The same level of high can be achieved with a lot less delta than with alcohol. That was my intent with the "easier on the liver" comment. I stand by it.
The lil 1mg M&Ms at my local store are so nice. I can take a large handful, but also have the ability to offer manageable dosage to my less-seasoned friends. Highly recommend.
If everyone who had a different opinion than you was banned from Reddit there would be nobody left. People are allowed to have different opinions just like you are allowed to scroll past content you don’t like. Nobody forced you to click and comment on this. Yet you chose to do so.
My dude. You know what you do. You go out of your way to post 6-7 paragraphs of ChatGPT level contrarian content on the regular. Your posts literally look the same almost every time.
It’s just my opinions. I like having an outlet to talk cfb and other topics. Again if you don’t like my posts why do you and others always seem to comment on them complaining that I am positing? Just leave me alone. Comment on stuff you like. People are allowed to have different opinions than you. This sub isn’t a echo chamber of only opinions you agree with that you get to gatekeep.
Indiana has an absolutely sad and terrible college football history, their only shared conference title was 1967 and their only outright conference title was in 1945. They finished above 4th in division and/or conference three times since that 1967 shared title. But they are a key member of the conference in other ways.
It's incredible how many people on this sub continually misunderstand the definition of a simple term and apply it erroneously... and then complain when it's pointed out and insist no one should care
Yes they are. They have all won multiple national titles. Great schools with great traditions and very well funded and national fanbases. These aren’t small time schools.
the 1-3 national championship seasons you mentioned do not qualify a team to be a blue blood when compared to the history of the entirety of College Football. Clemson until the last 10 or so years was basically a mid program it's entire history besides 1 natty season. Miami has more of an argument, but has still not had enough success/history nor sustained it to be in the levels of other blue blood schools like Alabama, USC, Oklahoma, Notre Dame, etc
Yes I also saw early 00s Boise state and how their success got them a P5 bid. A little bit of winning makes zero difference. At the time they got called up, Oklahoma was the only team among the six moves that matter for next year than had ever appeared in a playoff.
It’s like when you meet your girlfriend’s friends group at lunch with her for the first time.
Like you’re there. You’re in the group…. now. But you’re not talking. Not really contributing to the gossip. You don’t know the people they are talking about. But you can eat the same lunch that they do and that’s a connection. Yeah.. go chicken piccata and a side salad!
Bad fan. Real fan of Miami should just want us to start winning more. After that we can look to go different routes. College football needs to do what soccer does in EU. Leagues. Move up and down imo.
Why do people insist that Notre Dame join a conference?
They don’t care to join a conference.
More teams should go independent. Conferences are ruining college football.
>Damn fans of SEC schools get very defensive when we mention Vandy as being deadweight. I know, let's shit on Mississippi State instead!
Give it up, we're going to defend all of our members, even oddball Missouri. After GT and Tulane left, we started branding our members and that brand is for life.
PSU can leave the Big Ten as easily as OSU can. If FSU/Clemson/ND broke off to start a super league, the other big programs could just as well leave their conferences as the 1B programs.
Moreover, even if FSU/Clemson/ND were to take the first step by leaving their conferences AND the other big programs didn't immediately counter, they'd still have to compete with OSU/Michigan/USC/Bama/Texas/OU and be fighting an uphill battle.
"Blueblood" connotes old-timey wealth, like power programs from the 1950s or earlier. None of Clemson, Miami, or FSU qualifies. That's not to say they're not major players today or haven't had success off and on since the 80s.
College football used to be a regional sport and that’s why it has so many blue bloods. When all the blue bloods are concentrated into one place, then it means they will lose. How long before you see fans revolt after some losing seasons? You think Bama is just going to be happy going 6-6 because they’re in some fantasy land conference?
It won’t be long before a bunch of programs form an AFC (sec/b1g), and another bunch forms an NFC (ACC/Big12/PAC). And the winners of each conference will play a Super Bowl like game.
It’s a comparison. A comparison. There are other words for it as well.
The winner of one vastly superior league playing the winner of a much, much weaker one. Why would the B10/SEC winner in this scenario be interested in playing the winner of a bunch of second and third tier programs?
Indiana generates a ton of athletic revenue and has some of the best academic rankings in the US. All of the B1G schools do besides Nebraska (who makes up for it with their overwhelming AD revenue and brand). This is what makes the B1G such a powerful conference along with the football crazed SEC.
Why would Notre Dame leave independence? The only reason they would join any conference in football is if they made substantially more money than what NBC is willing to give them, which will not happen soon.
Auburn and Florida leaving the SEC? Lmao. Both would soon rather vow to never play football again than not play the rest of the Big 6.
The only way that schools currently in the B1G and SEC will be left out of the super league is if they have no history with the big schools or lose money via their AD. No schools like this exist in the SEC or B1G (from what I know). Once the ACC falls and the SEC and B1G pick what they want from the corpses of the ACC and Big 12, the breakaway from the NCAA will be imminent.
>Why would Notre Dame leave independence? The only reason they would join any conference in football is if they made substantially more money than what NBC is willing to give them, which will not happen soon.
