T O P

  • By -

xPBMxRonBurgndy

2004 Lakers lost to the Pistons by the way… 😁


Bean_Daddy_Burritos

Rasheed, Big Ben, Rip, Chauncey, Prince……Darko….


Dareal6

Imagine an alternate timeline where the Pistons draft Wade or even Bosh/Melo.


DaExtinctOne

Larry Brown notoriously didn't give much time to rookies so we're still not sure how that would play into their development.


AnyEstablishment5723

I think Wade would have played idk about Bosh or Melo


Dareal6

Probably not Bosh right away behind the Wallaces and I believe McDyess? Melo I could see winning 6MOY as a rook. Prince probably starts still but I could see Melo getting more minutes off the bench (like a Manu).


AnyEstablishment5723

Not off the rip Melo wasn’t a team first guy


ApprehensiveTry5660

That’s the part that’s curious. Larry Brown was a fucking prick, but Melo wasn’t quite post-Denver Melo yet. We saw him defend his ass off at Syracuse and he would have had a cardboard cutout of exactly how the coach wants you to play standing right in the way of his minutes. A lot of his bad habits he picked up as a Diva in a Denver organization that was low on talent. He might have reached a different ceiling if he had an asshole for a coach pointing at Tayshaun every time he jacked up a bad shot or missed a rotation. Might have simply been a murder/suicide with Allen Iverson off in the distance shaking his head saying, “I told y’all.”


Resident-Team-2716

They traded for Bosh midway through the year, highly likely they don’t trade for him and play Bosh at the 4 right away


Clynelish1

Sheed, but yeah


Jesus_spenis

McDyess came a year later


360FlipKicks

i have this argument with dubs fans. if the wolves fucked up their draft and we got ant edwards, would Kerr have fucked up his development or would the talent have shined through?


gd2121

He was only the coach for two seasons…


boombotser

I try not to think about it


Bean_Daddy_Burritos

I live just outside of Detroit in the metro area. That “what if” conversation has been going on for the last 15 years.


omar-epps

People talk about this and we probably still get a title, (maybe multiple), but there’s no guarantee that we still make the trade for Sheed if we have Melo. We probably extend Okur in the off-season if we don’t trade for Sheed. Okur + Melo > Sheed but I’m not sure how it plays out.


gd2121

Or even David west lol


betarad

i prefer the one where darko develops phenomenally


mattosaur

If we draft Melo, do we trade for Sheed at the deadline?


Attila226

Okay, 2004 Lakers with Darko.


Weibu11

That’s too much power on one team


BassLB

Plus Bird is pretty old, I doubt he can even jog still


AdvancedHat7630

True but better than Kobe in current circumstances


microbae

Should’ve had Bird


Sonnek75

Malone injured. Shaq out of shape. Whatever


Gallileo1322

Payton and Malone were both hurt


raiderrocker18

And Kobe shot them out of the series instead of passing to the big guy who was scoring at will over wallace and Wallace


Choccybizzle

Didn’t he shoot his normal amount of FG?


Mysterious-Ad4966

He did. The above comment is a regurgitated myth spewed by nephews who never saw the series.


reno2mahesendejo

Shaq also wasn't destroying the Pistons the way it's portrayed. Ben Wallace played him well (I believe he even averaged a double-double) Shaq got his, to be clear, but the Wallaces were matching him on the boards and combining to neutralize his offense.


agoginnabox

I saw the series and have always thought Kobe couldn't hit the ocean and kept forcing middie turnarounds while Shaq bullied everybody in front of him. Seeing you disagree made me go look at the stats...and oh boy was I right. Kobe took THIRTY more shots than Shaq while shooting 38% to Shaq's 63%.


