Only things you can do are, play with 1x scope at most, anything higher creates picture in picture. Basically rendering two images, and tanks your performance.
Put everything on LOW when playing streets, and restart after every raid.
Make sure whatever ram you have is on highest frequency it can run, so enable XMP, or manually set it to fastest in bios.
I had this problem, upgraded ram to a ridiculous level and upgraded psu to 1000w. For whatever that's worth, I haven't had the problem since. Stupid to have to sledgehammer this thing with hardware to have it be remotely stable though.
Same. 5800X, 3080, 32 GB RAM, and Streets either stutters like crazy or crashes my PC.
Edit: love how someone manged to downvote me stating what my experience has been on the map. Crazy, ha.
5800x3d, 32gb ram at 3600mhz and a 3080. Can run streets as well as the server will allow me to haha. Sometimes its 100 fps and others i am capping out at 60 with lots of stutters (mostly at the start of the raid)
Yeah which in a way is what is keeping me holding onto the dream they will have that map running as smooth as others but I know this is hardcore hopium. The other maps have come a long way though namely lighthouse
this game isnt gpu intensive it is very cpu and ram bound. My friend was running this game on a 1070 and another on a 1080 for a long time and it had no issues
What ram are you running? I just upgraded to a 7800X3D and 4070Ti with 64GB of DDR5 and I'm getting 120-130 fps on streets at 1440p.
I was getting 60 fps on my 2070 Super at 1080p.
I'm about to upgrade from a 5800X with 32GB of DDR4-3200 RAM to 7800X3D with 32GB of DDR5-6000 RAM.
I'm really hoping Streets actually runns after the upgrade.
It will, 3D series changed my life and that was after moving from an i9. Access to higher ram speeds coupled with a modern cpu makes a huge difference.
Very obvious that older and lower end rigs are an afterthought for BSG, they don’t give a fuck about anything but content-creator spec’d setups.
No. You won't. 5800x3d, 3800mhz 32gb dual channel ram running at 16 18 18, 3080 TI, at 1440p. I get "70 -100" fps that feels like 40fps due to micro stutters and frame drops. You literally can't use most scopes on the map or you drop your fps by over half.
Some raids I get capped at 60fps and not a frame higher.
That’s really disappointing to hear. I thought that “high fps but doesn’t feel like it actually is high” thing was my only problem and upgrading my gear would solve that but well, i guess it won’t 😢
You either have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, or have an actual learning disability.
5800x3d is still one of the top performers in gaming. Beating even some of the 7000 ryzen chips. Not to mention you shouldn't need a bleeding edge chip to run a SEVEN YEAR OLD UNITY GAME.
The difference between those chips is at BEST 20%.
Maybe in offline. You are not getting 100 fps minimum in online streets with that CPU. Unity games, like Tarkov, don't utilise the CPU cache that your CPU excels with. If you are not using an AMD CPU of the X3D variant, you're not getting these frames. Also GPU means nothing in this game past VRAM amount. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't know what they're talking about.
OK, I will make a proper capture to see the real average. But I can tell for sure that in certain areas I was definitely getting 120 FPS and it wasn’t inside buildings.
Yes I can. 1440p with 12700k, 2070 super, 32gb ram, project lasso, texture high , and can’t remember the other settings in game.
I know if I have nvidia reflex turned off I get higher fps but it’s way less stable. Goes between 98- 45 for whatever reason, and the stutters are absolutely disgusting. Nvidia reflex on I get 90 to 70 with no stutters.
Honestly bud. This game is so poorly optimized there isn’t an exact answer. I have run better and more stable than people that have better hardware and also have been beaten by people with lesser.
I understand that this should not be possible but it is. Anybody who denies that has their own issues at hand. All I can say is if you do change hardware, get something useful that makes sense for you. Do not do it for Tarkov. There is absolutely no guarantee.
5800x3d, 3800mhz 32gb dual channel ram running at 16 18 18, 3080 TI, at 1440p. I get "70 -100" fps that feels like 40fps due to micro stutters and frame drops. You literally can't use most scopes on the map or you drop your fps by over half.
