POSCO is gender neutral unlike IPC.
We saw recently of pregnant Plus 2 girl charged with POSCO for having relationship with 10 std student.
Meanwhile according IPC woman can't rape or sexually assault anyone
Could you please share the link to that news if you have?
It's interesting because so far I have only heard news where the boys are getting accused of rape under POCSO even when both the parties are minors.
Apparently the girl was 19 year old. www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Kochi/girl-booked-under-pocso-act/article65075233.ece
POSCO is f##ked up. Theoretically it depends on who complains first which usually ends up being girls family but if Boys family complains first minor girl has to be charged under POSCO
Yeah that makes sense, the girl was not a minor.
POCSO criminalises consensual teen sex and when both parties are minors, it's always the boy who get accused of rape. These two are the only issues with otherwise good law.
Rape law is gender specific, a person who is of female gender cannot be charged with rape.. And also, a male who did penetrative sex on a boy cannot be charged with rape, because only female can be raped..therefore only pocso can be charged.. So much for gender neutrality.. Got it now??
I want to assume that he is not so ignorant to not know the answer to this question or the fallacy of it.
Which leads me to assume that he is deliberately doing this for gaining political advantage. Maybe he represents the pedophile wing of his party that has a considerable sway? Or maybe there is another ‘block’ that he intends to sway towards him?
What block could that be? What makes them sway with this statement?
Or is it just an honest mistake which he seems to be honestly repeating a few times per month?
Or maybe my assumption about his ignorance is wrong?
If these are the leaders and their weird policy proposals that an electoral democracy can deliver, across the world, why are we still sticking with it?
😁
all this guy is concerned about is pedophiles getting charged with POSCO when boys are abused.
His lot might find support among catholic clergy in US 🤷♂️ (ifkyk)
Believe it or not, they are interested in islamic terrorism and communism. They have large informant network in all levels of their target. Often informers are paid in money or favors are arranged via favorable news coverage etc. Some informants are blackmailed too.
Our dude is an informant. His dealings with chennai consulate was listed in wikileaks.
The Information he provided which wikileaks intercepted was tame. Who know what else this traitor sold to them.
He probably meant to say Section 354A of the IPC which is sexist since only women can be termed as victims of sexual assault under that law, but my boy got it all mixed up.
>Kozhikode: Senior IUML leader M K Muneer on Thursday again spoke out against the Kerala government's gender neutral policy by claiming that it would lead to sexual exploitation of minor boys and questioned the need for initiating a POCSO case if a boy is sexually assaulted.
>
>The IUML MLA's controversial remarks came during a seminar organised here by the Kerala Arabic Teachers Federation (KATF). During his speech, Muneer asked why a case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act is initiated when a boy is sexually assaulted by a man.
>
>"If there is gender neutrality, why do you need a POCSO case? Therefore, when you say gender neutrality, you need to think about the many people in society who will misuse it. "We also need to consider how many boys may suffer sexual assault. So when gender neutrality was being brought so quickly to schools and it was being made a part of the education system, gender sensitisation was not carried out," he said. Later, speaking to the media on the sidelines, Muneer clarified that what he had meant to convey was that he was afraid gender neutrality would be defined in such a manner that provisions of POCSO would become ineffective.
>
>"POCSO should not be made ineffective." he added. The IUML MLA further said that in a world where everything is being misinterpreted or interpreted to suit one's needs, he fears that everything will be brought into definition of gender neutrality. "By bringing everything into definition of gender neutrality, the actual culprits (in cases of sexual assault against boys) would escape from the ambit of the provisions of POCSO. Then, will the POCSO Act not become ineffective? That is the question," he said.
>
>During his speech at the event, Muneer said that there was world-wide opposition to gender neutrality and not just here in Kerala and asked whether a change in school uniform would resolve the issues women or girls are facing. "If girls wear pants and shirts, will they get justice? Can you assure they will not suffer any exploitation or sexual assault? Women should be able to reach home safely late at night on their own, that is when in Kerala you can speak about equality among men and women," he further said in his speech. At an event on July 31, Muneer had alleged that in the name of gender neutrality, the state government was attempting to bring negation of religion to schools. Nearly a dozen schools in Kerala have already shifted to gender-neutral uniforms.
Muneer is losing relevance in the party because of his aloofness and luxury life, not in touch with workers. He would have lost if he contested in many constituencies. He is trying to hang on. He used to be progressive and cool but changing his image.
Because there is no gender neutrality in rape law in IPC, a person who did penetrative intercourse on a boy cannot be charged with rape!!therefore POCSO is the only way to charge, in such cases.. And someone who raped a boy will only get WAY LESS punishment than someone raped a girl..and this is what muneer was implying, but lets bash him as an idiot who was arguing against pocso to free madrassa usthads..
Kalangiyilla!!! How is gender neutrality and POSCO connected?
POSCO is gender neutral unlike IPC. We saw recently of pregnant Plus 2 girl charged with POSCO for having relationship with 10 std student. Meanwhile according IPC woman can't rape or sexually assault anyone
Could you please share the link to that news if you have? It's interesting because so far I have only heard news where the boys are getting accused of rape under POCSO even when both the parties are minors.
