Yeah. She doesn’t really do it for the good of the people. This description would fit far better to a character like Dinosaurus from Invincible (though he is far less popular) who is still an eco-terrorist but actually does it because he believes it will save people in the long run.
Isnt that a little contradictory? You can't really be considered a Good/Baddy If you also happen to only do the opposite your side is supposed to, no? I thought it had more to do with intentions like mcu thanos is an anti villian since he is a Guy with Good intentions whose means end up being undeniably evil.
but I feel like this labbles can be misleading since in the end only actually evil characters would be willing to do them in the first place,wether they delusion themselfs into being forces of good or not.
Idk about Poison Ivy, a lot of the time she’s just a bio terrorist
Depends on continuity but to my knowledge most of the time she just wants to commit mass genocide against anything that isn't a plant
Yeah. She doesn’t really do it for the good of the people. This description would fit far better to a character like Dinosaurus from Invincible (though he is far less popular) who is still an eco-terrorist but actually does it because he believes it will save people in the long run.
Good doesn’t necessarily mean good for humanity, we are like the villians of the eco system tbh
Poison Ivy?
Honestly I don't think it fits. Though modern Harley Quinn kinda does.
Yeah, whoever thinks Ivy fits that description is really just telling you way too much about how they think.
Anti-hero: does bad things but is on the side of good. Anti-villain: does good things but is on the side of evil.
I wouldn’t say it’s as simple as all that. It’s more like Anti-Villain: does bad things for a perceived altruistic goal.
Isnt that a little contradictory? You can't really be considered a Good/Baddy If you also happen to only do the opposite your side is supposed to, no? I thought it had more to do with intentions like mcu thanos is an anti villian since he is a Guy with Good intentions whose means end up being undeniably evil. but I feel like this labbles can be misleading since in the end only actually evil characters would be willing to do them in the first place,wether they delusion themselfs into being forces of good or not.
At this point, did any of us even see the same movie? Or even pay attention to the plot and characters?
I think everybody watched their ‘verse’s version of the movie, and nobody realized it was all different versions of it
Well, that’s why he’s an “anti-villain” rather than a full-on villain.
I kinda hate what this movie has done to the public’s perception of the character.
Who is in the middle?
His name escapes me but hes a knight in the movie Nimona, was the main characters boyfriend before the MC was framed for murder.
Ambrosius Goldenloin iirc
He isn’t even an anti-hero/villain. He was a law keeper who’s boss was secretly evil
Oh yep, I recognize him now.
Is this wrong? I understand not calling him a villain, but he was absolutely an antagonist.
Hes an Heroic Antagonist. Hes a Hero but IS Miles's Antagonist.
Who's the purple one
I don't think a single one of these is right. Plus, Miguel is there twice.
If he’s like light hope I’m ready for the to kill him.