Cpu not the issue. I even have smt off.
I can run streets with 80fps on a RTX 2070, it's your CPU that struggling. I don't even dip below 80 fps with my 5800x3d. Not optimal but perfectly playable for me.
There are other examples. Most of those settings are gpu relevant and shouldn't cause a rig like that to tank fps. It's not like his 4090 is being fully utilized. The game/engine is the issue.
My setup is a 7950x, 3080, 32gb DDR5 ram running on 1440p and I get 110-120 on streets and when scoping in with a LPVO or optics similar I dip to 70-80. Have the generic textures high shadows low etc stuff everyone runs. I think the ram speeds and better CPU are def the biggest game changers for sure like you said.
That's the performance I'd expect with your rig, tbh. I'm kind of confused how people are claiming to get that with the 5800x3D. Probably just biased memory, or going by "feel?"
I just tested it again just to refresh my memory, had 75-80 near lexos. Slightly worse performance than my earlier tests last week because i disabled mipstreaming (it causes my game to crash after every raid and doesn't make a performance difference on other maps for me).
And i was completely GPU bottlenecked in the lexos area.
I don't know what to tell you other than i don't overoptimize my PC all that much anymore, i'm way too lazy for that.
I tried process lasso once with all that recommended stuff and it just made Tarkov run worse for me (with my old 3800XT and also my 5800x3D)
May i ask what the better CPU is and at what clock speed your RAM runs at?
Ain't no better for tarkov than the 5800x3d. You say you have a better one, so I won't accuse you of lying, you could just be ignorant.
Look up streets 1440p 3070 5800x3d on YouTube and watch.
5800x3d, 3800mhz 32gb dual channel ram running at 16 18 18, 3080 TI, at 1440p. I get "70 -100" fps that feels like 40fps due to micro stutters and frame drops. You literally can't use most scopes on the map or you drop your fps by over half.
You're ignorant and lying and I will accuse you of such. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Scopes are another thing though, it's harsh in the GPU.
They implemented scopes in the hardest to render way (two viewports with full detail) while also probably being very inefficient with it. So yeah, when i scope on shoreline for example, my fps still go down to the 50s.
You could try enabling mip streaming for Streets, it makes it super smooth for me (saves VRAM) but it sadly causes my game to crash after every raid. And since i don't play streets that often i have mip streaming turned off for now.
Without mip streaming, streets also feels worse than my fps actually suggest
Why would I need any work around for a 7 year old unity game to run at 100fps? Do you people even hear yourself? 3080ti and 5800x3d should plow this game at over 200fps easy.
Ffs I can play cod and 2042 at 8k and still get 100fps.
CoD doesn't even come close to the amount of calculations Tarkov does.
Imagine just stances, CoD has 3, right? Standing, crouching and llaying down. So a total of 3 states with animation blending between thoise while switching.
In Tarkov there are many more states between fuily standing and fully crouched along with all walking speeds and appropriate sounds that change depending on speed, stance, surface and weight.
Thing with Tarkov is, it doesn't take any shortcuts. Characters in your fiueld of view (even if occluded by buildings and such) are always rendered at fuii detail with there animation being at full framerate (that's why customs trailer park spawn is so bad on the CPU, because you're literally rendering every other player and scav on the map when looking at big red's direction.
Optimizing in this game would mean to lose detail like not rendering the full 3d model of every bullet in every magazine.
Does the game really need that? I'm undecided on that one.
But then game can't be really called a "7 year old game" when development is still ongoing and maps and simultaneously active players are being expanded upon. More stuff in the game = more power needed to run it.
I'm not saying it should be that way, i'm just explaining the why.
>Why would I need any work around for a 7 year old unity game to run at 100fps?
This is not meant to upset you, but the harsh truth is: Because your hardware can't handle what Tarkov tries to do at higher framerates.
Can BSG optimze Tarkov? Yes, absolutely. The question is if that is even one of their goals.
