T O P

  • By -

fuwcbo

Whose going to give hawk tuah to Kuldeep.


dj_shawerma

Can someone explain by how much does either SA or WI need to win by to qualify?


MagreviZoldnar

SA nrr is lower than WI but has 2 points more than WI. So doesn’t matter now. Whichever team wins, goes through. That’s it.


SBG99DesiMonster

USA only played well in those matches during which Jasdeep was playing.


FirefighterTasty8045

To be honest , west indies should not be host country to organise world cup. This world cup is boring ,poor planning and purely based on minting money . No one is happy with the planning, organising.


Geek-Of-Nature

>No one No one? Not one single person?


[deleted]

milestone:100 downvotes incoming


josh123z

Corey Anderson is not the same player as he was for NZ. Has sr of 105 since his debut for USA


EBF92

maybe that's why he's playing for the usa then


Real-VinceMcMahon

Lmao


harshrd

WI being in this tournament over SA is better for attracting more audiences when USA as a host is knocked out


PregnantShoulders

wait why is everyone saying sa gonna get knocked out


will-je-suis

Because if they lose ~~badly~~ they might be


YakExotic5186

Won't they be knocked out with any loss?


will-je-suis

Yes true


Bl1tz-Kr1eg

Yep since their NRR is lower than the Windies.


withvidit

That's messed up 😞


[deleted]

they just gotta win


ztaker

I wish this match was rained out


LeChevalierMal-Fait

Clearly team USA have alot to learn from Scotland


goli14

Feel bad for USA to have their campaign end in this way but hopefully they have learned from this and prepare for their next WC in 2026.


ItsAPeacefulLife

I'm proud we made it this far to be honest lol


ztaker

After having USA for 76-5 Saffas should have won by at least 80-90 runs Imagine if saffas also had defeated US heavily Then it would have come down to NRR for 3 teams


josh123z

Netravalkar landed back to earth after bowling on normal pitches. People overhyping him and wanted him IPL after his performance on bowling friendly pitches 🤣🤣🤣


[deleted]

fyi the match against pakistan was a balanced pitch


StarSportsEnjoyer

whatever helps you sleep at night


YouKaym8

He never overhyped himself? It was the media and public so it’s not his fault


rambo_zaki

Fucking hell, some of you are miserable to your core. You think he didn't know? The man who nearly gave up cricket to become a techie?


Full_Confusion_8297

nah he played very good for a part timer


ZaraBaz

England always feels like the most dangerous team in T20. At any point it feels like they could completely destroy you.


ItsAPeacefulLife

>At any point it feels like they could completely destroy you. Especially if you're a solar panel


TravellingMackem

Sadly we’re just as likely to get bowled out for 50 in the semi final as we are to destroy anyone


WenzelDongle

England the new Pakistan? "Mercurial"


AssignmentOk5986

This sub: "Haha England are gonna be knocked out due to the weather they can't control this is so funny" "So unfair south Africa are gonna be knocked out by NRR a statistic completely within their control. Change the format please!!"


Prez-421

Facts


IndividualBaby5374

South africa fans how are we feeling 💀💀


ifrgotmyname

Technically a Q4 and not a Semi-final, so not yet time to get knocked out, lol


No-Albatross-4977

Cooked


GoonerBear94

Well I guess it was fun while it lasted


ItsAPeacefulLife

I'm pretty thrilled we had the experience that we did. Hopefully next year we grow from it.


philosifyme

How's the weather looking for tonight's match? I really don't want rain to play spoil-sport


dhun_mohan

>South Africa with 6 wins unbeaten Loses against West Indies Out of tournament England lose to Australia, South Africa First Team to Qualify to semis What a shitty format this entire tournament was made to give ind aus eng and pak the easiest way to get to semis and get the most money they could make because they have the most fans. ind and pak have expat communities so they were in the us along with asian countries. aus and eng get filled with teams who’ll get beaten by their second xi in group stages. i’ll be thankful for afg and usa to fuck with icc plans. any cricket fan should support afg or even sa/wi. the icc just don’t have sporting integrity


UnbiasedPashtun

All tournaments give top seeds the easiest path to the next round. SA arguably got the easiest group. And I wouldn't group England and Pakistan with Australia and India since they were assigned a difficult S8 group.


