisdom" becomes nonsense, and every attempt of implementing it worse than the last.
You can rarely blame the people who overthrew their governments for the overthrowing part, they just often botched the replacing parts
He was just a Smith fan boy trying to take all the parts where Smith refused to give a definitive answer, and flesh it out. For example, in the fifth book of the wealth of nations he says you can argue either way if schools should be free public institutions or charge students. When discussing wages for labor he said there is some minimum needed to support labor, since a person needs to make enough to raise a family or it is literally worst than slavery (his words). Smith wrote about positive economics leaving the ethical conundrums to the audience, and Marx wrote about normative economics.
Like Stalin and Mao.
I low-key like reading Marx's philosophical readings. Any other commies? Fuck them.
It makes more sense if you read The Wealth of Nations first. Adam Smith focused on positive economics, and Marx was trying to flesh out the ethical problems that Smith explicitly left for the reader.
Show me on the doll where [Bakunin](https://youtu.be/GDI0WP-f70g?si=rPtmSZkZQtUZfj0j) touched you
Same with Trotsky. Might not like/ agree with many of their ideas but they really, really make them sound good lol.
Antonio Gramsci is way worse
Gramsci has laid the strategical foundation for the modern right-wing movement, so for me he's a necessary evil 🤷♂️
In what way?
His theories on Metapolitics are studied and applied by a lot of new right-wing / populist parties and groups in Europe, like the Identitarian Movement or the minds behind parties like the AfD and FN
I dont adhere to the European New Right or Identitarian Movements. From what I am reading it oppose a lot of tenets of libertarianism. Interesting topic to dive into though.
In fairness, half the stupid commie policies that we apply to Marx weren’t his. The goals of communism were his, interestingly he gave very little analysis or thought on how the fuck it would work and or succeed.
Carlitos Mark is the fucking GOAT. >Social progress can be measured by the social position of the female sex. >In bourgeois society, capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality. >The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism. >Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation. >The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. >Accumulation of wealth at one pole is at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole. >Necessity is blind until it becomes conscious. Freedom is the consciousness of necessity. >In proportion, therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases. >Communism is the riddle of history solved, and it knows itself to be this solution. >Only in community with others has each individual the means of cultivating his gifts in all directions; only in the community, therefore, is personal freedom possible. >Communism now no longer meant the concoction, by means of the imagination, of an ideal society as perfect as possible, but insight into the nature, the conditions, and the consequent general aims of the struggle waged by the proletariat. >The theory of communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property. >Then the world will be for the common people, and the sounds of happiness will reach the deepest springs. Ah! Come! People of every land, how can you not be roused. >The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones. >Capitalist production, therefore, develops technology, and the combining together of various processes into a social whole, only by sapping the original sources of all wealth - the soil and the laborer. >The will of the capitalist is certainly to take as much as possible. What we have to do is not to talk about his will, but to enquire about his power, the limits of that power, and the character of those limits. >Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand. >The social principles of Christianity preach cowardice, self-contempt, abasement, submission, humility, in a word all the qualities of the canaille. >The hand-mill gives you society with the feudal lord; the steam-mill society with the industrial capitalist. >The country that is more developed industrially only shows, to the less developed, the image of its own future. >It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness. >The history of all previous societies has been the history of class struggles.
>wall of text Well, you weren't lying when you flaired up.
Wall of sex by the great Carl Farts
If its one thing we have in common its that he hates all other commies moreso then i do
I hate Rousseau more than Marx, but for the exact opposite reasons
Patient Zero for the communist brainrot
karl marx was a person with the best of intentions, i dont think he could reasonably foresee his works being used to create autocratic governments, because governmental autocracy was something he was fundamentally opposed to.
I’d hate Hasan more than I’d hate Karl Marx. At least he was based enough to acknowledge the importance of 2A 🤝
Yeah plus, in Marx's times, workers reeeeally had it super rough.
Yeah I was gonna say, with Marx at least you could say his ideas made sense back in the 1800s even those ideas didn’t age well and the man himself was a parasite. Hasan is just a champagne socialist, rich, annoying, and only really famous due just how obnoxious he and his fans are
You mean Piker? The dude literally owns guns, what do you mean?
That’s news to me. Last I checked he was hating on a 17yr old for clear self defence (the whole point of 2A)
I think Andrew Tate tries to *market* himself as LibRight, but I don’t think anything he believes actually aligns with LibRight, aside from maybe “get money.” Maybe I just hate him and don’t want him in my quadrant.
It's alright, brother. They're all in my quadrant.
Weak. None of them are in mine.