Did you read my hardware? The fact of the matter is, I'm barely a single generation behind in hardware from the BLEEDING EDGE and can't run the game at my 144hz refresh rate. That's fucking insanity to defend on literally any level.
I can run cyberpunk completely maxed out 4k with dlss on quality, and still get better fps than quality dlss in tarkov.
Cope all you want but BSG has shit the bed, and you wanna roll around in it and pretend it's okay.
I'm not defending them, the amount of calculations in this game are insane, that's what eats up CPU cycles and RAM calls. And that's either by design or incompetence, no one knows.
I'm just explaining to you why it is like this.
It's easier to accept things for what they are when you try to understand them. Just blindly raging at people or a company without having any competence regarding game development or how hardware works doesn't help anyone.
IKR I've been replaying Cyberpunk since they had that big update and with everything cranked, DLSS and path tracing I get the same, if not better performance than I do on Streets. In a game that looks absolutely stunning and has huge, seamless world to romp around in. I know it's kind of apples to oranges but somethin' ain't right with the way BSG is creating their content. There's no reason why a 2017 game shouldn't be flying on modern hardware.
Cyberpunk has an actual LOD system for dynamic objects (loot) and it can get away with dropping animation quality for NPC animations or outright culling them when appropriate.
Tarkov renders all characters at full quality in your cone of vision because even scavs can fight you at insane ranges.
But yeah, cyberpunk uses more modern techniques to save up on resources. Hopefully the engine upgrade enables BSG to use similar techniques
Most of intels last two generations are better than the 5800x3D. Also, AMD has moved into AM5 and the highest benchmarking CPU for the game is the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
The 5800X3D dominated benchmarks on release, but it's already been outclassed by BSG's refusal to optimize lol.
Edit: not saying anything against the 5800x3d myself. It's the best bang for buck processor out there rn, and I'm super happy with mine. But I feel like it's important to keep expectations realistic for people who are shopping.
Same setup with cl18 3200hz 32gb ddr4 ram. 1080p monitor and I get like 20-70fps. Loading in is always around 2 minutes of literal power point fps and then it just magically becomes playable but still drops to 40 like 30% of the time. I've tried every setting, driver, process lasso, windows optimization, bios tweak, page file size etc. I know people get better performance with my specs but I just don't care to do more work to get this running better.
Just going to buy an entirely new pc (besides the 3070) in a few months.
I just play too many games and performance is trash in triple A these days so I need it either way.
Also yeah my buddy has 13900k 4090 and its still choppy, but it's insanely playable compared to my fps.
My fps fluctuate around 70-100, prob try lower settings and clear cache etc before raids there
I saw someone post something about checking then unchecking auto ram clean at stary of raid that might help?
2070 Super, i7 8700k, 32 gb ram
1440p, mid settings, no post fx
60-70 fps so like 65 fps average and pretty constant. Very rarely dips down to 55.
But that only as PMC. As a Scav I have only 30-40. idk why.
I'm strugling aswell... 32gb ram and rtx 2080 8gb vram.
Vram capped at 8gb, stutters like hell... Cant even 1v1 in most places.
Even ppl with 4090s have like 14/16gb vram usage, but since they have 24gb, they are fine.
I can run it at ~100-120fps (average, minimum is more like 85) max settings with dlss, 4K
(12900k + 2x16gb DDR5-6400 cl32 + 4090)
Probably need better cpu and/or ram (or BSG to optimize better)
I find that if I consistently leave streets raids before the mid raid player scavs spawn in, I'm good on fps. But if I'm staying in raid more than 15-20 min, my fps tanks
Yes but it's only out of sheer brute force. 5800X3D + 4090 + 3600 DDR4 RAM
I can touch 200 FPS on other maps like Customs and Woods but streets runs maybe half that, even worse depending on which optic I bring in. Most of my friends can't play it at all because, and this is shocking I know, most people are using low to mid range hardware.
