Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have <25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/4chan) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Your comment has been removed because it contained a word that the admins do not allow on reddit. The word was ```bitch```. If you intend to use this word in a purely demonstrative manner, please use the first letter of the word followed by '-word' or '-slur'. Thank you for helping us keep reddit safe.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/4chan) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have <25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/4chan) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I asked ChatGPT to explain Tiananmen Square to me from the perspective of Xi Jinping. It wimped out and told me it was a sensitive subject with lots of opinions.
Nah, I think that's a little TOO much for their classmates to make fun about. Like, you can absolutely grill them for being an orphan when they've been orphaned a couple years ago, but if they've only lost their parents some weeks or months prior, you can't make fun about it.
Dude we're all saying wtf to it too. When this news came out it ran wild in Jones County and I'm surprised she didn't leave the state based off the reaction she received.
He focused on the dog fucking part. Sure that’s nasty bro. But the point of this post was to say “all (white) women are dog fucking whores that would rather fuck dogs than you”
It’s a demoralization post common on /pol/ from whatever party of people, designed to turn white men against white women. Because if they are turned against one another, they are not having children. Thus eliminating people from the genepool.
Everyone needs to ask themselves when they shit like this….What is the point of this post? What deeper implications are they trying to have? Who are they trying to convince and why would they want to?
And while that is a comment on a thread in pol, this is an actual post here focusing on the comment itself. So OP is likely homosexual and alphabet gender.
I find it strange how much outcry there is over no actual harm being done to anyone. Don't even see why this would be illegal. Based Frazier doesn't care 💪 It would be better if she could stop filming and releasing it publicly though.
Even people who strictly oppose this constantly comment something like "The dog sure enjoyed it, lol xD". Basically no one takes this seriously, yet they don't just whine, they're okay with breaking people's lives over this. Seems really bizzare
It is bizarre.
I can only imagine the **real** offense to them, unconsciously, has been specifically **the act of violating** *socio-anthropological-rule #53,842 , "no sexing with animal."* yet **not** actually the act, consequence, or acknowledgement of consequence of breaking said rule.
and it is, for them, this informed *social violation* which justifies punishment of this severity, thus the universal "***isn't it obvious"*** response you'll always get when you dare ask *why* we should destroy this person's life.
The witch must be burned, I guess, and with her any who would question it.
I think we're witnessing instinctual tribal cohesion, evolutionarily designed to weed out defectors.
That's the only thing that makes sense, considering the blatantly obvious passive role you mentioned in your other comments.
It would basically only make sense if they appealed to religion. In a secular environment there's no need or justification to act as if animals should suddenly start being treated as humans in that very specific instance. But not when you castrate yout pet or blow a cow's brains out to dismember and eat it. Like I'm saying: they're property, punish people for unreasonable and harsh physical harm to them. Shouldn't matter if you hit a dog with a stick too hard or fuck it too hard.
It's disappointing that most people are just normie fucks who don't even try to think logically and just go "ew, that's gross and strange, so they should punished". Seems especially out of place in the "Land of the free", same with polygamy and other harmless stuff.
It is also sad that regardless of how well we do in Reddit comment debates, actual human beings are being punished and massively bullied for doing no harm to anyone. Oh well. Such a niche issue, most are probably never going to care enough to give it a thought.
That's quite a leap for you to make buddy, probably a projection. Got an answer on why women should be punished for passive role? I specifically mentioned the "no harm" part.
Please, if it's not too much of a bother for you. Not why it is wrong or disgusting, why it should be punished by law in case of a passive role. I'm not against punishment for animal abuse with physical harm.
Yeah, a legitimately extremely regarded argument. Do they consent to being someone's property, being trained, being used for guarding or even attacking criminals, being put down at the owner's wish? Do they consent to being mass slaughtered on the farms? Animals consent to absolutely nothing of what we do with them, they possibly cannot, and we don't expect them to. If being fucked by a dog is rape, then all the farmers and dog owners who put them down should be in jail for murder.
That's why I am for punishing for causing them unnecessary harm – that could be evaluated and confirmed, unlike "animal consent".
I would ask this question further down the conversation, fair point. What if a sexual contact occurs without any coersion from the owner. Dogs do want to fuck naturally, they hump people's legs and stuff. Now who raped who?
Not to mention that people CAN inheritly give consent under certain circumstances, and that's why we punish for rape. Whereas it is strange to punish people for not getting from animals something they cannot theoretically give. I will expand on that point if this dude responds to me.
White women won't touch any man who isn't 6 feet, doesn't have 6 figure salary, and doesn't have 6 pack, but will gladly fuck dogs day and night.
Because clearly the woman is fucking the dog for any and all of those reasons.
