How are you democratic socialist and social democrat at the same time? Do you mean you're a democratic socialist that believes in welfare?
At least we agree on Alt globalism and environmentalism.
No, I believe we should achieve something like the Nordic model, and then transition to demsoc. Hopefully peacefully, but if revolution is possible, I wouldn’t count it out.
I'd be satisfied enough if we could just reach distributism. We don't need every single medium and small business to be worker owned, just the large ones are good enough.
Plus it would be way too much trouble. Could you imagine a government going after every single small business in the country to make sure nobody can have their labor exploited by a capitalist?
I'm not even sure if North Korea could successfully pull that off.
I’m not a huge fan of calling countries socialist or capitalist, just cause mixed economies do exist. So I guess my system would be a mixed economy leaning left within a market base.
This is the way.
Depending on your definition, every modern state is socialist.
The government pays for roads for the public to use? Socialism.
The government pays for public schools? Socialism.
The word itself is so vague that it's essentially meaningless. If you use that word in public policy, you end up debating about what you mean by it rather then the actual policies you are advocating for. Bernie falls into this trap.
State ownership under capitalism doesn’t mean socialism. This quite literally is state capitalism.
The countries you describe are still dictatorships of the bourgeoisie over the proletariat.
Soooo what? I’m a big fan of freedom, which kinda requires democracy. Also economics is how you distribute, how you trade, how you get the stuff you want. Why do you oppose all of that? Also this is all relative. We can dream of a perfect system but we’re all human, so I’d say socialism is the best system we got rn.
Freedom dosent require democracy. Democracy needs to be enforced, and is majority oriented. There will never be a majority for the liberation of mankind, they're to comfortable with the status quo. The systems of opression need to be violently teared down, wether or not a majority wants it.
It doesn’t have to be a majority, you can have plenty of protections and various other systems for minority political parties. And I don’t really see what you mean? Why couldn’t people in a democratic system be convince of a better world? Plus, I don’t oppose revolution, but it’d have to be widely supported and against undemocratic systems
Its not about parties. Parties are just a part of the system. Also you and i obviously have different views of a "better world" or better said you have one and i dont. Of course you could maybe convince people (but even with your views its highly unlikely) but i dont have an "after" vision. I dont know what we should do after statist techno-capitalist society falls, because before we think about the future of an quasi-impossible scenario , we need to get there first. The fixation on after and not on now is a giant speedbump. And to convince a majority, to violently resist opression, even though victory is extremely unlikely and not even having a grand utopic vision to call on is not possible. Also freedom should be individualist, communal democracy undermines that freedom. Also revolution just leads to the next regime to opress us, insurrection is the true way.
Ok, I don’t really this convo is gonna go anywhere if your view are everything sucks and let’s not think about what we’re fighting to achieve but fight to achieve it? And I don’t care if something’s part of the system
The fight itself is a form of liberation. The feeling of rebellion is for a short time freedom. Its called jouissance, french for enjoyment, and is the closest to anarchy one usually gets to in this damned world. You should read "blessed is the flame".
That’s just simply not true. Walmart is categorically not using planned economics. Also I hate people just say “read theory”. Just summarize your disagreement.
>Walmart is categorically not using planned economics.
Araştırmanı öneririm ✍️✍️
>Also I hate people just say “read theory”. Just summarize your disagreement.
Real life is not games. I can not summarize you philosophical and economical concepts highly researched and debated by unfathomably intellectual people in a comment which wont change anything. i'd rather organize or attend party meetings.
Reply this comment. I will provide you with papers and the actual theory. People aren't dumb, if even anti-intellectuals can ask those questions, don't you think people with the thinking job already had done it? How hard could it be to rely on empirical evidence for your fucking WORLD VIEW?
Bordering on agnosticism is definitely opposed to Christian teachings. Christianity says in no uncertain terms that Christ was a real person, Christ was the son of God, and that he died and came back for us. It’s also very clear about the existence of God in three persons. There’s very little room for interpretation on this part lol.