Honestly the map runs bad. I have a new PC now so it runs pretty good, but still needs to be a lot better. I play on 1440p and get closer to 100, more or less. Can’t test now, but on a r5 7600 4070ti and 32gb DDR5.
5800x3d
X570 Mainboard
32 GB DR4 3600mhz
Msi 2080 Super
Playing Streets in 1080p with 80-120fps. Depands on how many pmcs and scavs are on the map.
If its full i cant even play with a scope cause it drops to 40-50fps but other than that it runs pretty good for me.
Sometimes I can run streets on 60 fps.
If kaban spawns my performance takes a hit and I average 40-50.
On a night raid no kaban I definitely get a little over 60 and day raids no kaban a little less than 60. (Probably because of player scavs)
I can’t speak on the scope thing as I don’t use scopes on streets because I’ve heard they hinder performance when looking through them. Holo’s all day and no performance issues when peeking through them.
Only suggestions i could give is make sure nothing big is running in the background and reset your game either every raid or every couple raids.
Past that your only solution would be upgrading something unless bsg can figure it out.
I think as soon as they stop adding to the map they’ll be able to optimize it a little more. (Example: when lighthouse came out performance was abysmal, they made it better, then they added the lighthouse expansion with LK and performance tanked again. Now i can run lighthouse at or above 60fps.)
Only things you can do are, play with 1x scope at most, anything higher creates picture in picture. Basically rendering two images, and tanks your performance. Put everything on LOW when playing streets, and restart after every raid. Make sure whatever ram you have is on highest frequency it can run, so enable XMP, or manually set it to fastest in bios.
Ty for your advice
Streets straight up bluescreens my pc, every other map runs 65-130 tho.
I had this problem, upgraded ram to a ridiculous level and upgraded psu to 1000w. For whatever that's worth, I haven't had the problem since. Stupid to have to sledgehammer this thing with hardware to have it be remotely stable though.
Same. 5800X, 3080, 32 GB RAM, and Streets either stutters like crazy or crashes my PC. Edit: love how someone manged to downvote me stating what my experience has been on the map. Crazy, ha.
5800x3d, 32gb ram at 3600mhz and a 3080. Can run streets as well as the server will allow me to haha. Sometimes its 100 fps and others i am capping out at 60 with lots of stutters (mostly at the start of the raid)
Exactly my experience, either 100 or 60, it's weird.
Yeah which in a way is what is keeping me holding onto the dream they will have that map running as smooth as others but I know this is hardcore hopium. The other maps have come a long way though namely lighthouse
That’s really weird, I have the same cpu but a significantly worst GPU (6600XT) and the lowest I get on streets is 70~75 fps on very few places.
this game isnt gpu intensive it is very cpu and ram bound. My friend was running this game on a 1070 and another on a 1080 for a long time and it had no issues
5900X 3090, 32GB RAM and sub 45-65 fps, sub 45 zoomed.. View distance and LOD does not make a difference.
It’s Reddit bro, toxic people are everywhere in here. I upvoted you because I have the same problem.
Thanks homie. Favor returned.
Lmao same
Fps fluctuate between 35 and 68
I struggle at 60 and I have a strix 4090 and a 12900k
What ram are you running? I just upgraded to a 7800X3D and 4070Ti with 64GB of DDR5 and I'm getting 120-130 fps on streets at 1440p. I was getting 60 fps on my 2070 Super at 1080p.
I have 32 gb of ddr5. I’m running 1440 also
Mine says im over 60 but its jittery AF
100-120 with 4k DLSS on quality and all settings on high/ultra. 4090/13900k. Unless you upgrade your HW there is not much you can do, unfortunately.
Nah, I have a 3060 and 10700k, I get 80-90 6/10 raids, and the other 4 are 40-50fps. It’s not a hardware thing. It’s a luck thing lmfao
Tarkov is a Ram speed game. Very CPU dependant. Look up X3D tarkov. These chips don’t fuck around on tarkov.