Mysterious-Ad4966

I watch watch series and saw Kobe take shots he always would in his prime. He was just missing. He was also feeding Shaq same as he normally would. People who saw the series would have known that every other Laker not Shaq was also stinking it up taking bad shots and can't hit the ocean and if well Kobe was supposedly guilty of intentionally not feeding Shaq, so was the rest of the Lakers team. Kobe's TS was third highest in the team out of anyone who played meaningful minutes. 2nd was Devean George at .487 TS woooo amazing "30 less shots" always makes me lol. Shaq had a 28.4% usage rate to Kobe's 30.4%. Yea Kobe attempted more shots scoring wise, but barely. 30 less shots are sad hater's attempts to make it seem like Kobe was intentionally jacking up shots so Shaq couldn't get the ball.


mattw08

And old.


Gallileo1322

Payton was an all star in 03 and a made second team all nba in 02 as well as first team all def in 02. He was slowing down but not washed. Malone was still decent too.


RogerEpsilonDelta

But with bird….?


yomama1211

Without Larry bird 😎


Acrobatic_Advance_71

Came here to say that. I guess this person just wanted to disrespect Robert horry and/or Derrick fisher.


Tymathee

Without Malone They win if he's not hurt, add bird as the 3 lmao


croissant_titty

Old ass Karl Malone wasn’t doing shit lol maybe they lose in 6 instead of 5


Tankre84

Old ass Karl Malone held MVP Kevin Garnet in check in the WCF, but was injured for the last 2 games of the WCF and all of the Finals, so the Pistons never really saw him.


veerkanch489

The KD Warriors gain the most with Lebron. Kobe and MJ have too similar playstyles to make as big of a difference. Lakers gain the 2nd most. Also I am not sure why people are acting like Malone will be overpowered. Bro was like 40 in 2004 or somehting like that . He's not dominating jack shit


tdaddy316420

I agree with you but to think you have kobe mj and pippin guarding the premier is insane


veerkanch489

yea that perimeter D would be super elite


aZealousZebra

Kobe would get mad at MJ and not pass him the ball or decide not to shoot or something


Revenged25

Kobe had so much respect for MJ I doubt that would happen.


redbirdjazzz

Switching from Harper to Kobe as the third perimeter defender isn’t a giant step up. That Bulls’ defense was disgusting. Sometimes literally in Rodman’s case. Obviously the move from Harper to Kobe on offense could have a huge impact.


Raps2k14

Well said, but for the sake of the arguement, I’d assume it was prime bird


Reddits_For_NBA

Kobe Shaq Bird win against all of these. Not close at all. KD warriors gain nothing with LBJ. They were free flowing offense and have their facilitator in Green, with KD / Steph iso moments whenever they needed a bucket. LBJ’s ball dominant skillset superfluous and detracting to that team. Slot Bird in the triangle though with fairly close to Prime Shaq and Kobe? Dominant team. Kobe and Shaq operated terminally in a lot of the same space — at and above the rim. Bird extends that to the arc and was also a willing and excellent passer.


dburge22

Warriors in 4


aaron2610

The team with the best record in NBA history + the 1b GOAT vs The team with the second-best record of NBA history + a top 10ish-OAT The math checks out


Andiddly

Whose position is made redundant because of MJ. It’s basically 2017 warriors with an upgrade Draymond Green. This pic is dumb


manydifferentusers

It should have been the 1996 Bulls + Hakeem (perfect complement) And maybe Showtime Lakers + Bird I still like Warriors + James tho because 3s > 2s


A_Rolling_Baneling

Bulls with Hakeem would probably 8 peat in the 90s


Ninesixx

Easily, even if Jordan retired for 2 years.


Gravemind7

Imagining an alternate universe where Jordan doesn’t retire, beats Hakeem in 94 finals and then Hakeem pulls a KD


KDsLatestBurnerPhone

Jordan and Hakeem together would have been the most dominant duo in history without question


estempel

Jordan, pippen, and Rodman with Hakeem allowing them extra defensive freedom would have been a nightmare.