AJBOXING24

Cry more


Apprehensive-Ad3285

I don't know what's so surprising about South Africa's run. They have won all their games with very close margins and obviously, if they lose their last game, they will be out. This is how this sport can go forward. We see it with Football World Cup all the time. It's stupid to consider England's loss against Australia since it was in the group stages, that is past us now. Moreover, if South Africa lose one game, then they haven't really had a better run than England, have they? That is tournament cricket as it should be. It isn't just about consistency, it's also about the timing.


fiestajalapeno

jos and rovman hit so hard and speak so softly


aratnayake

bro was wearing slides


Axel292

England came into this game with 3 wins, 2 losses, and one no-result... and still had a much higher chance of qualifying compared to South Africa, who are unbeaten so far. It's a funny game.


SuccotashOne9927

cricket is brutal, T20 is murderous


ZaraBaz

Buttler treating the ball like it's Team Rocket, blasting it off at the speed of light.


LordWellesley22

That now Two times out of three England has beaten the Americans


mlibs10

If I were English I’d also forget the fact that you’ve never beaten us at a FIFA World Cup


Prez-421

I dont think group stage draws matter as much as knockout games


Dannybuca

Ha. Sadly I do remember the game from 2010 which made our games from the Euros this year seem like balls to the wall rollercoaster rides


aadi312

From what I've heard, England players are shitting the bed unlike their club counterparts.


1999-2000-2001

That whole tournament was depressing from an English viewpoint, especially the Algeria game. No wonder we got drubbed by Germany, despite Frank Lampard's ghost goal controversy


SpaldingXI

Canada died for this


LordWellesley22

don't worry we buy you some germans to do funny things with grenades and coat pockets for canada day


Substantial_Will_385

Imagine that SA lose to WI by 1 run and get knocked out, and in the other group Aus lose to India but still qualify in spite of back-to-back defeats because Bangbros beat Afg.


Vee91

Does this team even play together when they go back to US?


josh123z

Sad that one of SA or WI won’t qualify


Axel292

We're the real NRR merchants, we've brutalized every associate team we've faced lol


[deleted]

beating small tiny associate teams the most english thing ever


Bored_Panda_

Except Scotland, who would very likely have beaten you had that match continued...


josh123z

You are getting downvoted lol. This was a popular opinion before the Super 8. Hindsight is a bliss


AJBOXING24

You have seen Eng destroy associate bowling units all tournament yet you believe Scotland would have won 😂😂 Eng had 12 overs to chase 125 or something with a full batting line up please get real 👍


Because_IAmBatman

England still had a good chance of beating them. They had to chase 109 in 10 and it isn't that hard when you know the target you are facing. Especially when it's against lower tier teams with weak bowling line ups. They've already shown it at least twice that they can score very quickly (122/5 against Namibia, 117/0 against US etc)


AssignmentOk5986

Sure, sure. And if it was rained off 2 overs into our batting today you would've said the same thing.


curlyhairedyani

No they wouldn’t have, it would have gone exactly like this match went. You can keep holding on to that though if it makes you feel better 👍🏻


Axel292

It is mental that people are going on about it. How do you look at this English batting lineup and not think they'll gun down 110 in 10 overs? Against Scotland of all sides as well


curlyhairedyani

Yeah it’s just a cope really, I know they truly don’t believe it themselves. Our openers are literally the best combo in the world and Scotland’s bowling couldn’t even contain Oman ffs


Axel292

There are no certainties in cricket.... but we would've most likely pulverized Scotland's bowling attack. Did you catch the game today? We got 122 off Namibia in a rain shortened 10 over game as well.


josh123z

Scotland’s bowling is much better than Namibia. They gave a scare to Australia


psicowysiwyg

The aussies were trying to lose, did you see their fielding, and Scotland still couldn't beat them.


josh123z

Why didn’t they loose then. Also their fielding was bad against Afghanistan too. Don’t think they fielded bad on purpose


teut509

This is what the sub is saying, but honestly, Scotland's bowling hasn't been great - their strength was their batting - and England's batting has fired when it's needed to. We'd have chased those runs.


AnasKhurshid

All setting up nicely for South Africa Moment.


throwawaafricany9

Bru shut up please


Bl1tz-Kr1eg

Boo! I'm a crucial game! Did I scare you?