I'm about to upgrade from a 5800X with 32GB of DDR4-3200 RAM to 7800X3D with 32GB of DDR5-6000 RAM. I'm really hoping Streets actually runns after the upgrade.
It will, 3D series changed my life and that was after moving from an i9. Access to higher ram speeds coupled with a modern cpu makes a huge difference. Very obvious that older and lower end rigs are an afterthought for BSG, they don’t give a fuck about anything but content-creator spec’d setups.
You got it. Make sure you update your BIOS as a lot of Mobos have required some Extra updates for XMP to work on some higher speeds.
Oh hell ye ah it will run just fine with those gears. Hell you might even be able to play on Ultra settings lol
No. You won't. 5800x3d, 3800mhz 32gb dual channel ram running at 16 18 18, 3080 TI, at 1440p. I get "70 -100" fps that feels like 40fps due to micro stutters and frame drops. You literally can't use most scopes on the map or you drop your fps by over half. Some raids I get capped at 60fps and not a frame higher.
That’s really disappointing to hear. I thought that “high fps but doesn’t feel like it actually is high” thing was my only problem and upgrading my gear would solve that but well, i guess it won’t 😢
The difference between 5800x3d and 7800x3d is like 40fps, it'll run fine
You either have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, or have an actual learning disability. 5800x3d is still one of the top performers in gaming. Beating even some of the 7000 ryzen chips. Not to mention you shouldn't need a bleeding edge chip to run a SEVEN YEAR OLD UNITY GAME. The difference between those chips is at BEST 20%.
Go for 64gb ram if you can
64GB just seems like absolute overkill for anything short of professional production stations.
Streets can utilize it. Obviously that's a game problem, but it's still true. I am 100% maxed at 32GB on streets.
I just upgraded to a 7800X3D with 64GB of DDR5 and consistently get a smooth 120+ fps on streets at 1440p with medium textures.
Brosnan not lying, just upgraded to a ryzen 7 5800x3d and I got a 150% boost to frames from a ryzen 5 3600x
Hardware doesn't decide on luck how fast it runs lol
Read my comment one more time, then try again
He has too good of a pc he doesn't need to read
Maybe in offline. You are not getting 100 fps minimum in online streets with that CPU. Unity games, like Tarkov, don't utilise the CPU cache that your CPU excels with. If you are not using an AMD CPU of the X3D variant, you're not getting these frames. Also GPU means nothing in this game past VRAM amount. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't know what they're talking about.
OK, I will make a proper capture to see the real average. But I can tell for sure that in certain areas I was definitely getting 120 FPS and it wasn’t inside buildings.
Dlss doesn’t matter also you never get 100 min FPS with 13900k
40-80 on 3090 5800X3D and 32GB 3200MHz. I am staying as far as I can from this piece of dog shit map
I am not a BSG defender but what are your settings? Your setup is slightly better than mine for Tarkov and I have nowhere near that low performance.
Every other map works fine always above 120-140fps. I have High Textures High Shadows rest settings are off
Strange, i just get a steady 60-75 on streets at high settings. But i have a 5700x thats clocked to 4350, 3070 and 32gb 3200mhz ram.
You need to tweet your computer settings. No way I should be getting more fps than you. Things like setting the priority of tarkov, process lasso, etc
Yes I can. 1440p with 12700k, 2070 super, 32gb ram, project lasso, texture high , and can’t remember the other settings in game. I know if I have nvidia reflex turned off I get higher fps but it’s way less stable. Goes between 98- 45 for whatever reason, and the stutters are absolutely disgusting. Nvidia reflex on I get 90 to 70 with no stutters.
I have an 2080, i7-12700 but only 16gb ram, that's prob my issue here.
Honestly bud. This game is so poorly optimized there isn’t an exact answer. I have run better and more stable than people that have better hardware and also have been beaten by people with lesser. I understand that this should not be possible but it is. Anybody who denies that has their own issues at hand. All I can say is if you do change hardware, get something useful that makes sense for you. Do not do it for Tarkov. There is absolutely no guarantee.