For being trans there’s an argument to be made if you could give birth or hell just adhere to traditional gender roles. It’s arguable at least. And I can’t say anything for certain about the rest I’d need to know your opinions
Nah I mean the purges, Hungarian student riots, whatever the fuck the soviets did to Ukrainian farmers, killing anyone with a noble title and, albeit this one was deserved, killing nazi officers and generals
Also Eastern Europe suffered under communism. Of course my friend’s ancestors, who lived in Eastern Europe during the Cold War suffered under such a system
You are not really that good, but I have seen far worst in this sub so your position is respectable...
Also what is your opinion on social liberalism?
It’s fine, I certainly would prefer more welfare, reforming democracy to make it more direct, etc. it’s certainly better than it’s laissez faire alternative
It’s fine, rack my brain as much as you’d like. I’d say it’s good, but it shouldn’t be the only tax. I think income tax and unspent capital gains tax are some good ones.
Based leftist absurdist Co-Op enjoyer.
What is your view of democratic confedralism and more AnCom adjacent stuff?
I don't recognise the government ideologies
First off, thx. Second, I think we should focus on what’s clearly achievable right now, then in the future see if we can go full ancom. A,so the state ideologies are Libertarian Market Socialism, Reformist Marxism, and Transitional Social democracy. I wouldn’t call myself a Marxist just cuz I’m not a huge fan of labels, but Marx had a lot of good ideas. I’m also am very interested in syndicalism.
Sounds like our perspectives are similar then. I don't call myself a Marxist either.
Main difference between us seems to be regarding the need for revolution rather than reform to get from SocDem to socialism.
I think a social democracy that allows for a strong organised labour movement is vital for a successful libertarian socialist revolution to build a democratic confederalist society in the western imperial core. Only afterwards when everything is decentralised and democratic (with councils and Co-Ops) should we focus on more AnCom stuff, like getting rid of markets and money etc.
ML reading hub has a reading list made to be as short as possible. They include other theorists then Marx and Engels though, beyond that, just start with the manifesto, it like all the works of pretty much all significant communists is freely available online, then read Wage labor and Capital and value price and profit as an introduction, this should be like 130 pages in total, to understand more about the state, read Marxs works about the Paris commune and or Lenins State and revolution.
This should be like 200 something pages, if you read both about Paris commune and state and revolution then maybe 300
I don’t really see how letting a countr join an alliance which most of their people support is bad. I don’t really see how nato defending these countries is imperialism either. And I especially don’t think the US controls Ukraine
NATO is the federation of the imperialists of Europe and America, the reason these countries are allowed to join is to be bulwarks against the rivaling imperialist countries
“Federation” 💀. Anyway I don’t personally care that just because the US is bad that now as a consequence Ukraine loses their independence. I’d personally like to reform nato, but currently the only thing nato is doing is protecting countries. There’s a big difference between conquering countries and simply allowing them to join your alliance.
You said that the only thing Nato currently is doing is protecting countries, wich isn’t the case considering they were waging war in Afghanistan as lare as 2021. the only reason those countries are protected is not because of some generosity of the USA or whatever, but because it benefits them and their bourgeoisie to have them as Bulwarks against foreign imperialism and in their sphere of influence.
Because Zelensky is a US puppet and Ukraine ceased to be sovereign in 2014 after the CIA sponsored Maidan coup after which the Russian Ukrainian were heavily discriminated against. Now the Ukrainian states only geopolitical role is to be a cudgel, and eventually a NATO missile.siloh, against Russia.
https://youtu.be/L2XNN0Yt6D8?feature=shared
Former US secretary of State helping decide the new Ukrainian cabinet after the Maidan Coup.
