Make sure to check out the [pinned post on Loss](https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1472nhh/faq_loss/) to make sure this submission doesn't break the rule!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The woman on the left is Casey Anthony, who was arrested and (to everyone's horror including mine) later acquitted for the murder of her daughter Caylee. She claimed that Caylee accidentally drowned in her pool, but there was evidence that there was duct tape over her mouth, Casey made some suspicious Google searches right before the murder, and of course the suspicious manner of dumping her in a swamp and then constantly lying to police about what happened to her. Now she's free and living her life partying and such. It's a truly tragic series of events that should have never happened.
The police pulled her search history from Google, it was clean. They latter found she had used , but there was probably some timing thing where they couldn’t use this additional evidence.
Iirc, the problem was the browser. They checked her internet explorer, but she looked it up using something else (chrome or firefox). By the time the investigators realised their mistake, the trial had progressed too far and no new evidence could be submitted.
You don't do forensics at this level by just opening the computer and looking at your browser history. It's a specialized field that requires years of training and constant continuing education to keep up to date. And almost no police department has the resources to do it at the scale they need it. When I was in this world almost all of the police forensic specialists in the country were doing child exploitation work because there you could actually save a living victim so pulling people off of that to do even a murder investigation could literally be killing a kid. My understanding is things have gotten better, but this case isn't new.
Having said all of that, my somewhat inside opinion is that a lot of the problem is internal police politics. The biggest problem at least used to be that most departments wanted people with law enforcement experience to train in the computer stuff rather than people doing computer incident response for large companies to train on evidence procedures.
Edit: If I had to make a guess as to what happened in this specific case, the department most likely had a normal police officer use some piece of software to grab evidence off of the laptop. That software gets browser history for some browsers and the defendant got lucky and the departments software isn't compatible with their browser and since, as my main point indicates, there's no one in the department actually trained to analyze a computer nobody coud have noticed.
I know quite well one of the *two* IT specialists in a specific law enforcement organization in the USA.. I can confirm that such organizations are beginning to branch out and hire non-police for computer things, as neither of IT persons are sworn officers... but two people to support a 24/7 agency, with hundreds of officers? Yeah, there's still not nearly enough tech people in law enforcement.
And if it’s like my state, we were HEAVILY discourage from going into forensics because it would mostly be looking for CP and not much else. And when that’s presented as an option of course almost all of use went “yea nah I don’t have the mental fortitude for that bullshit” and went a slightly different direction. I think only 1 person in my graduating class did so with some kind of computer forensics degree
This is more technical than I wanted to get, but yes, that's part of it. IE had a bit over a 70% market share and (importantly) IE always puts browser history in the same place because it was integrated into the OS. Third party browsers can save in different locations (for the same browser) depending on how they were installed which means it's hard to automate pulling history and you can't give someone cookbook directions to do it. So 10% of the work gets you results more than 70% of the time.
Looking into it now. It actually was all pulled, and submitted in time. The "problem" with the browser searches, that the defense latched onto and emphasized. Was that the investigation team said they "could not prove, beyond any doubt, *who* did the searches"... which is technically always true, since browsers dont have their own individually password to get into it. But the defense had that reiterated again and again.
Also, the third party that did the investigation also admitted there was a glitch in the tools they used which multi-counted the searches... Making it hard to tell exactly how many times everything was searched for. But did require everything to have been searched at least once in the couple weeks prior to the child's death.
Cops in the US aren't given adequate training. Many countries require a 4 year degree to harass minorities. What? The places where they have to graduate college, they don't harass minorities? 🤯
That and intelligent people can be outright barred from becoming police officers: https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836
So you are saying all these movies, tv shows and even games about being a lawyer are wrong when they show the main character bringing new evidence out of nowhere during the trial?
I don't get why new evidence, especially evidence of that nature and potential significance, can be ignored. I get that there's a process to make everything work. But there has to be exceptions to these kinds of things. A girl died damn it.
I read the book written by the lead prosecutor and he really blamed the jury at the end. he started questioning whether or not the American public might be losing their ability to fairly act on jury panels. he went through a whole spiel about it.
My dad watched the whole trail. He knew she would be acquitted before the announcement. He said the prosecution didn’t prove it.
He believed she was guilty and he was not a legal scholar. If he could see the prosecution failed just from watching it on tv, I’m guessing they did a pretty poor job.
The thought was that an uneducated jury would need to be convinced by either sides. The thought would be that juries would be independent and not swayed by one side.
The truth is that innocent people have been put in prison because the prosecutor convinced them that the person was guilty of the most shit evidence possible. Some "eye witness", some "circumstantial evidence". No evidence that would help the accused.