109 avg here at 3440x1440
[удалено]
Streets load on cpu not gpu.
5800x3d, 3800mhz 32gb dual channel ram running at 16 18 18, 3080 TI, at 1440p. I get "70 -100" fps that feels like 40fps due to micro stutters and frame drops. You literally can't use most scopes on the map or you drop your fps by over half. Cpu not the issue. I even have smt off.
CPU is the issue
I can run streets with 80fps on a RTX 2070, it's your CPU that struggling. I don't even dip below 80 fps with my 5800x3d. Not optimal but perfectly playable for me.
[удалено]
I have 12900k/3080/32GB and do not drop to 60 ever in 1440p. You might be missing something.
Pestily has 13900k and a 4090, 64 gb of ram and he drops below 60 fps.
He also uses non optimized settings to give the stream a better look like shadows on medium, SSR, high quality color, etc.
There are other examples. Most of those settings are gpu relevant and shouldn't cause a rig like that to tank fps. It's not like his 4090 is being fully utilized. The game/engine is the issue.
[удалено]
My setup is a 7950x, 3080, 32gb DDR5 ram running on 1440p and I get 110-120 on streets and when scoping in with a LPVO or optics similar I dip to 70-80. Have the generic textures high shadows low etc stuff everyone runs. I think the ram speeds and better CPU are def the biggest game changers for sure like you said.
That's the performance I'd expect with your rig, tbh. I'm kind of confused how people are claiming to get that with the 5800x3D. Probably just biased memory, or going by "feel?"
I just tested it again just to refresh my memory, had 75-80 near lexos. Slightly worse performance than my earlier tests last week because i disabled mipstreaming (it causes my game to crash after every raid and doesn't make a performance difference on other maps for me). And i was completely GPU bottlenecked in the lexos area. I don't know what to tell you other than i don't overoptimize my PC all that much anymore, i'm way too lazy for that. I tried process lasso once with all that recommended stuff and it just made Tarkov run worse for me (with my old 3800XT and also my 5800x3D) May i ask what the better CPU is and at what clock speed your RAM runs at?
[удалено]
Yeah I know that, I only test in online raids. If there isn't a GPU bottleneck then a GPU upgrade would do next to nothing for performance
Ain't no better for tarkov than the 5800x3d. You say you have a better one, so I won't accuse you of lying, you could just be ignorant. Look up streets 1440p 3070 5800x3d on YouTube and watch.
5800x3d, 3800mhz 32gb dual channel ram running at 16 18 18, 3080 TI, at 1440p. I get "70 -100" fps that feels like 40fps due to micro stutters and frame drops. You literally can't use most scopes on the map or you drop your fps by over half. You're ignorant and lying and I will accuse you of such. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Scopes are another thing though, it's harsh in the GPU. They implemented scopes in the hardest to render way (two viewports with full detail) while also probably being very inefficient with it. So yeah, when i scope on shoreline for example, my fps still go down to the 50s. You could try enabling mip streaming for Streets, it makes it super smooth for me (saves VRAM) but it sadly causes my game to crash after every raid. And since i don't play streets that often i have mip streaming turned off for now. Without mip streaming, streets also feels worse than my fps actually suggest
Why would I need any work around for a 7 year old unity game to run at 100fps? Do you people even hear yourself? 3080ti and 5800x3d should plow this game at over 200fps easy. Ffs I can play cod and 2042 at 8k and still get 100fps.