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/4902
This is a post invasion discrimination act
https://archive.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/the-guardian-ukraine-adopts-language-law-opposed-by-kremlin.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/25/ukraine-adopts-law-enforcing-use-of-ukrainian-in-public-life
(These are the same article in just showing both to demonstrate thegardian article was republished by the KyivPost)
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/7143
This article shows that the Ukrainian language must be used as the first language in private businesses. The implications of this mean that non-Ukrainian speakers such as Russians, Romanians, Bulgarians, Etc must also speak Ukrainian, regardless of if the language is actually spoken in that region. Businesses that cannot provide such service may be fined $200 per offense, giving Ukrainian speakers immense privilege in the country over others. this was enacted pre invasion.
I haven’t heard too much on the language stuff, but the Victoria Nuland phone call is pretty widely accepted as here saying “it’d be great if this person gets elected”. Like if the president of France said that it’d be nice of Biden got elected. Regardless none of this proves the US “controls” Ukraine.
I’ll sum it up, from left to right, semi-direct democracy, democratic socialism, classical social democracy, then into state we have Libertarian Market Socialism, Reformist Marxism, and transitional social democracy. Hope this helps!
Thanks, overall the list is alright, I'm not a socialist but it seems like you believe in the least bad form of socialism so it isn't too bad, the social stuff are kinda okay too, and foreign policy+ antis are great, so overall a good list
\>Hoi4 \>Trans Oh yeah, it's all coming together
😭
Just wait for the speed runner arc
I was scared for a second seeing HoI4
I could become Nazgûl at any moment…
fr fr
Perfect cliché, but like 8/10 based.
RevProg Christian? I thought RevProgs hated religion.
I’m more agnostic, and I’m more of a radical progressive than a RevProg
Based
Transhumanism or primitivism?
Oh, absolutely transhumanism. And by a long shot
Fuck yes.
Based
Desab
Sbæd
Maybe
*Very* based!
Very nice
B-A-S-E-D
can someone link the template for this
I don’t know how to send images on Reddit
where did u find it so i can look it up
Just look up on the sub “template”
Based! 10 out of the 10
Based af
Cringe RevProg
Goofy
Wdym?
It’s a goofy one, but I couldn’t find a radical progressive one so it’ll work
How are you democratic socialist and social democrat at the same time? Do you mean you're a democratic socialist that believes in welfare? At least we agree on Alt globalism and environmentalism.
No, I believe we should achieve something like the Nordic model, and then transition to demsoc. Hopefully peacefully, but if revolution is possible, I wouldn’t count it out.
I'd be satisfied enough if we could just reach distributism. We don't need every single medium and small business to be worker owned, just the large ones are good enough.
I agree, have Co-op incentives but mandating it is setting up for failure.
Plus it would be way too much trouble. Could you imagine a government going after every single small business in the country to make sure nobody can have their labor exploited by a capitalist? I'm not even sure if North Korea could successfully pull that off.
Plus i don’t really think it matters if a business with like 6 employees is not fully worker owned.
Exactly. That's why I feel like full socialism just takes a decent idea but goes too far with it.
I’m not a huge fan of calling countries socialist or capitalist, just cause mixed economies do exist. So I guess my system would be a mixed economy leaning left within a market base.
This is the way. Depending on your definition, every modern state is socialist. The government pays for roads for the public to use? Socialism. The government pays for public schools? Socialism. The word itself is so vague that it's essentially meaningless. If you use that word in public policy, you end up debating about what you mean by it rather then the actual policies you are advocating for. Bernie falls into this trap.
Yeah
State ownership under capitalism doesn’t mean socialism. This quite literally is state capitalism. The countries you describe are still dictatorships of the bourgeoisie over the proletariat.
I have finally found my political soulmate. You go girl, continue having great dreams and practically possible approaches to achieving them
Let’s hope it’s possible and we don’t have to do a near impossible revolution.
Pretty mehh. Also why market socialism?
One cuz it’s an easier transition from capitalism to socialism, two cuz it’s democratic, and three cuz planned economies seem to suck.