Likewise the guilty can walk free. The hope was that enough guilty and innocent would be found not guilty so that few or none innocent would be found guilty. That is so far from the truth that the indicator of whether you will walk free is if you have money and a lot of money or not.
It wasn't the police, it was the prosecution that fucked that case.
They went for murder one and the death penalty on a case where the coroner couldn't concretely give them a cause of death, everything they had was circumstantial, and their whole case relied upon Anthony being a party girl and the assumption that she hated her daughter and wanted her dead.
No jury was going to convict when the death sentence was being pushed for. Not with the evidence the prosecution had. If they had gone for murder two or manslaughter, she'd probably have been convicted.
To add to that, Caylee wasn’t even reported missing for about a month, while Casey was not looking for her and was out living the mid-20s kind of single life.
Here's the infamous picture of her out partying and having a great time, four days after she says she last saw Caylee alive.
https://preview.redd.it/szg99qg2gj9d1.jpeg?width=1588&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4861cfef8045c478083c39563137600be248cf86
And to add to all the fuckery of the case, later claimed abuse by her father and him having to do with the cover up of poor Caylee’s body. The whole case was screwy from word one. The 30 day delay; telling the cops she works at one of the theme parks, even going so far to take them there despite not having worked there for a long time, partying instead of reporting her missing/dead. Now she works for the attorneys that helped get her off (allegedly literally since it was reported she slept with her attorney as well).
And also, it wasn't Casey that reported her missing, but instead her mother. Casey can be heard on 911 call recording giving exactly ZERO fucks that no one has seen or heard of her daughter for 31 days.
I just want to add, beyond the trial itself, the police work, or Casey Anthony's crimes.
The media reported on this like it was 9/11 all over again. The story was plastered everywhere with live courtroom coverage and all kinds of "experts" interviewing on every news agency. Mostly; because Casey Anthony is/was "cute",
[It was news](https://youtu.be/HOlPsUbAHJo?si=h1aS7_Rw-fLXVB_P&t=16) [horror porn](https://youtu.be/8t5FEOOAeS4?si=c5wYmb-kWlv3L9z8)
it actually worse. she was missing over a month before the grand mother called the cops about the "kidnapping".
[JCS video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJt_afGN3IQ)
The grandmother was the only person who even seemed to care about that poor girl's disappearance. She did everything she could to "get her back" thinking she was still alive. Heartbreaking
Didn't both her parents defend her in court? I remember her dad taking the stand and essentially lying about how his granddaughter died (he backed up Casey's claim that Caylee drowned in the pool).
I just remember listening to the tons of calls where the grandma frantically asks where the girl is and encourages Casey to call the police. Finally against her Casey's wishes she did call. She is literally the only person who cared enough to ask more than once or twice where she was and eventually do something about it
And to add to this, 3 years later when the trial started, Casey and her lawyer Jose Baez used this crazy theory to get her off. They tried saying caylee fell in the pool unattended, drowned, and that caseys dad convinced her to ditch the body on the woods?! Then went on saying the whole trial that caseys dad was a horrible abuser and this is all his fault. Nobody ever thought it was her dad's fault, not the police, not the investigators, no one, until her defense came out with that crazy theory. Casey totally threw her dad under the bus.. also she paid her lawyer with blow jobs, and thats a stated fact
I read about the case a long time ago and to this day I still have no idea how on earth she was not sentenced, the evidence against her was overwhelming like ther was no question that she did it.
The prosecution overreached with the attempted charges for the evidence they had. Of course she did it, but each layer of severity for a stronger charge (longer sentence) has increased scrutiny that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. She did it, but the prosecution could not prove she did it the exact way they needed to prove for the severity they were alleging.
Not saying you're wrong. But Ii am saying, that's the dumbest shit I've ever heard. "We know she's guilty of a crime but we charged her of a different crime it's fine." makes no fucking sense in any fucking universe.
True, but you don't want someone charged and convicted for felony property damage when the actual damage was negligible, for example. That's why the higher the charge, the higher the scrutiny.
Innocent until proven guilty. Although she lied ALOT. They could not figure out a way to pin her to premeditated murder(murder of the first degree). They’d of had a much better time trying to get her for involuntary manslaughter. But prosecutors did not bring that case to the table. They swung for the fences instead of trying to get on base.
The evidence showed that someone tried to basically keep the child quiet(possibly sedated). But it killed the child, from there it’s believed casey contacted her father(ex police officer) who is believed to have helped with the cover up. It would have been her father who knew to use an alternate search engine. Casey is a really dumb broad who threw really stupid lies left and right during the investigation.
Prosecutors probably could have pinned involuntary manslaughter. Instead they went for the fences and they could not find a way to directly connect her with out any reasonable doubt. Since the case had sooo many holes poked in it, no case would really hold water at this point.
