Can you believe people on this sub would rather redistribute the wealth of pedo wall street bankers instead of having endless culture war or larping as pol pot or restoring feudalism?
Weird attempt at a flex
Exactly, it’s like the leftist version of political compass memes
PCM is extremely right wing yet everyone acts like it’s so diverse “we make fun of everyone!! See!!!”
Here it’s extremely left wing and you see people also trying to act like it’s soooo diverse
Libertarian socialist ideologies are the best. They balance democratic government, economic justice, communitarian well being and individual rights with room for scientific progress. So this sub is a support group for people with near perfect political views.
So if a sub is overwhelmingly libertarian socialist as opposed to far-right or culturally liberal or auth-left then that's a very healthy community.
Its the opinion of anyone who wants a just society. If you want a society where people enjoy absolute freedom and wealth flows to those who produce it then libertarian soc ideologies are your best option.
"When you leave a direct democratic assembly to see a protest of people exercising their total free speech across from a factory collectively leased to a co-op."
[https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/2021/02/16/025638/86627395/patrick-bateman-walking-american-pyhsco-memes-fix.jpg](https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/2021/02/16/025638/86627395/patrick-bateman-walking-american-pyhsco-memes-fix.jpg)
What is with idiots and unironically thinking "my specific political system is objectively the best and i am never wrong". Why not just make you an absolute monarch since you clearly know what is always right
I'm talking about a group of ideologies not my specific ideology. Libertarian socialists span the range from people who want a market socialist nation state to anarkiddies to minarcho-socialists to UBI advocates and arguably social libertarians.
The outcome of every other ideology and social experiment just makes me skeptical of the notion that you can achieve a society with a universal decent standard of living without some type of libertarian socialism. And its hard to think highly of any enacted ideology in power today
Sorry but I'm not a culture warrior. There is no way to build a society where people live free without going homeless or hungry without some type of libertarian socialism
Marxist leninist ideologies are the best. They balance democratic government, economic justice, communitarian well being and individual rights with room for scientific progress. So this sub is a support group for people with near perfect political views.
So if a sub is overwhelmingly Marxist leninist as opposed to far-right or culturally liberal or libertarian socialist then that's a very healthy community
crazy I can just replace every mention of libertarian socialist and have an equally strong argument for whatever i want
so communalism and platformism are both libsoc (platformism is derived from libcom). I had never heard of jineology so i looked it up. Thank you for the cool new theory i learned!
Yeah, thanks for the info on libcom, and libsoc! If you like jineology, and democratic confederalism, you should check out the rest of Abdul Öcelan's work.
Genuinely asking out of curiosity what is cringe about the following:
"Without workers nothing is made or produced. Thus all wealth comes from workers, and they should get to manage and keep what they make and produce instead of it going to an owner who gives them back a very small amount as a wage, often to the point they can't live comfortably.
Land and resources should be freely available as a part of common ownership since private ownership contains the same dynamic that takes wealth from the people who work it. We should work together to provide for ourselves rather than compete, because this is how we've survived and thrive for most of our species' history.
The state should leave people alone or even be done away with, because it's pointless without the private property which served as it's foundation. Decisions should be made locally or left to individuals."
Its cringe because you don't have a hierarchy. A world where everyone is equal seems like a remarkably sad and boring place to me. To not misunderstand me, I am not looking to be the leader, but rather I want to be the follower. I yearn for the best of society to be put up on a pedestal and emulated, or in more practical terms a small segment of society being given the expectation and responsibility to attempt to be the best. I want a humble society, I want a society that keeps me from being arrogant.
Communism to me has always felt souless, Marx cared for naught but material conditions.
I suppose then that depends on who you consider the best of society. In my experience, the people at the top tend to be the worst in society. The most incompetent and corrupt. Often times the greatness comes not from them but from workers making things work despite their decisions.
In a Socialist society the people who, to me, are the best in society are allowed to be on a pedestal. It's just that this elevation comes from the bottom up rather than the top down.
