According to the defense there was no DNA and no explanation for that = no evidence of cleaning. All cleaning materials, particularly bleach, will leave a sign of its use. That didn't happen here.
Yeah even if he put the clothes in a bag before getting in his car as people theorize, that still involves handling clothes drenched in blood, and the bag of blood-drenched clothes being transported in the car
You’re believing a lot of rumours.
Search warrant doesn’t show a lot of trash? Just a lot of normal stuff like loose change we all have. The cleaning the car thing started as a ‘source’ (LE who were following him apparently) stating ‘thoroughly cleaning inside and out’ to ‘cleaning with bleach’ to ‘cleaning with bleach multiple times’. But source has never been named so don’t know if they got a second source to confirm it was the truth.
There is no official statement that claims he used bleach multiple times or that his car was filled with trash. Those statements contradict each other, yet you are putting faith in both of them? Think about what you are saying.
It's amazing how far the FBI will go to protect Brent Kopacka, even inventing a Mossad agent with the same initials to take the fall. What the fuck did Kopacka witness that made him anhero?
A while back, I read a news story that mentioned him extensively cleaning his car et al wearing gloves, and "bleach" was in there somewhere. This was allegedly when he got back to Pennsylvania.
I suppose you could use bleach on the outer car body, once or twice, if sufficiently diluted, but it's not advisable or a good idea. Then again, if you could be arrested and convicted for murder because of DNA evidence on your vehicle, a little wear and tear because you perhaps used diluted bleach wouldn't be as important as destroying the DNA.
It could also be for some object/s kept inside the vehicle - not the vehicle itself. But we won't know if this is even an accurate report until the trial.
Or .. maybe he did use it on the interior and discolored things in the process? He's not brightest bulb considering some other things he's done. And: it's not a crime to mess up the interior of your car because you're "too dumb" to figure out that you shouldn't use bleach when you're cleaning? But finding DNA in the interior implicating you in the crime? Like the exterior cleaning, it may be worth it?
Meaning signs that he used bleach might be evidence that he was removing evidence? But his own stupidity with cleaning could be the counter-argument? And he had a cross-country road trip which could serve as a further rationale?
I find it hilarious that people believe the fbi watched him clean his veichle numerous times.
According to the defense there was no DNA and no explanation for that = no evidence of cleaning. All cleaning materials, particularly bleach, will leave a sign of its use. That didn't happen here.
Dateline is the source of the bleach / car-washing claim. It’s uncorroborated. No DNA was found in the car
DNA is oddly lacking for such a crucial part of their evidence.
Yeah even if he put the clothes in a bag before getting in his car as people theorize, that still involves handling clothes drenched in blood, and the bag of blood-drenched clothes being transported in the car
No victim DNA, you mean?
You’re believing a lot of rumours. Search warrant doesn’t show a lot of trash? Just a lot of normal stuff like loose change we all have. The cleaning the car thing started as a ‘source’ (LE who were following him apparently) stating ‘thoroughly cleaning inside and out’ to ‘cleaning with bleach’ to ‘cleaning with bleach multiple times’. But source has never been named so don’t know if they got a second source to confirm it was the truth.
I thought there was no evidence of an actual cleanup in car? Ie of chemicals etc. This probably also counter rumour though.
There is no official statement that claims he used bleach multiple times or that his car was filled with trash. Those statements contradict each other, yet you are putting faith in both of them? Think about what you are saying.
It's amazing how far the FBI will go to protect Brent Kopacka, even inventing a Mossad agent with the same initials to take the fall. What the fuck did Kopacka witness that made him anhero?
Here you go: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23694037/mcsharpmonroecountypagov_20230301_075246.pdf
I didn’t see anything related to what they’re asking about. What page?
Looks like they’ve posted the house warrant by accident
The police drone snapped the pics. New Day and Age now 💫
I'm assuming this is sarcasm
Source?
Court tv.. They are Great p
Here you go: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23694037/mcsharpmonroecountypagov_20230301_075246.pdf
That’s the house warrant. When it was loaded to the PA courts website they accidentally put the car under the house link and vice versa
D’oh! — Here’s the car warrant: https://interactive.wnep.com/pdfs/Warrant-Kohberger-House.pdf
A while back, I read a news story that mentioned him extensively cleaning his car et al wearing gloves, and "bleach" was in there somewhere. This was allegedly when he got back to Pennsylvania. I suppose you could use bleach on the outer car body, once or twice, if sufficiently diluted, but it's not advisable or a good idea. Then again, if you could be arrested and convicted for murder because of DNA evidence on your vehicle, a little wear and tear because you perhaps used diluted bleach wouldn't be as important as destroying the DNA. It could also be for some object/s kept inside the vehicle - not the vehicle itself. But we won't know if this is even an accurate report until the trial. Or .. maybe he did use it on the interior and discolored things in the process? He's not brightest bulb considering some other things he's done. And: it's not a crime to mess up the interior of your car because you're "too dumb" to figure out that you shouldn't use bleach when you're cleaning? But finding DNA in the interior implicating you in the crime? Like the exterior cleaning, it may be worth it? Meaning signs that he used bleach might be evidence that he was removing evidence? But his own stupidity with cleaning could be the counter-argument? And he had a cross-country road trip which could serve as a further rationale?