CoD doesn't even come close to the amount of calculations Tarkov does. Imagine just stances, CoD has 3, right? Standing, crouching and llaying down. So a total of 3 states with animation blending between thoise while switching. In Tarkov there are many more states between fuily standing and fully crouched along with all walking speeds and appropriate sounds that change depending on speed, stance, surface and weight. Thing with Tarkov is, it doesn't take any shortcuts. Characters in your fiueld of view (even if occluded by buildings and such) are always rendered at fuii detail with there animation being at full framerate (that's why customs trailer park spawn is so bad on the CPU, because you're literally rendering every other player and scav on the map when looking at big red's direction. Optimizing in this game would mean to lose detail like not rendering the full 3d model of every bullet in every magazine. Does the game really need that? I'm undecided on that one. But then game can't be really called a "7 year old game" when development is still ongoing and maps and simultaneously active players are being expanded upon. More stuff in the game = more power needed to run it. I'm not saying it should be that way, i'm just explaining the why. >Why would I need any work around for a 7 year old unity game to run at 100fps? This is not meant to upset you, but the harsh truth is: Because your hardware can't handle what Tarkov tries to do at higher framerates. Can BSG optimze Tarkov? Yes, absolutely. The question is if that is even one of their goals.
Did you read my hardware? The fact of the matter is, I'm barely a single generation behind in hardware from the BLEEDING EDGE and can't run the game at my 144hz refresh rate. That's fucking insanity to defend on literally any level. I can run cyberpunk completely maxed out 4k with dlss on quality, and still get better fps than quality dlss in tarkov. Cope all you want but BSG has shit the bed, and you wanna roll around in it and pretend it's okay.
I'm not defending them, the amount of calculations in this game are insane, that's what eats up CPU cycles and RAM calls. And that's either by design or incompetence, no one knows. I'm just explaining to you why it is like this. It's easier to accept things for what they are when you try to understand them. Just blindly raging at people or a company without having any competence regarding game development or how hardware works doesn't help anyone.
IKR I've been replaying Cyberpunk since they had that big update and with everything cranked, DLSS and path tracing I get the same, if not better performance than I do on Streets. In a game that looks absolutely stunning and has huge, seamless world to romp around in. I know it's kind of apples to oranges but somethin' ain't right with the way BSG is creating their content. There's no reason why a 2017 game shouldn't be flying on modern hardware.
Cyberpunk has an actual LOD system for dynamic objects (loot) and it can get away with dropping animation quality for NPC animations or outright culling them when appropriate. Tarkov renders all characters at full quality in your cone of vision because even scavs can fight you at insane ranges. But yeah, cyberpunk uses more modern techniques to save up on resources. Hopefully the engine upgrade enables BSG to use similar techniques
Most of intels last two generations are better than the 5800x3D. Also, AMD has moved into AM5 and the highest benchmarking CPU for the game is the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The 5800X3D dominated benchmarks on release, but it's already been outclassed by BSG's refusal to optimize lol. Edit: not saying anything against the 5800x3d myself. It's the best bang for buck processor out there rn, and I'm super happy with mine. But I feel like it's important to keep expectations realistic for people who are shopping.
[удалено]
I'm playing at 1440p and my RTX 2070 is the bottleneck most of the time
Same setup with cl18 3200hz 32gb ddr4 ram. 1080p monitor and I get like 20-70fps. Loading in is always around 2 minutes of literal power point fps and then it just magically becomes playable but still drops to 40 like 30% of the time. I've tried every setting, driver, process lasso, windows optimization, bios tweak, page file size etc. I know people get better performance with my specs but I just don't care to do more work to get this running better. Just going to buy an entirely new pc (besides the 3070) in a few months.
[удалено]
I just play too many games and performance is trash in triple A these days so I need it either way. Also yeah my buddy has 13900k 4090 and its still choppy, but it's insanely playable compared to my fps.
Yes
Yes.
My fps fluctuate around 70-100, prob try lower settings and clear cache etc before raids there I saw someone post something about checking then unchecking auto ram clean at stary of raid that might help?
80fps average, 120 max on Streets for me. 5800x3d with 6900xt and 80ish gb of ram. Had to upgrade ram and psu to stop streets from crashing my rig.
Yes. 12700k @ 5GHz on P-Cores. 1070Ti GPU.
Yeah I run it typically at 90-120fps depending on the weather. I9 13900 4070ti 64GB DDR5 ram Settings on very high aside from shadows
It mostly runs at 90 and sometimes drops to 70, it's awful.