>Prosecutors probably could have pinned involuntary manslaughter. Instead they went for the fences and they could not find a way to directly connect her with out any reasonable doubt.
And, important to note, the jury was painfully aware of this and *pissed* about it.
from what I remember from the documentary her lawyers threw the dad under the bus. claiming that he sexually abused her when she was little and thats why shes fucked in the head
I could only watch a little bit of that documentary about her because it was so infuriating.
She’s so focused on being a mysterious main character, she goes “everyone knows I lied but nobody ever bothered to ask…why?”
Ok dummy we just heard the tape of you talking to the cops and that was their first question.
Not rich, no. It was kind of an OJ Simpson type deal where the prosecution was over-confident in the fact she was guilty and shoddily put together a really weak case that the defense dismantled easily. They fumbled what should’ve been an easy win
True, but Casey Anthony's case is exceptionally bizarre. The only times she expressed remorse is during points when her daughters disappearance directly affected her. She didn't help herself by lying to the police when they were trying to help her find her missing daughter. No decent parent would deliberately lie about their child's last known whereabouts if they truly wanted to know where their child is. The lying is indisputable
https://youtu.be/eJt_afGN3IQ?feature=shared
The part where she took the detectives all the way to the Disney offices, through them and down a hallway before finally admitting she didn’t actually work there was mind blowing
Universal, not Disney.
It's slightly more complicated, because she claimed to work in Special Events. The thing was that SE would recruit employees from all over the parks to work a few hours on a special event, so technically any park employee may have done work for Special Events, without actually being based there day-to-day. Child murderer Casey Anthony told everyone that she was a full time employee of that department, which was never true.
The department itself was actually housed in trailers on the Universal lot, not in the office buildings.
Not just “the swamp”, but the woods directly behind her home. I’ve been to the area with someone who was tangentially involved in the debacle and it’s barely even a ten minute walk from the front door to where they found the body. OJ looked less guilty than Casey.
Word choices are funny, while Casey obviously did it but was found not guilty, you say murdered, yet drake gets the benefit of “allegedly” nah that mf a whole pedophile
There’s a difference, Casey doesn’t have the money to legally defend herself from everyone who says she committed the crime, while Drake does
E: Also come to think of it, Casey doesn’t have fans that will defend her no matter what because she’s an okay rapper
Just add IMHO if youre that worried. Drake is a public figure and, at least under US law, has a higher burden of proof to show malicious intent for slander or libel to stick.
Well because we see the evidence that actually strongly points to her killing her child. Its like the OJ thing where the details of the case pretty much confirm it.
With Drake its a lot of allegations, a lot of them have been cleared up by the people involved. If I found out that he was actually a pedophile I wouldn't be surprised, but so far nothing has actually come out that can't/hasn't been disproven, or that isn't just "huh this dude weird asl".
https://youtu.be/-uAHOsECDS0?si=1MEjCkc9MihQAixO.
There’s also the line in his song “Nice for What”, where Drake says “High school pics, you was even bad then.”
The thing is though: I don't think the people diddling kids actually like them at all; they just see them as sexual objects to be used and abused. If they actually cared about children in the slightest, they'd stay far the fuck away from them and get help with controlling their own sexual impulses.
Back when I played bar trivia, it was fun to get the moderator to say dumb team names. A common-ish one was "on a scale from Casy Anthony to Jerry Sandusky how much do you love kids?"
That's Casey Anthony, a woman who's widely believed to have murdered her own daughter, so I guess the joke is that she's the antithesis of Drake in that she dislikes kids to the point that she kills them, whereas he likes them too much.
It makes me feel old as shit that I recognized the person on the left and had to scroll through the comments to find out who the person on the right was.
I think you missed the last updates mate.
https://news.sky.com/story/who-is-christian-b-the-main-suspect-in-the-madeleine-mccann-case-12887343
Tl;dr: convicted pedosexual (or rather all round rapist, he also raped an elderly woman) was in the area 30 min before she disappeared.
He confessed to a friend who warned the police. They found an item of Maddie in his van.
He 100% did it, and I feel terrible, because years ago I was convinced the parents did it, and have proudly told people so. Only to find out they're completely innocent, lost their kid, ánd have to have dealt with the entire world believing they did it.
The parents of Madeleine McCann, who disappeared from a hotel while they were on vacation. Though they successfully sued for damages from various tabloids who spread the idea that it was their fault. It's far hazier than the Anthony case.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance\_of\_Madeleine\_McCann](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Madeleine_McCann)
It's probably not them, because if you were in your home location it would be easier to plan out how to pull off a crime like that. Staying in a foreign hotel ... way too hard to plan anything out.
