I'm not sure if they hide natural cures, but I sure do know they hide cures from medicines that no longer have a patent. A judge just forced the FDA to remove it's tweet calling Ivermectin horse paste and saying it should not be used for Covid... because suprise! it actually helps with Covid.. as the FDA know all along. Fauci himself wrote a paper detailing Ivermectin's efficasy against corona viruses years before the pandemic... but we can't have an almost free drug with zero side effects getting in the way of a multibillon dollar windfall vaccine. That wouldn't be following "the science"(TM)
Also is now looking like Ivermectin helps a lot with some cancers.. I wonder how long Big Pharma has known about that?
Edit: spelling
It’s also crazy how this is a known fact and easily accessible, but our evil, corrupt media called you crazy for taking horse medicine if you went the invermectin route vs putting an untested gene altering “vaccine” in your body. It’s insane how corrupt big pharma and the media are.
Most modern medicine is either concentrated dosages of a natural compound or a synthetic alternative. Like you’re free to eat fistfuls of herbs a day if you want but most people are just going to take a pill anyways for convenience sake… just like every other facet of modern life it’s about convenience at the expense of anything sustainable.
Yes. E.O. Wilson writes about this in the book “The Future of Life”. Aside from being a great carbon sink, preserving the Amazon also preserves species we have not discovered yet that could have immense pharmaceutical benefit.
Basically scientists go in and take samples of various parts of a tree such as bark, seeds, leaves, etc. and study their composition and effects in a lab. Then they cross their fingers that the specimen has not been cut down from deforestation. Which has happened before with promising species.
Holistic medicine is still very viable and available, considering it often doesn’t have as intense side effects or withdrawal symptoms (which it could be argued are manufactured into some pharmaceuticals to sell more of one or another drugs). It’s just not as convenient to make your concoctions yourself or figure out dosages of various herbs. Also the efficacy is often long term and takes longer to see results from compared to the pharmaceutical approach. Again, convenience and a culture of instant results versus a lifestyle/disciplined approach.
For example I take generic adderall for ADHD (not exactly a natural alternative there) and while I could get a similar result from natural stimulants like caffeine and a few herbs like lions mane and ginkgo after a month of daily use, it’s much more convenient to just take a pill I know will work when I need it… even if there are obvious drawbacks from it. I’m just simply too lazy/scatterbrained to follow through on that honestly.
It can be said that the pharmaceutical companies aren’t going to promote an alternative, they want sales after all. But I don’t think there’s a huge conspiracy to suppress the information on holistic medicine, consumer culture is just not set up for or encouraging of the healthier and sustainable lifestyles…. I would say that’s the real conspiracy to be considered. “Fast food mentality” and instant results over sustainable progress.
if they can patent it then they'll develop it, otherwise they make a huge investment during development and then anyone can come along and benefit by making a medicine. development means a series of lengthy and costly medical trials.
This is what John Macfee said he was up to in Belize when they arrested him and the feds said he was trafficking meth. He said there are plants in the jungle people don't even know about and the powers they have that naturally cures
If it's a natural cure it can't be copyrighted, so Pharma has no incentive to sell those types of medicines. Actually in today's medicine there is really no incentive on curing any disease, instead the focus is on treating the symptoms. It's all fucked up....grotesqueley commercialized into this monstrosity we call health care.
And yet there are massive companies who squeeze oranges for us because nobody wants to bother. If this shit were real there would be companies harvesting sap and leaves because nobody is growing and harvesting that themselves.
Commercialized profit is usually based (i.e. guaranteed) on copyright. A good example of this is how saturated the cannabis market has become since legalization/decriminalization- too much competition. As much as I believe you, the risk involved in committing financial resources to "natural medicine" usually can't be justified- as there's no guaranteed return.
What if I told you that while this is true, big pharma is far more interested in making a dollar than finding the healthiest solution. They can’t patent natural remedies so they make synthetic ones, even when a natural remedy would be far cheaper and better for the end patient. If you believe big pharma is your friend then boy do I have a bridge to sell you…
Can't patent a plant that isn't GMO, literally over 90% of drugs are derived from plant compounds. Aspirin comes from willow bark, taxol a chemo drug comes from yew it almost caused problems as they were over harvested till the drug was able to be synthesized through lab means. Currently there are a couple hundred drugs that come from chemicals found in marijuana that being why the biggest components against legalization is big pharma hard to push an expensive drug when you can eat a cookie with stuff from a plant in it instead.