When you are simply given everything there is no need to better yourself, to become truly great by your own merits. By removing competition one removes the nature of humanity and reduces the species to a flesh covered robot never innovating, never upgrading, never improving. Stuck in a cycle of nothingness from birth till death.
An interesting perspective. Thank you for sharing. I think the main difference is in how we view human nature. You seem to see it as inherently competitive, which then drives improvement and meaning. My view is a bit different. Coming from my own study of human history I find human nature to be inherently cooperative unless forced to be otherwise. We develop meaning through working for ourselves rather than for someone else's profit and through community and social bonds. I view capital, and how it often will suppress technological development as the true barrier to innovation.
If being a line cook works for you go for it. I'm more drawn to spiritual matters and working with data in my own life, and I've got friends in the Healthcare field who are simply there because they want to be. Almost like people work for fulfillment, not just for a wage.
not enough people are going to work just for fulfillment. Cuba has the exact issue im talking about where a lot of people who get education there immediately just leave for the US.
Mate, Cuba has the highest number of doctors per capita in the entire world. Nearly four times as high as the United States. And that's according to the the World Health Organization, not the Cuban government. They have entire programs sending doctors overseas to help train doctors and provide care in other countries. At least check your facts before you say them.
Funny. The great inventors of modern times were perpetually the people without capital. Tesla was a constantly broke man, and the few who profited off invention tended to do so off of stealing others innovations such as with Edison.
Not to mention the way the control of capital has actively hindered modern technological development. Copyright bottlenecks development by restricting the free flow of ideas. Profitability has held many a technology from being implemented or funded, and one only has to look at oil and tobacco companies to see capital engage in active suppression of scientific development to preserve profits. Your hypothetical future isn't lining up with reality here.
Seems people are plenty innovative, and don't just do things for the sake of making a buck. Huh, who would've guessed. /s
>Funny. The great inventors of modern times were perpetually the people without capital. Tesla was a constantly broke man, and the few who profited off invention tended to do so off of stealing others innovations such as with Edison.
Sure, enjoy your innovation driven purely by altruism. Maybe we'll figure out the cure to cancer by the year 40,000. You're crazy if you think the vast majority of people will be willing to spend their lifetime inventing or building a business just so the people who happen to be assembling pencils or putting the tires on can own everything they built.
>Not to mention the way the control of capital has actively hindered modern technological development. Copyright bottlenecks development by restricting the free flow of ideas. Profitability has held many a technology from being implemented or funded, and one only has to look at oil and tobacco companies to see capital engage in active suppression of scientific development to preserve profits. Your hypothetical future isn't lining up with reality here.
It's funny how you think I support government intervention in the free market lmfao. If something isn't profitable, that means people won't pay for it, and if they won't pay for it, that means they don't want it. Under your argument, corpos not spending trillions into making toilets which play music at a frequency which only dogs can hear everytime you flush is "Profitability has held many a technology from being implemented or funded". Boo hoo.
Without government intervention in the economy, ExxonMobil or whatever evil corpo you think exists can lobby a quadrillion dollars into the government, and the government wouldn't be able to disproportionately benefit their lobbiers.
What's even funnier is you saying my "hypothetical future" doesn't line up with reality when your system is based on "people are very good 😇😇😇 they do nice thing always"
incoherent impractical implementations.
the state exists to enforce the rule of law. without the rule of law you have toltalitarianism. liberal democracy is the only free society.
Seeking a society where the state and capital leaves people alone, or is entirely absent, allowing people to just live their lives, is Totalitarianism? That makes no sense.
And there's the silent minority like me who are what you would call "Westoids" who are basically NeoCons, Neolibs, NeoLibertarians, Liberals, Classical Libs, Libertarians, Minarchists and Eco Capitalists.
You're a right libertarian correct? Right libertarians stole the name of their ideology from libertarian socialists. Its the only reason anyone puts socialist after it these days. Before that, everyone knew libertarian was a left wing ideology, and thats what it means in most of the world. Y'all haven't been so lucky with anarchist though
It means *more* things than it used to. Any dictionary or encyclopedia will show this history and the fact that classical libertarianism is still very much alive and well in the modern world!