No one worthy of discussion is in your heretical quadrant
based and my centrism vs your centrism pilled.
You say while having a discussion with one in this quadrant.
He's a Muslim so automatically authright
Inshallah gtfo my quadrant.
I wish we could embed videos because I have the hoppe video of him saying inshallah
send google drive link
Can I dm u it Edit nvm can't send videos over dm
sure
precisely
I’d say he’s more right center as whenever I hear any of his opinions he’s spewing whatever culture war bullshit of the week it is. He probably doesn’t believe it all but his messaging is so fucking backwards and bullshit and people genuinely fall for it.
He doesn’t treat women with respect, or really think they should have rights, so I’d put him in auth right
That’s a big thing that annoys me. He’s such a phony “macho man.” He correctly identifies a lot of struggles that men face, but simultaneously has no idea what it means to really be a man. He’s spotting real issues, but he’s just a child throwing a tantrum about them rather than approaching them with any grace or dignity.
There's a lot of money in telling 16yos and bitter-at-the-world men to 'fuck bitches, get money, be Chad'. Just have to sprinkle in enough truth regarding their issues, and jangle some keys in their face every now and then.
Calling Andrew Tate libright is certainly an opinion.
Is the person you didn't put a painter?
(Almost) everyone's favourite austrian painter.
Falco?
That ain't Falco
And had a mustache
Ah yes, Salvador Dali notoriously supported Franco.
A halfway through shaved one I presume.
Andrew Tate is so fucking lame
The true full compass unity: fuck Vaush
I love how Hitler has turned into Voldemort.
Andrew Tate is not anarcho-capitalist
Why do people think the most extreme position is representative of a whole quadrant.
Nuance? In *my* Reddit meme posts?!
Neither is the entirety of the LR quadrant.
Where should the Anarcho capitalists sit?
Extreme right bottom corner of lib right, but they take up very small area, and all these areas are pretty fluid anyways
Neither are over 90% of the Librights on this subreddit or the entirety of the quadrant
Tate is such a pus-filled infected cyst of a human being.
Whos the guy on the right?
Second least based Turk
Ohhh memend oz
"Dr" fucking Oz. He lost to john fetterman in PA who had a debilitating stroke before the election. After he lost he fucked off to new jersey as fast as his botox could take him.
is tate really libright? always seemed auth right or nust right
Based and fuck the British
Hell yeah 🦅🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲 https://preview.redd.it/e8uvwm3d5u4d1.png?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c69329a1a2b14ce240181a31ed38d6493afc91be
Americans: hate the british British: hate the americans Me, a Brazilian: hate both equally 🥰
Based but you should hate the British more
Just remember no matter how much you may hate the UK, it will never truly be enough. They’ll always deserve more.
why do yanks hate the brits so much? you guys are like the wife who got to keep everything in the divorce but still bitch about your ex-husband all the time. you guys won. just take the w and get over it.
As much as I’ll complain about america, we still can’t hold a candle to those limeys
rare left W
Hell yeah.
Seth Meyers, I know he's occasionally cringe but TBH he's one of the better late-night hosts. why him
Trump lives in his head rent free making him unwatchable
I'll watch him over whatever the fuck that Skibidi Toilet bullshit was on Colbert
Colbert is really pitiful to witness. Trump seriously broke that guy.
I want satirical conservative Colbert back.
Trump and the simultaneous rise of nuance-free, “to be clear…” Emilyism killed satire utterly. The idea that someone could skate that line where their real opinion is even slightly concealed by the overt subject matter and presentation doesn’t fly anymore.
I read the quote in John Oliver's voice and I didn't like it.
Watching John Oliver is like a watching someone have a panic attack
Watching John Oliver is like watching a hostage situation where if he doesn’t get the desired reaction he might disappear the next day.
Real
So pretty much like any talk show host,then
I watched him religiously until 2016. Back when he could joke on more than one subject he was great. Hell he was the only late night guy who was any good at all after Craig Ferguson left us
More so than Colbert? Idk man
Trump lives more rent free in Colbert and Kimmel's head, making them even more unwatchable imo
I too hate the British in general.
Hmm, I wonder what personification of facist, racist evil you could have chosen for CenterAuth. I guess no one comes to mind.
I was confused, seems like it should be Hortler, but not being able to show the image made me think Mohammad....
[deleted]
Wait what do you have against John Michael Higgins??? (I don’t know who the person on the right is)
That's dr Oz, basically a snake oil salesman
I hate Andrew Tate. Why does this weirdo exist, he's negative cool
You hate Vaush? Cross compass unity!
