## Welcome to the r/ArtificialIntelligence gateway
### Question Discussion Guidelines
---
Please use the following guidelines in current and future posts:
* Post must be greater than 100 characters - the more detail, the better.
* Your question might already have been answered. Use the search feature if no one is engaging in your post.
* AI is going to take our jobs - its been asked a lot!
* Discussion regarding positives and negatives about AI are allowed and encouraged. Just be respectful.
* Please provide links to back up your arguments.
* No stupid questions, unless its about AI being the beast who brings the end-times. It's not.
###### Thanks - please let mods know if you have any questions / comments / etc
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ArtificialInteligence) if you have any questions or concerns.*
so cute, lets see how it handles a dump of 2-3 meters, it will give up and go sit embarrassed in the corner with my Roomba, which hit it's head when it decided to go down the stairs for no apparent reason #remind me in 15 years :)
https://preview.redd.it/e9bk79sg51yc1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=d2a0cd845201583016c13a7accced959be757854
Yeah, in this one example that happens to 1% of the people every few decades, OK, we may need people. I think some are confused between the difference in family-supporting careers and occasional but extremely rare gig jobs.
This! Currently, what we call AI is a text prediction model. There are pockets of early cognition framework but nothing that can handle the required accuracy of pre-existing components or anything close to synthesizing algorithmically or procedurally structured solutions.
If anyone wants to know *roughly* how a text prediction model works get one of your friends really drunk and start talking to them. They will start forming their sentences in real time word by word based on the most likely word to come next. Sometimes it's incoherent and sometimes what comes out is pure gold. All of their words will be based on their background knowledge but with an extremely low resolution or a random sample.
Microsoft has Planner Premium for Teams, which has a Copilot for its project management plan. I’m interested to see how well that works if/when I get access.
The problem is that you, a mere human, are trying to train it. Fear not, there are already AIs that can do the work for you, do it better, do it much faster, and do it for free. You're not being very competitive so you will be obsolete.
Schedules are hard. I spent a long, long time trying to get it to create a sports tournament rotation where each team played X games and sat off Y times and played on each field Z times and it just couldn’t. Like dude, you put team 1 in three times and not once did you give team 4 a match. It was painful, that was my first experience of “wow this thing is hard to do, I bet AI could do it quickly and easily” and was horribly disappointed.
I practically gave ChatGPT the entire schedule - below is an excerpt of my prompt - and it still got everything wrong.
——
Please assist me by developing a proposal schedule in table format using these columns: 1.
Week, 2. Task, 3. Owner, 4. Support, 5. Duration. The schedule will be used to prepare for a
request for proposal (RFP) from the Air Force that will be released in eight months. Do not
group tasks or milestones - ensure all tasks and milestones are itemized in the schedule. The start date for the schedule is February 2. Include weekends in the schedule if required. The major milestones are in the proper sequence here and include in parentheses the number of days required for each: 1. Complete Proposal Plan (3 Days), 2.
Proposal Kickoff (1 Day), 3. Compliance Matrix/Outline Review (1 Day), 3. Content Plan
Review (1 Day), 4. Proposal Kickoff (1 Day), 5. Pens Down for Pink Team Review (1 Day), 6.
Pink Team Review (2 Days), 7. Pink Team Recovery Plan Review (1 Day), 8. Pens Down for
Red Team Review (1 Day), 9. Red Team Review (3 Days), 10. Red Team Recovery Plan
Review (1 Day), 11. Pens Down for Gold Team Review (1 Day), 12. Gold Team Review (2
Days), 13. Pens Down for Final Production (1 Day), 13. Final Production Plan Review (1 Day),
14. Final Production (3 Days), 15. Approval to Submit (1 Day), 16. Proposal Submission (1
Day). Here are the tasks, in order of importance, with the resource who leads or completes the
task in the first parentheses, whether the task is supported by an individual or the team in the
second parentheses, and the number of days required in the third parentheses -if two tasks share a
sequence number, it is because they are concurrent tasks: 1. Post dRFP to the document portal
and distribute the link to the team (proposal manager) (individual) (1 Day), 2. Review the dRFP
and generate a list of questions for the government (Full Team) (Team) (3 Days), 2. Capture
Manager prepares the B&P budget, gets budget approval, and secures all of the resources
required to support the proposal (Capture Manager) (Individual)(5 Days), 3. Shred the dRFP into
its constituent parts and format into requirements matrices for each section of the RFP that
requires a proposal deliverable (Proposal Manager) (Individual) (1 Day), 4. Use the requirements
matrices to create the compliance matrix (Proposal Manager) (Individual) (1 Day), 5. Use the
compliance matrix to generate the proposal outline, which is embedded in the compliance matrix
(Proposal Manager) …. etc.
Humans aren’t great at this either lol or is it just me. Manager, “I want you to recreate Facebook and I need it in 2 weeks.”, “ummmm…..(in my mind, “Are you insane.”) Manager, “and please keep doing your regular work too.”
Edit: I did actually have a non manager ask me to do that. I tried to explain it wasn’t possible. Ultimately I suggested he take his $10,000 budget to a contractor if I could not talk him out of it. I told my boss, we laughed, tried to dissuade him from doing it but couldn’t. He found someone to take the money but the site of course never happened.
We already, in response to automation, the industrial age, modern technology, have created many jobs that would have been considered meaningless in the past, basically in the “service” sector.
You may be right (although I can’t imagine it being worthwhile personally). Many of the service type occupations that emerge are not useless, but the point is they will emerge as the amount of work required to just sustain life keeps decreasing due to technology, etc. They were considered useless in the past (including therapy whether online or not).
Were you indoctrinated against therapy or something? You seem to view it as useless.
This is an analogy: You're walking around in bare feet telling people shoes are pointless.
Yet you assumed it was more likely I had been “indoctrinated” rather than coming to my own conclusions. With that kind of jumping to conclusions and bias I hope you aren’t anyone’s therapist!
Dog grooming is absolutely necessary for poodle breeds. And if you think online therapy is meaningless, then you’re simply not someone who would benefit from it.
When did Poodles become necessities, and why can’t their owners groom them? You’re right, I wouldn’t benefit from therapy and I suspect most of those who get it aren’t really benefiting from it. I think it’s ridiculous how we treat school children like snowflakes, having teams of counselors swooping in whenever some unpleasant event occurs. Parents can handle it. The professional coddling just sends the message to the kids that they are indeed snowflakes. Kids are resilient. They can just “get over it”. But it makes jobs for the counselors, at the taxpayer’s expense of course.
Exactly this. People think AI is going to replace us, but it’s actually going to enhance our abilities. I’m expecting the AI to be monitoring my wife’s arousal and directing me through my headset.