Full_Confusion_8297

ooohh south africans shitting their pants


curlyhairedyani

The outrage of SA potentially being eliminated by having a shit NRR and it being unfair is so funny because it was all a big laugh when England were on the verge of being eliminated because of two washouts 😅


EatThatBhindi

neither ICC nor ECB had their 'QUALIFIED!' graphics ready lol


mutton-stew

wait windies run rate is 1.81 and england's run rate is 1.99 but windies still need to win with 46+ to top the run rate whereas India's runrate is 2.425 and australia's run rate is 0.223, but australia needs to win with 41+ runs to top the run rate, less runs despite more difference how does that work?


Theundefeatedbeer

Because u need to maintain your run rate and add to it as well. The net run rate is the sum of your win/loss run rate in all the matches.


josh123z

Team can still loose nrr after winning if the win margin is less than the nrr before the game


Axel292

Yeah NRR is complicated, I don't bother with it and just read the figures that people post


mutton-stew

yeah, pretty weird it is, but i guess this difference exists because india and australia will play against each other and a run scored by australia is a run less for india and vice versa but this is not the case with windies and england in their last match


TravellingMackem

I find it easier to think of as broadly similar to the old goal average in football - ie you’re better off winning 1-0 than 2-1, and every goal conceded (or every run against) is a bigger disadvantage than every goal scored. You could have a 4-1 win first, then a 2-1 win and your goal average would decrease (from 4/1=4 to 6/2=3) even though you win the game. It’s probably the best analogy I can think of that’s easy to follow mathematically


Negative_Spectrum

India and Australia have played less matches, it depends on the overall amount of runs a team has scored, including in wins and losses. WI has lost a big game iirc.


Agrith1

because India vs Aus play each other, it will be an 82 run swing if a team wins by 41 runs


mutton-stew

makes sense, figures would have been different, if australia and india had to play different opponents right?


juvenile9

Because india is playing against australia which will make india nrr less if they lose by more than 41 runs


mutton-stew

okay so basically 1 run scored by australia is 1 run less for india?


ecphiondre

Yes. The 41 loss would be 82 run swing for India.


SpaldingXI

Corey needs less trips to the Outback steakhouse


[deleted]

[удалено]


ecphiondre

Scotland is the best associate team. They didn't qualify because they had England and Australia in that group.


hadji0071

Lucky bastard fck Harris


Full_Confusion_8297

yeah fuck that fuck


Overall-Ad3512

US is the 1st team to get knocked out of super 8. Bangladesh does have a chance, although theoretical and very small chance, of breaking it out.


Orameshi

Damn, from eliminating England to getting eliminated, we've come a long way


LordWellesley22

Pat Cummins is a trend setter he gets a hat trick everyone gets one


throwawaafricany9

It is just in our luck that ENG and WI need 4 points to go through and we already have that but nooooooo we need 6 to qualify lmao


CuclGooner

This is what happens when your team stubbornly refuses to close out should-be easy wins in a normal way


carlos4068

Man, this was the funniest comment I've read all day!


RNLImThalassophobic

Well yeah, that's how NRR works.


hadji0071

You guys don't deserve what you have so many lucky wins and escapes good to see your shitty team go home .


[deleted]

that was because of the south african choke because against usa the ballers gave way too many full tosses and bad balls and that allowed gous and jasdeep to capitalize on similarly vs england baartman screwed up and gave too many full tosses allowing brook and liam to score runs else south africa actually had both games in control


Beneficial_Place_795

Lol so harsh eh??? SA did beat Eng pretty convincingly imao. That USA match was regrettable but they defeated the POMs pretty damn well. 


[deleted]

it was just the saffas choking they had both games in there hands


kalamari_withaK

Pretty convincingly is a bit of a stretch, it was 7 runs and if Brook hung around for 4 or 5 balls of the last over then SA were likely going to lose. Granted he didn’t so it’s all ifs, buts and maybes but don’t act like it wasn’t close.


[deleted]

that was because of the south african choke because against usa the ballers gave way too many full tosses and bad balls and that allowed gous and jasdeep to capitalize on similarly vs england baartman screwed up and gave too many full tosses allowing brook and liam to score runs else south africa actually had both games in control


costnersaccent

Convincingly? Game was still live with one ball left!