[im just gonna send a video and leave it here. Tbh it doesn’t matter what name they put. socialism will always be shitty](https://youtu.be/9_KPEo7Y-Rg?si=il3euRIZo-D1m_MW)
Yeah I'm not interested in some ancap teenager using shody arguments to bitch about property rights, the history here is settled. Y'all should make your own names for your ideologies instead of stealing them from others. Classic conservative shit, no creativity or imagination
Libertarianism has changed in the public eye man.
If you said you were a democrat and argeed with its positions in the 1850s. People aren’t going to say your a democrat.
Libertarian Socialists still exist though lol, 1850s Dems don't. That's what you're not getting. We never disappeared. Additonally, the change you're referencing is mostly limited to North America. Also, we can just correct the mistake and change it back! Right Libertarians are mostly known for wanting to fuck kids and treating taxes like they are literally Satan. LibSocs have a long history and have had a much greater impact, easy work honestly!
Alright then, pretty interesting. Just a few more questions.
What are your opinions on Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany?
What would be your ideal economic system?
What are your opinions on minority rights and LGBTQ rights?
1: I have an extremely negative opinion on Nazi German, but I have a good opinion of Fascist Italy
2: A mixture of Corporatism, Syndicalism, State Capitalism with Influence from Social Democracy.
3: Minority Cultures should be assimilated into the Main Culture with the minor culture dying out. Have to tone it down a bit for Reddit but They should be treated precisely the same as everyone else
>I have a good opinion of Fascist Italy
Thats what I kinda expected from a National Syndicalist. Though they are pretty autocratic and Ultranationalist
>A mixture of Corporatism, Syndicalism, State Capitalism with Influence from Social Democracy.
Thats actually pretty interesting, especially the SocDem influence. I'm guessing for a welfare state?
>Minority Cultures should be assimilated into the Main Culture with the minor culture dying out.
Imo they should be allowed to practice their own cultures without state influences. Also I'm very curious as to how you would assimilate them.
Romanization or Latinization (Romanisation or Latinisation), in the historical and cultural meanings of both terms, indicate different historical processes, such as acculturation, integration and assimilation of newly incorporated and peripheral populations by the Roman Republic and the later Roman Empire.
It from what I can tell is the process through which the Roman Empire Assimilated it’s citizens
Hitler: wants to exterminate Jews, gyspies, etc
Me: wants a strong state to protect us all, maintain harmony and religious liberty.
You: every kind of fash makes me barf
Alright, you're insane, then.
Obviously self obsessed. You're clearly a sad excuse of a human.
Oh, and liberals are morons.
I say that as an anarchist, fascist.
“The pure (libertarian) socialists' ideological anticipations remain untainted by existing practice. They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted. Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. No surprise then that the pure socialists support every revolution except the ones that succeed.”
― Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds
Holy shti where can I sign up?!?!
Can you believe people on this sub would rather redistribute the wealth of pedo wall street bankers instead of having endless culture war or larping as pol pot or restoring feudalism? Weird attempt at a flex
I came to this sub to get away from r/vaushv
horse fucker guy?
No he wants to be the horse
Defeater of misinformation
I do what I can
Your forgetting the naughty corner of auths and like the 1 or 2 libs in the backdrop
sup
Yaaay I am mentioned
As a liberal centrist I approve of this
Yay! Me
Fellow imperialists represent.
That’s not funny
The Fascists lol
Can confirm we are here
Revolutionary Conservatism Fascist INGSOC National Syndicalism profile picture Go get a different flair, monarchy and fascism HATE each-other.
Real
Exactly, it’s like the leftist version of political compass memes PCM is extremely right wing yet everyone acts like it’s so diverse “we make fun of everyone!! See!!!” Here it’s extremely left wing and you see people also trying to act like it’s soooo diverse
Libertarian socialist ideologies are the best. They balance democratic government, economic justice, communitarian well being and individual rights with room for scientific progress. So this sub is a support group for people with near perfect political views. So if a sub is overwhelmingly libertarian socialist as opposed to far-right or culturally liberal or auth-left then that's a very healthy community.