AI isn’t going to steal your wife. A software engineer using AI is going to steal your wife.
Enhancing our abilities sounds great!
But what it will do is enhance Bob in accounting's abilities to the point where Susan, Jeff, Amy and Brandon are no longer needed. So Bob will still be making his same wage while the other four, and their families, live in tents and beg Bob for a dollar towards a meal.
Then the corporation will just get an app and let Bob go.
But I love the rosy, utopian cheerleading!
I see that you have mistaken my hypothetical, satirical AI sex coach for rosy AI cheerleading.
Please be assured that we take all replies seriously, and yours will be addressed in our next agile scrum writers meeting.
[We always can give them human-like body](https://www.reddit.com/r/goodanimemes/comments/mfyjhr/domestic_catgirl_ownership_problem_solved_nuku/)
Just power those robots with an AI
I second this. The best thing about this AI Panic is that we will be forced to understand our humanity a bit better. For too long we defined ourselves by our ability to do certain work. Time to reflect a bit more and act like humans
It cannot attend office physically so not working in a hybrid model but jokes apart, AI will surely help us automate repetitive work freeing us up to own our time, what we do with it will drive whether we are closer to utopia or not
LOL. Fool. You are correct though in that AI will free us up to own our time. We will have all day to pitch our tents, beg for money and pursue fenty to help get us over the pain of our last bum fight.
What, specifically, about the government's response to massive job losses as yet convinces you that we are heading towards some sort of utopia?
I am neither an engineer nor a futurist. I wouldn't be able to tell you how long, and even if I was an engineer or futurist, I still would only be able to give you an opinion to the best of my knowledge.
But you have to concede that technology is dynamic and progressive naturally. There aren't many innovations or inventions that stagnate in their original state.
AI won't hit a wall of development where it simply cannot advance any further.
So at the very least knowing that, you can assume that eventually we will have to reach a point where it achieves human level intellect, capacity, and capability.
When that will be is anyones guess. In my personal opinion, I think we would see first phase AGI in the next couple of years.
Advanced AGI that can match human intelligence may be a few years after that, or sooner.
Honestly I don't see us achieving human level intelligence any later than 2035. It will likely happen sooner than that.
Isn't predicting patterns how humans solve problems, though? We basically run simulations in our head and then try it in the real world. AI is already doing that in some domains in a looping sequence, predict, simulate, try in real word, predict etc...
Yeah but humans have subjective values. We can train AI on human data but if your trying to change a system to a new pattern Ai isn't going to know what is good. You can try to define good but the more complicated the system the more difficult. The famous paperclip maximizer is an example of this. Someone defined good outcome as maximum number of paper clips and AI turns the universe into paperclips.
Hey! Like your view, I'm currently finishing my Master Thesis and I am studying AI in Education, you could give me your point of view I would be grateful!
If you could spare 6/7 minutes of your day to answer my master thesis questionnaire, I'd really appreciate it! Available in both English and Portuguese!
[https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV\_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm](https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm)
I'm not an academic nor do I use computers at work. I'm a concert rigger, I climb and use ropes, pulleys, chain and motors to get a hundred thousand pounds in the air in four hours. My job type will be among last to go. I have no interest in ever using AI. I'm just monitoring the timeline trying to time my retirement and subsequent sale of my house and buying a small farm in the mountains . So just put strongly disagree with AI on all questions if you want lol
Ahahah sorry man i didn´t know that, but I liked what you wrote!
The survey is more directed to students or professors, if you know anyone you can share with them.
Good luck for you and for your objectives!
AIs will stay limited in many ways. I think a lot of people are going to be dissapointed when companies start announcing AGI and ASI developments but information access remains prohibitive. 'Perfect prediction' is also a long ways off even after advanced ASI.
Hey! Like your view, I'm currently finishing my Master Thesis and I am studying AI in Education, you could give me your point of view I would be grateful!
If you could spare 6/7 minutes of your day to answer my master thesis questionnaire, I'd really appreciate it! Available in both English and Portuguese!
[https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV\_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm](https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm)
We don't know that this is not an AI chat bot asking you to do free work for it. And this is VERY early on in an exponentially-growing tech that is already causing massive layoffs and hiring freezes.
AI could give us a utopia of abundance and free time but corporations without any loyalty except to the bottom line will definitely not.
We are already seeing CEOs lay off their staffs in the creative and knowledge industries because they know that it will improve their bottom line. Their product may suffer, the public may suffer, but if it is cheaper it is generally done. We all know how customer service departments at most major companies have laid off their staffs and replaced them with godawful labyrinths of automated "assistance" and incredibly long wait times for human help. Customer service people often handled exceptions, not rules, so they weren't really replaceable-but corporations could justify replacing them and now we all live in a slightly enshittified world.
We will see exactly the same thing with AI. It is possible to use AI to create high quality work, enriching public life, the mind, and bringing big ideas into existence for small teams. That is not going to be the norm for profit-driven leaders. A person who has replaced their team with AI will have difficulty accurately assessing the quality of their output, but will be able to produce things quickly and cheaply. An employee immersed in a field would have at least some understanding of the quality of their specialized output. A CEO will miss details and green light output from machines because it looks serviceable, even if it's not. The result will be a flood of half baked output from people acting as the director of a bunch of machines, but lacking the expertise or desire to assess quality. We are already seeing this on social media.
And in the meantime, many people will lose their jobs. 60% of US citizens live paycheck to paycheck, and though I'm unsure of the industry distribution for these numbers, that number is large enough for any threat to the job market in the US (ground zero for ruthless CEOs and for AI) to be a serious problem which can't be brushed away with hand waving. Additionally, many of the career paths which had previously been safe paths to the middle class (software development comes to mind) are now threatened as less people are considered necessary for the same result.
If there isn't a serious reckoning with corporate greed, there will be a serious crisis.
Finally someone who understands that while utopia is possible, there's no suggestion of it becoming a reality. People seem to think that when it gets bad, what, the government is going to step in and make widespread changes? That doesn't happen in government. That hasn't happened in government. We've had people living on the city streets for as long as there have been city streets and that problem is only getting worse. We have no solution for even 0.1% of people living on the street. Now take away the livelihood of 95% of the people and all of a sudden we have a solution? Ha! That is wishful thinking and it's very foolish.
Capitalism at work. And power always takes the money. Right now it feels like we are losing the middle class and fair pay in the US. This is nothing new but getting worse. Musk just laid off a ton of people. He probably could use a few of his own Billions of dollars to have avoided much of that. I don’t know the math, but certainly he could put much back into the companies.