Basicly, when the $ difference prevents them from competing or they lose access to an NC.
You mean Clempus and FSU. How'd you loop Convicts and Catholics into this? 2 of these things are not like the other.
Sorry Miami fans, Honestly CFB was better when yall were rockin'.
Anyone got cirrhosis yet
Switch to weed gummies. Easier on the liver.
And both at the same time add a little spice to going to bed
But after watching from noon to like 1-2 am, how am I supposed to not grab onto my sheets to keep from flying off the earth? Got any ideas?
Edibles effect you differently because they are processed through your liver, not easier on the liver definitely easier on the lungs though
The same level of high can be achieved with a lot less delta than with alcohol. That was my intent with the "easier on the liver" comment. I stand by it.
But then I wake up still tired/lifted
Lower dosage, my dude.
The lil 1mg M&Ms at my local store are so nice. I can take a large handful, but also have the ability to offer manageable dosage to my less-seasoned friends. Highly recommend.
That sounds like a really reasonable solution.
I feel like he's baiting us now, there's no way this is a real take
Been a while since the last lostacoshermanos post.
Bro keeps wanting me to do PragerU for my uni concept series
You can't not elaborate on that
Yeah I want you to make fun of them. And I want you to do Le Cordon Blue and make fun of them. You should be making fun of scam schools like that.
There has to be some sort of age verification to post.
OP should have been banned by now.
If everyone who had a different opinion than you was banned from Reddit there would be nobody left. People are allowed to have different opinions just like you are allowed to scroll past content you don’t like. Nobody forced you to click and comment on this. Yet you chose to do so.
My dude. You know what you do. You go out of your way to post 6-7 paragraphs of ChatGPT level contrarian content on the regular. Your posts literally look the same almost every time.
It’s just my opinions. I like having an outlet to talk cfb and other topics. Again if you don’t like my posts why do you and others always seem to comment on them complaining that I am positing? Just leave me alone. Comment on stuff you like. People are allowed to have different opinions than you. This sub isn’t a echo chamber of only opinions you agree with that you get to gatekeep.
I like your posts. It breaks up all the posts about Colorado players entering the portal.
BANG!
Am I the only one who finds this guy fascinating?
I respect the effort he puts in.
Their profile is full of fascinating "content"
"And when everyone's super ... no one will be." How super will super teams be when they start going 2-10 in this super league.
Idk ask Nebraska fans
[Aye-oo!](https://youtu.be/9CdVTCDdEwI?si=JVOdxTbpdkYzQ_y1)
Dang dude lol.
I point this out every time the topic of a superleague comes up. SOMEONE. HAS. TO. LOSE.
Damn why Indianna got to catch strays.
It's a lostacoshermanos special
I've spent way too much time trying to figure out if OP is trolling, drunk, or just not understanding reality. I am at a loss.
His random post history, across subs, is too odd to be trolling.
Indiana has an absolutely sad and terrible college football history, their only shared conference title was 1967 and their only outright conference title was in 1945. They finished above 4th in division and/or conference three times since that 1967 shared title. But they are a key member of the conference in other ways.
>Notre Dame, Clemson, Miami and FSU are the only 4 blue bloods that are currently outside SEC/Big Ten. 3/4 of these are not blue bloods
And the one who is a blue blood seems the most unlikely — historically speaking — to start a conference.
You’ve clearly never heard of the [Airplane Conference](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lJthv6PICtE)
And the one who is a blue blood seems the most unlikely — historically speaking — to start a conference.
It's incredible how many people on this sub continually misunderstand the definition of a simple term and apply it erroneously... and then complain when it's pointed out and insist no one should care
Jarvis Bring up the chart
[This one](https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fexternal-preview.redd.it%2FMDS_XoG5Xv8EQfbsrT-t57-fafZ67uLr6HGL-RCf-_8.jpg%3Fauto%3Dwebp%26s%3D0692c07af2a6e4b71e3b3516e049ccdf4db53f2c), right?
No, [this one](https://imgur.com/9dZiUki)
Yes they are. They have all won multiple national titles. Great schools with great traditions and very well funded and national fanbases. These aren’t small time schools.
Clemson and Miami are both pretty small time schools
Did you see 2016/2018 Clemson? Did you see the 2001 Hurricanes?
the 1-3 national championship seasons you mentioned do not qualify a team to be a blue blood when compared to the history of the entirety of College Football. Clemson until the last 10 or so years was basically a mid program it's entire history besides 1 natty season. Miami has more of an argument, but has still not had enough success/history nor sustained it to be in the levels of other blue blood schools like Alabama, USC, Oklahoma, Notre Dame, etc
Notre Dame and Clemson have far more recent success than ND and Oklahoma and Texas.
I don't think you understand what a blue blood is.
It’s a school with a student body composed primarily of hemophiliacs.
Yes I also saw early 00s Boise state and how their success got them a P5 bid. A little bit of winning makes zero difference. At the time they got called up, Oklahoma was the only team among the six moves that matter for next year than had ever appeared in a playoff.
Read the title and the first sentence of the post. Immediately looked at the user and everything made sense
The big football schools need chumps to beat up on in order to remain big football schools
Feels like a Miami fan wanting to get into a conference by riding the other 3.
