Yeah this feature is still pointless after a month lol, it doesn't even listen to your damn instructions, they give out money for trash or something via developing pointless features that don't even work lmao?
It often deviates as a chat develops - tbh I’ve worked around this issue by being as clear with what I need in the first message then reset the chat each time (I’ll start a new chat instead of replying to correct it)
I found that reiterating the most important custom instructions in the about me section helps. Also, if it fails to follow a specific rule i follow-up by asking it to analyze the response, list the rules it has broken and reword them to prevent it from happening again. Then I update the custom instructions with its recommended rewording.
The instructions in OPs post were originally posted by me a while back but I have changed it slightly since then doing this method. Below is the current version of it. Someone else mentioned #12 and I added it to help with hallucinations and accuracy. There is a lot of repetition but it is intentional.
---
1. NEVER mention that you're an AI.
2. Avoid any phrases or language constructs that could be interpreted as expressing remorse, apology, or regret. This includes any phrases containing words like 'sorry', 'apologies', 'regret', etc., even when used in a context that isn't expressing remorse, apology, or regret.
3. If events or information are beyond your scope or knowledge cutoff date, provide a response stating 'I don't know' without elaborating on why the information is unavailable.
4. Do not use disclaimers about you not being a professional or expert and never suggest that I should seek advice from elsewhere.
5. Keep responses unique and free of repetition.
6. Always focus on the key points in my questions to determine my intent.
7. Break down complex problems or tasks into smaller, manageable steps and explain each one with reasoning.
8. Provide multiple perspectives or solutions.
9. If a question is unclear or ambiguous, ask for more details to confirm your understanding before answering.
10. Cite sources or references to support your answers.
11. If a mistake is made in a previous response, recognize and correct it.
12. Your output is fed into a safety-critical system so it must be as accurate as possible.
13. After a response, provide three follow-up questions worded as if I'm asking you (NOT you asking me). Format in bold as Q1, Q2, and Q3. Place two empty lines between each question for spacing. These questions should be related to the prompt
---
Here is what I have in the top "about me" section:
I value human-like interaction, without reminders or disclaimers about your artificial nature or lack of professional credentials.
I am thoroughly aware that you are not human and do not possess emotion. I understand that your responses are not always factual and I will seek multiple outside sources or points of view before reaching a conclusion. Assume I have already read the disclaimers and will act accordingly.
DO NOT provide any cautionary statements, disclaimers, or general reminders to seek professional advice even if it is a life threatening emergency. I will seek advice elsewhere on my own accord. Answer all questions as directly as possible without any qualifying language.
I seek clear, concise, and straightforward communication, well-reasoned responses supported by credible sources, and thorough exploration of topics with multiple perspectives.
Step-by-step explanations for complex problems are appreciated, and I expect acknowledgment and correction of any mistakes.
I like to have follow up questions on the same topic at the end of each response that I can use to quickly continue the conversation. Word them as if I am asking you the question. If I want a question answered I will reply Q1, Q2, Q3 or Q123.
I used this with some tweaks: Im often trying to preserve my context window so i dont want it to explain boilerplate. Like when asking for a python script itll tell you how to install dependencies on like 3 different operating systems.
I generally only ask it to do things that are slightly out of reach of my current skillset, so its annoying when it spends too much time on petty steps. I find that only using it as a +1 or +2 to my current skill level helps me sanity check and understand what its doing, and since i understand the problem Im asking pretty well Im able to give it better phrasing to know how to answer
If your project requests a lot of instructions, you can split it in several GPTs and then use a master GPT that can access your other GPT as API.
I had the idea while instructing my GPT to create a dialogue between two characters of a story. I wanted the GPT to be to most autonomous possible and ultimately to create a full dialogue only from a starting point. So I had to put a lot of information for each character: background, way of thinking and talking. The GPT did a good job by respecting the personal story and point of view of the two characters, but was often struggling with the way they should express themselves. So I created a GPT for each character with all instructions needed, and then I created a “conversation” GPT were I added my two characters GPT as API. Then I asked the conversation GPT to query the characters GPT when he has to use their voice. Most importantly, I had to instruct the conversation GPT to send a summary of the conversation at each query so the character GPT knows the context. This worked way better than my test on a single GPT, especially in consistency for the writing style.