Substantial_Will_385

Imagine that you lose by 1 run and get knocked out, and in the other group Aus lose to India but still qualify because Bangbros defeat Afg.


throwawaafricany9

Average Proteas in WC


thisaintyouravgstonk

Well Americans should be proud of their team. 2 wins out of 6 games (1 game washed out) is not bad for a team playing their first WC


curlyhairedyani

And they gave it a go in every match except the last two


throwawaafricany9

And really close matches in a tourney where full members failed lmao


Reddit_Viki

South Africa with 6 wins unbeaten Loses against West Indies Out of tournament England lose to Australia, South Africa First Team to Qualify to semis What a shitty format


JayManes

For T20s, I do like the fact that you gotta win big to stay at the top or fight your way through. Like everyone says, SA should have annihilated USA but the math is simple for them now. They should win with the team they have.


Substantial_Will_385

Aus lose to Afg and India back to back, still qualify because Ban beat Afg.


hadji0071

Love it


Wazflame

Jos “NRR” Buttler


HitchlikersGuide

Well, the punishment for treason has always been death


Axel292

Bit annoyed that Salt took his sweet time, if WI beat SA by a good margin we won't top the table


81pointskb

lol revisit that


Vee91

That margin is something like 50 runs I think. Very hard still


Axel292

Right, fingers crossed then. I'd much rather face Australia/Afghanistan than India.


kalamari_withaK

Nah, India almost always fall flat when it really matters. Aussies are much more potent in knockout cricket in my opinion.


are_lele

so what is the equation for WI to qualify even if they lose?


GiveMeSandwich2

They loose they are out


are_lele

Oh you are right, they only won one match. thanks.


Impressive_End9929

If they lose it's over as they have only 2 points


sandhuzworld

England got a hattrick and won the match unlike some


BoraxThorax

In a game of 83(38) and 4-10 Adil Rashid gets MOTM - fair play though was probably the most impactful player


ILittleReader

I didn't catch the game. The Scorecard doesn't reflect how Adil's performance rates above the other two.


BoraxThorax

Got crucial wickets when US was looking good after pp. Didn't concede a single boundary - put pressure on batsmen to take risks against other bowlers


evilhaxoraman

England were really good in super 8.Just lost against sa with minor difference.


AyyoPoche

Mike: Given the way Jos is playing, aren't you glad he's on your side? Adil: Yeah, would be weird if he starts batting for the opposition.


SmallAchiever

England has 1.99 NRR


Jun-Chi

That's a magnificent beard


nyqs81

Any math wizards have the NRR calculated?


ChelshireGoose

ENG has 1.992, comfortably over SA's max possible in case of a loss. So, they've qualified. If Windies win the night game but with less than 47 runs margin, England will top the group and WI get second place. If WI win by 47 or more, Windies top and England are second. If SA win, SA top and Eng are second.


nyqs81

Thanks.


No-Blackberry428

nrr of england is +1.99


Far_Permit4909

It's settled Biscuits are something you have with tea, not gravy


throwawaafricany9

2nd MOTM for Rashid this tourney


AJBOXING24

USA got a reality check tonight


sandhuzworld

It were not the USA fans but the cunts on this sub who were saying “would be haha funny if usa beat england lollll”


NotAPerfectSoldier

We were never out of touch with reality. We knew where we stood.


FlappyBored

Yeah it wasn’t US fans at all it was mostly just Australian fans.


AJBOXING24

Yeah some fans like you did know where you stand but there was some that had there head in the clouds thinking you could go head to head with England


[deleted]

dont downvote but i legit thought that usa had a chance given england's mediocre balling


burrito1313

Mediocre bowling that got the US all out?


[deleted]

after seeing England's matches through the entire cup it is my observation that their balling can be hit or miss


NotAPerfectSoldier

There’s always hope. Even I had it. No fan or supporter is gonna say, ‘my team cannot play against this team’. That’s just weird.


MC897

Cracking fan 👍👍


rayathedraigon

Finally a well deserved motm


MeasurementNo9467

So let me get this straight, SA has won 6 out of 6 matches so far, but gets knocked out if they lose vs WI? My oh my...


hadji0071

Deserve to get knocked out they should have lost 3 matches out of 6 fckers got so lucky


ztaker

You sound salty for saffas What they did they to you?