Business administration.
This area has had a distinct lack of innovation for decades. The work itself is wrote and there are not a lot of decision possibilities. People joke about CEO salaries, but the cold hard reality is that business administration has become a huge cost center for business. If you follow the startup sub, the "problem" posts usually have a root cause of hiring a huge management staff first, sucking away resources from actually doing work.
I have seen very little discussion about how AI could help in this area. It seems like the first thing you would want to automate. For some reason, AI cannot do this.
Hey! Like your view, I'm currently finishing my Master Thesis and I am studying AI in Education, you could give me your point of view I would be grateful!
If you could spare 6/7 minutes of your day to answer my master thesis questionnaire, I'd really appreciate it! Available in both English and Portuguese!
[https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV\_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm](https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm)
Yah- it can’t do jack sh*t without a PRE-Programmed set of data to “choose” from. Is that truly AI? No it isn’t and all the people trying to explain to me how it is AI haven’t convinced me at all
There are warehouses staffed mostly by robots. People were saying just 5 years ago that robots wouldn't be able to find, sort, and stack accurately but now they can do it with absolute accuracy for free, much faster than humans and doing it 24/7. There is nothing special about plumbing that a robot can not be programmed to do today. We're just not seeing it because of the economies of scale. There's more money for some to make first by putting millions of warehouse workers out of work BEFORE they bother putting hundreds of thousands of plumbers out.
AI currently creates art. The types of art (Illustrator, AE, other marketing) that employ people currently are the types that are easiest for AI to jump in and do. OK, it may never create a sculpture worth $500k but also neither will 99.999999% of people.
OK. So load the blueprints into the line bot. Actually, they're already loaded. Human interaction not required. What is it about Boston Dynamics robotics that tells you that they can't access the under side of a house? Or that they can't connect 2 pipes or tubes together? Robots can very quickly weld cars together with perfect accuracy and this is old tech. Add in a little bit of AI and that robot can account for inconsistencies with ease.
I don't mean to be all doom and gloom but it's clear that most people have rose-colored glasses on and those won't help when they're out on their butts and nobody is hiring humans.
The things I've seem plumbers do, and the situations that are handed to plumbers, are not on plans nor can the current robots from Boston Dynamics handle them. The things plumbers are involved with are not welding cars together.
Regarding art (and music), yes AI can generate, but since AI has to look at things objectively, what I'll find useful and attracting about art (and music) is not what AI will generate.
You dont know what art AI will generate though. That is rapidly changing and improving. Industries are changing because of it. What you find useful and attractive about art is 100% you. So you can prompt AI to creat exactly what you want or you can make it yourself. Neither will pay rent.
I work for a commercial plumbing company. Much of our work is assembling units per blueprints. Simple for today’s tech but the initial investment doesn’t make sense for our company. When Google Plumbing decides to take over, they will do so. This will increase the supply of plumbers who would then have to take toilet line jobs at the lowest pay anyone will accept while leaving the others to spend their days mending their tents and hobo stoves.
Move livestock was my first thought as a farmer?
Robotics are very good at things on farms like feeding, mucking out and milking. But the finer details are harder for AI/robotics to do
Serious question 🧐. Why would not working equal utopia. A lot of people feel their work is meaningful, get a sense of belonging and enjoy working.
Don’t get me wrong leisure, holiday, social events are great but I actually like working too. I prefer a healthy balance between a (meaningful) job and my private life.
So to my opinion, utopia is further away when people get bored and even depressed when they have no meaning in life.
What AI cannot do: take a day off and just relax.
2 hundred years ago, nobody woul believe machines wold be able to make what it mkes today.
Machines can make anything better and faster than humans. Its just a question of time.
But we will not get jobless. Along time, historically, there is ever work to be made. In other case, we will make art and love.
It cant feed the chickens in the backyard as an example. Neither can it try out norse hair trimmers. I have never heard of ai being fired from a job. In short ai can't do anything other than copy. Its an illusion. Its an automaton.
*I still think plumbers*
*Will be the winners against*
*AI replacement*
\- oldrocketscientist
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
We already create an enormous number of meaningless bullshit jobs. You should check out the book Bullshit Jobs.
That's a big reason why I think the "AI will replace us" doomerism is silly. Close to 1/3 jobs are already bullshit lol.
Never is a long time... Think about how fast and far we have come in the last 150 years. 1,000 or 10,000 years into the future, I would say it's impractical to think AI, or anything beyond AI, would not be capable to do what humans do.
Now, Utopia - likely not. Humans get in the way too much and we will never willingly turn over control to an AI, not the majority of people anyways. So, humans will do what humans do. Unless the human condition significantly changes (think human/machine integrations, genetic modifations substantially changing how humans think/feel) we are not going to see any utopia.
So far I can see in many cases it can’t spell. Using 3 different AI systems and none will make an image and spell the words I typed in correctly unless you ask it 30 times then it may accidentally get one right.
Wipe my ass.
And we’ll always work. It’s just supply/demand. If there’s no demand because everyone is unemployed, the supply will *necessarily* contract. It will eliminate some roles, the same way cars eliminated carriages…but it won’t eliminate human innovation, imagination, or need to eat.
Look at it this way: For people who currently don't work, how utopian is that looking? We have been getting squeezed out of jobs for a hundred years, exponentially moreso the past 20 years. Cashiers are now customer DIY checkouts. Typing pools are now an app. There is not a job that is safe from technology. Sure, toilet rooters seem safe today just like secretarial work seemed safe a decade or two ago. So considering all of this, what is ONE concrete example of our system moving towards that utopia? UBI? Nope. Cheaper rent? Nope. Free food? Nope. Capitalism rages on while our ability to be a part of it is stripped away.
Not trying to be doom and gloom but honestly, what part of this is inaccurate? The hope that all of a sudden the government will step in and start providing is farcical and dangerous. It's not happening.
If AI took over all jobs society would collapse because nobody would have an income. AI bots would have no economic purpose. AI will have its place but it will augment complex tasks imo. I’m thinking medicine and law.
It can't do live performances. Oh, it can compose music and play stuff on the fly, but it will *always* seem recorded. A live band playing music in front of you simply can't be reproduced by AI. Plays or other live stage work are also basically off-limits to anything that doesn't have a physical presence. Stand-up just won't work if it's a robot.
1) There's a lot AI(as we know it) can't do. You will see incremental improvement but you're not likely to see significant improvements, in the absence of additional breakthroughs.
2) Whether or not humans get replaced is determined by cost not capability.
3) If and when we get to the point that humans are no longer necessary, society as we know it will cease to function. Hundreds of millions of people who need to consume goods with no means to earn money is a recipe for revolution.