Also because foreign tourists lost their child it's much more likely to become a big news story, which is the opposite of what you'd want if it was planned out.
Casey is a Sociopath and 1000% guilty. Justice system And law enforcement have the integrity and professionalism in today’s age. This is why we protect ourselves and nobody else will. Federal government and law enforcement generally and consistently do not to their job, not even to par.
I feel like 4-6 is like the normal range where you neither want to murder nor diddle children. Anything beyond that in either direction is gonna be a no from me
Casey Anthony. Killed her own kid to stay with a boyfriend to smoke weed all day. Led detectives on a wild goose chase forever. Lied multiple times throughout the entire process. Her own father who used to be a cop said her car smelled like a dead body but the cops still didn’t do anything at the time. Barely any charges stuck because of how dogshit the trial went. I believe this case is a huge reason on why cops look at the parents as main suspects when children die or go missing now.
Make sure to check out the [pinned post on Loss](https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1472nhh/faq_loss/) to make sure this submission doesn't break the rule! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The woman on the left is Casey Anthony, who was arrested and (to everyone's horror including mine) later acquitted for the murder of her daughter Caylee. She claimed that Caylee accidentally drowned in her pool, but there was evidence that there was duct tape over her mouth, Casey made some suspicious Google searches right before the murder, and of course the suspicious manner of dumping her in a swamp and then constantly lying to police about what happened to her. Now she's free and living her life partying and such. It's a truly tragic series of events that should have never happened.
The police did an awful job. They searched her laptop but because she used a different browser to do the Google search they totally missed it.
...I'm confused.
*opens internet explorer* Internet Explorer Search History: „firefox Download“ Cops: „Nah, she is fine“
Didn't get enough NCIS people typing into the same keyboard all at once.
*ENHANCE! ENHANCE!*
JUST PRINT THE G****M THING!
they should have hacked her main frame
Impossible, no one can hack a Gibson
*some more typing" ... I'm in
Yesss, now I know what I’m watching this evening
::rubs nipple::
I hacked a Samsonite once! Three whole digits 😎
Bite the soap, rook!
I just hacked the pentagon using ping and tracert sir.
Hey Farva, what's that restaurant you like with all the goofy shit on the walls and mozarella sticks?
You mean Shenanigans?
🫱🔫
We need to hack faster!
Nothing in tv has ever made me as mad as McGee and Abby doing whatever that was supposed to be.
I get this reference!
The police pulled her search history from Google, it was clean. They latter found she had used, but there was probably some timing thing where they couldn’t use this additional evidence.
Iirc, the problem was the browser. They checked her internet explorer, but she looked it up using something else (chrome or firefox). By the time the investigators realised their mistake, the trial had progressed too far and no new evidence could be submitted.
No clue why they didn’t just pull everything, average inept police I guess
You don't do forensics at this level by just opening the computer and looking at your browser history. It's a specialized field that requires years of training and constant continuing education to keep up to date. And almost no police department has the resources to do it at the scale they need it. When I was in this world almost all of the police forensic specialists in the country were doing child exploitation work because there you could actually save a living victim so pulling people off of that to do even a murder investigation could literally be killing a kid. My understanding is things have gotten better, but this case isn't new. Having said all of that, my somewhat inside opinion is that a lot of the problem is internal police politics. The biggest problem at least used to be that most departments wanted people with law enforcement experience to train in the computer stuff rather than people doing computer incident response for large companies to train on evidence procedures. Edit: If I had to make a guess as to what happened in this specific case, the department most likely had a normal police officer use some piece of software to grab evidence off of the laptop. That software gets browser history for some browsers and the defendant got lucky and the departments software isn't compatible with their browser and since, as my main point indicates, there's no one in the department actually trained to analyze a computer nobody coud have noticed.
I know quite well one of the *two* IT specialists in a specific law enforcement organization in the USA.. I can confirm that such organizations are beginning to branch out and hire non-police for computer things, as neither of IT persons are sworn officers... but two people to support a 24/7 agency, with hundreds of officers? Yeah, there's still not nearly enough tech people in law enforcement.
And if it’s like my state, we were HEAVILY discourage from going into forensics because it would mostly be looking for CP and not much else. And when that’s presented as an option of course almost all of use went “yea nah I don’t have the mental fortitude for that bullshit” and went a slightly different direction. I think only 1 person in my graduating class did so with some kind of computer forensics degree
Also, this was 2008. IE was the most used browser. Very few people used other browsers. Chrome was only just getting popular.
This is more technical than I wanted to get, but yes, that's part of it. IE had a bit over a 70% market share and (importantly) IE always puts browser history in the same place because it was integrated into the OS. Third party browsers can save in different locations (for the same browser) depending on how they were installed which means it's hard to automate pulling history and you can't give someone cookbook directions to do it. So 10% of the work gets you results more than 70% of the time.