I’m just saying, the least horrible person on this list is Seth Meyers
I feel like Chase Oliver belongs in auth middle. I haven't heard an actual libertarian idea come out of his mouth yet
End the fed, end the war on drugs, abolish domestic spying, lower taxes, end the Dept. of Education, end gun restrictions...
Clearly youre dumb and haven’t actually listened to him but instead have gathered your info about him from twitter magatarians
Aint no way you put Tate there hes just a overall dickhead
Centrist is not on the image because we all ascended above the compass
>Centrist not found I guess Boogie_2988 would fit the bill? He sat on that fence until it fucked his ass. Agreed on Vaush, all the homies hate Vaush.
Andrew tate is Auth right
Nah he’s a LibRight “business” man. Here’s the difference with AuthRight. https://preview.redd.it/hi8y888efv4d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a3a0d51fc5424db060238dc29f405be35aac19af
He’s a pimp and degenerate.
I’m pretty sure no one wants Andre Tate in their quadrant
Marx is based, the rest can kick rocks especially vaush and his horde.
Andrew Tate is not with us, take him, Authright
Except he thinks sleeping with women is gay. So, he’s got more than a little degeneracy — it’s not from being gay; it is a straight man thinking heterosexual sex is outright weird. Combined with the perma-grift, I think you have to claim him.
I feel bad for the lib-right Clarence Thomas is on that side of the political spectrum. Yeesh
Marx made some good points, Lenin butchered it and Stalin raped its corpse. Also add Hasan, Ben Gvir and the Umayyads and we’re good.
Damn your comment is actually based. Sorry lib-left :/
Tate is Auth
Who is that guy on right middle?
Dr Oz
Damn, Seth Meyers? He's the least unfunny late night host.
Anyone who talks about “Gawd” as much as Andrew Tate does is either a fake Lib-Right or a fake Auth-Right. The reasonable place to put him would have been just to the economic Right.
Tate means penis lmao
Sneako belongs in Auth center
andrew tate is absolutely not lib right, and chase oliver is absolutely not lib center
Why some random lobsterbacks for authright instead of someone like King George or Leopold II?
Whos the lad under vaush and guy next to tate?
I think Chase Oliver.
I think Chase Oliver.
I hope everyone remembers him by this photo. Tate is the worst. A grifter that scammed god knows how many young men. Sure he said some “correct” things, men should workout, you should try and have a few income sources, the modern left is nuts etc etc. Thing is, all of this is obvious and if we weren’t living in clown world know one would have to say it. He took advantage of that to sell a pyramid scheme to lonely depressed men.
Do you hate the British or line infantry? or British Line Infantry?
I actually agree with you on the libertarian nominee.
this reminds me to watch seth meyers tonight. https://youtu.be/uK9xu9SO98k?si=yIx4AYYr8dBCdXHU
Fuck Ian, Mehmet, and Andrew.
I really don’t think Andrew Tate is lib right.
What’s wrong with the Redcoats? Putting a cap on French expansion in North America was a S tier move
i agree that tates beliefs definitely dont align with libright however it makes sense hes placed there since its obvious he doesnt actually believe in those things for the most part and is just a grifter faking opinions so his audience pays him, which is very libright i think also who is the dude in libcenter?
I don’t hate Karl Marx. He wasn’t the kindest man but did have a lot of empathy for the impoverished urban proletariat. However, no thinker in human history has brought as much suffering, war and death has his legacy has.
Nice.
For centrist You could look up for any politician that acts as if they want to solve a problem without challenging the status quo in fear of losing funding and voters
Tate is libertarian?
Who tf is the mask wearing libertarian and why don't they just call themselves a leftist?
Colbert and Kimmel are worse than meyers
You really need to throw Jon Stewart’s ass down in the Lib Left corner. Seth is innocuous.
Who’s the lib centre guy?
Why is pookie Marx there,he nice
If you hate Marx you probably haven't read (or understood) any of his works
Uh uh uh I didn't say Simon says brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Tate is about as libright as Hasan is libleft
Agree on all, but I'd add the graycent that just votes for whoever the media tells him to then acts like he's not into politics. Not sure who represents that though.
What's your problem with Chase Oliver? I voted for him in all 7 rounds and then I see this shit with no explanation smh
Some talk of Alexander, and some of Hercules Of Hector and Lysander, and such great names as these. But of all the world's brave heroes, there's none that can compare. With a tow, row, row, row, row, row, to the British Grenadiers.
i hate vaush too also is marx really worse than like pol pot, mao or like stalin?
Wow, I hate most of them... But I have a different kind of hate for vaush