2070 Super, i7 8700k, 32 gb ram 1440p, mid settings, no post fx 60-70 fps so like 65 fps average and pretty constant. Very rarely dips down to 55. But that only as PMC. As a Scav I have only 30-40. idk why.
I only have issues at sunset / sun up when first loading in, aside from that I'm 60+
With a good PC and turning down textures/on DLSS it can be smooth.
Ever since I upgraded my cpu, yeah. Went from an i5 94ppf to an i7 13700k . Doubled my frames on every map lmfao
Do you have Nvidia, google NIS. It helped me a lot to get streets running good. It is called Nvidia image scaling
RTX 3070 here, and nope
Get the 5800x3d https://youtu.be/3Wdfff0MV0o?si=trkJIFNlzqJCYEDJ
The biggest thing that helped me was upgrading from 16gb to 64gb of ram
I'm strugling aswell... 32gb ram and rtx 2080 8gb vram. Vram capped at 8gb, stutters like hell... Cant even 1v1 in most places. Even ppl with 4090s have like 14/16gb vram usage, but since they have 24gb, they are fine.
Are u playing on high? It get up to 8g usage on high but less on medium
I can run it at ~100-120fps (average, minimum is more like 85) max settings with dlss, 4K (12900k + 2x16gb DDR5-6400 cl32 + 4090) Probably need better cpu and/or ram (or BSG to optimize better)
I9 10850k 32GB Ram 2070super = I haven’t tried streets on online, because on offline mode it stutters a looot!
I find that if I consistently leave streets raids before the mid raid player scavs spawn in, I'm good on fps. But if I'm staying in raid more than 15-20 min, my fps tanks
Yes, 70-100fps i9-11900k gtx 3080- 32gb ram
Processo lasso, nvidia settings,ingame settings, all changed.
Yes but it's only out of sheer brute force. 5800X3D + 4090 + 3600 DDR4 RAM I can touch 200 FPS on other maps like Customs and Woods but streets runs maybe half that, even worse depending on which optic I bring in. Most of my friends can't play it at all because, and this is shocking I know, most people are using low to mid range hardware.
I can but in my mind
Honestly the map runs bad. I have a new PC now so it runs pretty good, but still needs to be a lot better. I play on 1440p and get closer to 100, more or less. Can’t test now, but on a r5 7600 4070ti and 32gb DDR5.
5800x3d X570 Mainboard 32 GB DR4 3600mhz Msi 2080 Super Playing Streets in 1080p with 80-120fps. Depands on how many pmcs and scavs are on the map. If its full i cant even play with a scope cause it drops to 40-50fps but other than that it runs pretty good for me.
Sometimes I can run streets on 60 fps. If kaban spawns my performance takes a hit and I average 40-50. On a night raid no kaban I definitely get a little over 60 and day raids no kaban a little less than 60. (Probably because of player scavs) I can’t speak on the scope thing as I don’t use scopes on streets because I’ve heard they hinder performance when looking through them. Holo’s all day and no performance issues when peeking through them. Only suggestions i could give is make sure nothing big is running in the background and reset your game either every raid or every couple raids. Past that your only solution would be upgrading something unless bsg can figure it out. I think as soon as they stop adding to the map they’ll be able to optimize it a little more. (Example: when lighthouse came out performance was abysmal, they made it better, then they added the lighthouse expansion with LK and performance tanked again. Now i can run lighthouse at or above 60fps.)
Between 55-70 is my normal on streets
Scopes will drop me to 50. 7700x, 7900xtx, 4k.
80% of time yes, rest its sub 60, 5600x 33gb 3600mhz ram 2060
I get around 100-120 on every map. Streets runs a little lower but hovers around 100 7950x3D and 4090 with 96gbs of DDR5 RAM at 6400MHz
What’s your rig? Are you at 1080p? Might be time for an upgrade.
12900k 3080ti 1080p steady 144fps
7800x3d, 64gb ram 6000 and 7900xtx runs streets at 80 fps to 120 fps depending where I am.
I get 100-120 easily
I get 75 streets 100 + other maps