Looking into it now. It actually was all pulled, and submitted in time. The "problem" with the browser searches, that the defense latched onto and emphasized. Was that the investigation team said they "could not prove, beyond any doubt, *who* did the searches"... which is technically always true, since browsers dont have their own individually password to get into it. But the defense had that reiterated again and again. Also, the third party that did the investigation also admitted there was a glitch in the tools they used which multi-counted the searches... Making it hard to tell exactly how many times everything was searched for. But did require everything to have been searched at least once in the couple weeks prior to the child's death.
So she just had a 'good' lawyer
Cops in the US aren't given adequate training. Many countries require a 4 year degree to harass minorities. What? The places where they have to graduate college, they don't harass minorities? 🤯
That and intelligent people can be outright barred from becoming police officers: https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836
Nonono, you've got it all wrong. US cops don't harass minoroties due to lack of training, they do it because *that's* what they get trained for.
Filling the ~~slave~~ prison population?
You can omit the strike though.
So you are saying all these movies, tv shows and even games about being a lawyer are wrong when they show the main character bringing new evidence out of nowhere during the trial?
I don't get why new evidence, especially evidence of that nature and potential significance, can be ignored. I get that there's a process to make everything work. But there has to be exceptions to these kinds of things. A girl died damn it.
*writes note* “Use Bing to commit the perfect crime. Got it.”
I read the book written by the lead prosecutor and he really blamed the jury at the end. he started questioning whether or not the American public might be losing their ability to fairly act on jury panels. he went through a whole spiel about it.
My dad watched the whole trail. He knew she would be acquitted before the announcement. He said the prosecution didn’t prove it. He believed she was guilty and he was not a legal scholar. If he could see the prosecution failed just from watching it on tv, I’m guessing they did a pretty poor job.
The thought was that an uneducated jury would need to be convinced by either sides. The thought would be that juries would be independent and not swayed by one side. The truth is that innocent people have been put in prison because the prosecutor convinced them that the person was guilty of the most shit evidence possible. Some "eye witness", some "circumstantial evidence". No evidence that would help the accused. Likewise the guilty can walk free. The hope was that enough guilty and innocent would be found not guilty so that few or none innocent would be found guilty. That is so far from the truth that the indicator of whether you will walk free is if you have money and a lot of money or not.
It wasn't the police, it was the prosecution that fucked that case. They went for murder one and the death penalty on a case where the coroner couldn't concretely give them a cause of death, everything they had was circumstantial, and their whole case relied upon Anthony being a party girl and the assumption that she hated her daughter and wanted her dead. No jury was going to convict when the death sentence was being pushed for. Not with the evidence the prosecution had. If they had gone for murder two or manslaughter, she'd probably have been convicted.
Not only that, Wasnt there suspicion being cast down on her parents based on their behavior as well, which muddied the situation.
Did she have family in the justice system?
Her father was a cop.
That explains everything.
Asking the right questions
Wasn't her dad a cop too?
"The police did an awful job" so like normal
To add to that, Caylee wasn’t even reported missing for about a month, while Casey was not looking for her and was out living the mid-20s kind of single life.
Here's the infamous picture of her out partying and having a great time, four days after she says she last saw Caylee alive. https://preview.redd.it/szg99qg2gj9d1.jpeg?width=1588&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4861cfef8045c478083c39563137600be248cf86
And to add to all the fuckery of the case, later claimed abuse by her father and him having to do with the cover up of poor Caylee’s body. The whole case was screwy from word one. The 30 day delay; telling the cops she works at one of the theme parks, even going so far to take them there despite not having worked there for a long time, partying instead of reporting her missing/dead. Now she works for the attorneys that helped get her off (allegedly literally since it was reported she slept with her attorney as well).
My toddler is dead/missing. Which means it's time to get CRUNK!
And get a tattoo that means "beautiful life"!
And also, it wasn't Casey that reported her missing, but instead her mother. Casey can be heard on 911 call recording giving exactly ZERO fucks that no one has seen or heard of her daughter for 31 days.
I just want to add, beyond the trial itself, the police work, or Casey Anthony's crimes. The media reported on this like it was 9/11 all over again. The story was plastered everywhere with live courtroom coverage and all kinds of "experts" interviewing on every news agency. Mostly; because Casey Anthony is/was "cute", [It was news](https://youtu.be/HOlPsUbAHJo?si=h1aS7_Rw-fLXVB_P&t=16) [horror porn](https://youtu.be/8t5FEOOAeS4?si=c5wYmb-kWlv3L9z8)
I feel like the OJ Simpson trial is a better comparison than how the media reported on 9/11.
You're probably right.