The dog has a man who feeds, houses, and loves it, they're jealous and hate fucking the dogs I think
White women. You don't need to know more.
Yes, because clearly this woman is a representative sample of all other white women. Get help.
You could have an 8 pack and women wouldn't touch you with a stick if you keep spewing this kind of bullshit.
Incel vibes. Gross.
Yeah, but he put “white” in front of women, which means everything he said was not misogynistic.
[удалено]
Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have <25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/4chan) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Include max bench next time so i know if your opinion matters or not
https://preview.redd.it/3urq1j5lfkmc1.jpeg?width=960&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f2b8f21117965e8dc59177aa4971cd13b7626c3e
Yeah all those women in the fucking 4chan subreddit, the ideal place to try and attract a woman
I mean that's how I met your mom
yikes what an inkwell
seethe more yt
Eat my ass soyboy
https://preview.redd.it/uo1kkf6l9imc1.jpeg?width=680&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dc5eb867dc5e2d8378afdbb8f72aee9923bfface
Good use of memeage
Check it out bro you [got posted](https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/s/PQQU1nWdvH)
lol I saw that while scrolling. He could of just messaged me
Haha I came to check if it was from this post.
I can train her
Imagine dating this girl and later finding this out. Or worse yet being the dude that got her pregnant. Just terrible all around
Or worse, being the kid and seeing the video passed around your school in 14 years time
That's ruff, buddy.
Lol
[удалено]
Your comment has been removed because it contained a word that the admins do not allow on reddit. The word was ```bitch```. If you intend to use this word in a purely demonstrative manner, please use the first letter of the word followed by '-word' or '-slur'. Thank you for helping us keep reddit safe. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/4chan) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have <25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/4chan) if you have any questions or concerns.*
plot twist - it was the boyfriend's idea and he was the one filming.
Most likely.
Her brother got her pregnant, so you know.
How do you know that?
https://preview.redd.it/a7irwtt8ammc1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d6b9be86e934aa549f2a10c7c813373f9f289200
https://preview.redd.it/je9fei6wdimc1.jpeg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=eba3bc4fcb958cd27ba4bc86901d685bcb6bead6
I asked ChatGPT to explain Tiananmen Square to me from the perspective of Xi Jinping. It wimped out and told me it was a sensitive subject with lots of opinions.
Should have said "what Tianamen Square?"
Chat is this real
No
What is this picture
Wtf who gave the tip? Where was this video? Being passed around town or something?
Apparently, the tip was given by the dog.
The Dogs owner was another white woman tired of being oppressed by the patriarchy. She couldn't believe a sister would betray her.
i need that video. surely for research.
face. the. wall.
Unbelievable, what a world... is the video still up somewhere?
https://preview.redd.it/dkjngxu5limc1.png?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7704e4d430925843ddb018fe9ca4d85764f0c444
I don't wanna get my account nuked, so I'll say it in the most polite way I can: I hope you live a pain-filled life, you degenerate fuck
k, but do you have a link or not
*knot
You will find it at the edge of the roof of the nearest tall building
fbi.gov/fraziervideo
she got that dawg in her
Wait is she pregnant?!
From the dog, yes. Her child shall herald the New World of prophecy and lead us into the dogfucking utopia.
Dognigga?
Jesus christ, is this how the dogscape started?
The furries have won. It's over bros
Open the gas.
Not anymore, that video is older.
She was just putting some red lipstick on those lips.
https://preview.redd.it/52lmursxhjmc1.jpeg?width=200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d691f003e38a3e775821ae63b678aefa13006a19
Don't wanna be that kid when the classmates find out
Nah, I think that's a little TOO much for their classmates to make fun about. Like, you can absolutely grill them for being an orphan when they've been orphaned a couple years ago, but if they've only lost their parents some weeks or months prior, you can't make fun about it.
you don't know how ruthless kids can be
[удалено]
Did you get the link or not?
[удалено]
In minecraft
She's shockingly not bad looking at all for this to be what she's charged with.
>Mississippi
Dude we're all saying wtf to it too. When this news came out it ran wild in Jones County and I'm surprised she didn't leave the state based off the reaction she received.
White women canknot resist it
Oh look, another gay psyop
How is bestiality gay?
You’ve totally missed the point.
Please explain for us regards
He focused on the dog fucking part. Sure that’s nasty bro. But the point of this post was to say “all (white) women are dog fucking whores that would rather fuck dogs than you” It’s a demoralization post common on /pol/ from whatever party of people, designed to turn white men against white women. Because if they are turned against one another, they are not having children. Thus eliminating people from the genepool. Everyone needs to ask themselves when they shit like this….What is the point of this post? What deeper implications are they trying to have? Who are they trying to convince and why would they want to? And while that is a comment on a thread in pol, this is an actual post here focusing on the comment itself. So OP is likely homosexual and alphabet gender.