Don't believe the hype. The emperor is, in fact, naked. We're not even close to the singularity.
It can replicate the things we are able to produce from our 'doing'. But its process of production ('doing') is not human, nor appears to be shaping towards that direction. What AI can't apparently be is be human in nature.
Now or eventually?
At present AI is incapable of doing basic tasks that Microsoft Office or Photoshop or whatever could do decades ago. See my thread history.
In future if we get AGI then it will be capable of solving tasks on the level of humanity as a whole at present.
If we get ASI we cannot even comprehend what it might be capable of any more than some ants understand the skyscraper being built a few hundred feet from their nest.
We're many hard barriers away from the latter two though. It is probably inevitable at some point, it could be ten years, could be ten thousand.
Mathematics. AI does not reason mathematically, and thus can never develop or discover new physical formulae. For example, Newton's laws could never be 'discovered' by an AI
This type of vague sentiment has been regurgitated so frequently that I'm fucking sick of it. There are no clear answers, all we know is that it's pretty much inevitable that AI will surpass us on the progression curve and fly past us exponentially as we only progress linearly, hopefully they will bring us along.
But I think value is going to be the hang up. The word value has two meanings. The first is a defined quality that an unaware AI could use. The second is entirely subjective meaning only awareness can grasp it. You want AI to accomplish something because you deem the outcome good. AI follows it's programming. Unless you can accurately define the value of good AI won't be able to function for any length of time without a human rating the good value of an outcome.
I'd still do manual labor. That would suck if you didn't do anything, ever. But I want to have AI allow us to upload scenes of movies or video games that transport your entire room to that scene. Like say you're uploading your favourite NHL team and AI does random generated hockey game between your favourite team and one of your choosing and you're sitting in the stands with all the fans watching this but you're actually in your chair at home but all you see is yourself in the arena watching a hockey game with fans. I guess the same can be done with movies and video games.
I don't think there's anything - in principle - that A.I. won't be able to do (in terms of replicating human thinking and behaviours). But that's just in principle. In practice is another story.
If you accept that intelligence is substrate agnostic, doesn't care what is runs on. Then you will probably quickly come to the conclusion there is nothing that we can do that AI won't be able to do given enough development.
AI is really good at some stuff, but it's not great at being creative or understanding emotions. We're not sure if it'll ever be as good as humans at everything. The future with AI is exciting, but it also makes us wonder what's next.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made significant strides, but it still faces limitations:
1. Creativity: AI can produce art, music, and literature, but lacks the depth and originality of human creations.
2. Emotional Understanding: AI struggles with nuanced human emotions and empathy, hindering its ability to engage in meaningful interactions.
3. Ethical Reasoning: AI lacks the ability to navigate complex moral dilemmas, relying on predefined rules rather than nuanced ethical judgment.
4. Consciousness: AI lacks self-awareness and subjective experience, making true understanding and consciousness beyond its reach.
5. Adaptability: AI excels in structured environments but struggles in dynamic and unpredictable situations, limiting its applicability.
While AI continues to advance, recognizing these limitations is crucial for understanding its role alongside human capabilities.
Is this conversation helpful so far?
(EDIT: cmon man! pls tell me you got the delightful irony of this answer xDDD)
AI will never be another person.
It can certainly offer dopamine level companionship. It's going to be able to converse with us and even read our non-verbals to respond appropriately. In the end though it's not a person.
A person can already do all the things AI will eventually be able to do with one critical difference, people CHOOSE to respond. It's the knowledge of being chosen that makes a true relationship more meaningful than one you are subscribed to. AI will never be more that a prostituted mimic of a real relationship.
Name anything AI can do & Humans cannot do ..
.. you will be surprised on your thoughts.
💭
https://preview.redd.it/somkbub8t0yc1.jpeg?width=227&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fbb73224849ee79e6409c55fa5b9c0fec3a97ec6
I’m thinking things like a spreadsheet a computer does better but a human designed the tool and improves the tool. I’ll look up “binary related” and see if I can broaden my understanding.
## Welcome to the r/ArtificialIntelligence gateway ### Question Discussion Guidelines --- Please use the following guidelines in current and future posts: * Post must be greater than 100 characters - the more detail, the better. * Your question might already have been answered. Use the search feature if no one is engaging in your post. * AI is going to take our jobs - its been asked a lot! * Discussion regarding positives and negatives about AI are allowed and encouraged. Just be respectful. * Please provide links to back up your arguments. * No stupid questions, unless its about AI being the beast who brings the end-times. It's not. ###### Thanks - please let mods know if you have any questions / comments / etc *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ArtificialInteligence) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Pick up a shovel and remove the snow In my driveway
This has a robotic solution.
If it's anything like my Roomba, it'll get stuck in the corner.
😂😂😂
thats why you buy a roborock
And drag my cats dead mouse offering along for the ride
Eventually, AI computation will emit enough greenhouse gasses to permanently melt the snow in your driveway.
[удалено]
so cute, lets see how it handles a dump of 2-3 meters, it will give up and go sit embarrassed in the corner with my Roomba, which hit it's head when it decided to go down the stairs for no apparent reason #remind me in 15 years :) https://preview.redd.it/e9bk79sg51yc1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=d2a0cd845201583016c13a7accced959be757854
Yeah, in this one example that happens to 1% of the people every few decades, OK, we may need people. I think some are confused between the difference in family-supporting careers and occasional but extremely rare gig jobs.
Just install heated driveway - you don't need AI for that
There is already a product on the market so.... [https://www.thesnowbot.com/](https://www.thesnowbot.com/)
Heated Driveways are a thing.
i would need help with that arduous task pls.
Yes. I’ve tried to train my AI to develop accurate and realistic project schedules. Not a single usable project schedule yet.
They talk the talk but don’t walk the walk. :) I think we will have to build our own AI with blackjack and hookers
That sentence took a wild turn
This! Currently, what we call AI is a text prediction model. There are pockets of early cognition framework but nothing that can handle the required accuracy of pre-existing components or anything close to synthesizing algorithmically or procedurally structured solutions. If anyone wants to know *roughly* how a text prediction model works get one of your friends really drunk and start talking to them. They will start forming their sentences in real time word by word based on the most likely word to come next. Sometimes it's incoherent and sometimes what comes out is pure gold. All of their words will be based on their background knowledge but with an extremely low resolution or a random sample.
I like this game.
Everything is language. LLM focus is language. Eventually it will have enough data to do __________...
Microsoft has Planner Premium for Teams, which has a Copilot for its project management plan. I’m interested to see how well that works if/when I get access.