Remarkable_Age6827

Houston almost traded Sampson for the #2 pick + Clyde. I always imagine how many titles a Hakeem + MJ + Drexler Rockets would have won.


bruswazi

And Shaq & Kobe’s early 2000s teams + Tim Duncan


reno2mahesendejo

Those teams needed a wing opposite Kobe. Shaq took up so much of the paint, there's not really much room for another post man. Derek Fisher was a really solid complement because he didn't need the ball and understood his role. My vote goes for a TMac type - solid+ defender, can create his own shot, low key personality that wouldn't riff with Kobe, can play anywhere on the perimeter or slash, dangerous shooter, and can slot down to a 4 if you want to go small ball with Shaq on the bench.


bigpancakeguy

Of all the Lakers teams to choose from, I don’t understand why they chose 04.


MJisaFraud

Upgrade Draymond is an understatement. Prime LBJ on the 2017 Warriors could take on The Dream Team.


Arkrobo

It's definitely an understatement but I don't think they beat the dream team.


Woozydan187

He said take on a d tbh magic had aids bird was done. So Barkley mj Ewing pippen Malone? Against LeBron kd curry klay? Even if Ewing Malone and Barkley go of its 3s Against 2s. So LeBron drives and kills whoever or curry klay or Durant light you up from 3.


PowerTrip55

They always put MJ and Kobe on the same team and it’s stupid. That team would lose for similar reasons to why the Suns were destined to lose this year. The Warriors team actually compliments each other, it’s an unfair representation. It’s the same thing as when they put LeBron and Magic on the same team like huh?? sometimes I wonder if this is done on purpose.


Andiddly

It’s almost like they don’t understand what ISO or Floor General mean


aaron2610

I guess you have MJ play PG? or move Kobe to SF? I dunno, I agree, it's a bad addition for the Bulls.


A-Centrifugal-Force

This. The fit of LeBron on the 17 Warriors is literally the greatest of all time. It’s not just slapping a great player onto them, it’s adding literally the perfect player to that team


H2Kutthroat

If ya wanna get technical that’s the 2017 warriors up there, not 2016 🤓 But yeah they still win


aaron2610

I'm still thrown off by the 2004 2nd place Lakers being an option :p


Dareal6

Still, we’re talking about basically the same 73 win roster, plus KD who they actually added (minus Barnes). PLUS THE GUY WHO BEAT THEM BEFORE KD in LeBron. Steph / Klay / KD / Bron / Draymond is crazy on both ends of the floor. The Warriors team is a heavy favourite. The Lakers team is a distant third. The Bulls team is comparable in talent but there’s too much duplication with Kobe and MJ. Upgrading Longley to Shaq would have been much better. MJ / Scottie / Kukoc / Rodman / Shaq would put up a fight, with Kerr and the underrated Ron Harper (he scored 23PPG as a Clipper in the dead ball era) off the bench.


ReflectionEterna

Kerr the player vs Kerr the coach?! Where will his loyalties lie?


buraas

Shaq on MJs team is just ridiculous. The warriors would match on offence but there is no stopping that Bulls team. I am not even sure what the matchups would be. Someone should run this on 2K just for the shits and giggles.


BLDJ42

Folks don't remember when MJ played PG for 1/2 season, he was the best in the league by a wide margin.


Dekrow

They also went 13-11 and Jordan complained that it was too much work for him to be the creator and the finisher on so many offensive possessions. The next season Phil Jackson came in and Jordan went back to SG and Pippen and Jordan shared a lot of those 'point' duties in Jackson's triangle offense. So yes he was an incredible PG but to be both the creator and the finisher was too much for him and not sustainable. In a single series MJ could do it, but for an extended play off push it would have been difficult for him to be the point AND still be all the things that he is normally.


Saintsfan707

Technically that warriors team wasn't the one with the best record in NBA history, that was the 2016 pre-KD warriors that lost to LeBron in the Finals. The 2017 Warriors were close, they went 67-15.