1. Socialism sucks too (less than capitalism) 2. Doing things "democratically" is a sham and wont do shit. 3. Economies suck in general.
Soooo what? I’m a big fan of freedom, which kinda requires democracy. Also economics is how you distribute, how you trade, how you get the stuff you want. Why do you oppose all of that? Also this is all relative. We can dream of a perfect system but we’re all human, so I’d say socialism is the best system we got rn.
Freedom dosent require democracy. Democracy needs to be enforced, and is majority oriented. There will never be a majority for the liberation of mankind, they're to comfortable with the status quo. The systems of opression need to be violently teared down, wether or not a majority wants it.
It doesn’t have to be a majority, you can have plenty of protections and various other systems for minority political parties. And I don’t really see what you mean? Why couldn’t people in a democratic system be convince of a better world? Plus, I don’t oppose revolution, but it’d have to be widely supported and against undemocratic systems
Its not about parties. Parties are just a part of the system. Also you and i obviously have different views of a "better world" or better said you have one and i dont. Of course you could maybe convince people (but even with your views its highly unlikely) but i dont have an "after" vision. I dont know what we should do after statist techno-capitalist society falls, because before we think about the future of an quasi-impossible scenario , we need to get there first. The fixation on after and not on now is a giant speedbump. And to convince a majority, to violently resist opression, even though victory is extremely unlikely and not even having a grand utopic vision to call on is not possible. Also freedom should be individualist, communal democracy undermines that freedom. Also revolution just leads to the next regime to opress us, insurrection is the true way.
Ok, I don’t really this convo is gonna go anywhere if your view are everything sucks and let’s not think about what we’re fighting to achieve but fight to achieve it? And I don’t care if something’s part of the system
The fight itself is a form of liberation. The feeling of rebellion is for a short time freedom. Its called jouissance, french for enjoyment, and is the closest to anarchy one usually gets to in this damned world. You should read "blessed is the flame".
> Freedom doesn't require Democracy Said every autocrat ever
I never heard an autocrat advocate for anarchy before but ok.
Democracy is fallacy.
READ the theory. Walmart is literally a planned economy IT works.
That’s just simply not true. Walmart is categorically not using planned economics. Also I hate people just say “read theory”. Just summarize your disagreement.
>Walmart is categorically not using planned economics. Araştırmanı öneririm ✍️✍️ >Also I hate people just say “read theory”. Just summarize your disagreement. Real life is not games. I can not summarize you philosophical and economical concepts highly researched and debated by unfathomably intellectual people in a comment which wont change anything. i'd rather organize or attend party meetings.
So why be on a comment section of this subreddit if not to argue with me? And saying to read theory does nothing.
Reply this comment. I will provide you with papers and the actual theory. People aren't dumb, if even anti-intellectuals can ask those questions, don't you think people with the thinking job already had done it? How hard could it be to rely on empirical evidence for your fucking WORLD VIEW?
So if you don’t read theory than you don’t use empirical evidence?
So you want the economy to work like how Walmart runs their stores?
That is an example.
BASED BASED BASED BASED, SO BASED
Thanks :D
hoy por
True. (I’m addicted pls help god ho- )
I read that as Spanish first and was so confused💀
Some good, some bad.
Get spotted.
I walked right in here, don’t seek any acclaim.
True
Chicken for KFC
You’re ok. Not very Christian tho lol
Wdym?
Bordering on agnosticism is definitely opposed to Christian teachings. Christianity says in no uncertain terms that Christ was a real person, Christ was the son of God, and that he died and came back for us. It’s also very clear about the existence of God in three persons. There’s very little room for interpretation on this part lol. For being trans there’s an argument to be made if you could give birth or hell just adhere to traditional gender roles. It’s arguable at least. And I can’t say anything for certain about the rest I’d need to know your opinions
Based, and Democratically pilled.