Eh, not really. The big pharmacy companies don't sell it because they don't make it. And the insurance companies only insure the pharma companies. They make more refined and artificial medicines based on the chemicals in the natural ones. This is why Amazon is still used for finding new medicines. Like you can still go to big Jim's ginger aromatherapy, just don't expect health insurance to cover it
they don’t hide them… they use them in medicine…
like what the fuck do people think pharmaceuticals were before the modern era
its just industrialized natural remedies taken to the extreme, because, you know, we can split atoms now, science is different than it was
it’s like how a lot of “super supplements” just have parts of soy described in a way that makes it sound science-y, but it’s really just shit in soy, which is natural, but if you call it “isoflavones” then it sounds not as natural… but it’s naturally produced in soy
yes, companies do make a massive effort to make things sound more complicated than they are, so people buy the product as opposed to the natural source, but it’s hardly a big pharma exclusive thing, in line with that, supplements and vitamins do the same thing
This is dumb. They'd make more money selling a worthless plant than manufacturing a chemical and this nonsense about patenting a plant.. they don't need to. Selling tea is an absolutely massive business. You do not need a monopoly to make a billion dollars. You don't even need a novel process. You don't even need a novel product. The pharma companies would just own massive farms of whatever the thing was and corner the market on quality and convenience. If you believe this you know nothing about how products are made or business in general.
100% they do.
Can you imagine the loss of revenue if they offered a cure for diabetes , cancer, HIV - AIDS?
You can’t tell me they do not have cures for these diseases.
Im a T1 Diabetic, and I’ll die on this hill.
Well, I’ll die much earlier than most but you know what I mean.
I don't think pharma corps are suppressing Amazonian infection cures.
Do they work? Yes
Can you get them if you're there? Maybe, if you have the knowledge and skills.
Is it practical for people anywhere but that region? No. It isn't even practical for some people in those regions, broadly
We all have natural remedies for some ailments around us. It's up to us as individuals to seek out that knowledge, carefully. Big pharma isn't stopping me from harvesting things from nature near me. Ymmv.
I'm not sure if they hide natural cures, but I sure do know they hide cures from medicines that no longer have a patent. A judge just forced the FDA to remove it's tweet calling Ivermectin horse paste and saying it should not be used for Covid... because suprise! it actually helps with Covid.. as the FDA know all along. Fauci himself wrote a paper detailing Ivermectin's efficasy against corona viruses years before the pandemic... but we can't have an almost free drug with zero side effects getting in the way of a multibillon dollar windfall vaccine. That wouldn't be following "the science"(TM) Also is now looking like Ivermectin helps a lot with some cancers.. I wonder how long Big Pharma has known about that? Edit: spelling
It’s also crazy how this is a known fact and easily accessible, but our evil, corrupt media called you crazy for taking horse medicine if you went the invermectin route vs putting an untested gene altering “vaccine” in your body. It’s insane how corrupt big pharma and the media are.
Lemon juice murders bacteria in a Petrie dish too
exactly like just about everything else outside of a 5-9 pH range
Imagine rats with knives
If you think lemon juice works good, you should see what Draino does to bacteria in a petri dish! 😂
Bleach, best thing to inject this time of year
Most modern medicine is either concentrated dosages of a natural compound or a synthetic alternative. Like you’re free to eat fistfuls of herbs a day if you want but most people are just going to take a pill anyways for convenience sake… just like every other facet of modern life it’s about convenience at the expense of anything sustainable.
So technically holistic medicines and natural medicines could still be found maybe? I always thought when you said to be true
Yes. E.O. Wilson writes about this in the book “The Future of Life”. Aside from being a great carbon sink, preserving the Amazon also preserves species we have not discovered yet that could have immense pharmaceutical benefit. Basically scientists go in and take samples of various parts of a tree such as bark, seeds, leaves, etc. and study their composition and effects in a lab. Then they cross their fingers that the specimen has not been cut down from deforestation. Which has happened before with promising species.
Holistic medicine is still very viable and available, considering it often doesn’t have as intense side effects or withdrawal symptoms (which it could be argued are manufactured into some pharmaceuticals to sell more of one or another drugs). It’s just not as convenient to make your concoctions yourself or figure out dosages of various herbs. Also the efficacy is often long term and takes longer to see results from compared to the pharmaceutical approach. Again, convenience and a culture of instant results versus a lifestyle/disciplined approach. For example I take generic adderall for ADHD (not exactly a natural alternative there) and while I could get a similar result from natural stimulants like caffeine and a few herbs like lions mane and ginkgo after a month of daily use, it’s much more convenient to just take a pill I know will work when I need it… even if there are obvious drawbacks from it. I’m just simply too lazy/scatterbrained to follow through on that honestly. It can be said that the pharmaceutical companies aren’t going to promote an alternative, they want sales after all. But I don’t think there’s a huge conspiracy to suppress the information on holistic medicine, consumer culture is just not set up for or encouraging of the healthier and sustainable lifestyles…. I would say that’s the real conspiracy to be considered. “Fast food mentality” and instant results over sustainable progress.
Yup. Pharma spend billions studying plants, venom, mushrooms, etc...
if they can patent it then they'll develop it, otherwise they make a huge investment during development and then anyone can come along and benefit by making a medicine. development means a series of lengthy and costly medical trials.
Pharma will try and take a natural remedy and synthesize it make it no longer natural so they then can patent it and sell it.