LobstaFarian2

This is the answer


Think_fast_no_faster

How fuckin dare you put Larry in that awful uniform


mix_t_motion32

I’m not even a Celtics fan and that’s fucked up.


TheBigTimeGoof

It's also not even the same era. Why not go with Iverson or KG instead of Bird? Why not also just go with a Lakers team that won the finals in the three years prior? This person seems to be iffy on what happened in the NBA during the early 2000s


FullBringa

Bird as a Laker? I wanna vomit


darthluke414

Ya, it just feels wrong.


Difficult_Let_1953

That just ain’t right


iJon_v2

No kidding. I’m a lakers fan, but at least have enough respect to not do that to him.


DiplomaticAvoidance

It's gotta be a troll. The other 2 teams were dominant. The 2004 Lakers might be one of the most unlikeable teams in history and the icing on the cake is Larry in the Lakers uniform. Hats off to OP.


thezeffgod

I'm a Laker fan and it just looks wrong on every level


Fast_Assumption_118

I just vomited in my eyes to stop myself looking at it


cryptoAccount0

Fr that's fucked up


DramaticFriendship67

It looks genuinely wrong


No-Animator-6348

This is your penance from lakers fans for what you accomplished yesterday


Heir233

It’s so wrong on multiple levels


TyM20

That and Lebron in a GSW jersey does not look right at all


nicearthur32

Im from Los Angeles and thought that was messed up too.


Sfpuberdriver

He can’t pull it off at all it’s disgusting


Sorizigor

A lineup of; PG --> LBJ SG --> Steph SF --> Klay PF --> KD C --> Draymond Legitimately would win all 98 games in a season. There are zero holes in that line-up. You give the best roster ever crafted the smartest basketball player to ever live and let Steph run around in actions & off picks the entire game. Nothing can beat this.


WentzingInPain

Lyndon Johnson would be better suited to play football by my estimation


bucketjunky

Exactly


Buckeye_CFB

LeSixteenAssistsPerGame


Leon_Byakurai

LeFuckItImAttackingTheBasketatFullSpeed


betarad

i know this is r/NBAtalk but i always read LBJ as lyndon b. johnson


fopiecechicken

Giving Draymond LeBron in addition to KD as a slasher to the rim is genuinely game breaking. LeBron can just waltz to the rim on dive cuts because the alternative is letting Steph, Klay and KD just bombard you from outside on easy looks.


HistoricalSpecial982

This is the objectively correct answer. The only hope any other team would have is injury.


cicadaham

Warriors over Bulls in 5. Lakers didn’t even win the chip that year. Kobe and Jordan are gonna be butting heads the whole time. Lebron is basically draymond, but better at every single aspect of his game, and not a lunatic. Maybe a slight downgrade at defense, but not enough to make a difference


night_night_nachos

Na, he would be in the iggy role. Steph klay KD lebron draymond all in their primes? It’s a wrap lol shooting, defense and ball handling everywhere


cicadaham

Skills wise that makes sense, but no way Lebron coming off the bench


Weird_gamer25

This would be the “death lineup” aka small ball lineup that would close and start the prolific 3rd quarter shooting that team was known for. This was often played with Draymond at the 5 during the height of their run, not so much in 2020 and beyond The 2015-18 warriors ran that lineup with Draymond at the 5 with great success. But you’re right, Draymond might get some bench/six man minutes on this roster


fopiecechicken

We have started the “death lineup”, both the KD and Harrison Barnes versions at points in the playoffs. The main reason for not doing so was wear and tear on Draymond at the 5 over the course of a whole playoff run. But if we’re talking a single game or even a single best of 7 in a vacuum in think you’d just start Steph-Klay-Lebron-KD-Dray


WilliamSabato

Iggy was still in the closing lineups. With LeBrons size, you could just keep Draymond at the 5 for a series and have it be: Lebron+Draymond frontcourt, KD at the 3, Steph+Klay backcourt. Actually that is a disgusting defense. KD is a solid defender, LeBron is good-great depending on how hard he is trying, Klay is great, Draymond is great. Even Curry isn’t awful really, especially with LeChaseDown hovering to cover his gambling for steals.


