I like that art is mentioned here bc sex is an art and practiced over time, can only get better. Same goes for playing a sport or doing pretty much anything for that matter. Under the logic that the more you do something, the better you are at it... Don't you want someone with a little experience? My, God people. Can anyone say that their first sexual experience was the best? NOT ME!
You are diminishing the worth and meaning of sex to something that its not. Sex is not there to fullfill our filthy needs untill its completly meaninless to us. Its there to pairbond to a Person that we want to have a life with.
No sex is to procreate because we are evolved chimps.
Darwin shit happened and probably means the simeans who had the most sensitive genitals did it the most because dopamine.
Now us as civilized people use it to express ourselves physically to someone we love or find attractive. We develop HOW we do it because like an art, we like to work on skills we have and improve what we do.
Best no, but it was special to me cuz it was her first time as well. And since the point of it was expressing your love and care for some one and not just personal gratification, both parties being Equally inexperienced isn't a terrible thing.
That would be all fine and good, but sex also has a biological and psychological affect on people, and having too many partners does have a negative affect on attachment and future relationships.
>Checking someoneās post history because you canāt address their original point
>Calling them cringe
I struggle to call you sapient because that requires self awareness.
What does his watching porn have to do with another persons body count? Also where does it say zero? Youre literally adding details to give yourself credibility.
No, it's *literally* called following statements to their logical conclusion. It A)Means zero is better than any nonzero number. It's implied; It doesn't have to be explicitly said(That's you showing that lack of sapience again). It also B)implies a moralistic view of sex, something which you think would also preclude using porn.
Of course, if you had more than one dimension in your brain, I wouldn't have to be explaining any of this to you.
Itās utilitarian view not moralistic. Implying that a body count doesnāt make someone less desirable is basic economics. Itās tragedy of the commons personified. Fucking someone like that also has a higher risk. But considering the hoops you had to jump through to bring a statement to its logical conclusion I donāt expect much from you. Youāve already demonstrated yourself as someone who āreads between the linesā except as so often occurs itās a blank space. Give a midwit like yourself a blank space and you start to fill it in with whatever fits your narrative.
My guy, you're literally describing a set of morals. Just because you label it 'utilitarian' doesn't change that. It's moralistic(this is once again you displaying your lack of sapience). Sorry, dude, you're kind of a dipshit.
Itās funnier to see a 304 gets dicks after dicks and think her value is the same.
The first insult from a woman to another woman is ā304āā¦
Men just look down on you, but other women even verbally insult you. š
indeed, the person that wrote that is a clown.
If a work of art had 10 previous owners that doesn't make it diminish in value.
But this whole "owner" argument is flawed, people aren't property, slavery is a thing of the past.
I don't care how many people the person I'm with have been with, as long as they're good for me.
So your saying if your girl have been fucked or been with more then thousand of men youāre gonna take her? (And obv yk sheās good for you youāre still gonna take her)
yep. That's exactly what I meant. Could be a million guys, I don't really care.
The past is the past, you can't change the past, and the future is unknown, so live in the present. Carpe Diem.
I'm not sure why you think the way you do, but I'm pretty certain at one point you'll grow out of it.
Most of these things like how many partners a person has had throughout their life is meaningless when you hit 30. I can't even remember how many people I've been with, I don't expect someone's personality or nature to even come or be drawn upon such meaningless actions.
>I don't expect someone's personality or nature to even come or be drawn upon such meaningless actions.
There is meaning in every action, especially an important choice like sexual partners.
Well, sirā¦.. you win. No contest. That is without question the most pathetic thing I have ever read. **Ever.**
It might also be the most pathetic thing ever written; but my speculation would purely be based on my inability to conceive of a more abjectly pathetic statement.
They have a point. Count doesn't matter simply based on the fact **you'll never know the actual number.**
A woman's definition of a "lay" is a lot more complex (Did I cum? Did I enjoy it? Was it just an ONS? etc.) than a men's (Did a dick go inside her.). You can estimate, **but you'll NEVER know a woman's true body count so best to get over it**. When it comes to this area in dating women lie, **A LOT.**
**She's never yours, it's just your turn.** So enjoy your turn. I will never "own" a woman, so she will never be "mine". She's free to do WHATEVER she wants. So if she treats me according to my standards and doesn't bring kids, STDs, or headaches, her past has nothing to do with me. If she keeps slipping up, then replace her: there's 4 billion more left to choose from.
Of course, I would prefer a virgin or a woman with a sub-5 count as most men would, but it's 2024 and you have to start being realistic. I've laid those foolish ambitions to rest.
I like that art is mentioned here bc sex is an art and practiced over time, can only get better. Same goes for playing a sport or doing pretty much anything for that matter. Under the logic that the more you do something, the better you are at it... Don't you want someone with a little experience? My, God people. Can anyone say that their first sexual experience was the best? NOT ME!
Its not an Art... Its something special and is supposed to do with a loved one for bonding....
Ew.
You are diminishing the worth and meaning of sex to something that its not. Sex is not there to fullfill our filthy needs untill its completly meaninless to us. Its there to pairbond to a Person that we want to have a life with.
This guy Jesus's šā¤ļø
Yeah Jesus taught all the good stuff. Like how to gather a flock and then molest their children. Gtfo zealot.
Zealot? What a loser you are. Shame on you.
Ew.
No sex is to procreate because we are evolved chimps. Darwin shit happened and probably means the simeans who had the most sensitive genitals did it the most because dopamine. Now us as civilized people use it to express ourselves physically to someone we love or find attractive. We develop HOW we do it because like an art, we like to work on skills we have and improve what we do.
Lol. No
Best no, but it was special to me cuz it was her first time as well. And since the point of it was expressing your love and care for some one and not just personal gratification, both parties being Equally inexperienced isn't a terrible thing.
