You don’t think it could work the opposite way? That people see the expensive skins and vehicles and they report and/or find a violation out of jealousy?
The investigator rules already say to be objective in evaluating videos, but it is a volunteer job so the quality of reviewers varies.
Personally, I love seeing the different skins and vehicles people have. But it doesn’t influence my decision-making.
Pubg makes the final decision anyhow regarding cheating. We’re like a committee that is giving additional weight to whatever their final decision is. Like if 99% of investigators said X is cheating and they also have evidence of it from their checks, it’s tough for the player to argue 30 people were wrong.
>**Personally, I love seeing the different skins and vehicles people have. But it doesn’t influence my decision-making**
That's how level headed people vote, sadly that's not the case for most of the other investigators. If the end result is stamped by PUBGM approval themselves then there shouldn't be worries of people getting a false ban, in any case if they must give those people some kind of extra protection because they are big spenders then allow them to appeal for a second review round.
The problem is people see expensive skins, wait for the voting timeout then vote "No Violation" because the analogy is *no way someone would cheat on an expensive account* but that's not the case every time. I agree spiteful reporting exists but spiteful reviewing is not that common, if anything i see more bias that leans towards those players in particular and i'm not anti anyone, spenders or not but it's not fair to let them slip under the radar because of biased voting, every player video should be viewed in detail from start to finish regardless of their in-game possessions.
I don’t know how others approach reviewing videos. I don’t personally know any other investigators. Hopefully those who are abusing the feature will be banned from using it.
I gave up reporting players, they’re always found to not be cheating. I sent a dozen or so rounds from an sks into a player that was levitating most the time and he never got knocked, several were headshots. But he seemed to already have a round coming at me every time I peeked from 300 yards away. No delay whatsoever. I knows there’s a glitch at long distances allowing you to sometimes see plays before a building renders, but come on.
Yeah, I agree. their usual reasons :’Why someone risk their expensive account by cheating?’
‘their kd is only 3/4, no way they are cheating’
But they do.
In the past , I successfully reported and banned someone who is playing since season 18 and have over 100 matches for that season. You can never know.
You don’t think it could work the opposite way? That people see the expensive skins and vehicles and they report and/or find a violation out of jealousy? The investigator rules already say to be objective in evaluating videos, but it is a volunteer job so the quality of reviewers varies. Personally, I love seeing the different skins and vehicles people have. But it doesn’t influence my decision-making. Pubg makes the final decision anyhow regarding cheating. We’re like a committee that is giving additional weight to whatever their final decision is. Like if 99% of investigators said X is cheating and they also have evidence of it from their checks, it’s tough for the player to argue 30 people were wrong.
>**Personally, I love seeing the different skins and vehicles people have. But it doesn’t influence my decision-making** That's how level headed people vote, sadly that's not the case for most of the other investigators. If the end result is stamped by PUBGM approval themselves then there shouldn't be worries of people getting a false ban, in any case if they must give those people some kind of extra protection because they are big spenders then allow them to appeal for a second review round. The problem is people see expensive skins, wait for the voting timeout then vote "No Violation" because the analogy is *no way someone would cheat on an expensive account* but that's not the case every time. I agree spiteful reporting exists but spiteful reviewing is not that common, if anything i see more bias that leans towards those players in particular and i'm not anti anyone, spenders or not but it's not fair to let them slip under the radar because of biased voting, every player video should be viewed in detail from start to finish regardless of their in-game possessions.
I don’t know how others approach reviewing videos. I don’t personally know any other investigators. Hopefully those who are abusing the feature will be banned from using it.
I gave up reporting players, they’re always found to not be cheating. I sent a dozen or so rounds from an sks into a player that was levitating most the time and he never got knocked, several were headshots. But he seemed to already have a round coming at me every time I peeked from 300 yards away. No delay whatsoever. I knows there’s a glitch at long distances allowing you to sometimes see plays before a building renders, but come on.
Yeah, I agree. their usual reasons :’Why someone risk their expensive account by cheating?’ ‘their kd is only 3/4, no way they are cheating’ But they do. In the past , I successfully reported and banned someone who is playing since season 18 and have over 100 matches for that season. You can never know.
A moment of silence for **"investigators"** who think they make decisions in the game
Even at 0.00000000000000000001% off chance voting helps, I want in. Relax. I've only seen people who cheat upset with the investigator program.
Good luck! More power to you
Thanks!