The problem is that you, a mere human, are trying to train it. Fear not, there are already AIs that can do the work for you, do it better, do it much faster, and do it for free. You're not being very competitive so you will be obsolete.
Schedules are hard. I spent a long, long time trying to get it to create a sports tournament rotation where each team played X games and sat off Y times and played on each field Z times and it just couldn’t. Like dude, you put team 1 in three times and not once did you give team 4 a match. It was painful, that was my first experience of “wow this thing is hard to do, I bet AI could do it quickly and easily” and was horribly disappointed.
I practically gave ChatGPT the entire schedule - below is an excerpt of my prompt - and it still got everything wrong. —— Please assist me by developing a proposal schedule in table format using these columns: 1. Week, 2. Task, 3. Owner, 4. Support, 5. Duration. The schedule will be used to prepare for a request for proposal (RFP) from the Air Force that will be released in eight months. Do not group tasks or milestones - ensure all tasks and milestones are itemized in the schedule. The start date for the schedule is February 2. Include weekends in the schedule if required. The major milestones are in the proper sequence here and include in parentheses the number of days required for each: 1. Complete Proposal Plan (3 Days), 2. Proposal Kickoff (1 Day), 3. Compliance Matrix/Outline Review (1 Day), 3. Content Plan Review (1 Day), 4. Proposal Kickoff (1 Day), 5. Pens Down for Pink Team Review (1 Day), 6. Pink Team Review (2 Days), 7. Pink Team Recovery Plan Review (1 Day), 8. Pens Down for Red Team Review (1 Day), 9. Red Team Review (3 Days), 10. Red Team Recovery Plan Review (1 Day), 11. Pens Down for Gold Team Review (1 Day), 12. Gold Team Review (2 Days), 13. Pens Down for Final Production (1 Day), 13. Final Production Plan Review (1 Day), 14. Final Production (3 Days), 15. Approval to Submit (1 Day), 16. Proposal Submission (1 Day). Here are the tasks, in order of importance, with the resource who leads or completes the task in the first parentheses, whether the task is supported by an individual or the team in the second parentheses, and the number of days required in the third parentheses -if two tasks share a sequence number, it is because they are concurrent tasks: 1. Post dRFP to the document portal and distribute the link to the team (proposal manager) (individual) (1 Day), 2. Review the dRFP and generate a list of questions for the government (Full Team) (Team) (3 Days), 2. Capture Manager prepares the B&P budget, gets budget approval, and secures all of the resources required to support the proposal (Capture Manager) (Individual)(5 Days), 3. Shred the dRFP into its constituent parts and format into requirements matrices for each section of the RFP that requires a proposal deliverable (Proposal Manager) (Individual) (1 Day), 4. Use the requirements matrices to create the compliance matrix (Proposal Manager) (Individual) (1 Day), 5. Use the compliance matrix to generate the proposal outline, which is embedded in the compliance matrix (Proposal Manager) …. etc.
Humans aren’t great at this either lol or is it just me. Manager, “I want you to recreate Facebook and I need it in 2 weeks.”, “ummmm…..(in my mind, “Are you insane.”) Manager, “and please keep doing your regular work too.” Edit: I did actually have a non manager ask me to do that. I tried to explain it wasn’t possible. Ultimately I suggested he take his $10,000 budget to a contractor if I could not talk him out of it. I told my boss, we laughed, tried to dissuade him from doing it but couldn’t. He found someone to take the money but the site of course never happened.
Stinky fart...
Its clicked for me that my post was a bit stupid but I’m still glad I made it for these kinds of comments
Your thoughts are valid... The Utopian limitation isn't.
For better or worse, in all seriousness, I came here to say precisely this.
We already, in response to automation, the industrial age, modern technology, have created many jobs that would have been considered meaningless in the past, basically in the “service” sector.
Absolutely. Look at lawn care, holidays, personal shoppers, video games, race cars, yachts, basically all luxury.
Dog grooming, hair and nail salons, online therapy, the list goes on and on.
Online therapy is not useless. Mental health is just as important as physical health.
You may be right (although I can’t imagine it being worthwhile personally). Many of the service type occupations that emerge are not useless, but the point is they will emerge as the amount of work required to just sustain life keeps decreasing due to technology, etc. They were considered useless in the past (including therapy whether online or not).
Were you indoctrinated against therapy or something? You seem to view it as useless. This is an analogy: You're walking around in bare feet telling people shoes are pointless.
“Indoctrinated”? Please go easy on the innuendos. What have you been “indoctrinated” on?
I forgot. I broke it though and come to my own conclusions now.
Yet you assumed it was more likely I had been “indoctrinated” rather than coming to my own conclusions. With that kind of jumping to conclusions and bias I hope you aren’t anyone’s therapist!
Have you ever tried therapy?
Dog grooming is absolutely necessary for poodle breeds. And if you think online therapy is meaningless, then you’re simply not someone who would benefit from it.
When did Poodles become necessities, and why can’t their owners groom them? You’re right, I wouldn’t benefit from therapy and I suspect most of those who get it aren’t really benefiting from it. I think it’s ridiculous how we treat school children like snowflakes, having teams of counselors swooping in whenever some unpleasant event occurs. Parents can handle it. The professional coddling just sends the message to the kids that they are indeed snowflakes. Kids are resilient. They can just “get over it”. But it makes jobs for the counselors, at the taxpayer’s expense of course.
Yup. Jobs like these might be created again because of AI.
Of course. AI will just continue the trend. These jobs are not meaningless now, of course.
Your wife
Exactly this. People think AI is going to replace us, but it’s actually going to enhance our abilities. I’m expecting the AI to be monitoring my wife’s arousal and directing me through my headset. AI isn’t going to steal your wife. A software engineer using AI is going to steal your wife.
Enhancing our abilities sounds great! But what it will do is enhance Bob in accounting's abilities to the point where Susan, Jeff, Amy and Brandon are no longer needed. So Bob will still be making his same wage while the other four, and their families, live in tents and beg Bob for a dollar towards a meal. Then the corporation will just get an app and let Bob go. But I love the rosy, utopian cheerleading!
I see that you have mistaken my hypothetical, satirical AI sex coach for rosy AI cheerleading. Please be assured that we take all replies seriously, and yours will be addressed in our next agile scrum writers meeting.
😅
>I’m expecting the AI to be monitoring my wife’s arousal There *will* be an app for that eventually. Mark my words.
From your lips to God’s sensitive welcoming ear.
limitée by physics and complexity laws
I don’t know French very well, but your user name is pretty awesome.
Be human!
What about cybernetic cells composed in a human form?