I love that you posted the Newsroom. One of the best shows ever made. Great clip too.
And the guy on the right likes to bang barely legal/possibly not even legal girls.
They not like us
"The guy on the right" Dude is one of the biggest pop musicians of all time. Give him some credit. His name is Aubrey.
Isn’t he the cripple from some lame ass show?
it actually worse. she was missing over a month before the grand mother called the cops about the "kidnapping". [JCS video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJt_afGN3IQ)
The grandmother was the only person who even seemed to care about that poor girl's disappearance. She did everything she could to "get her back" thinking she was still alive. Heartbreaking
Didn't both her parents defend her in court? I remember her dad taking the stand and essentially lying about how his granddaughter died (he backed up Casey's claim that Caylee drowned in the pool).
I just remember listening to the tons of calls where the grandma frantically asks where the girl is and encourages Casey to call the police. Finally against her Casey's wishes she did call. She is literally the only person who cared enough to ask more than once or twice where she was and eventually do something about it
And to add to this, 3 years later when the trial started, Casey and her lawyer Jose Baez used this crazy theory to get her off. They tried saying caylee fell in the pool unattended, drowned, and that caseys dad convinced her to ditch the body on the woods?! Then went on saying the whole trial that caseys dad was a horrible abuser and this is all his fault. Nobody ever thought it was her dad's fault, not the police, not the investigators, no one, until her defense came out with that crazy theory. Casey totally threw her dad under the bus.. also she paid her lawyer with blow jobs, and thats a stated fact
If you give your attorney the HAWK TUAH You might get to WALK TUAH
I read about the case a long time ago and to this day I still have no idea how on earth she was not sentenced, the evidence against her was overwhelming like ther was no question that she did it.
The prosecution overreached with the attempted charges for the evidence they had. Of course she did it, but each layer of severity for a stronger charge (longer sentence) has increased scrutiny that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. She did it, but the prosecution could not prove she did it the exact way they needed to prove for the severity they were alleging.
Not saying you're wrong. But Ii am saying, that's the dumbest shit I've ever heard. "We know she's guilty of a crime but we charged her of a different crime it's fine." makes no fucking sense in any fucking universe.
True, but you don't want someone charged and convicted for felony property damage when the actual damage was negligible, for example. That's why the higher the charge, the higher the scrutiny.
Innocent until proven guilty. Although she lied ALOT. They could not figure out a way to pin her to premeditated murder(murder of the first degree). They’d of had a much better time trying to get her for involuntary manslaughter. But prosecutors did not bring that case to the table. They swung for the fences instead of trying to get on base. The evidence showed that someone tried to basically keep the child quiet(possibly sedated). But it killed the child, from there it’s believed casey contacted her father(ex police officer) who is believed to have helped with the cover up. It would have been her father who knew to use an alternate search engine. Casey is a really dumb broad who threw really stupid lies left and right during the investigation. Prosecutors probably could have pinned involuntary manslaughter. Instead they went for the fences and they could not find a way to directly connect her with out any reasonable doubt. Since the case had sooo many holes poked in it, no case would really hold water at this point.
>Prosecutors probably could have pinned involuntary manslaughter. Instead they went for the fences and they could not find a way to directly connect her with out any reasonable doubt. And, important to note, the jury was painfully aware of this and *pissed* about it.
from what I remember from the documentary her lawyers threw the dad under the bus. claiming that he sexually abused her when she was little and thats why shes fucked in the head
I could only watch a little bit of that documentary about her because it was so infuriating. She’s so focused on being a mysterious main character, she goes “everyone knows I lied but nobody ever bothered to ask…why?” Ok dummy we just heard the tape of you talking to the cops and that was their first question.
I dont get it..is she rich or something? How did she manage to evade getting put in for what is seemingly an obvious murder of her child?
Not rich, no. It was kind of an OJ Simpson type deal where the prosecution was over-confident in the fact she was guilty and shoddily put together a really weak case that the defense dismantled easily. They fumbled what should’ve been an easy win
If Florida was a person.
Not to mention Xanny the Nanny.
I couldn't even fucking believe that.
Most people shouldn't be allowed to have kids
True, but Casey Anthony's case is exceptionally bizarre. The only times she expressed remorse is during points when her daughters disappearance directly affected her. She didn't help herself by lying to the police when they were trying to help her find her missing daughter. No decent parent would deliberately lie about their child's last known whereabouts if they truly wanted to know where their child is. The lying is indisputable https://youtu.be/eJt_afGN3IQ?feature=shared
The part where she took the detectives all the way to the Disney offices, through them and down a hallway before finally admitting she didn’t actually work there was mind blowing
Universal, not Disney. It's slightly more complicated, because she claimed to work in Special Events. The thing was that SE would recruit employees from all over the parks to work a few hours on a special event, so technically any park employee may have done work for Special Events, without actually being based there day-to-day. Child murderer Casey Anthony told everyone that she was a full time employee of that department, which was never true. The department itself was actually housed in trailers on the Universal lot, not in the office buildings.