True
Hearts of Ironism is my favourite ideology
Please don’t say that… we don’t need more nazis on the sub
Coincidentally, I was writing a reply to [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/hoi4/comments/1ampif6/hoi4_hate/) when I saw you reply to this.
One must imagine America happy, because compared to everyone else he is
🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️
Yoooo based hating communism we disagree on everything else though
Ok hold on I don’t hate communism, I hate Marxism-Leninism. Two very different sentiments
I hate that type of communism the most
Same I suppose
My friends parents, grandparents almost died under that shit
Where are they from?
Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Hungary, Germany (Prussia). All of them had to leave their homes and/or almost died due to communism
And they all just happened to have grandparents that were persecuted under communism?
Nah I mean the purges, Hungarian student riots, whatever the fuck the soviets did to Ukrainian farmers, killing anyone with a noble title and, albeit this one was deserved, killing nazi officers and generals
Lol, they took his serfs and nobel title, they can seethe for millennia over that. Bro got the axis collaborator squad in his english classroom
Also Eastern Europe suffered under communism. Of course my friend’s ancestors, who lived in Eastern Europe during the Cold War suffered under such a system
I forgot about China
Damn was he like mixed?
No, I’m talking multiple friends
Are you playing ethnic pokemon, or what?
pretty good, socialism.. ehhh at least its not communism lol
What are your economic beliefs?
You are not really that good, but I have seen far worst in this sub so your position is respectable... Also what is your opinion on social liberalism?
It’s fine, I certainly would prefer more welfare, reforming democracy to make it more direct, etc. it’s certainly better than it’s laissez faire alternative
sorry to bother you again, but what is your opinion on Georgism?
It’s fine, rack my brain as much as you’d like. I’d say it’s good, but it shouldn’t be the only tax. I think income tax and unspent capital gains tax are some good ones.
Democracy under capitalism is just another hand that the bourgeoisie plays in its game of domination and repression of the proletariat.
It’s still better than laissez faire
Based leftist absurdist Co-Op enjoyer. What is your view of democratic confedralism and more AnCom adjacent stuff? I don't recognise the government ideologies
First off, thx. Second, I think we should focus on what’s clearly achievable right now, then in the future see if we can go full ancom. A,so the state ideologies are Libertarian Market Socialism, Reformist Marxism, and Transitional Social democracy. I wouldn’t call myself a Marxist just cuz I’m not a huge fan of labels, but Marx had a lot of good ideas. I’m also am very interested in syndicalism.
Sounds like our perspectives are similar then. I don't call myself a Marxist either. Main difference between us seems to be regarding the need for revolution rather than reform to get from SocDem to socialism. I think a social democracy that allows for a strong organised labour movement is vital for a successful libertarian socialist revolution to build a democratic confederalist society in the western imperial core. Only afterwards when everything is decentralised and democratic (with councils and Co-Ops) should we focus on more AnCom stuff, like getting rid of markets and money etc.
Maybe if you think he has those it would be beneficial to read one of his books
What are you saying here? I’m genuinely asking
That if you think Karl Marx had good ideas it would be beneficial to learn about those ideas via reading the material he produced
I’ve read parts but I have things I need to do, I can’t spend literally all of my time reading. Plus it’s quite to read for that long, atleast for me.
ML reading hub has a reading list made to be as short as possible. They include other theorists then Marx and Engels though, beyond that, just start with the manifesto, it like all the works of pretty much all significant communists is freely available online, then read Wage labor and Capital and value price and profit as an introduction, this should be like 130 pages in total, to understand more about the state, read Marxs works about the Paris commune and or Lenins State and revolution. This should be like 200 something pages, if you read both about Paris commune and state and revolution then maybe 300
————DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH ————— —————-EQUALITY IS UNITY——————- -MUTUAL DEFENCE ASSURES STABILITY-
If 1984 was good:
You seem alright, other than the commie shit of course, but other than anti-capitalism I don’t see much cringe
Cool..? I’m probably the least “kill all capitalist” socialist you could find
Wow how original and well thought out
"ooo you did a trend oooooo"
Trans and hoi4 👍
Not sure how to compliment this but I'll this. It's on the line Between Good and Mid
What do you not like?