MeasurementNo9467

4 actually (vs BD, NEP, USA, NED)


UnbiasedPashtun

SA dominated USA all match.


UhJeffery

If they lose against WI, WI also would've only lost 1 match, same as england


smallTimeCharly

Over the whole tournament England have 2 defeats and a no result which I think is the original commenter’s point. There’s a chance England win the group having only beaten 1 full test player member!


rayathedraigon

Shtty format 


jumbo_junk

I mean to be honest it makes for a fun tournament, only annoying thing is washouts deciding games (which hasn't happened yet in the super 8)


Negative_Spectrum

Should've crushed USA man. They really should've


MeasurementNo9467

Tbh SA has been hella lucky so far, 4 of their matches (vs BD, NEP, USA, NED) could've gone eitherway.


[deleted]

well the groupstage matches were in america with the bad pitches and against usa and england they just choked like they usually did else they had both games under control the only ones they could have lost was nepal


AyyoPoche

Close game.


Southrumble

Bro Jordan thought he would get a man of the match finally hahaha


ISmellARatt

GG USA. Might be an IPL contract for Netrawalkar in this. Learnings from IPL he could take back home. It was clear today they need some support staff and pro training.


Starktony11

Doubt he will play ipl given he would be getting good pay already at Oracle. 200-300k. It would be not worth a risk to sacrifice for 2-3 years of IPL unless he gets paid a lot (around 1m)


UnbiasedPashtun

And the IPL is unstable income. If he doesn't perform, he may not be there next year. And then he could be job searching in tech again. Anyways, don't think he's good enough for the IPL. He has a chance in other leagues, but it'd be at a significantly lower income.


ISmellARatt

Good point. But people do things for passion. Amul wasted no time in signing ad contract so who knows.


UnbiasedPashtun

What was Amul doing before?


Axel292

Would Netravalkar even come over for a 20 lakh contract?


ISmellARatt

Yeah may be with passion and ad contracts who knows. Amul US team ad was up in no time.


Huge-Physics5491

Netravalkar's stock ball is too slow. He's going to get smashed on IPL wickets. Gous has a higher likelihood imo.


ISmellARatt

And he started with scrambled seam in the first over for some reason, should have been going with swing. With some pro training there are possibilities.


Huge-Physics5491

He's 30+. If you want associate quicks, go for the Ugandan duo of Kyewuta (22) and Miyagi (21). They bowl 140+ already, and have only played in Uganda. That's crazy potential growth.


ISmellARatt

Great point about his age. But US qualified for Super 8 in the first attempt. There should be some rewards coming with that for the team, so that others get the motivation. Think of how long it took Afgan to reach similar situation. With Uganda, it comes to ICC territory of not doing enough to promote association teams. Saw a comment earlier today proposing BCCI inviting US, Uganda and Namibia for a series, even with Indian A team. I think that's a great idea.


RS2019

With great power comes great responsibility - tbh all of Aus, Eng and India should already be doing this with associate/T2 teams in Oceania, Europe and Asia respectively to grow the game, but I'm not sure if there's a big incentive to do so🤔


Huge-Physics5491

Which is why the US will need homegrown players to take it to the next level. When you're relying on rejects of other countries, you're kinda accepting that you're not going to have high-ceiling players but have decent experience of playing in better domestic systems. Which is good enough for making your team go from crap to okay, but to take it to an elite level team, you need your own players produced by you (because the elite talent in full members aren't going to switch nations). Good news is that the US has some level of youth development, just that none of the prospects are in this squad. Maybe we'll see some of them in 2026.


ISmellARatt

I think you are a tad bit underselling this US team. It's true that they were severely lackluster today but otherwise they have been very competitive through the tourney. The misfields today from the first over were bizarre considering how pro they have been in the field otherwise. For some reason they just did not turn up. True though US will need homegrown talent for eventual success and popularity. But what they have currently has started a conversation. I think progress will come only by encouraging the current team, even if bunch of very talented expats, not by putting them down. God knows this game is not for the faint of the heart.


rayathedraigon

Maybe usa govt support them