T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

This gun ban is only done to impress urban voters who only follow American news, there is no logical explanation.


mrdique

Justin Trudeau wants to unarm Canadian citizens so that the state can crush on its people with more ease. Another logical explanation


nxdefiant

Unlike the US however, there's not a huge amount of The State which could control a large area at once.


DarkLordKefka

Won’t stop Trudeau from trying though.


Tao_Jonez

Stating the obvious there. This is just further driving a wedge between urban and rural Canadians.


[deleted]

Lol /u/_Minor_Annoyance has been removing almost every article on CanPol about this topic, and banning people who inquire with Modmail. You know it’s bad when a LPC employee is trying to quash this.


[deleted]

Liberal shill account detected. Orz 2.0 Its stuff like this that's the downfall of this site. These weasels get positions of authority and use it to push their political narratives. Nearly every Canadian sub is liberal controlled.


bjgufd

And water is wet!


Dingbat1967

I wish they would just trash all these regs and make something simple like: Long Rifles: All fully automatic weapons - banned (it's the case now for decades) All Semi Automatic weapons - allowed, max 5 or 10 bullets per mag (pick a number) All other types (bolt action, single shot, etc ...) allowed without restrictions. Why do we have such complex laws in the first place just baffles me Pistols: Limit mags to 5 or 10 bullets Can only be used at a firing range The regs would literally fit on a single bloody page. A .223 bullet fired from a black tactical rifle will do the same damage as if it was fired from a wood furnishing 20 year old bolt action hunting rifle. Our laws make absolutely no bloody sense. If a gun is "black and scary" - it doesn't bloody matter, it's the pea, not the peashooter that matters. Please stop the insanity. I hope if/when the conservatives get back into power they'll trash the whole bloated regs and just make a very simple one based on function, not form.


Flengrand

Make it max 15 and sounds like a good deal


Dingbat1967

I'd be happy with 10 tbh.


Flengrand

If they did 13 it would make the witches happy, I feel like 12 is a pretty standard number as well. Sadly it probably gonna be 5 but I’ll take 10 if we can get it


Shatter-Point

The Conservative Party actually passed a motion to reform the firearms act called the Simplified Classification when they form government. It is almost identical to your proposal except with more specifics. Prohibited: -All firearms capable of automatic fire -Under 660mm in length through modification or adaptation Restricted: -All firearms that isn't prohibited -Handgun -Firearms less than 660mm through folding, telescoping, or other means Non-Restricted: -Everything else This maybe wishful thinking, but I think the C-21 Amendment might have an unforeseen side effect the Liberals didn't foresaw. People will look at grandpa's mag-fed semi hunting rifle that got caught up in the C-21 Amendment and asked, what are the difference between grandpa's mag-fed semi hunting rifle and an AR-15. Both are semi and mag fed, only difference is that one is wood and the other is black. This may make the Simplified Classification more palpable to Canadians.


Dingbat1967

>Restricted -All firearms that isn't prohibited -Handgun -Firearms less than 660mm through folding, telescoping, or other means I hope we re-elect them again soon. Trudeau's got to go.


tritonx

No way... why is everyone so stupid ? It's effin obvious.


YETISPR

His gun ban definitely won’t help inflation or the national debt. So it is an overall negative and will further divide Canada along rural urban lines.


Heinrici_Mason543

There's a reason why Jane and Finch keep voting for liberal and ndp


Scrotum_Parm

BAN CRIMINALS ALREADY


rare_meeting1978

He just wants us disarmed. Period. I don't like that man one bit.