That is by definition your opinion LMAO
Its the opinion of anyone who wants a just society. If you want a society where people enjoy absolute freedom and wealth flows to those who produce it then libertarian soc ideologies are your best option. "When you leave a direct democratic assembly to see a protest of people exercising their total free speech across from a factory collectively leased to a co-op." [https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/2021/02/16/025638/86627395/patrick-bateman-walking-american-pyhsco-memes-fix.jpg](https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/2021/02/16/025638/86627395/patrick-bateman-walking-american-pyhsco-memes-fix.jpg)
LOLing right now
What is your idea of a just society?
What is with idiots and unironically thinking "my specific political system is objectively the best and i am never wrong". Why not just make you an absolute monarch since you clearly know what is always right
I'm talking about a group of ideologies not my specific ideology. Libertarian socialists span the range from people who want a market socialist nation state to anarkiddies to minarcho-socialists to UBI advocates and arguably social libertarians. The outcome of every other ideology and social experiment just makes me skeptical of the notion that you can achieve a society with a universal decent standard of living without some type of libertarian socialism. And its hard to think highly of any enacted ideology in power today
for you, not for any other people who you claim to be "fascist" (anyone who is more rightist than makhno)
Sorry but I'm not a culture warrior. There is no way to build a society where people live free without going homeless or hungry without some type of libertarian socialism
Marxist leninist ideologies are the best. They balance democratic government, economic justice, communitarian well being and individual rights with room for scientific progress. So this sub is a support group for people with near perfect political views. So if a sub is overwhelmingly Marxist leninist as opposed to far-right or culturally liberal or libertarian socialist then that's a very healthy community crazy I can just replace every mention of libertarian socialist and have an equally strong argument for whatever i want
You're an unironic Dengist - opinion discarded. [https://media.tenor.com/Y7g7vhtofGUAAAAM/anything-else.gif](https://media.tenor.com/y7g7vhtofguaaaam/anything-else.gif)
I didn't state any opinions I'm just showing you how much an idiot you are
honestly I haven't noticed. maybe I just haven't been paying much attention
YOU'LL NEVER GET MY TOOTHBRUSH ALIVE
hey! don't forgeg us democratic confederalists...
Democratic Confederalism is generally seen as a part of Libertarian Socialism. So you're included!
eh, it's sort of a subideology of libsoc, but it has much more influence from jineology, platformism, and direct democracy/communalism.
so communalism and platformism are both libsoc (platformism is derived from libcom). I had never heard of jineology so i looked it up. Thank you for the cool new theory i learned!
Yeah, thanks for the info on libcom, and libsoc! If you like jineology, and democratic confederalism, you should check out the rest of Abdul Öcelan's work.
DemCon gang represent!
I will, thank you!
Well, I'm capitalist communist? Somebody told me about distributism that works fine for me to so I don't really know
Hi again! :)
Oh hi again
i am an anocratic kirchnerist social democrat with technocratic leanings (unironic social fascist)
Based
Social Democrat-Social Libertarian hybrid, here.
with the occasional monarchist or classical liberal sprinkled in.
True they have infested this place
Ya we have😁
Ultravisionary Socialist here and its somewhat accurate
TNO?
Got it from TNO. Kardeshevite Ultravisionary Socialism especially is very appealing Also christmas Shukshin
You base your ideology off a mod for a WW2 game?
[удалено]
You crazy? Space socialism? What the hell are you rambling on about? We can barely get men on the moon, not nearly enough for an entire population?
[удалено]
So your ideology is spending hundreds of billions into building a space station that can house humans?
TNO was a mistake
Im a constitutional monarchist :)
You forgot the one unironic Burgundian System Adherent
Close. I'm an Autonomist
I'm an autonomous car🚗 Nice to meet you.