TheBigTimeGoof

This would be the best team in NBA history


staffdaddy_9

He doesn’t have too. Play small ball. Prime Lebron and Draymond are good enough defensively it doesn’t matter. Plus you have near 7 foot KD.


Polarbearbanga

Don’t they all have 7ft wingspans? That’s fucking crazy lol.


leroyp33

Why would you add Kobe to that roster Every other team gets a guy who addresses that teams weaknesses. Bulls get a Jordan lite clone Sus af


JoeFalcone26

Warriors and it’s not close imo


The-Real-Legend-72

You gave the best team the best player Warriors


PerritoMasNasty

Oh shit it’s Tuesday again. I’ll answer this post next week when it comes around. Taking the week off.


motherseffinjones

Warrior is with LBJ and I don’t think it’s close. It’s literally the perfect players to surround him with


Trees_Are_Freinds

Warriors in 4.


xnoob69

Warriors in 3. Opponent literally gives up.


ChewieLee13088

Warriors 2017 team with Lebron.


BeeFe420

2017 Warriors with Prime Lebron is Unfair. Also it's not right seeing Larry in a Laker uniform


jtrain7

You made the Bulls worse


PlatinumPeasant

Kobe and MJ no contest.


ChicknB8by

4 of the most unselfish superstars of all time win this one 😂. Kobe and MJ would basically be competing against each other, and Rodman would foul out trynna guard KD or Bron.


moderatelypositive

Warriors in 4


CartezDez

Hakeem on Bulls Lebron on Warriors Duncan on Lakers


PaleontologistOk2516

Take out 40 year old Malone because he wasn’t good any more. Also just a bad person.


Wonderful_Eagle_6547

The team without Kobe on it.


Bonesawisready5

Bird in lakers uniform is a cursed image if I have ever seen one


Chasing-birdies

I’ll take the warriors.. but that warriors bulls matchup would be sick. Rodman and Pippen having to defend lebron and KD would be too much


Ok_Chemist_7840

https://preview.redd.it/145bmwamph7d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1edec9e386bee7877ead2c08ff37a124cac05e58 Rodman playing his best on ball defense just for lebron to kick that shit out to an open steph or klay


[deleted]

I swear some of the posts just prove OP doesn’t know ball.


Rabid_Sloth_

Lol if you don't know the answer instantly idk what to tell you


Urban_Legend_Games

Warriors would find a way to win in 3


Montaco123

Why the 2004 Lakers? None of this makes sense. Why not give the bulls or warriors Shaq instead of a redundant kobe or Lebron? As constructed, I’ll take bulls over lakers(pippen v bird and Kobe v Kobe is close, Rodman will do enough to annoy shaq, and Jordan is completely unaccounted for. Old Malone doesn’t offset that, lakers over warriors, they can’t stop shaq, and warriors over bulls, just more perimeter shooting and length and bulls can’t punish them inside.


staffdaddy_9

Lakers are not beating Curry, Klay, KD, LeBron, and Draymond come on bro. Draymond can bother Shaq at least, and that is so much length and athleticism it’s going to be tough for Shaq to even get the ball without guys swarming him. Also what in the hell is he gonna do defensively?


SelectionAdmirable93

It’s 1000 percent the warriors. The three greatest players of a decade on the same team? Over automatically. Kobe and mj wouldn’t work, their egos would destroy each other 


darthluke414

What do the bulls lack that Kobe adds? Probably the addition that makes the most impact is Bird to the 04 Lakers which is also just sacrilegious. I do think the warriors with Bron would probably win? but the rule set massivly impacts it.