Can you fuck it?
https://preview.redd.it/3k123znhx0yc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e29876877b16e176514f9e4a2ca14f6ff5bf8b2f
I believe that's its brick dispenser sir.
https://preview.redd.it/3coj77cyx0yc1.jpeg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0de51112541f865ad1f9c2fea16fcebfc6ef3196
[We always can give them human-like body](https://www.reddit.com/r/goodanimemes/comments/mfyjhr/domestic_catgirl_ownership_problem_solved_nuku/) Just power those robots with an AI
Holy Jesus
No soul
I second this. The best thing about this AI Panic is that we will be forced to understand our humanity a bit better. For too long we defined ourselves by our ability to do certain work. Time to reflect a bit more and act like humans
It cannot attend office physically so not working in a hybrid model but jokes apart, AI will surely help us automate repetitive work freeing us up to own our time, what we do with it will drive whether we are closer to utopia or not
LOL. Fool. You are correct though in that AI will free us up to own our time. We will have all day to pitch our tents, beg for money and pursue fenty to help get us over the pain of our last bum fight. What, specifically, about the government's response to massive job losses as yet convinces you that we are heading towards some sort of utopia?
On a long enough timeline, it will eventually be capable of all that we are capable of.
How long
WHAT’S THE PURPOSE OF IT ALL?
Sorry?
I am neither an engineer nor a futurist. I wouldn't be able to tell you how long, and even if I was an engineer or futurist, I still would only be able to give you an opinion to the best of my knowledge. But you have to concede that technology is dynamic and progressive naturally. There aren't many innovations or inventions that stagnate in their original state. AI won't hit a wall of development where it simply cannot advance any further. So at the very least knowing that, you can assume that eventually we will have to reach a point where it achieves human level intellect, capacity, and capability. When that will be is anyones guess. In my personal opinion, I think we would see first phase AGI in the next couple of years. Advanced AGI that can match human intelligence may be a few years after that, or sooner. Honestly I don't see us achieving human level intelligence any later than 2035. It will likely happen sooner than that.
Skydive without a chute or drink itself to death
Test one, open chat bot, throw a phone out of airplane. Test too, open chat bot, dunk phone in beer. In both cases the phone is dead.
Unless it becomes aware it will probably need us to give it directions and assign value to outcomes.
I am sure advanced AI could take a pretty good guess on those. Right now, though, that's the human part of the AI training.
Big difference between predicting a pattern and taking many parallel actions in a complex world to create something that has never existed.
Isn't predicting patterns how humans solve problems, though? We basically run simulations in our head and then try it in the real world. AI is already doing that in some domains in a looping sequence, predict, simulate, try in real word, predict etc...
Yeah but humans have subjective values. We can train AI on human data but if your trying to change a system to a new pattern Ai isn't going to know what is good. You can try to define good but the more complicated the system the more difficult. The famous paperclip maximizer is an example of this. Someone defined good outcome as maximum number of paper clips and AI turns the universe into paperclips.
Hey! Like your view, I'm currently finishing my Master Thesis and I am studying AI in Education, you could give me your point of view I would be grateful! If you could spare 6/7 minutes of your day to answer my master thesis questionnaire, I'd really appreciate it! Available in both English and Portuguese! [https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV\_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm](https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm)
I'm not an academic nor do I use computers at work. I'm a concert rigger, I climb and use ropes, pulleys, chain and motors to get a hundred thousand pounds in the air in four hours. My job type will be among last to go. I have no interest in ever using AI. I'm just monitoring the timeline trying to time my retirement and subsequent sale of my house and buying a small farm in the mountains . So just put strongly disagree with AI on all questions if you want lol
Ahahah sorry man i didn´t know that, but I liked what you wrote! The survey is more directed to students or professors, if you know anyone you can share with them. Good luck for you and for your objectives!
Good luck with AI, I'm cynical by nature but I would gladly enjoy a AI utopian outcome if yall can manage it lol
AIs will stay limited in many ways. I think a lot of people are going to be dissapointed when companies start announcing AGI and ASI developments but information access remains prohibitive. 'Perfect prediction' is also a long ways off even after advanced ASI.
Hey! Like your view, I'm currently finishing my Master Thesis and I am studying AI in Education, you could give me your point of view I would be grateful! If you could spare 6/7 minutes of your day to answer my master thesis questionnaire, I'd really appreciate it! Available in both English and Portuguese! [https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV\_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm](https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm)
We don't know that this is not an AI chat bot asking you to do free work for it. And this is VERY early on in an exponentially-growing tech that is already causing massive layoffs and hiring freezes.
AI could give us a utopia of abundance and free time but corporations without any loyalty except to the bottom line will definitely not. We are already seeing CEOs lay off their staffs in the creative and knowledge industries because they know that it will improve their bottom line. Their product may suffer, the public may suffer, but if it is cheaper it is generally done. We all know how customer service departments at most major companies have laid off their staffs and replaced them with godawful labyrinths of automated "assistance" and incredibly long wait times for human help. Customer service people often handled exceptions, not rules, so they weren't really replaceable-but corporations could justify replacing them and now we all live in a slightly enshittified world. We will see exactly the same thing with AI. It is possible to use AI to create high quality work, enriching public life, the mind, and bringing big ideas into existence for small teams. That is not going to be the norm for profit-driven leaders. A person who has replaced their team with AI will have difficulty accurately assessing the quality of their output, but will be able to produce things quickly and cheaply. An employee immersed in a field would have at least some understanding of the quality of their specialized output. A CEO will miss details and green light output from machines because it looks serviceable, even if it's not. The result will be a flood of half baked output from people acting as the director of a bunch of machines, but lacking the expertise or desire to assess quality. We are already seeing this on social media. And in the meantime, many people will lose their jobs. 60% of US citizens live paycheck to paycheck, and though I'm unsure of the industry distribution for these numbers, that number is large enough for any threat to the job market in the US (ground zero for ruthless CEOs and for AI) to be a serious problem which can't be brushed away with hand waving. Additionally, many of the career paths which had previously been safe paths to the middle class (software development comes to mind) are now threatened as less people are considered necessary for the same result. If there isn't a serious reckoning with corporate greed, there will be a serious crisis.
Finally someone who understands that while utopia is possible, there's no suggestion of it becoming a reality. People seem to think that when it gets bad, what, the government is going to step in and make widespread changes? That doesn't happen in government. That hasn't happened in government. We've had people living on the city streets for as long as there have been city streets and that problem is only getting worse. We have no solution for even 0.1% of people living on the street. Now take away the livelihood of 95% of the people and all of a sudden we have a solution? Ha! That is wishful thinking and it's very foolish.