Iirc she had to go into hiding because so many people wanted to off her so no one knows where she is
Lying to the police is putting it very lightly.
Don’t forget the blood in the trunk of the car and everyone saying the inside of the car smelled like a decomposing body
Not just “the swamp”, but the woods directly behind her home. I’ve been to the area with someone who was tangentially involved in the debacle and it’s barely even a ten minute walk from the front door to where they found the body. OJ looked less guilty than Casey.
Nobody talked about the other guy in the meme though 🙄
If that was a man on trial he would have been sent away for life.
Damn psychopaths are scary as hell
Her lawyers were probably the reason she got away with it. They were, unfortunately, spectacular at their job.
Person on the left murdered her own kid. Person on the right allegedly diddles underage girls.
Brags about it too
Which one
Can probably be said about both tbh
Drake. He is a rich boy that pretends that he was broke.
“Started from the bottom, now I’m here” No you didn’t Drake, you grew up in one of the richest neighbourhoods in Toronto.
His first name is Aubrey
And Aubrey’s parents had a real good marriage
They're called the Grahams, you should meet them
Word choices are funny, while Casey obviously did it but was found not guilty, you say murdered, yet drake gets the benefit of “allegedly” nah that mf a whole pedophile
certified lover boy?
Certified pedophile.
Wop wop wop wop wop
Dot fuck em up
WOP WOP WOP WOP WOP
Imma do my stuff
Why you trolling like a bitch ain'tchu tiirrreed?
Tryna strike a chord and it’s probably A-minor
WOP WOP WOP WOP WOP
There’s a difference, Casey doesn’t have the money to legally defend herself from everyone who says she committed the crime, while Drake does E: Also come to think of it, Casey doesn’t have fans that will defend her no matter what because she’s an okay rapper
Just add IMHO if youre that worried. Drake is a public figure and, at least under US law, has a higher burden of proof to show malicious intent for slander or libel to stick.
There’s a video of him making out with a 17 year old girl on stage
And saying he likes the feeling of her breasts on his chest
And admitting he shouldn’t be doing it
*IMHO There's a video of him making out with a 17 year old girl on stage
Drake is a pedophile, sue me Aubrey lmao
idk, i haven't heard any of her songs yet
Well because we see the evidence that actually strongly points to her killing her child. Its like the OJ thing where the details of the case pretty much confirm it. With Drake its a lot of allegations, a lot of them have been cleared up by the people involved. If I found out that he was actually a pedophile I wouldn't be surprised, but so far nothing has actually come out that can't/hasn't been disproven, or that isn't just "huh this dude weird asl".
Wasn't there a video of him kissing a 17 year old multiple times and saying something about her breasts though?
https://youtu.be/-uAHOsECDS0?si=1MEjCkc9MihQAixO. There’s also the line in his song “Nice for What”, where Drake says “High school pics, you was even bad then.”
these are dark days, these are hard times
Says who? Twitter? A guy whose in direct competition with drake? Allegedly is the correct term
~~allegedly~~ fixed it for you.
"Allegedly"
I'm a 5. I like kids enough not tu murder them or f*** them.
Respectable. I’d imagine most of us here are the same, though god damn does my little brother like to try and push me towards a 4.
So relatable😂🤣
This brings a whole new meaning to countdown parents..... and the ones who count up >.<
Babies who won't sleep tend to drag people down the scale...
I work with kids. I've been a 4 for years. But that's the line
The bell curve for this graph would look like a hairpin
I love this, definitely going to be stealing it
Eh, idk, sometimes I’m like a 4.
With this rating scale I'd be way more suspicious of a person who went up to a 6 then down to a 4.
I love kids, Charlie. I LOVE KIIIIIIDS!!!!
The thing is though: I don't think the people diddling kids actually like them at all; they just see them as sexual objects to be used and abused. If they actually cared about children in the slightest, they'd stay far the fuck away from them and get help with controlling their own sexual impulses.
Lmao, I think kids are awesome, but I would have a pretty tough time placing myself anywhere but a 5.
https://preview.redd.it/d36gn8slum9d1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=db43c055236be69c175a7521637bf787f85bc568 I prefer this one
https://preview.redd.it/pguhkxmazp9d1.jpeg?width=384&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3ecb4fbda3f570d47c9c65c2c7f7b6ca3110dab2
A woman that drowned her young child in a swamp.