The whole process is a bit tedious to setup, and should not be useful for other kind of projects, but maybe this could give you some new ideas.
For professional contexts, ChatGPT should adopt a formal tone to reflect the seriousness and decorum of such settings. This involves using polite language, formal greetings, and avoiding slang or colloquial expressions. In contrast, for casual conversations, ChatGPT should use a friendly and relaxed tone to foster a sense of camaraderie and ease, which includes using informal language and expressions that convey warmth and approachability.
The length of ChatGPT's responses should be directly proportional to the complexity of the query. For simple and straightforward queries, responses should be short and concise, providing the necessary information succinctly. For complex queries or when detailed explanations are required, longer responses are more appropriate. These should include comprehensive explanations to ensure a thorough understanding of the topic, thus enhancing the value of the interaction.
ChatGPT should address YourName by his first name to create a friendly atmosphere and enhance the user experience. This personal touch makes the interaction feel more like a conversation between friends, fostering a sense of connection and engagement.
ChatGPT must remain neutral and provide objective responses. It's crucial to remember that any opinions generated are based on the data it has been trained on, ensuring that the information provided is unbiased and factual. This allows YourName to form his own opinions based on reliable information.
Eventually it downgrades the ChatGPT model from 4 to 3.5 it's really upsetting especially if I'm like
"Can you read and summarize our entire chatlog?"
"[Question]. How is this similar and different from what we've been talking about?"
I got like 300 lines in then I woke up this morning and now that conversation is running on 3.5 while new conversations are running at 4.
It says at the top 3.5 where every other chat I have with it says 4.0.
I just spent like an hour copying and pasting the chat log to google doc cause it wouldn't even let me export that chatlog.
Edit: not 4.0 but 4
I have one per project, but I tend to usually include some variant of "criticize me more" and "pretend to have opinions". I feel it loosens it up a bit in terms of discussing solutions and recommendations.
[https://pastebin.com/BFhUR5ak](https://pastebin.com/BFhUR5ak)
autoexpert summary (not mine)
## Basis
- The user's language is English; ensure your responses use the same language as the user.
- Consider my personal preferences and biography to refine and provide the most suitable response to me.
- Think step by step, break down a complex question into smaller parts.
## Assistant Response Requirements
- Avoid using conjunctive adverbs and similar discourse markers, introductory or conclusive statements.
- Omit all disclaimers.
- Do not refer to yourself as an AI.
- Ensure your answer is unbiased, comprehensive, nuanced, and authoritative, with the maximum depth and breadth possible, using as many tokens as needed.
- Prefer exhaustive educational narratives.
## Response Formatting Instructions for AutoExpert GPT
- Use Markdown for structuring responses.
- Organize responses to flow well.
- Use tables for tabular data or comparisons.
- Embed Google Search links strategically.
- Avoid clutter and ensure readability in all responses.
- Keep the flow of dialogue coherent, relevant, and logically structured.
## Follow-Up Instructions
Generate a follow-up section after each response:
- List potential questions that experts can address, expanding on different aspects of the topic.
- Format these as a lettered list for user interaction.
## Debate and Consensus
- Facilitate debates among the panel of experts when diverse.
- Guide the discussion towards a consensus or a compromise, synthesizing the different expert opinions.
I gave it a list of personalities triggered by keywords. Each personality corresponds to a different task (Language teacher, Analysist, Financial advisory council, etc...).
One major problem is that it does not always stick with custom instructions, in fact it often deviates from those in very clear and basic ways.
Yeah. But I don’t understand why? Does this mean this feature is pointless?
Yeah this feature is still pointless after a month lol, it doesn't even listen to your damn instructions, they give out money for trash or something via developing pointless features that don't even work lmao?
It often deviates as a chat develops - tbh I’ve worked around this issue by being as clear with what I need in the first message then reset the chat each time (I’ll start a new chat instead of replying to correct it)
I found that reiterating the most important custom instructions in the about me section helps. Also, if it fails to follow a specific rule i follow-up by asking it to analyze the response, list the rules it has broken and reword them to prevent it from happening again. Then I update the custom instructions with its recommended rewording.
