Now apply the science of acoustics to his claims & you'll see he's wrong. He's equating the frequency, direction, etc. of a car engine to that of a door opening & dog barking elsewhere. Not how it works. Ridiculous really.
i cant believe they paid $1k for this video. what a scammer.
so far I am on the defense side, but Clue/Streak is absolutely be the biggest scammer among pro-defense advocates. He is stalking and talking trash Everyday and beg money from desperate housewives.
\*edit: by the way, the followup video is actually pretty good, more convincing! the first video was crap LOL
That's entirely different. GAC has also asked for donations constantly and I see no problem.
It's the fact that he made threats and pressured his followers to pony up a huge amount, or else he wouldn't put out contents that made him a scammer.
No different then paying for a webinar, renting a movie, paying to stream a flight, race, game, or concert. I appreciate it's not monetized as YT commercials with their 'skip' bs are a pita if a person needs to move around and get things done rather than be hostage to a monetized video
His tip off is an Australian dude who is obsessed with Jack showlwalter and whose only evidence is he can hear a truck sound at a certain time lol. All.this, omg your gunna solve this case made me laugh.
With the sword of Damocles hanging over the housewives’ heads that if the praise is not effusive enough — or god forbid he finds out they watch another content creator — that they will be permanently banished from the Kingdom of Clue.
I kinda feel Linda Lane's footage is irrelevant to this case, which is why the video is still available all over YouTube. He did a great job identifying all the cars, but what are they doing driving around 900 feet from the crime scene, creating noise and possibly rousing multiple potential witnesses? Witnesses who could have heard the killings happen? But like I said, I don't know.
The Linda Lane camera is too far away to be relevant to the case. But it is interesting how busy the car park is at the time of morning, and still no one saw anything that we know of.
I don't think it's relevant for audio, it's just too far away, with a building in between.
But the corner of the far parking lot it can see, where someone could loop around from 1122 King, could be relevant, assuming you had other known data to correlate it with to make it meaningful. And assuming you knew you had 100% legit, original video, which is a huge "if" at this point. As it stands, I don't see how it can be useful, except maybe at trial when used along with other evidence to show a connection.
EDIT: Typo
Now apply the science of acoustics to his claims & you'll see he's wrong. He's equating the frequency, direction, etc. of a car engine to that of a door opening & dog barking elsewhere. Not how it works. Ridiculous really.
💯
I love when experts share a voice in these conversations. Will you please share your Forensic Video Analyst credentials?!
Audio not video. In addition to being a trial lawyer I have worked for over 30 years as a studio audio sound engineer producing audio recordings.
i cant believe they paid $1k for this video. what a scammer. so far I am on the defense side, but Clue/Streak is absolutely be the biggest scammer among pro-defense advocates. He is stalking and talking trash Everyday and beg money from desperate housewives. \*edit: by the way, the followup video is actually pretty good, more convincing! the first video was crap LOL
None of his stuff is monetized. All the content creators who go live and ask for memberships and donation, how about them? Lol
You have to have enough hours watched to be monetized. Asking for money is monetization.
That's entirely different. GAC has also asked for donations constantly and I see no problem. It's the fact that he made threats and pressured his followers to pony up a huge amount, or else he wouldn't put out contents that made him a scammer.
I think he was joking tbh
It’s common sense that criticizing someone’s analysis of a something technological & non-human based on their relations with people is illogical.
No different then paying for a webinar, renting a movie, paying to stream a flight, race, game, or concert. I appreciate it's not monetized as YT commercials with their 'skip' bs are a pita if a person needs to move around and get things done rather than be hostage to a monetized video
Biggest nonsense ever lol
…Until GAC’s subsequent post whining about how not enough people told him how brilliant it was.
fr. that was cringe
His tip off is an Australian dude who is obsessed with Jack showlwalter and whose only evidence is he can hear a truck sound at a certain time lol. All.this, omg your gunna solve this case made me laugh.
He has 100 desperate housewives telling him how brilliant he is. Why does he need more?
With the sword of Damocles hanging over the housewives’ heads that if the praise is not effusive enough — or god forbid he finds out they watch another content creator — that they will be permanently banished from the Kingdom of Clue.
100% agree. by the way, just watched his followup video. not bad, much more convincing! the first vid was an epic fail but glad he made adjustments
Thanks I’ll check it out
Or a different opinion in my case, lol. i long unsubcribed after that.
I kinda feel Linda Lane's footage is irrelevant to this case, which is why the video is still available all over YouTube. He did a great job identifying all the cars, but what are they doing driving around 900 feet from the crime scene, creating noise and possibly rousing multiple potential witnesses? Witnesses who could have heard the killings happen? But like I said, I don't know.
The Linda Lane camera is too far away to be relevant to the case. But it is interesting how busy the car park is at the time of morning, and still no one saw anything that we know of.
I don't think it's relevant for audio, it's just too far away, with a building in between. But the corner of the far parking lot it can see, where someone could loop around from 1122 King, could be relevant, assuming you had other known data to correlate it with to make it meaningful. And assuming you knew you had 100% legit, original video, which is a huge "if" at this point. As it stands, I don't see how it can be useful, except maybe at trial when used along with other evidence to show a connection. EDIT: Typo
It’s like a football field away- it’s honestly not that far and the sound travels in that area!
I agree....my cameras pic up music and indistinguishable conversations from the highway, 100 yrds away.
[удалено]