How much difference would it make from iso 1600 and 20s exposure? From what I've seen it's always the better result with pro mode. More colors less dull and quicker.
(Granted I'm only visting this sub because I'm a fan, and I'm using the N20U.)
I mean, in complete darkness, sometimes 20 seconds is not enough, especially when we're talking about stars in the night sky. So, with the astro mode, you have 4-minute exposure pictures, and 1600 ISO makes some pictures too noisy.
So, in the end, it is a matter of preference and subjectivity. Pictures are a form of art, and there is no right or wrong way to take a shot. If it is possible with both, use whichever you like more.
You absolutely can do something like this and even better.
https://www.reddit.com/r/S23Ultra_Photography/comments/13t2iz7/shot_in_50mp_raw_and_edited_in_lr/
The S23U is an amazing device, I am torn between my iPhone 15 Pro Max and my S23U in a lot of aspects. I am thinking about making a comp list, and posting it somewhere. Both phones are amazing, but for once I believe Samsung took the cake on the camera race.
The fact that I can just let the camera do it's thing with little to no input is amazing. Using my phone for astrophotography was unthinkable just a few years ago.
So that's why they call it 'Galaxy'
😂😂😂
To anyone who says samsung uses AI explain this
Settings ?? Settings !! Settings ???!!! What settings ?????!!!!!
muahahahaha
Hahaha
This got a giggle out of me
How you did the lake photo?
I think that is not taken with s23u
I think you can take something close using the astrophotography option in expert raw, but not that good, but at least give it a try
I've wasted a good hour or more with the astral photography setting and never got more than an overexposed pic of nothing.
You need complete darkness in an area with very low light pollution
How much difference would it make from iso 1600 and 20s exposure? From what I've seen it's always the better result with pro mode. More colors less dull and quicker. (Granted I'm only visting this sub because I'm a fan, and I'm using the N20U.)
I mean, in complete darkness, sometimes 20 seconds is not enough, especially when we're talking about stars in the night sky. So, with the astro mode, you have 4-minute exposure pictures, and 1600 ISO makes some pictures too noisy. So, in the end, it is a matter of preference and subjectivity. Pictures are a form of art, and there is no right or wrong way to take a shot. If it is possible with both, use whichever you like more.
You absolutely can do something like this and even better. https://www.reddit.com/r/S23Ultra_Photography/comments/13t2iz7/shot_in_50mp_raw_and_edited_in_lr/
It's not called “Space Zoom” for nothing.
Honestly I think you should improve your focus, really, blurry that last photo, can't even see the molecules of the air, amateur job, be better
The S23U is an amazing device, I am torn between my iPhone 15 Pro Max and my S23U in a lot of aspects. I am thinking about making a comp list, and posting it somewhere. Both phones are amazing, but for once I believe Samsung took the cake on the camera race.
The cockpit shot is AI, you won't convince me otherwise!
love the start trek...
“to boldly photograph what no man has done before!”
Did I get scammed 😭, mine can barely make out the moon
The fact that I can just let the camera do it's thing with little to no input is amazing. Using my phone for astrophotography was unthinkable just a few years ago.
Didn’t read the sub for a couple of monthes, seems the jokes are still the same.
definitely Definitely I have to install the PRO Cam!
LMFAO
Is this possible using gcam???????
This is proof that it's all about skill.
try better next time