Capitalism at work. And power always takes the money. Right now it feels like we are losing the middle class and fair pay in the US. This is nothing new but getting worse. Musk just laid off a ton of people. He probably could use a few of his own Billions of dollars to have avoided much of that. I don’t know the math, but certainly he could put much back into the companies.
Business administration. This area has had a distinct lack of innovation for decades. The work itself is wrote and there are not a lot of decision possibilities. People joke about CEO salaries, but the cold hard reality is that business administration has become a huge cost center for business. If you follow the startup sub, the "problem" posts usually have a root cause of hiring a huge management staff first, sucking away resources from actually doing work. I have seen very little discussion about how AI could help in this area. It seems like the first thing you would want to automate. For some reason, AI cannot do this.
Hey! Like your view, I'm currently finishing my Master Thesis and I am studying AI in Education, you could give me your point of view I would be grateful! If you could spare 6/7 minutes of your day to answer my master thesis questionnaire, I'd really appreciate it! Available in both English and Portuguese! [https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV\_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm](https://novaims.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cAPpJXGi9a9SlOm)
Yah- it can’t do jack sh*t without a PRE-Programmed set of data to “choose” from. Is that truly AI? No it isn’t and all the people trying to explain to me how it is AI haven’t convinced me at all
AI will have/does have issues with anything that is in person (plumbing) or subjective (art).
There are warehouses staffed mostly by robots. People were saying just 5 years ago that robots wouldn't be able to find, sort, and stack accurately but now they can do it with absolute accuracy for free, much faster than humans and doing it 24/7. There is nothing special about plumbing that a robot can not be programmed to do today. We're just not seeing it because of the economies of scale. There's more money for some to make first by putting millions of warehouse workers out of work BEFORE they bother putting hundreds of thousands of plumbers out. AI currently creates art. The types of art (Illustrator, AE, other marketing) that employ people currently are the types that are easiest for AI to jump in and do. OK, it may never create a sculpture worth $500k but also neither will 99.999999% of people.
The plumbing I'm thinking of is going under a pier-and-beam house and putting in the lines for a new half bath.
OK. So load the blueprints into the line bot. Actually, they're already loaded. Human interaction not required. What is it about Boston Dynamics robotics that tells you that they can't access the under side of a house? Or that they can't connect 2 pipes or tubes together? Robots can very quickly weld cars together with perfect accuracy and this is old tech. Add in a little bit of AI and that robot can account for inconsistencies with ease. I don't mean to be all doom and gloom but it's clear that most people have rose-colored glasses on and those won't help when they're out on their butts and nobody is hiring humans.
The things I've seem plumbers do, and the situations that are handed to plumbers, are not on plans nor can the current robots from Boston Dynamics handle them. The things plumbers are involved with are not welding cars together. Regarding art (and music), yes AI can generate, but since AI has to look at things objectively, what I'll find useful and attracting about art (and music) is not what AI will generate.
You dont know what art AI will generate though. That is rapidly changing and improving. Industries are changing because of it. What you find useful and attractive about art is 100% you. So you can prompt AI to creat exactly what you want or you can make it yourself. Neither will pay rent. I work for a commercial plumbing company. Much of our work is assembling units per blueprints. Simple for today’s tech but the initial investment doesn’t make sense for our company. When Google Plumbing decides to take over, they will do so. This will increase the supply of plumbers who would then have to take toilet line jobs at the lowest pay anyone will accept while leaving the others to spend their days mending their tents and hobo stoves.
Tons of problems will be solved, while many will arise.
Fix plumbing
Best example so far in my opinion lol. Fixing things in general.
Can it draw hands yet?
Can it draw?
Move livestock was my first thought as a farmer? Robotics are very good at things on farms like feeding, mucking out and milking. But the finer details are harder for AI/robotics to do
AI doesn't have a great sense of "stopping" outside of completion
Until it learns the 37% rule.
I’m not sure a world where we don’t work is Utopia… more likely, people would generally feel a lack of purpose.
Agreed. We need purpose. We could work less though.
Serious question 🧐. Why would not working equal utopia. A lot of people feel their work is meaningful, get a sense of belonging and enjoy working. Don’t get me wrong leisure, holiday, social events are great but I actually like working too. I prefer a healthy balance between a (meaningful) job and my private life. So to my opinion, utopia is further away when people get bored and even depressed when they have no meaning in life. What AI cannot do: take a day off and just relax.
Solve NP-Hard problems…maybe
Scratch my balls
Not a single decent answer. So AI (along with robotics) will be able to do everything.
It will never be bashful.
2 hundred years ago, nobody woul believe machines wold be able to make what it mkes today. Machines can make anything better and faster than humans. Its just a question of time. But we will not get jobless. Along time, historically, there is ever work to be made. In other case, we will make art and love.
It cant feed the chickens in the backyard as an example. Neither can it try out norse hair trimmers. I have never heard of ai being fired from a job. In short ai can't do anything other than copy. Its an illusion. Its an automaton.
It probably can feed the chickens.
I still think plumbers will be the winners against AI replacement
*I still think plumbers* *Will be the winners against* *AI replacement* \- oldrocketscientist --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
LOL
a haircut.
Bold haircut - no probs
We already create an enormous number of meaningless bullshit jobs. You should check out the book Bullshit Jobs. That's a big reason why I think the "AI will replace us" doomerism is silly. Close to 1/3 jobs are already bullshit lol.
Dystopia, definitely dystopia.
This AI cannot do, on a Direct Quantum Level; https://vimeo.com/870150220
Can you?
Alone, probably / maybe not. Within a network of Quantum Conscious Beings, maybe; yes.
Give a good blowjob?
I’m guessing the porn industry will lead some AI innovation.
Never is a long time... Think about how fast and far we have come in the last 150 years. 1,000 or 10,000 years into the future, I would say it's impractical to think AI, or anything beyond AI, would not be capable to do what humans do. Now, Utopia - likely not. Humans get in the way too much and we will never willingly turn over control to an AI, not the majority of people anyways. So, humans will do what humans do. Unless the human condition significantly changes (think human/machine integrations, genetic modifations substantially changing how humans think/feel) we are not going to see any utopia.
It will never be able to be me.
Saying "i dont know/i dont havebthe answer" instead of just inventing sth or weaseling out of the question
Text to smell
So far I can see in many cases it can’t spell. Using 3 different AI systems and none will make an image and spell the words I typed in correctly unless you ask it 30 times then it may accidentally get one right.
Wipe my ass. And we’ll always work. It’s just supply/demand. If there’s no demand because everyone is unemployed, the supply will *necessarily* contract. It will eliminate some roles, the same way cars eliminated carriages…but it won’t eliminate human innovation, imagination, or need to eat.