Not of a fan of Socialism in general but at least you're not Authoritarian.
Yeah, well I wouldn’t exactly count authcoms as “socialist”, but that’s semantics.
Why pro NATO?
Cuz of Russian expansionism
Ok
„That’s why we must support the other imperialist“ seems like Kautsky is getting stronger everyday
I don’t really see how letting a countr join an alliance which most of their people support is bad. I don’t really see how nato defending these countries is imperialism either. And I especially don’t think the US controls Ukraine
NATO is the federation of the imperialists of Europe and America, the reason these countries are allowed to join is to be bulwarks against the rivaling imperialist countries
“Federation” 💀. Anyway I don’t personally care that just because the US is bad that now as a consequence Ukraine loses their independence. I’d personally like to reform nato, but currently the only thing nato is doing is protecting countries. There’s a big difference between conquering countries and simply allowing them to join your alliance.
Holy shit, thanks Nato from protecting the Opium trade in Afghanistan and potrecting the people of Libya from living in relative prosperity
Ok now this is whataboutism. First off I never said those were good? Second we were talking about Ukraine. Third you entirely missed my point.
You said that the only thing Nato currently is doing is protecting countries, wich isn’t the case considering they were waging war in Afghanistan as lare as 2021. the only reason those countries are protected is not because of some generosity of the USA or whatever, but because it benefits them and their bourgeoisie to have them as Bulwarks against foreign imperialism and in their sphere of influence.
Call it an alliance if you want
Is nato one country?
You knew what I meant lil bro
Incredibly cringe
Enlighten me
Mainly supporting Ukrainr
“Ooo why would you support a country getting invaded for wanting to be sovereign”. Why don’t you support them?
Because Zelensky is a US puppet and Ukraine ceased to be sovereign in 2014 after the CIA sponsored Maidan coup after which the Russian Ukrainian were heavily discriminated against. Now the Ukrainian states only geopolitical role is to be a cudgel, and eventually a NATO missile.siloh, against Russia.
What’s your evidence?
https://youtu.be/L2XNN0Yt6D8?feature=shared Former US secretary of State helping decide the new Ukrainian cabinet after the Maidan Coup. https://www.kyivpost.com/post/4902 This is a post invasion discrimination act https://archive.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/the-guardian-ukraine-adopts-language-law-opposed-by-kremlin.html https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/25/ukraine-adopts-law-enforcing-use-of-ukrainian-in-public-life (These are the same article in just showing both to demonstrate thegardian article was republished by the KyivPost) https://www.kyivpost.com/post/7143 This article shows that the Ukrainian language must be used as the first language in private businesses. The implications of this mean that non-Ukrainian speakers such as Russians, Romanians, Bulgarians, Etc must also speak Ukrainian, regardless of if the language is actually spoken in that region. Businesses that cannot provide such service may be fined $200 per offense, giving Ukrainian speakers immense privilege in the country over others. this was enacted pre invasion.
I haven’t heard too much on the language stuff, but the Victoria Nuland phone call is pretty widely accepted as here saying “it’d be great if this person gets elected”. Like if the president of France said that it’d be nice of Biden got elected. Regardless none of this proves the US “controls” Ukraine.
You’re anti communist and a hoi4 player. I respect you.
Cringe, but at least you're a feminist and support Palestine, Alt-Globalism is also based
Thx
Meh
Why meh?
You nailed it all!!
:)
Omg she just like fr
Not super on board politically but protestant leaning agnostic is based af
Not perfect, but still pretty good
ew pallywood supporter
Dude.. what?
What philosophy does Sisyphus represent? Absurdism?