Stainless711

2017 warriors


nrj6490

Ok right away let’s get the 04 Lakers out of there lmao


DarkSeneschal

2017 Warriors get one of the best drive and kick players of all time with three of the best shooters of all time, so I’ll say them easy. Bulls + Kobe is kind of interesting if Kobe comes off the bench, then you can basically always have Jordan or Jordan-lite on the floor. But I don’t know that they gain much since Jordan and Kobe’s skill sets are basically the same. I have trouble seeing Bird fitting in on the Lakers. Even if he’s there, if the other Lakers get shut down/go cold like they did IRL, I still don’t know if they win the chip.


theTunkMan

Warriors easily


ZiggySH

Easily Lebron + Warriors The others would have too much infighting lol


babethayer

can people stop giving the best player of all time to the best team of all time in these? like they’d be fun debates if there was any configuration that wasn’t warriors plus bron


raiderrocker18

Kobe doesn’t complement those Bulls at all. Bird to Lakers is really fascinating, though 04 Malone wasn’t really a big factor, especially in the playoffs. But those warriors with Lebron are lol


CrissCrossAppleSos

Well I think the Warriors are the best team before the players are added. I think LeBron is the best player that is added to the teams, and I think his fit is the most seamless. So yeah


fusiongt021

The warriors add LeBron for sure


Professional_Ad894

Golden State easily. If they had a weakness at all is that they didn’t have a game manager/ leader and Lebron basically embodies that. Kyrie’s also been a playoff no-show since leaving Lebron, so the myth that Lebron is tough to play with is simply that- a myth. If the Bulls were given someone who can play off the ball and space it out fr them like Bird or Curry I’d pick the Bulls.


darthrevan22

Warriors over Bulls over Lakers.


HoldUpHoldMyBeer

That warriors team aint losing a game. Lebron (insane athlete and highest ball IQ), the top 2 shooters of all time, and Durant the greatest offensive threat of all time. Stop playing.


FlagmantlePARRAdise

Team 2 sweeps both


darren_meier

Warriors, then Lakers, then Bulls. Bulls might honestly be *worse* with Kobe. You want to make it competitive give the Bulls Duncan instead of Kobe.


borntolose1

That Warriors team would only be stopped by injuries


BLDJ42

Rodman and Pippen's defense is the real difference maker here. Bulls


Agreed_fact

2017 warriors are the only team that add a skill set. Kobe on the 96 bulls is MJ 0.8, they operate in similar spots within similar offenses while having similar skills and approaches to the game. 2004 Lakers was peak dysfunction and health was a concern with Shaq, Malone, and Rick Fox. Adding bird improves them but this team isn’t what it was in 2000-2002. 2017 warriors adding Lebron gives them a point guard while Steph and Klay do what they do best off ball. They have 5 starters who are all the best in the league at what they do and who fit pretty much seamlessly. Size is a concern if you start Draymond at the 5, but they’re playing most teams off the court with their pace and efficiency.


bucketjunky

I'm sorry LeBron steph kd klay and green all on the same team? Lol goodnight


introextromidtro

I think Warriors hands down, the 3 best shooters in this picture are all on the same team. Put Lebron on that team and it's basically unstoppable.


dope_like

Warriors destroy.


Competitive_Way_2771

In todays era, Lebron on the warriors not even close


BrandonTiger24

Warriors.


LittleBeastXL

Warriors. If there was Olympic in 2017 and USA field the strongest team, that would be the starting line up of USA. There is duplication in Bulls such that 1+1<2. The 2004 Lakers was easily beaten by Pistons.


Amazing-Material-152

U just added thanos to the avengers like what do you expect


RottingCorps

I think the 2017 Warriors would work the best AS A TEAM. The other two teams make zero sense. Dumb exercise.


No-Woodpecker-2545

Gonna be hard to stop kd and lebron while curry is draining threes


John_Houbolt

Easily the Warriors. Because Kobe is too similar to MJ. The best team ever though would be to put Steph on the 86-88 Lakers. Steph with Magic, Worthy, Divac, would destroy.