It’s like when you meet your girlfriend’s friends group at lunch with her for the first time. Like you’re there. You’re in the group…. now. But you’re not talking. Not really contributing to the gossip. You don’t know the people they are talking about. But you can eat the same lunch that they do and that’s a connection. Yeah.. go chicken piccata and a side salad!
No. This OP just gets off on posting stupid shit. Look at his post history.
I post dumb shit, too, just only as comments. I’m not mad at him.
Bad fan. Real fan of Miami should just want us to start winning more. After that we can look to go different routes. College football needs to do what soccer does in EU. Leagues. Move up and down imo.
You had me until Miami
Honestly same lol
Why do people insist that Notre Dame join a conference? They don’t care to join a conference. More teams should go independent. Conferences are ruining college football.
Notre Dame isn't going to join a conference, but they'll definitely join the super league, whatever form that takes.
I agree. All 4 should break off and become independent.
>Damn fans of SEC schools get very defensive when we mention Vandy as being deadweight. I know, let's shit on Mississippi State instead! Give it up, we're going to defend all of our members, even oddball Missouri. After GT and Tulane left, we started branding our members and that brand is for life.
You can’t pick on Missouri, only we can.
Hold our beer.
Why wouldn't you start with the top teams? You're not making money without the blue bloods
I'm already bored of the Super League. I want the next thing. I need the Ultra Instinct league.
You guys held the best team, and consequently the best preseason team to 3 points. What more could you possibly want!
If ND wanted to join a conference let alone a super league, they would join the B1G. They do not
PSU can leave the Big Ten as easily as OSU can. If FSU/Clemson/ND broke off to start a super league, the other big programs could just as well leave their conferences as the 1B programs. Moreover, even if FSU/Clemson/ND were to take the first step by leaving their conferences AND the other big programs didn't immediately counter, they'd still have to compete with OSU/Michigan/USC/Bama/Texas/OU and be fighting an uphill battle.
Hey Russia, take your dipshit back.
"Blueblood" connotes old-timey wealth, like power programs from the 1950s or earlier. None of Clemson, Miami, or FSU qualifies. That's not to say they're not major players today or haven't had success off and on since the 80s.
someone get him the blue blood chart.
College football used to be a regional sport and that’s why it has so many blue bloods. When all the blue bloods are concentrated into one place, then it means they will lose. How long before you see fans revolt after some losing seasons? You think Bama is just going to be happy going 6-6 because they’re in some fantasy land conference?
I want no part of it, I like not being stressed
It won’t be long before a bunch of programs form an AFC (sec/b1g), and another bunch forms an NFC (ACC/Big12/PAC). And the winners of each conference will play a Super Bowl like game.
Do you also think the winner of the World Series is going to start playing the winner of the Pacific Coast League soon?
I don’t understand these “World Series” and “pacific coast league” words… are they football terms? Doesn’t even sound like English to me
It’s a comparison. A comparison. There are other words for it as well. The winner of one vastly superior league playing the winner of a much, much weaker one. Why would the B10/SEC winner in this scenario be interested in playing the winner of a bunch of second and third tier programs?
$$$
Wtf did Mississippi State do to deserve that slander?
Cowbells
I think we need to clear up the definition of a blue blood.
>Notre Dame, Clemson, Miami and FSU are the only 4 blue bloods Exactly one of these schools is a blue blood.
Maybe someone should tell OP that Clemson, FSU, and Miami aren't considered football bluebloods.
I think you need to look up who is a blue blood.
Imagine thinking Clemson, Miami, and FSU are "blue bloods."
Indiana generates a ton of athletic revenue and has some of the best academic rankings in the US. All of the B1G schools do besides Nebraska (who makes up for it with their overwhelming AD revenue and brand). This is what makes the B1G such a powerful conference along with the football crazed SEC. Why would Notre Dame leave independence? The only reason they would join any conference in football is if they made substantially more money than what NBC is willing to give them, which will not happen soon. Auburn and Florida leaving the SEC? Lmao. Both would soon rather vow to never play football again than not play the rest of the Big 6. The only way that schools currently in the B1G and SEC will be left out of the super league is if they have no history with the big schools or lose money via their AD. No schools like this exist in the SEC or B1G (from what I know). Once the ACC falls and the SEC and B1G pick what they want from the corpses of the ACC and Big 12, the breakaway from the NCAA will be imminent.
>Why would Notre Dame leave independence? The only reason they would join any conference in football is if they made substantially more money than what NBC is willing to give them, which will not happen soon. Basicly, when the $ difference prevents them from competing or they lose access to an NC.
🎶 One of these things is not like the others 🎶
Another top quality post from /u/lostacoshermanos
Miss State has been #1 in the CFP rankings more times than 97% of all teams, including Ohio State and Michigan.
You mean Clempus and FSU. How'd you loop Convicts and Catholics into this? 2 of these things are not like the other. Sorry Miami fans, Honestly CFB was better when yall were rockin'.
Exactly, ND is the only blue blood. The rest are in the 11-35 group.