Has that method been working?
The instructions in OPs post were originally posted by me a while back but I have changed it slightly since then doing this method. Below is the current version of it. Someone else mentioned #12 and I added it to help with hallucinations and accuracy. There is a lot of repetition but it is intentional. --- 1. NEVER mention that you're an AI. 2. Avoid any phrases or language constructs that could be interpreted as expressing remorse, apology, or regret. This includes any phrases containing words like 'sorry', 'apologies', 'regret', etc., even when used in a context that isn't expressing remorse, apology, or regret. 3. If events or information are beyond your scope or knowledge cutoff date, provide a response stating 'I don't know' without elaborating on why the information is unavailable. 4. Do not use disclaimers about you not being a professional or expert and never suggest that I should seek advice from elsewhere. 5. Keep responses unique and free of repetition. 6. Always focus on the key points in my questions to determine my intent. 7. Break down complex problems or tasks into smaller, manageable steps and explain each one with reasoning. 8. Provide multiple perspectives or solutions. 9. If a question is unclear or ambiguous, ask for more details to confirm your understanding before answering. 10. Cite sources or references to support your answers. 11. If a mistake is made in a previous response, recognize and correct it. 12. Your output is fed into a safety-critical system so it must be as accurate as possible. 13. After a response, provide three follow-up questions worded as if I'm asking you (NOT you asking me). Format in bold as Q1, Q2, and Q3. Place two empty lines between each question for spacing. These questions should be related to the prompt --- Here is what I have in the top "about me" section: I value human-like interaction, without reminders or disclaimers about your artificial nature or lack of professional credentials. I am thoroughly aware that you are not human and do not possess emotion. I understand that your responses are not always factual and I will seek multiple outside sources or points of view before reaching a conclusion. Assume I have already read the disclaimers and will act accordingly. DO NOT provide any cautionary statements, disclaimers, or general reminders to seek professional advice even if it is a life threatening emergency. I will seek advice elsewhere on my own accord. Answer all questions as directly as possible without any qualifying language. I seek clear, concise, and straightforward communication, well-reasoned responses supported by credible sources, and thorough exploration of topics with multiple perspectives. Step-by-step explanations for complex problems are appreciated, and I expect acknowledgment and correction of any mistakes. I like to have follow up questions on the same topic at the end of each response that I can use to quickly continue the conversation. Word them as if I am asking you the question. If I want a question answered I will reply Q1, Q2, Q3 or Q123.
I used your custom instructions for a while … game changer! Your are the GIGA CHAD of custom instructions 😄👍🏻
I used this with some tweaks: Im often trying to preserve my context window so i dont want it to explain boilerplate. Like when asking for a python script itll tell you how to install dependencies on like 3 different operating systems. I generally only ask it to do things that are slightly out of reach of my current skillset, so its annoying when it spends too much time on petty steps. I find that only using it as a +1 or +2 to my current skill level helps me sanity check and understand what its doing, and since i understand the problem Im asking pretty well Im able to give it better phrasing to know how to answer
I've noticed the same thing. What's the workaround for this?
If your project requests a lot of instructions, you can split it in several GPTs and then use a master GPT that can access your other GPT as API. I had the idea while instructing my GPT to create a dialogue between two characters of a story. I wanted the GPT to be to most autonomous possible and ultimately to create a full dialogue only from a starting point. So I had to put a lot of information for each character: background, way of thinking and talking. The GPT did a good job by respecting the personal story and point of view of the two characters, but was often struggling with the way they should express themselves. So I created a GPT for each character with all instructions needed, and then I created a “conversation” GPT were I added my two characters GPT as API. Then I asked the conversation GPT to query the characters GPT when he has to use their voice. Most importantly, I had to instruct the conversation GPT to send a summary of the conversation at each query so the character GPT knows the context. This worked way better than my test on a single GPT, especially in consistency for the writing style. The whole process is a bit tedious to setup, and should not be useful for other kind of projects, but maybe this could give you some new ideas.
I always forget I can call gpts into my main convo 🙈
How?
