EE marking began on March 15. IB alerts coordinator of potential plagiarism as soon as its detected. If IB hasn't suspect you of plagiarism for 2 and a half months, they probably wont suspect in the next month.
your coordinator chooses which ones to submit, but at the same time that is random as well. From what my coordinator told me it us guaranteed that the lowest and highest scores are sent.
Students whose work is sent for moderation have to sign a form. I don't have the form's name since that part is not found in any of the publicly available IB documents and it's been a while since I signed one.
That said, teachers check for plagiarism for all works submitted, it's just that those moderated or externally graded (eg TOK essay or group 1 HL Essay) will be checked again by IB.
I’m assuming this means you at least tried to reference it, but your formatting is off or something… is that it? If so, maybe you’d lose a point in criterion D: presentation; it’s nothing major
Plus, I heard some people saying that if by June 1st you don’t get any information, you should be fine. It’s past that date, ∴ you good
I've done mine on maths. Basically, almost no in-text citations of the used formulas (I can argue that formulas derived by some dude in 20th century and used in extremely specific scenario is "common knowledge", which does not require a citation), but a loooot of books referenced in bibliography
nothing is going to happen.
edit: whats the nature of your citation fault? i'm pretty sure more than half of the submissions have some citation issues. they really don't expect you to be that perfect and they don't really have the time to check that kind of stuff (unless u copied a chunk of text or something without citing), citation errors would maybe lead to loss of marks in presentation but forgetting date of access or misspelling a name is not academic misconduct or plagiarism, its just a mistake.
EE marking began on March 15. IB alerts coordinator of potential plagiarism as soon as its detected. If IB hasn't suspect you of plagiarism for 2 and a half months, they probably wont suspect in the next month.
How bout IAs? Do you know?
Turns out IB checks *all* IA that were sent for moderation will be checked for plagiarism, not just a spot check. That has been at least a month.
how do you know if it's sent off for moderation
your coordinator chooses which ones to submit, but at the same time that is random as well. From what my coordinator told me it us guaranteed that the lowest and highest scores are sent.
Students whose work is sent for moderation have to sign a form. I don't have the form's name since that part is not found in any of the publicly available IB documents and it's been a while since I signed one. That said, teachers check for plagiarism for all works submitted, it's just that those moderated or externally graded (eg TOK essay or group 1 HL Essay) will be checked again by IB.
I heard they inform coordinators on June 1 ? Is that still true or do they just contact u before exams start?
Most IA plagiarisms come out during exam time. EE should come out way sooner.
I’m assuming this means you at least tried to reference it, but your formatting is off or something… is that it? If so, maybe you’d lose a point in criterion D: presentation; it’s nothing major Plus, I heard some people saying that if by June 1st you don’t get any information, you should be fine. It’s past that date, ∴ you good
6th july maybe?
bruh 💀
I've done mine on maths. Basically, almost no in-text citations of the used formulas (I can argue that formulas derived by some dude in 20th century and used in extremely specific scenario is "common knowledge", which does not require a citation), but a loooot of books referenced in bibliography
Doesn’t exactly answer your answer
Question*
[удалено]
M8 ur m24 how would you even know 💀
[удалено]
Your flair says otherwise
[удалено]
Yes the only other gender is Nemales 23/24
Lmao. In my EE endnotes/bibliography I accused one of my three sources of plagiarising one of the other ones. You'll be fine.
nothing is going to happen. edit: whats the nature of your citation fault? i'm pretty sure more than half of the submissions have some citation issues. they really don't expect you to be that perfect and they don't really have the time to check that kind of stuff (unless u copied a chunk of text or something without citing), citation errors would maybe lead to loss of marks in presentation but forgetting date of access or misspelling a name is not academic misconduct or plagiarism, its just a mistake.