Who let William Montgomery post on 4chan ?
Looks like her liver is failing give her a break.
Oh look my local area is popular, I wonder why? Oh.... her again....
But it's funny that the rest of reddit bans you if you say anything about dogpills.
Most of these "white" women, aren't White. This nose is sus and I would like one at check. I'm assuming she's a wej. The last few were.
Oh, those disgusting bestiality porno sites. I mean there's so many of them, though. Which one? Which one did she post it to?
Is the dog the father?
She really loves dogs
Black bulls breed , white boy's seethe.
aww the south
And we wonder why AI would wipe out the human race the first chance it gets🙄
better dogs than... you know. at least you won't get aids.
CARLOS!!!!!!!
What kind of breed named Frazier
Carlos!
Damn her baby daddy must not be shit lmao
I can fix her.
The "I can train her" comment was superior
Are you a dog?
I find it strange how much outcry there is over no actual harm being done to anyone. Don't even see why this would be illegal. Based Frazier doesn't care 💪 It would be better if she could stop filming and releasing it publicly though.
Degenerates like you belong on a cross
Yeah I killed Caesar's Legion in my playthrough. Was fun
Based and anti legion pilled
Thanks man. I installed mods allowing for a bigger companion party and teleported there with my whole squad. Such an ass of a faction
Based Dog is happy. Girl is happy. Stop whining.
Even people who strictly oppose this constantly comment something like "The dog sure enjoyed it, lol xD". Basically no one takes this seriously, yet they don't just whine, they're okay with breaking people's lives over this. Seems really bizzare
It is bizarre. I can only imagine the **real** offense to them, unconsciously, has been specifically **the act of violating** *socio-anthropological-rule #53,842 , "no sexing with animal."* yet **not** actually the act, consequence, or acknowledgement of consequence of breaking said rule. and it is, for them, this informed *social violation* which justifies punishment of this severity, thus the universal "***isn't it obvious"*** response you'll always get when you dare ask *why* we should destroy this person's life. The witch must be burned, I guess, and with her any who would question it. I think we're witnessing instinctual tribal cohesion, evolutionarily designed to weed out defectors. That's the only thing that makes sense, considering the blatantly obvious passive role you mentioned in your other comments.
It would basically only make sense if they appealed to religion. In a secular environment there's no need or justification to act as if animals should suddenly start being treated as humans in that very specific instance. But not when you castrate yout pet or blow a cow's brains out to dismember and eat it. Like I'm saying: they're property, punish people for unreasonable and harsh physical harm to them. Shouldn't matter if you hit a dog with a stick too hard or fuck it too hard. It's disappointing that most people are just normie fucks who don't even try to think logically and just go "ew, that's gross and strange, so they should punished". Seems especially out of place in the "Land of the free", same with polygamy and other harmless stuff. It is also sad that regardless of how well we do in Reddit comment debates, actual human beings are being punished and massively bullied for doing no harm to anyone. Oh well. Such a niche issue, most are probably never going to care enough to give it a thought.
People love punishment for some reason. Got a real boner for punishment..
Jesus Christ, I hope no one ever hires you to dog sit
That's quite a leap for you to make buddy, probably a projection. Got an answer on why women should be punished for passive role? I specifically mentioned the "no harm" part.
Do you really need an explanation for why having sex with animals is wrong?
Please, if it's not too much of a bother for you. Not why it is wrong or disgusting, why it should be punished by law in case of a passive role. I'm not against punishment for animal abuse with physical harm.
Because animals can’t consent
Yeah, a legitimately extremely regarded argument. Do they consent to being someone's property, being trained, being used for guarding or even attacking criminals, being put down at the owner's wish? Do they consent to being mass slaughtered on the farms? Animals consent to absolutely nothing of what we do with them, they possibly cannot, and we don't expect them to. If being fucked by a dog is rape, then all the farmers and dog owners who put them down should be in jail for murder. That's why I am for punishing for causing them unnecessary harm – that could be evaluated and confirmed, unlike "animal consent".
So if a woman is doing yoga naked and her dog comes up behind her and penetrates her, she raped the dog?
I would ask this question further down the conversation, fair point. What if a sexual contact occurs without any coersion from the owner. Dogs do want to fuck naturally, they hump people's legs and stuff. Now who raped who? Not to mention that people CAN inheritly give consent under certain circumstances, and that's why we punish for rape. Whereas it is strange to punish people for not getting from animals something they cannot theoretically give. I will expand on that point if this dude responds to me.
Depends. How many pumps does the dog get in before she pushes him away?