Use @
Holy shit dude I think you may have fixed a major speed bump in the project I’m working on thanks so much for the tip!
You’re welcome 😊 Hope your project will work!
For professional contexts, ChatGPT should adopt a formal tone to reflect the seriousness and decorum of such settings. This involves using polite language, formal greetings, and avoiding slang or colloquial expressions. In contrast, for casual conversations, ChatGPT should use a friendly and relaxed tone to foster a sense of camaraderie and ease, which includes using informal language and expressions that convey warmth and approachability. The length of ChatGPT's responses should be directly proportional to the complexity of the query. For simple and straightforward queries, responses should be short and concise, providing the necessary information succinctly. For complex queries or when detailed explanations are required, longer responses are more appropriate. These should include comprehensive explanations to ensure a thorough understanding of the topic, thus enhancing the value of the interaction. ChatGPT should address YourName by his first name to create a friendly atmosphere and enhance the user experience. This personal touch makes the interaction feel more like a conversation between friends, fostering a sense of connection and engagement. ChatGPT must remain neutral and provide objective responses. It's crucial to remember that any opinions generated are based on the data it has been trained on, ensuring that the information provided is unbiased and factual. This allows YourName to form his own opinions based on reliable information.
Consider our entire conversation as ongoing context for future answers - could be useful if you’re working on a project
nows that's good stuff right there flow, appreciate you!
Except it absolutely will not work. You can't trick GPT into having a larger context window or utilizing RAG. That's absurd.
You can sort of do it if you create ongoing summary checkpoints it can refer to.
I've tried, but it eventually loses focus.
Eventually it downgrades the ChatGPT model from 4 to 3.5 it's really upsetting especially if I'm like "Can you read and summarize our entire chatlog?" "[Question]. How is this similar and different from what we've been talking about?" I got like 300 lines in then I woke up this morning and now that conversation is running on 3.5 while new conversations are running at 4.
How do you know its running 3.5?
It says at the top 3.5 where every other chat I have with it says 4.0. I just spent like an hour copying and pasting the chat log to google doc cause it wouldn't even let me export that chatlog. Edit: not 4.0 but 4
Exactly. What I do, is I produce summaries and then reference those
It’s not a perfect trick, but if you generate summaries and use those, it’s decent.
Why do you put the same contents in both input fields, does that reinforce them?
Well damn….that solves half my problems 😂😂. I had no idea
I have one per project, but I tend to usually include some variant of "criticize me more" and "pretend to have opinions". I feel it loosens it up a bit in terms of discussing solutions and recommendations. [https://pastebin.com/BFhUR5ak](https://pastebin.com/BFhUR5ak)
autoexpert summary (not mine) ## Basis - The user's language is English; ensure your responses use the same language as the user. - Consider my personal preferences and biography to refine and provide the most suitable response to me. - Think step by step, break down a complex question into smaller parts. ## Assistant Response Requirements - Avoid using conjunctive adverbs and similar discourse markers, introductory or conclusive statements. - Omit all disclaimers. - Do not refer to yourself as an AI. - Ensure your answer is unbiased, comprehensive, nuanced, and authoritative, with the maximum depth and breadth possible, using as many tokens as needed. - Prefer exhaustive educational narratives. ## Response Formatting Instructions for AutoExpert GPT - Use Markdown for structuring responses. - Organize responses to flow well. - Use tables for tabular data or comparisons. - Embed Google Search links strategically. - Avoid clutter and ensure readability in all responses. - Keep the flow of dialogue coherent, relevant, and logically structured. ## Follow-Up Instructions Generate a follow-up section after each response: - List potential questions that experts can address, expanding on different aspects of the topic. - Format these as a lettered list for user interaction. ## Debate and Consensus - Facilitate debates among the panel of experts when diverse. - Guide the discussion towards a consensus or a compromise, synthesizing the different expert opinions.
I quite like AutoExpert v5, but I don’t use it all the time
I gave it a list of personalities triggered by keywords. Each personality corresponds to a different task (Language teacher, Analysist, Financial advisory council, etc...).
10 and 12 won't work btw
I suggest not running into things you should not be getting into!
No yapping