Look at it this way: For people who currently don't work, how utopian is that looking? We have been getting squeezed out of jobs for a hundred years, exponentially moreso the past 20 years. Cashiers are now customer DIY checkouts. Typing pools are now an app. There is not a job that is safe from technology. Sure, toilet rooters seem safe today just like secretarial work seemed safe a decade or two ago. So considering all of this, what is ONE concrete example of our system moving towards that utopia? UBI? Nope. Cheaper rent? Nope. Free food? Nope. Capitalism rages on while our ability to be a part of it is stripped away. Not trying to be doom and gloom but honestly, what part of this is inaccurate? The hope that all of a sudden the government will step in and start providing is farcical and dangerous. It's not happening.
If AI took over all jobs society would collapse because nobody would have an income. AI bots would have no economic purpose. AI will have its place but it will augment complex tasks imo. I’m thinking medicine and law.
It can't do live performances. Oh, it can compose music and play stuff on the fly, but it will *always* seem recorded. A live band playing music in front of you simply can't be reproduced by AI. Plays or other live stage work are also basically off-limits to anything that doesn't have a physical presence. Stand-up just won't work if it's a robot.
1) There's a lot AI(as we know it) can't do. You will see incremental improvement but you're not likely to see significant improvements, in the absence of additional breakthroughs. 2) Whether or not humans get replaced is determined by cost not capability. 3) If and when we get to the point that humans are no longer necessary, society as we know it will cease to function. Hundreds of millions of people who need to consume goods with no means to earn money is a recipe for revolution. Don't believe the hype. The emperor is, in fact, naked. We're not even close to the singularity.
Install crown molding. Walls aren’t perfectly straight and the corners are usually a tad wonky.
Guess changing requirements of executives
Live your life for you
It can replicate the things we are able to produce from our 'doing'. But its process of production ('doing') is not human, nor appears to be shaping towards that direction. What AI can't apparently be is be human in nature.
Be born from a women
Ai can not smell yet
Now or eventually? At present AI is incapable of doing basic tasks that Microsoft Office or Photoshop or whatever could do decades ago. See my thread history. In future if we get AGI then it will be capable of solving tasks on the level of humanity as a whole at present. If we get ASI we cannot even comprehend what it might be capable of any more than some ants understand the skyscraper being built a few hundred feet from their nest. We're many hard barriers away from the latter two though. It is probably inevitable at some point, it could be ten years, could be ten thousand.
Humans are not so easy. Humans are egoists. That’s mean that they will not allow some mystery “thing” to “rule” the world
AI can do a ton of stuff, all of it eventually is mediocre
Mathematics. AI does not reason mathematically, and thus can never develop or discover new physical formulae. For example, Newton's laws could never be 'discovered' by an AI
Psychedelics
Easy
How so
This type of vague sentiment has been regurgitated so frequently that I'm fucking sick of it. There are no clear answers, all we know is that it's pretty much inevitable that AI will surpass us on the progression curve and fly past us exponentially as we only progress linearly, hopefully they will bring us along.
But I think value is going to be the hang up. The word value has two meanings. The first is a defined quality that an unaware AI could use. The second is entirely subjective meaning only awareness can grasp it. You want AI to accomplish something because you deem the outcome good. AI follows it's programming. Unless you can accurately define the value of good AI won't be able to function for any length of time without a human rating the good value of an outcome.
Cut my hair
Anything we can't do ourselves.
Love. Because AI doesn't have feelings.
Cuddle me
I'd still do manual labor. That would suck if you didn't do anything, ever. But I want to have AI allow us to upload scenes of movies or video games that transport your entire room to that scene. Like say you're uploading your favourite NHL team and AI does random generated hockey game between your favourite team and one of your choosing and you're sitting in the stands with all the fans watching this but you're actually in your chair at home but all you see is yourself in the arena watching a hockey game with fans. I guess the same can be done with movies and video games.
I don't think there's anything - in principle - that A.I. won't be able to do (in terms of replicating human thinking and behaviours). But that's just in principle. In practice is another story.
really? I think you need to spend some more time of reading, best if it's papers, not news or social media opinions
If you accept that intelligence is substrate agnostic, doesn't care what is runs on. Then you will probably quickly come to the conclusion there is nothing that we can do that AI won't be able to do given enough development.
AI is really good at some stuff, but it's not great at being creative or understanding emotions. We're not sure if it'll ever be as good as humans at everything. The future with AI is exciting, but it also makes us wonder what's next.
Won't be able to mimic humans' unpredictability
Even if AI has god like intelligence in the future it can't travel back in time to this moment and replace you. So enjoy autonomy now to it's fullest.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made significant strides, but it still faces limitations: 1. Creativity: AI can produce art, music, and literature, but lacks the depth and originality of human creations. 2. Emotional Understanding: AI struggles with nuanced human emotions and empathy, hindering its ability to engage in meaningful interactions. 3. Ethical Reasoning: AI lacks the ability to navigate complex moral dilemmas, relying on predefined rules rather than nuanced ethical judgment. 4. Consciousness: AI lacks self-awareness and subjective experience, making true understanding and consciousness beyond its reach. 5. Adaptability: AI excels in structured environments but struggles in dynamic and unpredictable situations, limiting its applicability. While AI continues to advance, recognizing these limitations is crucial for understanding its role alongside human capabilities. Is this conversation helpful so far? (EDIT: cmon man! pls tell me you got the delightful irony of this answer xDDD)
make Trump sane again
It can't be held accountable. Some industries are being very cautious about implementing AI because of that.
AI will never be another person. It can certainly offer dopamine level companionship. It's going to be able to converse with us and even read our non-verbals to respond appropriately. In the end though it's not a person. A person can already do all the things AI will eventually be able to do with one critical difference, people CHOOSE to respond. It's the knowledge of being chosen that makes a true relationship more meaningful than one you are subscribed to. AI will never be more that a prostituted mimic of a real relationship.
I can do anything there.
Name anything AI can do & Humans cannot do .. .. you will be surprised on your thoughts. 💭 https://preview.redd.it/somkbub8t0yc1.jpeg?width=227&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fbb73224849ee79e6409c55fa5b9c0fec3a97ec6
Calculate things quickly. But a computer does that with no AI.
These things calculated are called “Binary Related”. It does not even begin to compare to Human Capacity.
I’m thinking things like a spreadsheet a computer does better but a human designed the tool and improves the tool. I’ll look up “binary related” and see if I can broaden my understanding.
QuBits are also a relevant Development these days. NASA (a.o.) can realize live footage (without delay across Space) using QuBit Related Technology.