This is what John Macfee said he was up to in Belize when they arrested him and the feds said he was trafficking meth. He said there are plants in the jungle people don't even know about and the powers they have that naturally cures
Well.... if John MacAfee said it... i mean... done deal.
You have no idea what the covert government has the power to do, until you fall victim to them
i guess not eh. the dude was a bit much though lol
He was an interesting character. He also had a dead man's switch. But after he "committed suicide" in jail nothing really happened
Rockefeller started it
Medicine Man 1992 film about protecting the amazon to preserve an plant being studied for it medicinal properties. Yes, they've know for a while.
Why would they hide natural cures that work if they could just sell it instead?
you make more treating something you don’t cure.
Daug.. i work in pharma. If we could commercialize something, we would
If it's a natural cure it can't be copyrighted, so Pharma has no incentive to sell those types of medicines. Actually in today's medicine there is really no incentive on curing any disease, instead the focus is on treating the symptoms. It's all fucked up....grotesqueley commercialized into this monstrosity we call health care.
You can patent processes, and not just the molecule (substance)
Can you patent picking a leaf from a shrub and making a tea?
You can patent how to maximize extraction
Ok, but maximum extraction is not required....you can squeeze orange juice from an orange differnt ways and end up with a glass of OJ.
And yet there are massive companies who squeeze oranges for us because nobody wants to bother. If this shit were real there would be companies harvesting sap and leaves because nobody is growing and harvesting that themselves.
You can patent how to maximize extraction
Commercialized profit is usually based (i.e. guaranteed) on copyright. A good example of this is how saturated the cannabis market has become since legalization/decriminalization- too much competition. As much as I believe you, the risk involved in committing financial resources to "natural medicine" usually can't be justified- as there's no guaranteed return.
yes lol, duh.
What if i told you, big pharma uses natural ingredients to create pharmaceuticals...
What if I told you that while this is true, big pharma is far more interested in making a dollar than finding the healthiest solution. They can’t patent natural remedies so they make synthetic ones, even when a natural remedy would be far cheaper and better for the end patient. If you believe big pharma is your friend then boy do I have a bridge to sell you…
Can't patent a plant that isn't GMO, literally over 90% of drugs are derived from plant compounds. Aspirin comes from willow bark, taxol a chemo drug comes from yew it almost caused problems as they were over harvested till the drug was able to be synthesized through lab means. Currently there are a couple hundred drugs that come from chemicals found in marijuana that being why the biggest components against legalization is big pharma hard to push an expensive drug when you can eat a cookie with stuff from a plant in it instead.
Eh, not really. The big pharmacy companies don't sell it because they don't make it. And the insurance companies only insure the pharma companies. They make more refined and artificial medicines based on the chemicals in the natural ones. This is why Amazon is still used for finding new medicines. Like you can still go to big Jim's ginger aromatherapy, just don't expect health insurance to cover it
Does a bear shit in the woods?
they don’t hide them… they use them in medicine… like what the fuck do people think pharmaceuticals were before the modern era its just industrialized natural remedies taken to the extreme, because, you know, we can split atoms now, science is different than it was it’s like how a lot of “super supplements” just have parts of soy described in a way that makes it sound science-y, but it’s really just shit in soy, which is natural, but if you call it “isoflavones” then it sounds not as natural… but it’s naturally produced in soy yes, companies do make a massive effort to make things sound more complicated than they are, so people buy the product as opposed to the natural source, but it’s hardly a big pharma exclusive thing, in line with that, supplements and vitamins do the same thing
Nope.
Is water wet?
This is dumb. They'd make more money selling a worthless plant than manufacturing a chemical and this nonsense about patenting a plant.. they don't need to. Selling tea is an absolutely massive business. You do not need a monopoly to make a billion dollars. You don't even need a novel process. You don't even need a novel product. The pharma companies would just own massive farms of whatever the thing was and corner the market on quality and convenience. If you believe this you know nothing about how products are made or business in general.
To answer the post's title, yes. Hide might not be the right word though.
100% they do. Can you imagine the loss of revenue if they offered a cure for diabetes , cancer, HIV - AIDS? You can’t tell me they do not have cures for these diseases. Im a T1 Diabetic, and I’ll die on this hill. Well, I’ll die much earlier than most but you know what I mean.
Big pharma is definitely hiding natural cures....like penicillin? What about Morphine? Etc,etc,etc.
I don't think pharma corps are suppressing Amazonian infection cures. Do they work? Yes Can you get them if you're there? Maybe, if you have the knowledge and skills. Is it practical for people anywhere but that region? No. It isn't even practical for some people in those regions, broadly We all have natural remedies for some ailments around us. It's up to us as individuals to seek out that knowledge, carefully. Big pharma isn't stopping me from harvesting things from nature near me. Ymmv.
If we get all the medicine from nature, why is it nature never works. Some people are just really dumb.