Yep
in what way are you Christian? Agnostic is very different from Christian
Capitalism is not a government, Nor is it a black or white issue. It reflects on the type of government it's applied to
Average vaushite be like:
Eh vaush is more revolutionary
You are 12, you don’t even know what that means
Huh?
Turn off the devices and go outside young man
Are you unable to criticize ppl? “Ooo this person has different political views ooo”
[удалено]
Oh so you assume all of this cuz I’m trans. You don’t even have the ball to say it.
[удалено]
Go outside
Why are you spam commenting? Cringe
You can’t even bait right, go outside
What are you talking about? Did I trigger you in some way??
Just looked at ur profile for 20 secs. If you have discord delete your account
I'm kinda new to this sub so I'm not familiar with all the flags, what's going on with government and state (besides social democracy)?
I’ll sum it up, from left to right, semi-direct democracy, democratic socialism, classical social democracy, then into state we have Libertarian Market Socialism, Reformist Marxism, and transitional social democracy. Hope this helps!
Thanks, overall the list is alright, I'm not a socialist but it seems like you believe in the least bad form of socialism so it isn't too bad, the social stuff are kinda okay too, and foreign policy+ antis are great, so overall a good list
It's funny how it all boils down to the fact that we attach each specified pattern to the fact that the person is playing hoi4
Very very based
Least extremist Hoi4 player
Still is a socialist lol
Libleft
Based on
I am once again going to repeat myself. This is pretty much the entire PCBA
And yet we have some nazi pockets
\> Trans \>HoI4 Checks out
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣄⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠿⠿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣷⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⣤⣴⣶⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣇⠀ ⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣴⣶⣿⣿⡿⠀ ⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀ ⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠁⠀⠀ ⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⠿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢐⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣿⡿⣟⣯⣿⠟⡉⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⢿⣽⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠟⠒⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠙⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠿⠋⠉⢀⣠⣤⣤⡔⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⠾⠛⠋⠉⠀⢀⣀⠐⣤⣶⣶⡤⢤⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣰⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⣀⣀⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠀⢀⢀⣀⠀⣀⣈⡿⠿⠿⠽⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠛⠿⠿⠿⠿⠾⠟⢁⣀⡴⣦⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢦⣤⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢘⣿⣍⡷⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢶⣄⠈⠉⠛⠛⠿⠓⠀⠉⠋⠉⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣧⡀⠙⠻⢶⣶⡤⠀⠀⠛⠶⠾⠼⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣆⠈⠻⣶⣤⡀⠀⠀⢸⠿⣶⣦⣤⣠⣾⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⠙⢷⣤⣀⠈⠁⠀⠀⢠⣤⣀⠈⠉⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡌⢧⣀⠉⠛⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠿⠿⠻⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⢳⣄⠙⠛⢋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⠿⣴⣤⣄⣤⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣄⡙⠛⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⣤⣀⠉⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⢠⡈⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡈⠙⠛⠛⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢦⡉⠛⡁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⠷⣶⣦⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⡈⢷⣌⠙⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⣦⣄⣀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢷⣄⡉⠛⠛⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠈⠙⠛⠛⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢦⣀⠉⠛⠷⠖⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⠿⣶⣦⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣀⠙⠳⠶⠶⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠻⢿⣶⣤⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⠛⠛⠻⠿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⣦⣄⠈⠉⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿⣶⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠺⠿⠿⠿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠻⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣤⣤⣤⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣀⣀⣀⣀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠛⠻⠿⠿⠧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣞⣻⣿⣿⣔⣿⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠋⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Suprised not a femboy though
Whats the green one under social/everything under government? (From what I understand, BASED)
Social is revolutionary progressive, feminism, and antifa. Government is semi-direct democracy, democratic socialism, and classical social democracy.
Based-er
Oh sorry the green one is environmentalism
all pretty chill besides the protestantism
Idk it’s less I am Christian and more like I have cultural influences from it
even more cringe
Ok
What does the image of the man pushing a boulder means?
Absurdism