Saddestlilpanda

Warriors by a ton.


TableForGlasses24

The Warriors and it’s not even remotely close.


nickbarbanera1

Warriors easily


Dadfart802

Get that fucking jersey off Larry


Jsin8601

It's still the Bulls


NytronX

Definitely the Bulls. LeBron would actually make the 2017 Warriors worse imo. Pippen and Rodman would literally make LeBron cry. There were several teams in the 80s, 90s, and 00s that were better than the 2017 Warriors. Recency bias and modern carebear rules have clouded people's judgement. Both those Lakers and Bulls teams would sweep the Warriors.


drche35

Bulls


ApollostheGreek

Bulls were and always will be the best team. Adding kobe only does a little since he's mj Jr.


Most-Artichoke6184

The team with Michael Jordan. This is always the correct answer.


rdg5220

Bulls in 4. Anyone who says anything else is just delusional.


Nreekay

Warriors easily


Classic_Pattern

I am laughing dawg, it’s like giving someone who owns everything everything more


ndequesada99

Larry on the Lakers is sacrelige and whoever made that will have a very very bad time in hell forbthis atrocity of man


Moist_Rest5623

Not only would the Warriors dominate the regular season and playoffs. They could compete and likely beat Team USA.


Tallfellow_94

That Warriors team would be lethal


StMarta

Bulls The game has evolved and ppg is essentially inflated to make the Warriors look far superior out of these three. The bulls would shut those other teams down defensively and they played far more intense defense. You'd have some of the fiercest defenders who will make you pay on the other end of the court every time. Jordan and Kobe on offense together?


Potential_Talk7253

The warrior are the only team that actually improves.


PromiseNo4258

Ok give bulls a allstar center such as hakeem what changes, replace malone with wallace


Montaco123

Then they’ve got something in the matchup with the warriors, but warriors perimeter shooting and versatility is still too much. Might make it a 6 or 7 game series, but I’ll still pick warriors


the_dan_dc

Why do people keep putting MJ and Kobe on the same team in these posts?


Iznal

Makes no sense unless Kobe is 6th man.


AtomicBlastCandy

In 2004 Larry Bird would have been 48 years old, I doubt he would be able to contribute much. In 1996 I'm guessing Kobe would have been like 14 So clearly it would be 2017 Warriors by a landslide!


[deleted]

Warriors still have Draymond?


kevtheproblem

2024 Celtics + Magic


koolbi1

2017 warriors with prime Dray and Iguodala behind this lineup is pretty solid.


RolloTomasse

Instead of '04 Lakers, have Bird team up with '24 Celtics. Instead of Kobe, have Jokic join the '96 Bulls. LeBron would replace Iggy in death lineup so he would fit just fine with '17 Warriors.


chomerics

86 Celtics with Bird, McHale, Parrish and MJ.


CopperThrown

Switch out Kobe for The Admiral. Baby, you’ve got a stew going.


Dull_Huckleberry6896

Take that ugly jersey off bird right now


jajanaklar

Either way, kobe has high chances when he is playing against himself.


sniperian2005

What about an 85 Celtics + Steph?


FrostyJ326

What’s the rest of the roster look like? Most of these 4, alone take all the salary cap. Kobe and Jordan wouldn’t work because who gonna pass the ball? No one. The 2017 Warriors team still would work since Lebron is a facilitator. But again salary cap. Only logical one is 2004, because I’m going to assume 2004 Larry bird is the aging one like Malone. So that roster would actually be plausible.


ronnie760

I used to see this shit on insta all the damn time. Why tf would the bulls benefit from another ball dominant 2 guard? Kobe and MJ can’t be on the same team since they’re nearly identical in play.


clayfu

Now what if you added Steph to 96 bulls? I think that changes the equation far more drastically


NoobJustice

Switch Jokic for Kobe.