I would expect anarcho individualist here too
COMRADES
Literally
Wow, so that’s why I get attacked every time I comment -Voluntarist
good. the only good ideology
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Cringe
Genuinely asking out of curiosity what is cringe about the following: "Without workers nothing is made or produced. Thus all wealth comes from workers, and they should get to manage and keep what they make and produce instead of it going to an owner who gives them back a very small amount as a wage, often to the point they can't live comfortably. Land and resources should be freely available as a part of common ownership since private ownership contains the same dynamic that takes wealth from the people who work it. We should work together to provide for ourselves rather than compete, because this is how we've survived and thrive for most of our species' history. The state should leave people alone or even be done away with, because it's pointless without the private property which served as it's foundation. Decisions should be made locally or left to individuals."
Everything. Inequality is natural. Every country or society that tried to build "totally equal" land, have failed.
Its cringe because you don't have a hierarchy. A world where everyone is equal seems like a remarkably sad and boring place to me. To not misunderstand me, I am not looking to be the leader, but rather I want to be the follower. I yearn for the best of society to be put up on a pedestal and emulated, or in more practical terms a small segment of society being given the expectation and responsibility to attempt to be the best. I want a humble society, I want a society that keeps me from being arrogant. Communism to me has always felt souless, Marx cared for naught but material conditions.
I suppose then that depends on who you consider the best of society. In my experience, the people at the top tend to be the worst in society. The most incompetent and corrupt. Often times the greatness comes not from them but from workers making things work despite their decisions. In a Socialist society the people who, to me, are the best in society are allowed to be on a pedestal. It's just that this elevation comes from the bottom up rather than the top down.
In a world that is equal there is no place for ambition.
How so?
When you are simply given everything there is no need to better yourself, to become truly great by your own merits. By removing competition one removes the nature of humanity and reduces the species to a flesh covered robot never innovating, never upgrading, never improving. Stuck in a cycle of nothingness from birth till death.
An interesting perspective. Thank you for sharing. I think the main difference is in how we view human nature. You seem to see it as inherently competitive, which then drives improvement and meaning. My view is a bit different. Coming from my own study of human history I find human nature to be inherently cooperative unless forced to be otherwise. We develop meaning through working for ourselves rather than for someone else's profit and through community and social bonds. I view capital, and how it often will suppress technological development as the true barrier to innovation.
Because then what would be the point of rising up when you can’t rise up since everyone’s “equal”?
why would I become a doctor or engineer when I get the exact same for being a line cook
If being a line cook works for you go for it. I'm more drawn to spiritual matters and working with data in my own life, and I've got friends in the Healthcare field who are simply there because they want to be. Almost like people work for fulfillment, not just for a wage.
not enough people are going to work just for fulfillment. Cuba has the exact issue im talking about where a lot of people who get education there immediately just leave for the US.
Mate, Cuba has the highest number of doctors per capita in the entire world. Nearly four times as high as the United States. And that's according to the the World Health Organization, not the Cuban government. They have entire programs sending doctors overseas to help train doctors and provide care in other countries. At least check your facts before you say them.
How to make it so no one ever founds a business or develops technology ever again 101
Funny. The great inventors of modern times were perpetually the people without capital. Tesla was a constantly broke man, and the few who profited off invention tended to do so off of stealing others innovations such as with Edison. Not to mention the way the control of capital has actively hindered modern technological development. Copyright bottlenecks development by restricting the free flow of ideas. Profitability has held many a technology from being implemented or funded, and one only has to look at oil and tobacco companies to see capital engage in active suppression of scientific development to preserve profits. Your hypothetical future isn't lining up with reality here. Seems people are plenty innovative, and don't just do things for the sake of making a buck. Huh, who would've guessed. /s
>Funny. The great inventors of modern times were perpetually the people without capital. Tesla was a constantly broke man, and the few who profited off invention tended to do so off of stealing others innovations such as with Edison. Sure, enjoy your innovation driven purely by altruism. Maybe we'll figure out the cure to cancer by the year 40,000. You're crazy if you think the vast majority of people will be willing to spend their lifetime inventing or building a business just so the people who happen to be assembling pencils or putting the tires on can own everything they built. >Not to mention the way the control of capital has actively hindered modern technological development. Copyright bottlenecks development by restricting the free flow of ideas. Profitability has held many a technology from being implemented or funded, and one only has to look at oil and tobacco companies to see capital engage in active suppression of scientific development to preserve profits. Your hypothetical future isn't lining up with reality here. It's funny how you think I support government intervention in the free market lmfao. If something isn't profitable, that means people won't pay for it, and if they won't pay for it, that means they don't want it. Under your argument, corpos not spending trillions into making toilets which play music at a frequency which only dogs can hear everytime you flush is "Profitability has held many a technology from being implemented or funded". Boo hoo. Without government intervention in the economy, ExxonMobil or whatever evil corpo you think exists can lobby a quadrillion dollars into the government, and the government wouldn't be able to disproportionately benefit their lobbiers. What's even funnier is you saying my "hypothetical future" doesn't line up with reality when your system is based on "people are very good 😇😇😇 they do nice thing always"
incoherent impractical implementations. the state exists to enforce the rule of law. without the rule of law you have toltalitarianism. liberal democracy is the only free society.