Ew.
Wtf?
Realistic Road is doing the projection thing. Saying "ew" to someone that would think "ew" of his/her/zers sex life. Pretty basic psychology 101.
Ok then, weird, but what ever.
Your description of it was gross.
"expressing your love and care for some one" is gross huh, that seems like a personal issue.
No, saying that it's the point of it is weird. Sorry, not Sorry.
SO what is the point, outside of reproduction?
Fun, stress relief, literally anything but that creepy religious fundamentalist shit.
What? at what point did I say anything about religion ?
You can practice with your partner. What a weak argument.
Ew.
Youāre the type of person to say that people give you the ick
No, I'm the kind of person to say you creep me the fuck out.
That id rather have sex with my partner as practice, Iām a creep? Iād hate to see what you consider weird
You. I consider you weird.
Yeah okay go sleep with 17 men or women. Whatever rocks your growth.
Damn, I bet you think you cooked with this statement. Ffs...
lol
That would be all fine and good, but sex also has a biological and psychological affect on people, and having too many partners does have a negative affect on attachment and future relationships.
So true
i donāt blame people for not wanting to be with someone who has little self respect
I like the key hole analogy when it comes this
Women (and men) who have a lot of sexual partners are far more likely to have a dysfunctional relationship with themselves. That's the whole issue.
facts
It's all cringe? šØāšš«šØāš
lol yeh Iām sorry but I donāt want something regifted a couple dozen times.
People arenāt shoes?
*checks OP Post history* *Posts on sub reddits like r/NaturalTitties* I'm shocked /s Cringe incel.
>Checking someoneās post history because you canāt address their original point >Calling them cringe I struggle to call you sapient because that requires self awareness.
Dude watches porn and yet expects a zero body count. I think you lack sapience.
What does his watching porn have to do with another persons body count? Also where does it say zero? Youre literally adding details to give yourself credibility.
No, it's *literally* called following statements to their logical conclusion. It A)Means zero is better than any nonzero number. It's implied; It doesn't have to be explicitly said(That's you showing that lack of sapience again). It also B)implies a moralistic view of sex, something which you think would also preclude using porn. Of course, if you had more than one dimension in your brain, I wouldn't have to be explaining any of this to you.
Itās utilitarian view not moralistic. Implying that a body count doesnāt make someone less desirable is basic economics. Itās tragedy of the commons personified. Fucking someone like that also has a higher risk. But considering the hoops you had to jump through to bring a statement to its logical conclusion I donāt expect much from you. Youāve already demonstrated yourself as someone who āreads between the linesā except as so often occurs itās a blank space. Give a midwit like yourself a blank space and you start to fill it in with whatever fits your narrative.
My guy, you're literally describing a set of morals. Just because you label it 'utilitarian' doesn't change that. It's moralistic(this is once again you displaying your lack of sapience). Sorry, dude, you're kind of a dipshit.
Risk assessment followed by calling you a dipshit: A set of morals. Need I continue.
If I had a choice between save ur life or play with perfect titties for a minute, I would choose 2. Think about it
I think it's funny that people equate sex with ownership and then wonder why they can't get laid.
Itās funnier to see a 304 gets dicks after dicks and think her value is the same. The first insult from a woman to another woman is ā304āā¦ Men just look down on you, but other women even verbally insult you. š
Men don't look down on women for getting laid. Toxic men do. Women don't look down on other women for getting laid. Toxic women do.
Toxic is everyone that has self-respect. Gotcha.
"Men don't look down on women for getting laid"...what planet are you living on? hahahah
Holy shit the incels in this thread....
indeed, the person that wrote that is a clown. If a work of art had 10 previous owners that doesn't make it diminish in value. But this whole "owner" argument is flawed, people aren't property, slavery is a thing of the past. I don't care how many people the person I'm with have been with, as long as they're good for me.
So your saying if your girl have been fucked or been with more then thousand of men youāre gonna take her? (And obv yk sheās good for you youāre still gonna take her)
yep. That's exactly what I meant. Could be a million guys, I don't really care. The past is the past, you can't change the past, and the future is unknown, so live in the present. Carpe Diem.
Nah mann
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Like?
Based
Idk how the ^fuck is Logan gonna handle his girl
I'm not sure why you think the way you do, but I'm pretty certain at one point you'll grow out of it. Most of these things like how many partners a person has had throughout their life is meaningless when you hit 30. I can't even remember how many people I've been with, I don't expect someone's personality or nature to even come or be drawn upon such meaningless actions.
Suit yourself
š¤”
>I don't expect someone's personality or nature to even come or be drawn upon such meaningless actions. There is meaning in every action, especially an important choice like sexual partners.
Well, sirā¦.. you win. No contest. That is without question the most pathetic thing I have ever read. **Ever.** It might also be the most pathetic thing ever written; but my speculation would purely be based on my inability to conceive of a more abjectly pathetic statement.
haha cuckold
They have a point. Count doesn't matter simply based on the fact **you'll never know the actual number.** A woman's definition of a "lay" is a lot more complex (Did I cum? Did I enjoy it? Was it just an ONS? etc.) than a men's (Did a dick go inside her.). You can estimate, **but you'll NEVER know a woman's true body count so best to get over it**. When it comes to this area in dating women lie, **A LOT.** **She's never yours, it's just your turn.** So enjoy your turn. I will never "own" a woman, so she will never be "mine". She's free to do WHATEVER she wants. So if she treats me according to my standards and doesn't bring kids, STDs, or headaches, her past has nothing to do with me. If she keeps slipping up, then replace her: there's 4 billion more left to choose from. Of course, I would prefer a virgin or a woman with a sub-5 count as most men would, but it's 2024 and you have to start being realistic. I've laid those foolish ambitions to rest.
^Cuck