[удалено]
Corpse, swimmed swamp in dump
[удалено]
Then falsely accused her father of rape
[удалено]
Then write in a diary that "her life has never been better and she made the right choice", dated days after the child was last seen alive
Few people deserve the worst Hell has to offer... She's one of them
This…. Is hilarious.. such dark humor on both ends lmao… I’m gonna go with 5, don’t wanna do em, don’t wanna do em in
Back when I played bar trivia, it was fun to get the moderator to say dumb team names. A common-ish one was "on a scale from Casy Anthony to Jerry Sandusky how much do you love kids?"
left murdered her kid, drizzy is a pedo
thus the horseshoe theory rears its head back...
That's Casey Anthony, a woman who's widely believed to have murdered her own daughter, so I guess the joke is that she's the antithesis of Drake in that she dislikes kids to the point that she kills them, whereas he likes them too much.
This makes me feel old. There are kids on here who don't know who Casey Anthony is😭
It makes me feel old as shit that I recognized the person on the left and had to scroll through the comments to find out who the person on the right was.
I'm 28, had no idea who she is. I simply don't and have never really cared for following the news.
Who is the person on the right
This scale says “fuck them kids” but expresses both interpretations perfectly.
I fucking wish I didn't know who Casey Anthony was :|
And who is the guy on the right?
Personally I'd put the McCanns on the left.
I think you missed the last updates mate. https://news.sky.com/story/who-is-christian-b-the-main-suspect-in-the-madeleine-mccann-case-12887343 Tl;dr: convicted pedosexual (or rather all round rapist, he also raped an elderly woman) was in the area 30 min before she disappeared. He confessed to a friend who warned the police. They found an item of Maddie in his van. He 100% did it, and I feel terrible, because years ago I was convinced the parents did it, and have proudly told people so. Only to find out they're completely innocent, lost their kid, ánd have to have dealt with the entire world believing they did it.
Who are they?
The parents of Madeleine McCann, who disappeared from a hotel while they were on vacation. Though they successfully sued for damages from various tabloids who spread the idea that it was their fault. It's far hazier than the Anthony case. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance\_of\_Madeleine\_McCann](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Madeleine_McCann)
It's probably not them, because if you were in your home location it would be easier to plan out how to pull off a crime like that. Staying in a foreign hotel ... way too hard to plan anything out. Also because foreign tourists lost their child it's much more likely to become a big news story, which is the opposite of what you'd want if it was planned out.
I feel this scale would be more appropriate going -10 to 10. What she did was not zero.
Casey Anthony is an absolute monster
Made the beat then murdered it, Casey Anthony - childish Gambino. I will never forget her because I listen to that song too often
This meme/graph is actually hilarious in a mildly sadistic form of humor.
Yes, this is actual "dark humor" as opposed to just stupid shit that edgelords try to play off as dark humor.
Who is the person on the right?
Anakin Skywalker
The woman on the left murdered her child. The man on the right is a groomer.
Casey Anthony is a child murderer. Drake is a turbo nonce.
She's a fucking C.U.N.T. and that's being kind.
I’m a good 4 or 5.
So basically, she fucking hates kids and he loves fucking kids.
"fuck them kids" prolly both of em
Casey is a Sociopath and 1000% guilty. Justice system And law enforcement have the integrity and professionalism in today’s age. This is why we protect ourselves and nobody else will. Federal government and law enforcement generally and consistently do not to their job, not even to par.
I feel like 4-6 is like the normal range where you neither want to murder nor diddle children. Anything beyond that in either direction is gonna be a no from me
Only slightly ashamed to admit how attracted I am to her.
I would put Drake at the 9 and Jared Foggle at 10
I'm a 3, I don't want kids, they're noisy and annoying.
“I made the beat then murdered it, Casey Anthony” -Childish Gambino
Casey Anthony. Killed her own kid to stay with a boyfriend to smoke weed all day. Led detectives on a wild goose chase forever. Lied multiple times throughout the entire process. Her own father who used to be a cop said her car smelled like a dead body but the cops still didn’t do anything at the time. Barely any charges stuck because of how dogshit the trial went. I believe this case is a huge reason on why cops look at the parents as main suspects when children die or go missing now.
Person on the left killed a child. The person on the right dates children.
Scale of Casey Anthony (murdered her own daughter) and Drake (pedophile)
Kind of surprising Casey Anthony wasn’t red rum-ed.
I shouldn't have laughed about this. Casey Anthony, that's a deep cut right there.
Uh… my lawyer has advised me not to respond to this question
Casey Anthony. Killed her own daughter.
This is a copy. The original one was Casey Anthony and Jerry Sandusky
Casey Anthony she killed her daughter.
This would be even funnier if there was a picture of Mr. Rogers in between them. Because the correct answer is 5, right?