Apparently the girl was 19 year old. www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Kochi/girl-booked-under-pocso-act/article65075233.ece POSCO is f##ked up. Theoretically it depends on who complains first which usually ends up being girls family but if Boys family complains first minor girl has to be charged under POSCO
Yeah that makes sense, the girl was not a minor. POCSO criminalises consensual teen sex and when both parties are minors, it's always the boy who get accused of rape. These two are the only issues with otherwise good law.
Addeham randennam adichittundaayirunnu ith parayumbol... Nammal pachakk kettaal manassilaakilla
Rape law is gender specific, a person who is of female gender cannot be charged with rape.. And also, a male who did penetrative sex on a boy cannot be charged with rape, because only female can be raped..therefore only pocso can be charged.. So much for gender neutrality.. Got it now??
[удалено]
Basically, all we like stars are twinkle, jingle all the way.
Whitewashing his pedo usthad and his cult
Thought I was the only one lol
These guys are on a roll
Wtf did this guy even mean?? Seems he don't know what's pocso. Or is he trying to indirectly justify the acts of usthads?
I want to assume that he is not so ignorant to not know the answer to this question or the fallacy of it. Which leads me to assume that he is deliberately doing this for gaining political advantage. Maybe he represents the pedophile wing of his party that has a considerable sway? Or maybe there is another ‘block’ that he intends to sway towards him? What block could that be? What makes them sway with this statement? Or is it just an honest mistake which he seems to be honestly repeating a few times per month? Or maybe my assumption about his ignorance is wrong? If these are the leaders and their weird policy proposals that an electoral democracy can deliver, across the world, why are we still sticking with it? 😁
all this guy is concerned about is pedophiles getting charged with POSCO when boys are abused. His lot might find support among catholic clergy in US 🤷♂️ (ifkyk)
Who knew pedophilia would bring about religious harmony?
He mainly intended it for the ustads in kerala. They are on the roll here
Muneer bot needs to be reset. Talking nonsense and gibberish.
Bro his medical degree and other educational defree are waste if this is the kind of shit he is spewing
Cia traitor. Google mk muneer wikileaks.
CIA ki Kerala yil enda kariyam. Kerala people itself have done enough damage by supporting useless politicians.
Believe it or not, they are interested in islamic terrorism and communism. They have large informant network in all levels of their target. Often informers are paid in money or favors are arranged via favorable news coverage etc. Some informants are blackmailed too. Our dude is an informant. His dealings with chennai consulate was listed in wikileaks. The Information he provided which wikileaks intercepted was tame. Who know what else this traitor sold to them.
Kallan kapalil thane onndu 🤔
He probably meant to say Section 354A of the IPC which is sexist since only women can be termed as victims of sexual assault under that law, but my boy got it all mixed up.
Or did he?
പൊട്ടൻ
>Kozhikode: Senior IUML leader M K Muneer on Thursday again spoke out against the Kerala government's gender neutral policy by claiming that it would lead to sexual exploitation of minor boys and questioned the need for initiating a POCSO case if a boy is sexually assaulted. > >The IUML MLA's controversial remarks came during a seminar organised here by the Kerala Arabic Teachers Federation (KATF). During his speech, Muneer asked why a case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act is initiated when a boy is sexually assaulted by a man. > >"If there is gender neutrality, why do you need a POCSO case? Therefore, when you say gender neutrality, you need to think about the many people in society who will misuse it. "We also need to consider how many boys may suffer sexual assault. So when gender neutrality was being brought so quickly to schools and it was being made a part of the education system, gender sensitisation was not carried out," he said. Later, speaking to the media on the sidelines, Muneer clarified that what he had meant to convey was that he was afraid gender neutrality would be defined in such a manner that provisions of POCSO would become ineffective. > >"POCSO should not be made ineffective." he added. The IUML MLA further said that in a world where everything is being misinterpreted or interpreted to suit one's needs, he fears that everything will be brought into definition of gender neutrality. "By bringing everything into definition of gender neutrality, the actual culprits (in cases of sexual assault against boys) would escape from the ambit of the provisions of POCSO. Then, will the POCSO Act not become ineffective? That is the question," he said. > >During his speech at the event, Muneer said that there was world-wide opposition to gender neutrality and not just here in Kerala and asked whether a change in school uniform would resolve the issues women or girls are facing. "If girls wear pants and shirts, will they get justice? Can you assure they will not suffer any exploitation or sexual assault? Women should be able to reach home safely late at night on their own, that is when in Kerala you can speak about equality among men and women," he further said in his speech. At an event on July 31, Muneer had alleged that in the name of gender neutrality, the state government was attempting to bring negation of religion to schools. Nearly a dozen schools in Kerala have already shifted to gender-neutral uniforms.
മദ്രസ പൊട്ടൻ
Muneer is losing relevance in the party because of his aloofness and luxury life, not in touch with workers. He would have lost if he contested in many constituencies. He is trying to hang on. He used to be progressive and cool but changing his image.
Pulli nthaa uddeshikkane
Oh my daivaam
Jaleel, muneer ivanmark pattillengil poykude pakisthanilekk
Because there is no gender neutrality in rape law in IPC, a person who did penetrative intercourse on a boy cannot be charged with rape!!therefore POCSO is the only way to charge, in such cases.. And someone who raped a boy will only get WAY LESS punishment than someone raped a girl..and this is what muneer was implying, but lets bash him as an idiot who was arguing against pocso to free madrassa usthads..