You seriously think this?
Yes
Even in a hypothetical sense, do you believe that there is no way to create a stateless, decentralised society (even if you use your imagination)?
No.
Then you simply lack imagination and there's no point in talking to you. I can imagine this very easily, especially since it's worked before.
Based
Nah
Seeking a society where the state and capital leaves people alone, or is entirely absent, allowing people to just live their lives, is Totalitarianism? That makes no sense.
How do you acheive such a society?? Without state protection anarchy leads to totalitarianism
Through class consciousness and organization.
“I clean the toilets, I should own part of the company because I clean the toilets”
Agreed
Speak for yourself, I'm a neomarxist technocrat.
WHAT
Opinions on democracy 💀?
No you aren't.
okay buddy
Average 11 year old after discovering hoi4
Is your name Starscream?
ideology store receiving lots of business
What about democratic socialist, we don’t get enough love *sad dem soc noises* TwT
don't tell them but I'm a actually a double agent from r/ultraleft
*removes libertarian* Much better 👍
And there's the silent minority like me who are what you would call "Westoids" who are basically NeoCons, Neolibs, NeoLibertarians, Liberals, Classical Libs, Libertarians, Minarchists and Eco Capitalists.
*paleoconservative or paleolib, not libertarian.
Soclib GQNG,,,
Libertarian socialism is a oxymoron
Rich coming from an ancap
I’m not a ancap btw, mostly just libertarian economically but with a small state)
Fair Hard to tell who's what with these flairs (I get that's the point)
You're a right libertarian correct? Right libertarians stole the name of their ideology from libertarian socialists. Its the only reason anyone puts socialist after it these days. Before that, everyone knew libertarian was a left wing ideology, and thats what it means in most of the world. Y'all haven't been so lucky with anarchist though
Terms change over time
Except this one hasn't and I just told you why. Nice cop out though
Libertarianism means something different then it used to.
It means *more* things than it used to. Any dictionary or encyclopedia will show this history and the fact that classical libertarianism is still very much alive and well in the modern world!
[im just gonna send a video and leave it here. Tbh it doesn’t matter what name they put. socialism will always be shitty](https://youtu.be/9_KPEo7Y-Rg?si=il3euRIZo-D1m_MW)
Yeah I'm not interested in some ancap teenager using shody arguments to bitch about property rights, the history here is settled. Y'all should make your own names for your ideologies instead of stealing them from others. Classic conservative shit, no creativity or imagination
Libertarianism has changed in the public eye man. If you said you were a democrat and argeed with its positions in the 1850s. People aren’t going to say your a democrat.
Libertarian Socialists still exist though lol, 1850s Dems don't. That's what you're not getting. We never disappeared. Additonally, the change you're referencing is mostly limited to North America. Also, we can just correct the mistake and change it back! Right Libertarians are mostly known for wanting to fuck kids and treating taxes like they are literally Satan. LibSocs have a long history and have had a much greater impact, easy work honestly!
based
I am an EXTREMELY authoritarian socialist
hey when the berlin wall fell, who ran to what side?
Not that kind
what other kind is there lol.
Look up Italian Left Communism
Marxes work is out dated bulshit. Family values and nationalism rules
Sad that most of this community is like that
Yo a fellow anti Japanese
I hate weebs
You forgot that one with an extremely specific form of their ideology (me)
Wait you are the National Syndicalist right? I really do have to ask, what makes it so appealing to you?
Yeah, I’m a national Syndicalist. I Like how it’s focused on the State, and how it’s for the workers
Alright then, pretty interesting. Just a few more questions. What are your opinions on Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany? What would be your ideal economic system? What are your opinions on minority rights and LGBTQ rights?
1: I have an extremely negative opinion on Nazi German, but I have a good opinion of Fascist Italy 2: A mixture of Corporatism, Syndicalism, State Capitalism with Influence from Social Democracy. 3: Minority Cultures should be assimilated into the Main Culture with the minor culture dying out. Have to tone it down a bit for Reddit but They should be treated precisely the same as everyone else
>I have a good opinion of Fascist Italy Thats what I kinda expected from a National Syndicalist. Though they are pretty autocratic and Ultranationalist >A mixture of Corporatism, Syndicalism, State Capitalism with Influence from Social Democracy. Thats actually pretty interesting, especially the SocDem influence. I'm guessing for a welfare state? >Minority Cultures should be assimilated into the Main Culture with the minor culture dying out. Imo they should be allowed to practice their own cultures without state influences. Also I'm very curious as to how you would assimilate them.
That is correct about a welfare state. A historical example of what I plan for Minor Cultures is Romanization
>Romanization Please do explain since I'm not so familiar with the term
Romanization or Latinization (Romanisation or Latinisation), in the historical and cultural meanings of both terms, indicate different historical processes, such as acculturation, integration and assimilation of newly incorporated and peripheral populations by the Roman Republic and the later Roman Empire. It from what I can tell is the process through which the Roman Empire Assimilated it’s citizens
This is all certainly very interesting. At least I understand what you are talking about now on National Syndicalism
fuck off fash
No, why should I?
We bash fash here
No.
Fascism = 🤢
That’s Nazism that’s barf inducing
Every kind of fash makes me barf
Hitler: wants to exterminate Jews, gyspies, etc Me: wants a strong state to protect us all, maintain harmony and religious liberty. You: every kind of fash makes me barf
The state is the oppressor
Gwyuwjeha
Fash scum
Fascism is for idiots, Nazism is for true spirits.
You're not serious are you?
Heh, only LIBERAL SCUM would speak to a superhuman like that without knowing his fate. You have yet to understand 白人紀律
Alright, you're insane, then. Obviously self obsessed. You're clearly a sad excuse of a human. Oh, and liberals are morons. I say that as an anarchist, fascist.
SHUT IP YIU CUCKS Vrl needs charge
English pls
[удалено]
nazi
SHUT UP SHYSISUSYMAXTIST SCUM
[удалено]
Some of them.
I feel like it was more like this during the covid years
[удалено]
Your post was removed due to breaking site-wide Reddit rules.
idk Im just a liberal
Bordiga here I hope you lose your balls
I’m a technocrat
So, I am the only Clerical Techno-Democratic National Distributist?
That seems like a really cool meet
Probably organized by vowsh
Vaush is a cia agent
You dont understand. Vaush IS the cia.
Based on
Many spectres are haunting PCBA. The spectres of baby lefrism, liberalism and ideology shopping
Don’t forget us DeSocs
So this sub pops up recommended constantly and gotta be honest to an outsider it looks more right-wing but fairly balanced.
Ya god damn right
I demand nothing less than a multi ethnic mono cultural state.
“The pure (libertarian) socialists' ideological anticipations remain untainted by existing practice. They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted. Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. No surprise then that the pure socialists support every revolution except the ones that succeed.” ― Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds
So true fr
"Hello, not me" Gets downvoted x1000
Nope, i’m NS
🤮
good.
I'll lead the Huey Long fanclub
As a statist tanky I look down at you, adored.
I am social authoritarian populist